Use Of Technology In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1897 Words4 Pages

In modern society, time has allotted for the evolvement of technology and scientific advancements. Humans have contributed to numerous illustrious creations, such as the hoverboard, the 3-D printing pen, and the iPhone, that have all benefited society in some way. With new technology being created every day and society becoming increasingly reliant on the uses of technology, some question whether such technology is benefiting society in a positive way and whether scientific advancements have limits. Although technology is created under affirmative intentions, all technology has the potential to create issues for society as well as its creators. In relation to the issues technology can produce for society, Mary Shelley’s Romantic novel Frankenstein …show more content…

In Shelley’s novel, the main character Victor Frankenstein takes responsibility for using science to construct a monstrous creation which brings repercussions and forces Frankenstein to contemplate whether his actions of advancing in the science field were justified and moral. After educating himself of the improvements science can provide to society, Frankenstein gathers his knowledge and places it towards creating another human race which would attempt to benefit mankind. Similar to the NSA’s sole purpose – to protect American citizens from dangerous, foreign intelligence – Frankenstein’s creation also possessed its own sole purpose - to better mankind and to provide a helpful service to society. Although Frankenstein began his advancement of science with noble intentions, some question whether his actions towards producing the creation were reasonable. Critics argue that Frankenstein used his scientific knowledge and addition to science as a means of testing the limits of nature and even the role of creator. Frankenstein claims his creation, and possibly future creations, will see him as creator and will serve him as such. Frankenstein states, “A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me. I might in process of time (although I now found it impossible) renew life where death had apparently devoted the body to corruption” (47). Critics also believe Frankenstein’s creation was produced out of arrogance and will serve society no use other than a mockery to nature’s boundaries. An anonymous writer from a blog entitled “Frankenstein never Learned” supports this idea and argues, “Victor himself is entirely static. He never changes, and never really learns from his mistakes, or takes full

Open Document