Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religion in politics
The period of reformation and its impact
The period of reformation and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religion in politics
Rebellion is an idea so deeply ingrained into our human nature it is almost impossible to look anywhere without seeing a rebellion. So often rebellion has a negative connotation because in order to rebel one must break rules and breaking rules is considered by most people, a bad thing. But obviously there is justified rebellion because sometimes governments have become unjust and the people had the right to rebel against the governing authorities. So where is the line between a just and unjust rebellion? A rebellion is justified when governing bodies create rules and laws that contradict laws instituted by God and then it is the responsibility of the people to rebel in order to reinstate God’s law in the governing body. In order to …show more content…
During this time the Catholic strayed from its roots as a collection of God’s people to a political entity that was focus on the personal gain of the clergy, pope, cardinals, and other such positions of power than the salvation and the relationships of the people with God. There were also many other problems such as purchasable indulgences that were lies that had been institutionalized into the system of the Catholic church. In his 95 theses he laid out his argument against the church. The Bible says that, “only God can forgive sins” since when we sin it is God’s law that we are breaking (Mark). But at the time the Popes was claiming that he could forgive sins; Luther address this in his fifth theses specifically when he that, “The pope neither desires nor is able to remit any penalties except those imposed by his own authority or that of the canons,” along with many other problems with the Catholic church (Luther). Simply put, God calls us to glorify Him in all that we do and the rules of the Catholic Church were restricting people from glorifying God to their fullest potential. Martin Luther saw this and other practices that were violating God’s law and decided to first try to reform the problems he saw. But this was unsuccessful so in order to restore God’s law to the governing law Luther had to rebel and his rebellion was …show more content…
In Romans Paul says that, “the authorities that exists have been established by God” (Romans).Some would say that because all government has been instituted by God that we should follow whatever the government tells us to do. The problem is that man is fallen and cannot be a perfect ruler and can create rules that do conflict with the rules that God has set for us. Even in the bible there are stories in the Bible that are in this very situation. In the book of Daniel is under the rule of Darius. Through trickery and deceit people who wished to see Daniel killed had Darius pass a decree that no one is supposed to worship any god or entity besides Darius. Daniel, being a devout jew, rebels against this decree and worships God and is thrown into the den of lions. But, “[Daniel’s] God sent his angel, and he shut the mouths of the lions. They [did] not hurt [him], because [he] was found innocent in [God’s] sight” (Daniel). Because Daniel disobeyed his earthy ruler so that he could obey God’s command he found favor in God’s sight. If the cause of our rebellion is true and pure to fix a system that is oppressing our right and duty to follow God’s command then it is not only recommended that we rebel but in fact
Martin Luther desired to reform the Church because he believed that it was corrupt and wanted to be seen as the gateway to Heaven. In Luther’s eyes, the Roman Catholic Church was teaching the wrong things and showing bad behavior. Because of this, Martin Luther, being a conscientious friar and professor of theology, did not feel secure in the idea of salvation. The Church was teaching that salvation came through faith AND good works while Luther concluded
There are times throughout the history of the United States when its citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government. There were such cases during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, when there was unfair discrimination against the Afro-American community and Americans refusing to pay poll taxes to support the Mexican War. They used civil disobedience to eventually get legislation to stop the injustice brought against them and their nation. Civil disobedience is defined as refusal to obey civil laws or decrees, which usually takes the form of passive resistance. People practicing civil disobedience break a law because they consider the law unjust, and want to call attention to its injustice, hoping to bring about its withdrawal.
This suggests that they had negative relations with the government and authorities because their voices were not being listened to and they weren’t equally represented in the government’s policy decisions. Riot was a tactic employed to get their voices heard but there was a fine line between being listened to and retribution for their actions. For example, before the Oxfordshire rising in 1596, the people of Oxfordshire appealed to Lord Norris and other members of authority to help resolve the issue of dearth in the area. However, Lord Norris did little to help improve the situation and further appeals took place until the rebels resulted to riot in the hope of change. However, the rising against enclosure largely failed due to the lack of support, as only a handful of men turned up to support the rebels cause. Additionally, what gave rebellions the scale and force they had, such as the Pilgrimage of Grace, was the combination of supressed local grievances which had built up over time as they had not been effectively dealt with. For example, if someone heard a rumour about a potential uprising they may have become involved to express their personal grievances which may have been repressed in the past but had not achieved the outcome the rebels wanted. The Pilgrimage of Grace was caused by a combination of factors,
... a drunken brawl in downtown Toronto that was easily squashed by amateur policemen than a rebellion. In fact it is not even called a rebellion in the Canadian Encyclopedia but rather "an uprising with limited support and was largely a historical accident."
Sophocles’s Antigone and Julia Alvarez’s In the Time of the Butterflies are based upon a common theme: rebellion. While reading both pieces in class, the notion of to what extent a rebellion is justified surfaced frequently; however, reading both texts was insufficient in finding a conclusion to this topic, so I read through various poems to aid my deduction. After my extensive research, I came to the conclusion that rebellion can be justified by a rebel’s genuine belief in their cause. The process of justification is based upon one’s personal qualification of what is considered just; therefore, a single belief in the righteousness of any revolt justifies a rebellion.
During Luther’s early life he faced a severe inner crisis. When he sinned he looked for comfort in confession and followed the penance, the fasting, prayer and observances that the church directed him. But, he found no peace of mind and worried about his salvation. But reading St. Paul’s letters he came to believe that salvation came though faith in Christ. Faith is a free gift, he discovered, it cannot be earned. His studies led him to a conclusion that, “Christ was the only mediator between God and a man and that forgiveness of sin and salvation are given by god’s grace alone” (Martin Luther, 01). Historians agree that, “this approach to theology led to a clash between Luther and the Church officials, precipitating the dramatic events of Reformation”.
People started to see the logic in his words and they started to break away from the Catholic church and in the process starting the protestant reformation. In his theses Luther believed that Faith not good deeds could save a person. People were convinced when they were told that if they pay so much money that their loved ones would be able to get out of purgatory and make it to heaven. Indulgences such as this was one of the major things that made Martin Luther so angry and adamant of writing his 95 theses because he wanted to see a change in the Catholic
" Additionally, it is important to understand Luther’s distinction between the Law and the Gospel in order to further explore Luther’s understanding of human freedom. The Law is God’s commandment; it allows humans to coexist, limits chaos and condemns sinfulness, though it is not God’s road to salvation.... ... middle of paper ... ...
One type of rebellion is when a child or teenager goes against the rules set in order to find out what is wrong with going against the rules. To illustrate, a child walks into a candy store with his mother. He was in shock at the amount of candy on the shelves. In his mind he feels like taking one piece of candy could not hurt a thing even though he knows it is wrong. He slowly reaches for the candy and tucks it into his winter coat.
... injury and even death of others, maybe even themselves. One other reason for rebellion involves family. Sometimes parents may acquire a divorce and the parents begin dating someone new and their children will not listen or do anything for their boyfriend or girlfriend because they may not approve or they are still hurting. Rebellion happens all over the world, at any time, over a little thing, maybe even bigger reasons. Not just bad people rebel. Saints sometimes rebel because they do not like what is being taught or what is being said. Everyone has a say in what they believe and not all rules should be made by the same group of people all the time. Men and women all around the globe can be found breaking laws every day. They make even break a few rules in their everyday life, but that is because they believe in their own mind that it is the right thing to do.
The question is, "Why do people rebel?" "rebel?" , someone might ask. Rebel is when an individual who rises in opposition or resistance against something such as government laws/rights. This paper will explain the reasons why anyone would ever rebel against anything such as or change.
That's part of the definition. Rebel: verb “To rise in opposition or armed resistance to an established government or ruler.” If there were no
The very definition of a rebellion involves the desire to challenge or put an end to authority positioning. Using this definition, one can
However, God arranged and ordained the government the way he did and all of mankind should submit to authority for a very important reason. According to the author of the Expositor's Bible Commentary, “Christians should be obedient, submissive citizens because the power of government has been ordained of God and rulers have ministry to perform for God” (Harrison par.). As believers, our duty is to submit to Christ, and then people are to submit themselves to the authority for different purposes. The author of the Expositor's Bible Commentary also stated something else that stuck out in his book. It said, “God established civil authority meaning the government- to be a terror or restraint to evil works, to punish evildoers, and to praise the good.
These are usually against occupation or against a superior power. Examples are many but some of which include Urabi revolt, the Warsaw uprising, and the Easter Rising. These were all against an empire of some sort, the first and last being the Uk and the middle one the Nazi’s. These are well-intended revolts but they simply deteriorate the situation further. In the Urabi revolt, Egypt came under British occupation.