Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on more affordable housing
Issues of affordable housing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on more affordable housing
The foreclosure crisis has been devastating. Families no longer able to afford mortgage payments are forced into bankruptcy, while banks find themselves with properties valued at less than the loan principal. Solutions proposed thus far have primarily focused on loan re-modification measures that only slightly relieve the financial burden for homeowners and frustrate lenders who are forced into less attractive loan terms. However, one solution not being discussed in congress may resolve the housing market slump while benefiting families and investors alike.
The reality for many homeowners is that they simply cannot make their mortgage payments; due to depreciating home prices, they are also unable to sell. Foreclosure sadly has long been the only way out. According to the Center for Responsible Lending, a home goes into foreclosure every 13 seconds. What if these same homeowners could somehow rent their current residence and thus avoid foreclosure altogether? An extremist approach would call on federal and state governments to buy properties nearing foreclosure and subsequently lease them out. A much better solution is to offer incentives to investors in order to transform distressed homes into attractive investment opportunities that will stimulate home sales, while simultaneously offering low rents to current residents – which can be appropriately called the Real Estate Investment Revitalization Program.
Although interest rates remain at historical lows, levels have been ineffective in promoting such a buy-lend approach. By additionally offering low-interest or even zero-interest secondary loans, however, REIRP would entice investors to take a buy-and-hold investment strategy since the risk of further depreciation would be...
... middle of paper ...
...timately contributed to enormous price depreciation in the hardest hit areas when the housing bubble burst.
The Real Estate Investment Revitalization Program offers a unique solution to the foreclosure problem currently being experienced in the United States. By bringing together investors and distressed homeowners in a mutually beneficial arrangement, REIRP resolves issues inherent in loan re-modification programs. Furthermore, it gives current homeowners the ability to sell their property, something the Deed for Lease program by Fannie Mae and other programs are unable to do. REIRP may not be the best solution for everyone, but the program would undoubtedly help many distressed homeowners avoid foreclosure while creating attractive investment opportunities that will help spur home sales – a positive outcome for families, investors and the entire housing market.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the article called “Can We Keep Our Promises?” by Robert D. Arnott, and to help better understand the three key risks facing each investor.
In existence is $150,000, specifically set aside for the purchase of distressed real estate. This essay will outline a detailed strategy ensuring a maximum return in regard to the financial investment made on the home. Including a description of distressed real estate and foreclosure in addition to how utility can play a role in the decision-making process.
Housing is the most instable component. It gave a new perspective for research that economists did not have. In the Great Recession the housing decreased more than anything. From 1997 to 2005 a momentum (the rate of acceleration of a security's price or volume, Investopedia) was driven. In 1997 no more capital gains taxes on houses up to half million dollars. The Bubble started in 1991.
After a generation of portfolio managers and investors profiting from decades of favorable returns on stocks, they believed the modern economy was impervious to major calamities (“Rethinking” 20). As inflation rates fell from record highs in the late 1970s and early 1980s to the record lows that they are today, interest rates followed, enabling Americans to borrow more money from lenders which, in turn, increased housing prices to all-time highs (“Rethinking” 21).
“The housing market will get worse before it gets better” –James Wilson. The collapse of the United States housing market in in 2008 was one of the most devastating moments for the world economy. The United Sates being arguably the most important and powerful nation in the world really brought everyone down with this event. Canada was very lucky, thanks to good planning and proper preventatives to avoid what happened to the United States. There were many precursor events that occurred that showed a distinct path that led to the collapse of the housing market. People were buying house way out of their range because of low interest rates, the banks seemingly easily giving out massive loans and banks betting against the housing market. There were
The new millennium brought with it a housing boom which had reached an unsustainable level (Pollock, 2011). Housing prices grew rapidly, and Baker (2010) noted a rise in house prices of over 70% from 1995 to 2006. For example, he noted average home prices in Los Angeles rose more than $400,000 over the period of 1995 to 2006 and approximately $519,000 in San Francisco. Prices around the country increased substantially as well (Baker, 2010). To encourage homeownership, banks promoted creative financing options (i.e. adjustable rate, interest only,...
It can be argued that the economic hardships of the great recession began when interest rates were lowered by the Federal Reserve. This caused a bubble in the housing market. Housing prices plummeted, home prices plummeted, then thousands of borrowers could no longer afford to pay on their loans (Koba, 2011). The bubble forced banks to give out homes loans with unreasonably high risk rates. The response of the banks caused a decline in the amount of houses purchased and “a crisis involving mortgage loans and the financial securities built on them” (McConnell, 2012 p.479). The effect on the economy was catastrophic and caused a “pandemic” of foreclosures that effected tens of thousands home owners across the U.S. (Scaliger, 2013). The debt burden eventually became unsustainable and the U.S. crisis deepened as the long-term effect on bank loans would affect not only the housing market, but also the job market.
subprime mortgages were major factors of the collapse of the 2007-2009 economy collapse. All of America suffered from the 2008 recession.
While no one likes the idea of turning people out of their homes, when you buy something you can’t afford, you have to return it. When you make a bad business decision, you have to take the consequences. Capitalism doesn’t work when there is no downside to risk – that downside is there to make sure that the system works properly. The most sensible, soundest and, ultimately, kindest solution to the debt crisis caused by the real estate bubble is foreclosure – expedient, easy, simple foreclosure. This is the best way for the housing market to grow again, which in the end will give people the opportunity to enjoy the piece of mind that comes from knowing they own a home they can afford and can really call their own.
In essence, the problem leading to the foreclosure crisis is the recent decrease in people’s ability to make their loan payments due to job loss and lower wages brought on by the economy’s weak state. Rather than throw billions of dollars at big banks in the hope that they find ways to help the homeowners’ loans, the government should attack the problem through the individual. Simply, the government aid being spent in the hopes of stimulating the economy should be funneled toward reducing the balance of home loans to make the monthly payments affordable for the owner. By funneling the government aid directly to the American home owner in need, the economy would greatly benefit as homeowners regain their footing with their budget because the economy and foreclosure are directly related. When one hurts, so does the other; when one prospers, the other does as we...
The causes of the Great Recession all started as hundreds of billions of dollars was given to the United States abroad and financiers conceiving were to make a profit and what better way but the real estate market. Since the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and an expansion made in 1995 the than President Bush endorsed the program that created Option adjustable rate mortgages (nick-named “Pick-A-Pay”) to allow for bank to sell these options even though they were high risk (Conservapedia, 2013). The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977/95 is defined as to framework financial institutions, state and local governments, and community organizations to jointly promote banking services in the community” (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, n.d.). That being said, there were three individuals, and firms that contributed the most to the recession including Senator Charles Schumer D-NY, Fannie Mae, American Ins...
All good things must come to and end. In late 2005, the housing bubble burst, and housing began to decline in price. People who refinanced, particularly those who financed with variable interest rates suddenly found their homes were valued at much less. The housing market became flooded with homes for sale, because the homeowners with variable rates and interest only loans could not continue to make their payments. (Greenspan) The rise in the number of homes for sale caused further lowering of home values.
We analyzed the market for two weeks to determine when the equity market would turn from a bearish to bullish market. Without a change in the market and a declining bond price, we decided to invest in equities according to our investment strategy, which brought us into the second phase of our portfolio. Therefore, at the beginning of February we bought shares in Sirius, Microsoft, Neon, Washington Mutual, and Nike. As assumed, the equity market continued to plummet decreasing the value of all our stocks except for our Gold Corporation stock.
In order to understand the concept of financialization and the housing market on the global and local level, one must know that there is a global pool of money that is simply the worlds savings bank. In 2000 the pool had $36 trillion and has since doubled in size (Blumberg 2008). Its most recent profit increase was a result of developing countries and cities such as India, Abu Dhabi, and China making money. This doubled the cash pool available for investments, but left fewer solid investments for the taking. The solution was residential mortgages and the US housing market. The investment managers thought the low-risk high-return investment in the housing market was a good, stable idea. The glo...
Following the sudden increase of the dot-com bubble and the possibility of decline threatening the US management started dropping the interest rates to improve the economy. The interest-rate turned as low as 1.5% in June 2003 which was at its least possible point since 1958 (Gerding, 2009). This low interest-rate found its users in the shape of homebuyers and borrowers with the housing market at last expressing some development after period of declining movement. Indeed the rate of a thirty year unchanging mortgage in the year 2003 was the lowest in 40 years and thus the dream of owning a residence in US was becoming an incredibly simple reality for Americans (Ely, 2009). With increasing housing charges borrowers assumed th...