Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Martin luther king jr
Patrick Henry's speech
Patrick Henry's speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Martin luther king jr
The question is, "Why do people rebel?" "rebel?", someone might ask. Rebel is when an individual who rises in opposition or resistance against something such as government laws/rights. This paper will explain the reasons why anyone would ever rebel against anything such as or change. To start off, on August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered a speech called, "I have a dream.", In Washington D.c in front of 250,000 individuals who wanted change for jobs and freedom in which Martin Luther King jr. recruited the speech. It can, in fact, be argued that people rebel for the desire for change as it is demonstrated in "the Tiananmen Square Massacre" by Mike Kubic, "Speech in the Virginia Convention" by Patrick Henry, and "Letter to Birmingham …show more content…
Peace, but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!” and “ Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love?” This part of Patrick Henry's speech means that individuals can cry all they want, but nothing will change with tears. The war will still on, just because people shed tears and begging does not mean it will stop. The English men that Patrick Henry is speaking to are not willing to reconcile, so they have to fight back, they have no choice, but to rebel. People rebel because there is no choice. Patrick Henry says that there is no peace because the war has begun. Individual well how people have to rebel to get what they need as the result of having no choice. For example, Black Lives Matter. Black Lives matter is an activist movement originated in African American communities. The campaign against violence and systemic racism towards black people. Black people made this campaign as to have no choice. They had and wanted to do something about the wrong and rebel against it. Still yet, Patrick Henry was very wise. Patrick knew what he wants and he did not hold back to tell the president that everyone wanted some sort of change. In the speech by Patrick Henry, “ Speech in the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry states, “ Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.” Patrick Henry is saying that he would rather die than not have the change. The change in which has not to be a slave. As it claims, “Give me liberty or gives me death” in other words, let me be free or kill me. Rebelling is when someone goes against something or someone else. Patrick Henry is doing exactly that. Patrick is speaking up and saying what he believes in than going with what the government wants from individuals. For example, Students in Singapore are protesting against the uncontested presidential election. It is not that people do not like the
Patrick Henry’s effective diction emphasizes how much the British had suppressed the colonists and that it was time to fight for their freedom. Henry displays this through his strong use of pathos, logos, and ethos. His rhetorical questions really appeal to the logic and ethics of the colonists and leaves the no choice but to join him and rebel.
At the Virginia convention in 1775 Patrick Henry spoke out anonymously about standing up to the British monarchy and gaining independence. His simple use of language and emotionally captivating passages inspired many to fight for a republic. Persuading the devout and loyal colonies to pull away from their mother country took courage.
He uses words like “chains” as symbols of America's ties with Great Britain in order to show the slave-like hold that Britain claims over America, which creates a sense of fear in the hearts of the members of the Congress. By saying “For my own part… a question of freedom or slavery” Patrick Henry frames the only outcome of their decision as either freedom, which would be the product by going to war against the British, or slavery and subjugation, which would be the result of reconciliation and obedience. He implores the Congress to not ignore the gravity of the situation at hand of how “war and subjugation” are Great Britain's true intentions.
Throughout the speech Patrick Henry uses parallelism to acquire the support from the Americans to join the war effort. He believes that they have done the best of their ability to prevent the war and explains that "We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne." He uses this to describe the effort that was used to prevent the war, but which in the end failed. He says that “there is no longer any room for hope” and truly believes that America has done all it could to be in peace with the British. He proceeded to say that “Our petitions have been slighted; our
He addressed the cruel taxes and policies that have been placed upon the American people. He also, speaks of the tiring efforts of the colonies to overcome the impossible British policies. Henry begins his statement with the numerous actions taken by people in response to the British approach to limit their freedom. Writing in the statement, Henry complains that many actions have been taken in an effort to achieve freedom but have failed. Henry himself writes, “In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation?”. In making this comment Henry urges the British to be prepared for them. After overcoming the stamp act , Henry urges the British to be ready for revolution if freedom is not given. This exactly, Henry points out, if basic privileges are not given to men and women, there will be a war. Henry himself writes. “give me liberty, or give me death!”. Basically, Henry is warning that if freedom is not given, he is willing to fight until it is. Patrick Henry’s statement is crucial to the American cause in the War for Independence. He led the fight against the stamp act, after being elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1765. Also, he proposed his argument for going to war was in an effort to live as free men and fight. His speech inspired men to join the cause and fight for
Both Paine and Henry tried to push for support against Great Britain and motivate the colonies and their residents to side with the revolutionaries. Both felt obligated to stand up for their unalienable rights and the good of the nation, and this is most evident when Henry declared that he had to speak up, or "[he] should consider [him]self as guilty of treason towards [his] country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven [...]" (Henry 232). Both agree that compromise with Great Britain is not a solution, for it had been ineffective in the past. Both believe that only war can solve the problems of the colonies, and "only in this way [...] we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country" (Henry 230). When Henry pronounces that through freedom, which can only be reached through winning a war, is the only way to accomplish the nation's goals, he sets an objective. Henry's logicality and straightforwardness hits the audience with ...
Patrick Henry’s speech is very powerful and yet emotional at the same time. There is an urgent need in reacting to the British as there is “no time for ceremony,” and the Americans must resist their “insidious smile.” Henry is appealing to pathos because this is not the time to let down their guard and to pay attention to what the British are really doing. He is also referring to the lack of positive responses like “a snare to your feet” from the petitions that were sent to the British, an image of a trap ready to capture the
Patrick Henry attempts to persuade the House of Burgesses to revolt and declare war against Britain by logically convincing them that it is their natural right to be free and calling on their patriotism and pride as leaders of colonial America. Throughout his speech, Henry justifies his argument for going to war, by logically explaining himself to the leaders of the American colonies. Obviously “men often see the same subject in different light.” Therefore, Patrick Henry uses this in a step-by-step explanation of why he believes that the colonies should join together in revolt. He states, because men have different views, he wishes to express his own, without “be[ing] disrespectful,” to anyone in the House.
Patrick Henry makes his views very clear in his Letter. He is obviously against ratifying the Constitution. His main argument's consists of the sovereignty of the states, the system of checks and balances and the senate, the leaning towards a monarchy, and absolute power. Henry thinks that the uniting of all the states under one government would take away the sovereignty of the states. He states that, "Here is a resolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sove...
Patrick Henry argues that they tried to get liberty peacefully but it didn't work. He asked the council " Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer on the subject? Nothing.". They have tried to talk to the Britain's that they wanted freedom and liberty. The Britain's turned them down like when the U.S turned down the league of nations. They tried petitions, they tried supplications, and the Britain's ignored them.
Through high moral character Henry established credibility with the audience through creating a setting that aroused feelings in the people at the convention in order to convince them they had to fight for more than just peace. The goal Henry had when he spoke about war was to be honest with the crowd and point out that they needed to do something now or they would lose not just what he loved, but what they also loved. Henry said “If we wish to be free, if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending.and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight!”. In this quote, the tactic of ethics is apparent in that Henry wanted to achieve a personal level of connection with the audience and establish his credibility. By relating losing the war it also meant the loss of their feelings of comfort and contentment from the privileges they had worked hard on to achieve.
“Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a movement against police violence that is, as argued by BLM supporters, disproportionately and systematically directed at black people. The movement has highlighted incidents in which police have harassed and killed black men and women. BLM is considered one of the most visible and controversial civil rights movement of the last decades.” (Black Lives Matter. 2016) “Black Lives Matter is an American social activist organization devoted to stopping violence and injustice against African Americans. The group was founded in 2013 following the acquittal of In the sixties African Americans began a Civil Rights Movement that, to some, still continue today; hence, the Black Lives Matter movement. During the sixties, the
“Give me liberty, or give me death!”Patrick Henry spoke these powerful words at a convention in Richmond, Virginia to a large group of delegates, influencing the men to declare independence from Great Britain. This statement came at the end of Henry’s most reveled speech to the Virginia House of Burgesses, sparking the movement of rebellion that would eventually result in the establishment of a new, independent nation known as America. The Liberty or Death speech is considered one of, if not the, most important declarations ever spoken in American history. Not only as the catalyst that tipped the scales towards resistance, but also as a speech that fully embodied that of an American of the revolutionary generation, appealing to the ideas most citizens at
First off Black Lives Matter is a powerful organization that has gained national attention. The movement was started in 2012, after the death of seventeen year Trayvon Martin. A very controversial trial came about, against a police officer named George Zimmerman who had shot the young black man. The main goal of black lives matter is to prevent
‘It would not finish it if one side stopped fighting. It would be worse if we stopped fighting. ’”(p49) This quote shows how Henry wants to fight and get the war over with. He is forced to become a war criminal when he is threatened to be shot for leaving his troops when in fact he was abandoned (p225), and even after that, he feels guilty for abandoning the war.