Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About drone warfare
Drones and counter terrorism
Use of drones in the war on terror
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About drone warfare
A modification within the paradigm of armed conflict has begun to manifest itself, due to no small part of the United States self-proclaimed war on terror; it is the use of military drones. In addition, this war is being conducted on a global scale, these drones provide a more nimble and swifter approach, however, can these devices be compliant under IHL? In addition, the case against drones includes violations of sovereignty, excess death of civilian along with destruction of civilian infra structures and extra-judicial killings. These are legitimate concerns and depend-ing on how these devices re used will determine how these concerns are dealt with According to IHL as represented by the ICRC, a weapon is banned if it has the following: bullets that expand or flatten in the human body, poison and poisoned weapons, chemical weapons, biological weapons; weapons that injure by fragments which, in the human body, escape detection by X-rays; incendiary weapons; blinding laser weapons; Explosive Remnants of War and Cluster Munitions. Not mentioned are nuclear ordinances, which would be covered under proportionality and indiscriminate use. The International Committee of Red Cross contains a listing of the rules concerning IHL; here is a partial reading governing armed conflict 1. Everyone must be entitled to benefit from fundamental judicial guarantees. No one must be sentenced without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court. No one must be held responsible for an act he has not committed. No one must be subjected to physical or mental torture, corporal punishment or cruel or degrading treatment. 2. Parties to a conflict and members of their armed forces do not have an unlimited choice of methods and means of w... ... middle of paper ... ...strike, and that if “consent is withheld, a strike will not go ahead (Columbia Law School).” Five, regarding the use of autonomous drones, there must a hu-man in charge of the mission to monitor the drone with means to kill the drone if it veers from its mission Military drones do have purposes other than being a weapon; the devices can be used to deliver medical aid and other humanitarian supplies. Military drones can aid in investigation of IHL/LOAC violations, search and rescue operations, reconnaissance and surveillance. Through transparency, over sight and consequences for those who decide to go against established proce-dure, The United States can create via customary law the manner these military drones will be used and still adhere to IHL/LOAC. The question, are military drones legal depends on what their mission is, how they are equipped and whom you ask.
Commercial drones are also used for surveillance purposes. Surveillance applications include livestock monitoring, wildfire mapping, pipeline security, home security, road patrol, and anti-piracy. They are also used in commercial and motion picture film making. So basically we can use this technology to make the service faster. The current usage of commercial drones is pretty basic and only involved in the usage of delivery drones.
Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.
“a violent struggle among state and non-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant population(s). Irregular warfare favors indirect and asymmetric approaches, though it may employ the full range of military and other capacities, in order to erode an adversary’s power, influence, and will.” This definition is broad and has led many military leaders to simply describe irregular warfare as anything that is not regular war. If leaders turn to this over simplified definition, then one can logically and incorrectly infer that non-violent operations such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief are forms of irregular warfare. The problem with classifying irregular warfare as a distinct and separate form of warfare is that stakeholders must in turn dedicate resources solely for the purposes of dealing with...
Before any legislation could be implemented, a definition of human rights had to be compiled and accepted. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was approved in 1948 by th...
Drones are also called unmanned aerial vehicles. They come in various sizes for many uses. Drones are known by different names such as “Killer Drone” or “Spy” or “Surveillance Drone” as they are mostly used to decimate enemy and harm civilians, which is why drones receive negative feedback from the public. Not all people use drones in warfare, they also use them as a hobby to film and entertain. Despite the fact that drones have negative sides, they also have positive sides as well.
In a constructivist approach, the drones are being justified as legal because a norm is being constructed. The norm is that it is acceptable to murder by the use of drones as long as the U.S. declares it as correct. The United States believes their military actions are right. As quoted in The Guardian post “ Drones may predate Obama, but his resolute use of them is unmatched,” it is to be said that the reason why they are so widely held in U.S. is that the drones “can linger for hours above their targets, watching and hovering up data such as cellphone signals” (Ross, 2015). This helps the U.S. military to pursue terrorists and
UAVs in recent years have become a vital part of the American military with their use rising with demand. Even though there are many who disapprove of the use of drone in overseas conflicts the benefits that we receive are far more important. With their continued use we save many American lives both civilian and military, protecting citizens from terrorist organizations and keeping our troops out of harms way, while also being an economy safe solution. Ultimately UAVs are America’s silent guardians that grind away hours on end protecting Americas national security.
“The first recorded use of attack drones occurred on Aug. 22, 1849 when the Habsburg Austrian Empire launched 200 pilotless balloons armed with bombs against the revolution-minded citizens of Venice.” (Brett Holman, 2009). Today drones are launched from allied countries, and are remotely controlled by pilots in the United States. Since drones are remotely operated, ground troops and aircraft pilots risk of getting hurt is minimized. Drones are very effective and create few errors. According to Peter Bergen (2012), in 2012 there has been 153 drone strikes in Pakistan, and no civilian casualties have been reported. Nations around the World questions whether drone strikes need more restrictions under international law because these nations believe that the technology of drones will spread to other countries, causing more violence than good. Drones help keep U.S. soldiers safer by keep troops of the ground in foreign territory. Annually 1% of the U.S.’ Military Budget goes towards funding drones. Use of military drones could allow for the military to downsize and spend less money.
Many people who oppose drone strikes still question the legality of drones, since they are flying assassins, killing or wounding those who are caught in its blast zone. Drone strikes are extensively reviewed legally to justify the
Drone – An unmanned aerial vehicle. An aircraft without a pilot on board that has its flight controlled either autonomously by computer in the vehicle or under remote control by a pilot on the ground. The first attempt at creating an unmanned aerial vehicle was the “Aerial Target” by A.M. Low’s in 1916 but the first production was of a Remote Piloted Vehicle by movie star Reginald Denny in 1935. In 1959 the start of United States UAVs program began when the U.S. started planning the use of unmanned aircraft’s over fear of losing the lives of pilots in hostile regions. On August 2nd to the 4th, during the conflict at Tonkin Gulf the U.S. deployed highly classified UAVs into combat the Vietnam War in 1964. When pictures were shown of destroyed drones by Wide World Photos, the official U.S. response was “no comment” (Garome 64). With a technology that had been attempted for 60 years and the U.S. being the first to use them under military control, Why is this breakthrough in technology not shown with the same pride as the first moon landing or the first atomic bomb? In this exposition we shall explore the national and international uses of U.S Drones and uncover why, as a country, we don’t acknowledge the threat this new technology has on the stability of our nation.
On December 10th in 1948, the general assembly adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This declaration, although not legally binding, created “a common standard of achievement of all people and all nations…to promote respect for those rights and freedoms” (Goodhart, 379). However, many cultures assert that the human rights policies outlined in the declaration undermine cultural beliefs and practices. This assertion makes the search for universal human rights very difficult to achieve. I would like to focus on articles 3, 14 and 25 to address how these articles could be modified to incorporate cultural differences, without completely undermining the search for human rights practices.
If I told you that there was a device that could easily carry bombs, take pictures of people, places, and government bases, and clog our nation's airways, would you want anyone to be able to get one? No. Therefore, drones should be regulated by the government. As crazy as it seems, the issue of drones(unmanned aerial vehicles/UAVs) is currently being debated. There are many dangers of drone use, and some ways that these dangers can be negated.
‘Drones’. The word sends a shiver down the backs of many people, and rightly so. Drones have recently become famous for their harmful activities in the Middle East, and people are afraid that they will be used at home. In the United States of America, citizens are becoming aware of the increasing use of ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ by law enforcements agencies. This is leading to a lot of propositions for new legislations, and while these may seem good at first, what does this really mean?
Drones are unmanned remote controlled aircraft. They have been used by many industries, by government agencies and consumers. The government wants to be able to use them in international issues and also in the city for crimes. Consumers want to be able to deliver goods to customers quickly and efficiently. Then, you have the everyday consumer that just wants them for the entertainment aspect, for sporting events or discovering new land.
Our technological advances are a major controversy in the world today. As time goes on and easier ways are discovered to do our daily jobs, our technology takes us further into the future and allows us to expand our possibilities. Drones, or UAV’s (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) are most popular in the military, but are commonly used in fulfilling civilian needs. For example, Jeff Bezos, owner of the popular shopping site Amazon.com, hopes to fly drones to deliver packages by early 2015 and make delivery more efficient while creating more simple jobs for everyone in the shipping department. The United States is mostly in control of drones for military usage though, and in 2003 were the first to fire missiles at an enemy from a drone called the Predator. However, countries all over the planet use drones for journalism, to prevent untimely deaths, monitor crowded areas, and protect lives in the police force. On the flip side, drones haven’t always been used for the good of the cause. In some cases, civilians have been harmed and protests have existed in several countries in the world. Pakistan, for example, is one of these major countries that believes that drones are evil and are simply a recipe for disaster. Events, such as protests, have taken place within the United States with the intent of limiting the implementation of drones in the military. The primary goal is to prevent drone usage while performing anti-terrorism and reconnaissance missions in third world countries. Drones Watch is a website that contributes greatly to the distribution of information concerning the usage of drones, their legality on drones in the States, and even has a step by step tutorial on how to fight against the caus...