On Drone Warfare

1335 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The use of drones to counter terrorism

1. Introduction
There has been an increasing trend for the United States to rely on the use of drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to counter the threat posed by Al-Qaeda and other terrorists mostly from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Iraq. The emergence of this new technology has sparked widespread debate over the ethical justification of its use both in the United States and around the world. There are essentially two distinct camps in the debate, one endorsing armed drones as an efficacious, novel form of warfare, whereas another criticizing it as problematic. In this paper, I will introduce the arguments of both sides, namely, why some people endorse the use of drones and others oppose to it. I will then introduce Bradley Strawser’s viewpoints on drone warfare and explain why I find them persuasive. I will anticipate a few objections to Strawser’s position and demonstrate how Strawser might be able to respond.

2. The Debate Over Drone Warfare
Those in favor of drones argue that drones have many advantages compared with other military weapons in denying terrorists. First, drones are able to most accurately hit their intended targets, thus they help prevent unintended deaths of noncombatants . Drones allow the operator to study his or her targets carefully instead of reacting in the heat of the moment, making strikes more discriminating. The Long War Journal tracked the performance of U.S drones in Pakistan, and the report showed that civilian casualties resulted from drones only counted as 6% of overall fatalities. This number shows that drones kill a lower ratio of civilians to combatants than we have seen in any wars in which other weapons were used. Second, drones reduce risk of their own operators and prevent the...

... middle of paper ...

... US Drone Attacks? by Kenneth Roth. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/apr/04/what-rules-should-govern-us-drone-attacks/ (accessed May 11, 2014).
Bradley Jay Strawser, “More Heat Than Light: The Vexing Complexities of the Drone Debate”, The Quarterly Dialogue Advisory Group/ 3 Quarks Daily Peace and Justice Symposium: Drones, (2013), http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2013/02/the- quarterly-dag-3qd-peace-and-justice-symposium-drones.html
Strawser, Bradley Jay. "Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles." Journal of Military Ethics 9, no. 4 (2010): 342-368.
John Fabian Witt, “On Adopting a Posture of Moral Neutrality”, The Quarterly Dialogue Advisory Group/ 3 Quarks Daily Peace and Justice Symposium: Drones, (2013), http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2013/02/the-quarterly-dag-3qd-peace- and-justice-symposium-drones.html

Show More
Related

  • The Use of Drones in Operation Copper Dune

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    (Global Security, 2014) There seems to be numerous drone flights, conducted by the Air Force’s

    Read More

  • Drones: Peace Keeper or Terrorist Teacher

    1614 Words  | 4 Pages

    Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.

    Read More

  • Confessions Of A Drone Warrior Analysis

    219 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article ‘’Confessions of a Drone Warrior’’, published in the GQ in October 22, 2013, by Matthew Power, the author talks about a drone pilot’s experience after working with military drones for 6 years. In this article, the main point the author is trying to prove is that flying military drones is not some kind of video game, it’s as real as it gets, even though the pilot doesn’t actually take part in combat. It can change people. During his service, the Airman First Class Brandon Bryant killed 1626 people. It’s terrifying, considering that the pilot had to watch every person die. His job was to monitor people(normally high-value targets in Afghanistan) from the sky and when he got the command to kill from the authorities, he fired a missile

    Read More

  • Analysis of Daniel Byman´s Why Drones Work and Majorie Chohn Killer Drone Attacks Illegal, Counter- Productive

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, Byman argues that “drones have devastated al Qaeda and associated anti-American militant groups... and they have done so at little financial cost” (Byman 1). In the article, Byman compares the financia...

    Read More

  • Similarities between Obama and Bush Administrations

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the use of drones, NYT’s Peter M. Singer (“Do Drones Undermine Democracy?”) makes the comprehensive argument that the use of drones goes against the how wars are meant to be fought—human participation. It can be counter argued that these automatons are better in terms of expendability; personnel are not easily replaced while drones are easily replaceable. The Bush 43 strategy relied more on men, and it did yielded adverse results politically. The switch to drones presented dynamic political benefits, for which Singer argued allowed for circumvention of aggravated/emotive discourse among members of the American populace, academics and mass media. It is imperative to remember that the cost of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq—increases in casualties—was detrimental to the American credibility and brought about victory to Obama in 2008 elections.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Drones

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    Those who oppose the use of drones in warfare claims it violates international law. They believe that the strikes have no justification therefore violating international law. (Moskowitz) They claim that the benefits of the usage of drones do not outweigh the cons of using drones. The opposition claim that civilian casualties make up 2-10% of total fatalities from drones firing on wrong targets or the civilians are collateral damage.(Globalresearch) The dissentient think it causes more unrest than peace in some regions due to the collateral damage caused to buildings and civilians and is another sign of American arrogance. (ABC News)Even though their points are valid, these reasons do not warrant the cease of drone activity.

    Read More

  • Is Obama's Drone War Moral? By Matt Peterson

    299 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article, “Is Obama’s Drone War Moral?”, Matt Peterson argues that the lack of transparency surrounding the number of drone strikes and resulting casualties undermines Obama’s administration efforts to justify the targeted killing program. He states that the administration refusal to detail individual strikes makes it impossible for the public to assess the morality of the program. He attempts to support his points by examining the standards for carrying out violence in self-defense and by explaining how the policies and practices put in place by Obama’s administration fails to uphold these standards. This paper will evaluate the strength and weakness of Mr. Peterson’s analysis to determine whether the conclusions the author draw are

    Read More

  • Just War Theory Essay

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Indeed, as prior U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld wrote when describing the war on terror, “this will be a war like none other our nation has faced.” However, these changes bring the morality of this new face of war into question, and the justification of drone use and other modern military tactics involved in the war on terror is a subject of much debate. Focusing on U.S. involvement in Yemen from 2010-2015 as part of the war on terror, this essay will argue that, while the U.S. has met most of the criteria of jus ad bellum, the methods the U.S. has employed to counter terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda have ultimately violated the principles of just war theory, even when analyzed from the perspective of modern warfare within the framework of the current global

    Read More

  • Drones and IHL

    2753 Words  | 6 Pages

    A modification within the paradigm of armed conflict has begun to manifest itself, due to no small part of the United States self-proclaimed war on terror; it is the use of military drones. In addition, this war is being conducted on a global scale, these drones provide a more nimble and swifter approach, however, can these devices be compliant under IHL? In addition, the case against drones includes violations of sovereignty, excess death of civilian along with destruction of civilian infra structures and extra-judicial killings. These are legitimate concerns and depend-ing on how these devices re used will determine how these concerns are dealt with

    Read More

  • The War on Terror and the aAbuse of Human Rights

    1067 Words  | 3 Pages

    Murphy, Dan. "Aerial Drones Serve as Weapons of War." Weapons of War. Ed. Diane Andrews Henningfeld. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Briefing: Aerial Drones as Weapons of War." Christian Science Monitor (22 May 2009). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • Drones are the Future

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the latest and most controversial topics that has risen over the past five to ten years is whether or not drones should be used as a means of war, surveillance, and delivery systems. Common misconceptions usually lead to people’s opposition to the use of drones; which is the reason it is important for people to know the facts about how and why they are used. Wartime capabilities will provide for less casualties and more effective strikes. New delivery and surveillance systems in Africa, the United Air Emirates and the United States will cut costs and increase efficiency across the board. Rules and regulations on drones may be difficult to enforce, but will not be impossible to achieve. The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance.

    Read More

  • The Ethical Use Of Drones

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    A lot of countries all over the world depend on technological advances to fight against their opponents. This reduced the risk of having a soldier wounded or dying in a war by making it easier with using these technologies when it comes to head to head combat. Even though using technologies are a great idea but many ethical issues arise from it. One of the main issue is the use of these Drones. This technology is developing more and more. In a recent study showed that there are over 700 active drone development all over the world and these programs are controlled under companies, research institutes, and the government. United States is mainly using these drones to fight against so called “terrorist” but some other countries use them as well. It is immoral and unethical to use these drones because it cause psychological disorders, violate privacy, cause deaths of innocent lives, and increase terrorism. (Reardon)

    Read More

  • Military Drones Essay

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every day the world is evolving, different types of technology are being made for different kinds of uses. Some people in the army want to use drones to carry out different types of missions, in other places in the world. Using will help soldiers carry out missions, quicker, easier, and much more efficient. 60% of Americans agree on the usage of drones for army purposes. Many people say that the army should not use drones because drones will increase the number of terrorists, drones can kill and injure innocent civilians, and that drones will “...allow the United States to become emotionally disconnected from the horrors of war” (ℙ8, Drones). There are many advantages with having drones aid military bases, because

    Read More

  • Drones In The Gulf War

    619 Words  | 2 Pages

    Environment Impact of Drones Used for War: Drones are not driven by gasoline like cars, so there is no real impact in terms of emissions that come straight from the use of the drone (Browne, McKinnon, Piecyk, & Whiteing, 2010). The environmental impact from the chemicals that are used in the weapons that are onboard (Drones –Dangerous for Humans and the Environment, 2014).

    Read More

  • The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) has changed in many ways over the course of the last decade. It has changed in terms of design, functionality, and use during that time. An advancement that the public and foreign nationals debate is the legality of using such aircraft when the weapons systems they carry are used to target suspected threat forces across international borders. Specifically in Pakistan, this has been a particularly challenging problem to overcome. It is hard to debate that given the opportunity to place a machine or a man in harms way, we would choose a machine. This argument can only work so long as the potential for collateral damage remains in at a tolerable level. A tolerable level looks very different if you are an official in Washington DC compared to a mother of four who has seen the devastating fallout that can occur because a Taliban leader was sleeping in the house next door.

    Read More

More about On Drone Warfare

Open Document