Liberalism Theory And The Characteristics Of United States Foreign Policy

890 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of liberalism

1. Introduction
Liberalism in the twentieth century continue to be the most widely followed ideology, most of the states adhere to this ideology due to the benefits it comes with. However the following essay will discuss liberalism theory with specific reference to the United Kingdom’s (UK) foreign policy. The essay is divide into five parts, the first part will be the insightful discussion of the liberalism theory in detail, followed by the identification of the characteristics of liberal states. In the international relations, in order for one to understand states behaviour, then they must scrutinize states foreign policy. However it is better to start by understanding the concept foreign policy. The third part will define the concept of …show more content…

According to Balaam and Dillman (2011: 53) “liberalism in broader term means liberty under law”. However according to the (internet: 2014) liberalism is a “political or social philosophy advocating freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institution to assure unrestricted developmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties”. This entails how liberals believe in the entrenchment of power on separate institutions so as to avoid …show more content…

This entails the establishment of peace among liberal states. Liberals do not assume joint peace with any other state instead they understand that states are subjected to international anarchy and are potentially aggressive (Badie et al 2011: 1436). Liberal state are peaceful, yet they are also prone to a war, from aggressive instincts of authoritarian leaders and totalitarian parties (Doyle 1986: 3), for example the threats from North Korea to South

Show More
Related

  • Liberal Franklin D. Roosevelt vs. Conservative Herbert C. Hoover

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today, the definition of the term “liberal” is relatively uncontested, and its content is relatively well defined. A liberal today is someone who advocates for governmental solutions to various problems, not for unaided individual freedom. Liberals today trust and call for governmental action, not for the type of self-determination supported by Hoover. Contemporary liberals believe in individual freedom, but they typically advocate f...

    Read More

  • Conservative and Liberal Ideologies in Regard to Health Care

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    Liberalism is an ideology which advocates equality of opportunity for all within the framework of a system of laws. It includes a belief in government as an institution whose primary function is to define and enforce the laws. Furthermore, a Constitution, must be developed not solely by one ruler but by representatives of the elite groups. Therefore, liberalism invariably involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. The Constitution then defines ...

    Read More

  • The Political Spectrum

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    - Liberalism is a form of political structure where the powers of the government are limited against the people and their property

    Read More

  • Comparing Classical vs. Modern Liberalism

    1802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Typically Liberalism can be categorized into two different strands, Classical and Modern (yet some thinkers advocate a third strand that is referred to as Neo-Liberalism), each characterized by their differing and to some extent unavoidably overlapping attitudes regarding the theory behind the ideology and how it should be put into practice. Prior to examining how these relate to one another and before making any comparisons, it is important to give a definition, as best as possible, of Liberalism as a concept.

    Read More

  • Understanding International Relations

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.

    Read More

  • What Are The Three Types Of Political Realism?

    1875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberalism might seem like a great theory, but there are some downsides. Realist argue that they have not learned from their mistakes. The League of Nations and the PCIJS do very little to influence states behavior. These institutions that they create does not help create a balance of power. Also realist argue that these international institutions does not keep states safe. They mainly focus on commercial, financial, and environmental affairs. They do not do anything to maintain national security and that proposes a problem. Of course realist believe that national security the only thing that helps a nation survive. They believe that they can only count on themselves, not on any other state or institution to keep them safe. The last complaint about liberalism is that they turn policy into moral decisions while realist just do what is necessary for their state. Liberals believe that they have a responsibility to protect populations that are vulnerable. For example President Obama states, “Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries, The United States of America is different. And as President, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Leadership And Foreign Policy

    2218 Words  | 5 Pages

    On the other hand, liberalism’s main principles emphasise, human rights, individuality, equality before the law...

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Essay

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    To understand the power struggle relating to foreign policymaking, it is crucial to understand what foreign policy entails. The Foreign Policy Agenda of the U.S. Department of State declares the goals of foreign policy as "to build and sustain a more democratic, secure, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community." While this definition is quite vague, the actual tools of foreign policy include Diplomacy, foreign aid, and military force.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Liberalism And Constructivism

    1738 Words  | 4 Pages

    Modern Liberalism can be tied to the creation of the President Woodrow Wilson’s speech “The World must be made safe Democracy, Fourteen Points”. One of the points, the last one called for the creation of a League Nations. The purpose of the League was create a forum where na-tions can discuss their differences without resorting to war and to maintain each nation’s politi-cal and territorial integrity. The league turned out to be a failure for three reasons: One the United States, which championed its cause did not join due to an isolationist world view other major nations were excluded such as Russia and Germany, creating a lack of legitimacy and prestige. Second, the lack to authority to have nations contribute military power to enforce its will if economic sanctions did not work. Third, the international community was not ready for a League concept.

    Read More

  • Communitarianism: A Liberal Response

    1294 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...aditions of certain cultural practices, but not to the extent of making it a political theory. In todays world, we need a solid foundation to each individual in order to have a working, non-oppressive, self-respecting society. The liberal approach respects the ideals of certain cultures, but not to the extent of the communitarian. Overall, the liberal theory of justice is a more relevant political theory in our globalized world.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Conservatism

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    As both "conservatism" and "liberalism" have had various meanings sooner or later and transversely countries, the word liberal conservatism has been used in relatively different sanity. In political science, the word is used to pass on to ideologies that merge the support of capitalism, for instance value for contracts, protection of private property and free market require reference to validate with the principle in natural discrimination, the significance of religion, and the worth of traditional integrity need reference to validate in the course of a construction of inadequate, legitimate, representative government (Abdou & Zaazou 2013). It contrasts with traditional liberalism and particularly aristocratic conservatism, rejecting the belief of correspondence as a little in discordance with human nature, instead emphasizing the thought of natural inequality (Crozier. 2012).As the conservative thought in democratic countries hold typical liberal institutions such as the rule of law, private property, market economy, and constitutional representative government, the liberal factor of liberal conservatism

    Read More

  • Liberalist Governments and Socialist Governments

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ideas of liberalist government spread throughout the world. For the United States, it helped abolish slavery. For Latin America, it paved the way for independence from Spain and Portugal. In the 19th Century, the Austrian Empire, German states, and Italian states brought forward the ideas of liberalism. They demanded written constitutions, suffrage rights, and freedom of the press. However, by the end of the 19th Century, liberalism was challenged ...

    Read More

  • The Impact of Liberalism on International Relations

    2018 Words  | 5 Pages

    To start, Liberalism traces its roots back to the Enlightenment period (Mingst, 2008) where many philosophers and thinkers of the time began to question the established status quo. Such as the prevailing belief in religious superstition and began to replace it with a more rational mode of thinking and a belief in the intrinsic goodness of mankind. The Enlightenment period influenced Liberalism’s belief that human beings are thinkers who are able to naturally understand the laws governing human social conduct and by understanding these laws, humans can better their condition and live in harmony with others (Mingst, 2008). Two of the most prominent Liberal Internationalists of the Enlightenment period were Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham who both thought that international relations were conducted in a brutal fashion. It was Kant who compared international relations as “the lawless state of savagery” (Baylis and Smith, 2001, pp 165). It was also Kant who believed nations could form themselves into a sort of united states and overcome international anarchy through this (Mingst, 2008). This was probably the beginning of a coherent belief in a sort of union of sovereign states. Toward the end of the seventeenth century William Penn believed a ‘diet’ (parliament) could be set up in Europe, like the European Union of today (Baylis and Smith, 2001). We can see much of this liberal thinking today in organizations such as the United Nations.

    Read More

  • Liberalism In International Relations Essay

    1846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberalism assumes that the war and can be policed by the institutional reforms that empower the international organizations and law.

    Read More

  • Essay On Liberalism

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have

    Read More

More about Liberalism Theory And The Characteristics Of United States Foreign Policy

Open Document