Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utilitarianism and moral ethics essay
Utilitarianism ethics
Utilitarianism ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Unocal is an oil company that was faced with an ethical dilemma. The owners and managers of this company wanted to invest money in Yadana project, and then got enormous profit. They knew that the government of the country, where this project was took place, violated the human rights of the local people. Unocal had evidence of these actions, but they decided to invest money in this project. To determine if their actions were ethical or not, we need to look at this problem from four different perspectives: utilitarian, rights, justice, and ethics of care.
According to Velasquez, utilitarianism is “a general term for any view that holds that actions and polices should be evaluated on the basis of the benefits and costs they will impose on society” (Velasquez, 2012, p.78). To determine how company should have behaved in this situation according to utilitarianism, the managers needed to complete four actions:
1. Considered all alternatives (invest money or not);
2. For each alternative action they needed to estimate direct and indirect benefits and costs that the action would produce for every person affected by the action;
3. For each action they needed to subtract the cost from the benefits to determine the net utility of each action;
4. The action that produced the greatest sum total of utility must be chosen.
The benefits of Unocal’s actions included improvements in education, improved health care, new transportation infrastructure and small business opportunities, and improved the economy of Thailand. The harm from their actions included forced labor, relocation of local people without any compensation, torture, murder, and rape. Unocal believed that they provided more benefits than harm to the Burmese people. So, from this...
... middle of paper ...
...ustice, rights, and ethics of care points of view. Just from the utilitarian perspective, the company acted reasonably and ethically. It shows that Unocal should reconsider their actions and start to care about other people, not only their profit. They showed that their actions helped Burmese people in general (improvements in education, health care, new transportation infrastructure and small business opportunities). But it still did not help people who were murdered, forced to work, and relocated without any compensation. Since Unocal decided to invest money in Yadana Field project, they must provide safe working and living conditions for local people.
Works Cited
1. Velasquez, M. G. (2012). Business Ethics: concepts and cases. Boston, MA. Pearson.
2. Dictionary. (n. d.). Justice. Retrieved April 29, 2014, from
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/justice.
This bold sentence serves as an attention grabber as it challenges a common dogma once stated by John Dalberg, “ Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” By making this brief but, powerful statement, Aung Sang Suu Kyi surprises her audience by blaming them for the corruption of the government making her audience more keen to understand her point of view. Aung Sang Suu Kyi then directs her words towards her Burmese people as she alludes to specific words such as “ Chanda- gati”, “Dosa-gati”, “Bhaya-gati” and “ Chanda-gati” (Kyi, 1) to explain the corruption of her land in the words of her people. This builds ethos as she can connect to her people and clearly explain how “chanda-gati” or the corruption built by fear is the most dangerous form of corruption. She can then further explain how the only way to root out the corruption of the Burmese Army and gain freedom is to first eradicate the people's fear of the government and instill confidence in the basic human rights of the Burmese
The stakeholder in an ethical dilemma is anybody that is affected by the outcome of the decision. In this scenario, Mark Solomon and Garza Lupe will be both subjected by the end result of the decision. The conflict is ...
A cost-benefit analysis is “whenever people decide whether the advantages of a particular action are likely to outweigh its drawbacks” (Benefit-Cost Analysis, n.d.). The analysis estimates the economic value placed upon a
Highlight the main ethical issues that this case brings to light and critically apply :
Pojman, L. (2002). 6: Utilitarianism. Ethics: discovering right and wrong (pp. 104-113). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Through this we see that the author’s point of view is someone who understands that the events that took place that morning in Burma, were not humane and degrading.
Throughout this paper I will argue between Mil (Utilitarianism) and Held (Care Ethics). Mil is a British Philosopher well known for his ethical and political work and Held is an American Feminist and Moral Philosopher. After reading this essay you will have a good view on what Utilitarianism and Care Ethics is and also what my concluding position is.
The standards of ethics serve as guidelines for the conduct of individuals and businesses alike. Uzi Nissan acted h...
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory in which determining the rightness or wrongness of action or decision is based on determining whether the greatest benefit or happiness will be provided in the highest or greatest number of population. This simply means that action or decision must be based on the highest amount or number of beneficiary (Martineau, 2006). However, this ethical theory has two major types. First is the “act utilitarianism” and second is the “rule utilitarianism.” Act utilitarianism specifically adh...
Utilitarianism is a movement in ethics which began in the late eighteenth centaury and is primarily associated with the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham and was later adapted and fully developed by John Stuart Mill in the ninetieth century. . The theory states that we should try to achieve ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory of ethics. Teleological theories of ethics look at the consequences to decide whether an action is right or wrong. Utilitarianism is defined as a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of it consequences: specifically: a theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible
However, not everyone being tread fairly and justly. Differentiation and discrimination divide people lives on earth. A classic term from Milton Friedman (2011, 258) mentions that “the business of business is business". This indicates business desire to pursuit profit prior rather than contributing society and environment. As a result, business impact massively on society and environment. Therefore, it is crucial that businesses have to agree with United Nations Global Compact and Triple Bottom line theories. Before moving further, it is crucial to have an understanding of Phronesis inquiry. In Greek word Phronesis can be translated as prudence, common-sense and practical wisdom mentioned by Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Critically, it involves highly logical thinking and human natural capacity on moral and intellectual virtue (Eagle and Low 2014, 246). According to a classic term “to do the right thing in the right place, at the right time in the right way”. This simply defines that how individual or groups behave logically and ethically in different circumstance (Hegel 2015). There are 4 Phronesis values need to be considered. Firstly, it is where we are going. This means that the direction and method have to be correct. Secondly, it related to who gains and who loses, and by which mechanisms of power? This can be explained as benefits have to be equal among people and it is unethical to tend to one consistently gain and another often lose. Thirdly, the value is this development desirable? This defined as doing the moral issue need more information to judge the ethical issue. Eventually, it is in regard to what, if anything, should we do about it? This mean ethical issues need to be noticed by people instead of ignoring and also take action to solve it accordingly (Martin 2015, 151). The Phronesis values will be further transfer in regard to the Congo Child labour
Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that states if the consequences of an action
In Buddhism’s most basic principles, it is understood that all beings have a right to live, life should respected and people should refrain from taking all life. Yet, currently in the country of Myanmar, extreme Buddhist monks are preaching religious superiority and leading a genocide on Myanmar’s minority religious people, especially Muslims, down to the women and children. To make matters worse Myanmar’s governing officials (exclusively Buddhist) have passed laws that assist in the persecution of minorities. There are some local reports that government authorities are tracking down and arresting religious minorities without reason. Then those who are arrested haven’t been seen or heard from since. With the known death toll of Myanmar Muslims and other minority groups increasing and the Myanmar government publicly admitting to “misplacing” huge numbers of people who fall into the religious minority, suspicions that the Myanmar government is assisting in this religious genocide have justifiably
Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,