Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
In essay form, explain crucifixion
In essay form, explain crucifixion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: In essay form, explain crucifixion
1. According to Luke (23: 1-24), Christ was charged with claiming to be Son of God, King of the Jews. This claim was in direct opposition with the other commands; therefore, causing much debate among Jewish council and Roman authority. Pilate had difficulty finding him guilty. He states “I find nothing wrong with this man!” (Luke 23:4). Furthermore, after being brought in front of Herod, Jesus was accused of trying to start a rebellion (Luke 23: 14). Personally, I think that Jesus was incorrectly charged for the crimes held against him. Herod and Pilate found Jesus to be not guilty of any accusation. The very definition of a rebellion involves the desire to challenge or put an end to authority positioning. Using this definition, one can …show more content…
Jesus was found not guilty by both Pilate and Herod; however, was still put to death. The decision to crucify Jesus was made by the people: like an overemphasized jury in today’s court proceedings. The evidence needed today to convict Jesus would have needed to be stronger than the claims they had against him. Innocent until proven guilty.
2. According to Luke (22:3-5), Satan entered into Judas and persuaded the Temple guards and priests to betray Jesus. Judas was offered money in exchange for this betrayal. Personally, I do not think of Judas as a truly evil person. He was a disciple of Jesus; this desire to follow Christ has something to say about his character. Instead, I consider Judas just as I consider Adam and Eve, persons who were overcome by evil and controlled by the sin of the devil.
Understanding Judas as a literary trope, may makes sense as a consideration for the order of events leading to the crucifixion at God’s will. However, I don’t necessarily understand it that way. It was a test of faith. Judas failed; just as Adam and Eve failed. However, I don’t think that God’s will was Judas’ failure. In my opinion, God does not wish failure upon us. Instead, I believe the outcome would have been the same regardless of the events leading up to his
and I will not spy” (13).... ... middle of paper ... ... In the end, the people chose Barabbas, which meant Jesus, including two other criminals, was sent to be crucified.
...uch like Judas did when he gave Jesus to the Romans for his crucifixion. Billy represents Judas, who betrayed Christ. Billy’s betrayal ultimately led to McMurphy’s death and downfall.
...ough Wright does not say it directly, this may even suggest that the victim Judas encounters could be Jesus on his way to be crucified. Judas temporarily forgets his intent to kill himself and runs to the victim, ignoring the soldiers. Then he remembers the Last Supper and the meal he ate with Jesus and the other apostles ("Bread my flesh had eaten"(12)), and his betrayal of Jesus with a kiss ("the kiss that ate my flesh"(13)). He goes to the man and "[holds him] for nothing is his arms"(14). In this line Wright compares Judas' payment for betraying Jesus to the fact that he now offers comfort for nothing.
say that due to the way Jesus reacted at his arrest and the fact that
Our understanding of Jewish and Christian history has changed dramatically with the publication of Caesar's Messiah by Joseph Atwill (Ulysses Press), which had previously been privately published under the title The Roman Origins of Christianity. According to Atwill, the Gospels are not accounts of the ministry of a historical Jewish Jesus compiled by his followers sixty years after his death. They are texts deliberately created to trick Messianic Jews into worshipping the Roman Emperor 'in disguise'. The essence of Atwill's discovery is that the majority of the key events in the life of Jesus are in fact satirical: each is an elegant literary play on a military battle in which the Jewish armies had been defeated by the Romans. This is an extraordinary claim-but supported by all the necessary evidence.
Mary watched her child as Jesus traveled the country , and taught others about Christ. She had a sense of discernment that authorities and others were intimidating by his teachings. The Jewish authorities were in a difficult situation. They were trying to maintain a balance to the stable nature in their community , but saw Jesus as a threat. The situation grew worse overtime , and led the community to prosecute Jesus in the city of Jerusalem. He was taken into custory , presented a trial , and nailed to the cross.
Over 2000 years ago, there purportedly was a man born of a virgin, who made outrageous claims. This man was Jesus of Nazareth and He professed to be the Son of God. Without question, Jesus is one of the most influential people that ever walked the earth, but was he the Son of God? Many suggest that he was not Lord, just a great moral teacher, which is a legitimate answer if one does not consider the bold statements that he proclaimed to the world. Lewis suggests that if Jesus was not God, but claimed to be God, then these opponents have lost their argument because he was clearly not a moral teacher but an outright liar or a crazy lunatic. On the other hand, scholars argue Jesus never professed to be God and followers of Christ distort the
The Passion of the Christ revealed to us the death of Jesus Christ, but nowhere did it show us that the Jews alone where to blame. Jewish leaders call the Passion of the Christ anti-Semitic claiming that it will cause violence between religions (Assist News Service 2003). There's no doubt that the Bible says who is responsible for Jesus' death. God ordered the crucifixion as part of his plan for humanity's salvation, and Jesus allowed it to happen. The chairman of the Christian Broadcasting Network, John Maxwell said, "Anyone who sees this film and thinks that the Romans and Jews killed Jesus missed the point" (Assist News Service 2003). Those of us who are believers in and followers of Jesus Christ must always be very attentive a...
There are many ideas of what drove Judas to betray Jesus. The main one was already mentioned, and it is the one where Mary was anointed and Judas’ view on Jesus went from seeing him a King to a clown. Another reason that Judas may have betrayed Jesus was out of greed. As you know, Judas was a businessman and he handled the financials of the Apostles. Judas could have been seen as stingy, but organized with the money of the Apostles. Judas did not like to waste anything which is why he was so upset when the lady dropped the incense at Jesus’
John 18:39- but it is your custom for me to release to you one prisoner at the time of the Passover. Do you want me to release `the king of the Jews'?"King of Jews- He's not the king of the Jews, He's slapping them in the face.The same thing Jesus was being accused of Barnabbas did.JN 19:1 Then Pilate took Jesus and had him flogged. [2] The soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on his head. They clothed him in a purple robe [3] and went up to him again and again, saying, "Hail, king of the Jews!" And they struck him in the face.Then Pilate took Jesus and had him flogged.This is your Messiah people, this is not VBS, or bible study, this is the Messiah that is in love with you.MT 27:27 Then the governor's soldiers took Jesus into the Praetorium and gathered the whole company of soldiers around him.
... and put this on his head. They mocked him by bowing down to him chanting, Hail, King of the Jews (New J Bib, 1181). He was then led off to be crucified. Above his head they placed the charge against him, which read, This is Jesus, the King of the Jews (New J Bib, 1181). At that point in time, rebels were crucified and this was a standard method. Ultimately, the Romans considered Jesus as a rebel following from his actions and crucified him as a method of punishment (Prof. Trum).
First of all, notice that the text does not say that Judas died as a result of hanging. All it says is that he "went and hanged himself." Luke however, in Acts, tells us that "and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out." This is a pretty clear indication (along with the other details given in Acts - Peter's speech, the need to pick a new apostle, etc.) that at least after Judas' fall, he was dead. So the whole concept that Matthew and Luke both recount Judas' death is highly probable, but not clear cut. Notice verse 5..."Then he...went and hanged himself." Matthew does not state death as being a result. The Greek word used is APAGCHO. Matthew 27:5 is it's only occurrence in the New Testament. In the LXX (the Greek translation of the OT used at the time of Jesus), it's only used in 2 Samuel 17:23 : “Now when Ahithophel saw that his advice was not followed, he saddled a donkey, and arose and went home to his house, to his city. Then he put his household in order, and hanged himself, and died; and he was buried in his father's tomb.” Notice that not only is it stated that Ahithophel "hanged himself" [APAGCHO], but it explicitly adds, "and died". Here we have no doubt of the result. In Matthew, we are not explicitly told Judas died. Also, there is nothing in the Greek to suggest success or failure. It simply means 'hang oneself'". So, my line of reasoning to dispel the contradiction myth is that the "two" accounts of Judas' death is this...Matthew doesn't necessarily explain how Judas died; he does say Judas "hanged himself", but he didn't specifically say Judas died in the hanging incident. However, Acts seems to show us his graphic demise. Therefore, there is no contradiction between Matthew and Acts, more specifically the death of Judas.
They know for a fact (blind faith) that God is good, Satan is evil. But is Satan really the most evil thing in existence? Is God perfect and loving? Is eating the apple really a bad thing? Satan.
Then in between them is Judas, where he appears to swoon with his face shadowed facing in Christ’s direction and looking withdrawn. His right hand clutches tightly onto a bag while his left hand reaches for the bread at the same time as Jesus. Christ’s face here seems calm, whereas the facial expressions of the Apostles look astonished and outraged. The hand gestures of the Apostles exhibits implied lines, for instance when Thomas lifts his pointer
The term “Synoptic Problem” alludes to the similarities and differences that are apparent in the Synoptic Gospels. Events that occurred are detailed in somewhat different arrangements and narrations. These differences and similarities have caused observant Christians to wonder what could cause what appears to be a chronological difference in these Gospels, and why do we have more than one Gospel? All of these observations and questions in essence make up the “Synoptic Problem.” (Lea and Black,The New Testament Its Background and Message 2003:114).