Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern liberalism vs modern conservatism
Relationship between religion and politics
Compare and Contrast Liberalism and Conservatism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern liberalism vs modern conservatism
My Ideology Over the years, when examining my own ideology, I found that I could not determine whether or not I am a liberal or conservative person. I had often found myself relating to the beliefs similar to those of the Liberal side of the political spectrum. Yet despite this familiarity, I also hold myself steadfast to some conservative values. Recently, I perceived that my opinions on both the social and economic policy, as it pertains to liberals and conservatives, varies on many matters. Upon reflection, I concluded that perhaps, as of yet, the best interpretation of my current ideology would be more inclined to liberal perspectives. In my examination of my ideology, I found that we, as an American society, all seek to achieve the …show more content…
same goals and ambitions in life. Whether it be the traditional American Dream of wealth and prosperity or other subtle aspirations of normalcy, we desire the tangible aspects of freedom, opportunity, equality, and liberty. The resounding argument is how to achieve them. As a liberal, I find that my beliefs and values are centered upon the ideals of liberty and equality.Though I do agree with conservatives on most other issues, I also believe that the government should take an active role in ensuring that the welfare of the American people prevail over other issues such as initiating War on Terrorism. I feel that it is the government’s duty to help alleviate any ailments within the American community and to protect, maintain, and carry out the civil liberties and individual and human rights upon it’s citizens. Although contrary to my liberal viewpoints on governmental issues such as Welfare, I find that in reality, if I were put in a precarious position regarding my beliefs on controversial matters such as abortion or same sex marriage, I would be more inclined to side with conservative standpoints.
However, despite my resolute if not passionate feelings towards my ideals, I would not be adamant about actively participating in politics of any kind. I would rather leave those quarrels other political voices and remain on the sidelines of the political process as a bystander than anything else. This is of course of choice and, currently, a by product of not being eligible to participate in public political affairs such as voting. This currently remains and will remain my choice in the matter, much to my peers dismay, because it coincides with my religious beliefs and family …show more content…
values. Cultural matters such as religion has greatly influenced my position on the political spectrum.
As a Jehovah’s Witness, I have grown up with the aspect of political neutrality and with the reluctance of avidly participating in political affairs. I was raised on the preference of taking “no part in this world”, to not take sides in political issues, and to not in any way campaign against or for political elections. However, as I grew up, my political neutrality and conservative values began to change when I started high school. One experience, for example, was when I met one of my very good friends. This friend just so happened to be an avid supporter of the Pro-Choice issue in regards to abortion. Although I do not condone the issue of abortion and feel that human life begins at conception, I also feel very strongly about the aspect of women having a choice on whether or not to have the
operation. My ideology also began to change when I became thoroughly introduced to the subject of ‘separation of church and state’. I do not agree with the conservative’s belief that religion should (or can) be acknowledged in public schools and government buildings. I feel that any symbols or implications of the Christian heritage in public and government locations should be removed because, through personal experience, it can be highly oppressive, offensive, and imposing on people with other religious affiliations than Christianity. I feel this way because, as I am a Jehovah’s Witness, I am often a victim to prejudice and opposition from people of other religious groups. My religion, family, and friends influence my ideals and behaviors in many ways. My religion, in my opinion, serves as a foundation and as an outline for my morals and beliefs. My family influences those beliefs and values by shaping them and friends either reinforces them or introduces me to new ones. I also feel that our community has have a big impact on them as well. I have, unfortunately, always been one to want to ‘fit in’ and go along with the status quo. Because of this, I feel that our relatively conservative state yet my local and very liberal-proned school has had conflicting impacts on the development of my ideology. I also believe that my families financial status also has had a major impact on my point of view as well. As I was raised on a relatively low income, my family is very dependent on the government’s welfare programs. I know that, from experience, the conservative belief that “if one wants to be successful in life they need to work hard to achieve it” is not necessarily held true. To be successful in this life, you need to have an education, but in order to have an education you need money. If someone cannot pay for an education, then they cannot move out of the endless cycle that plagues poverty. Although the conservative belief that people need to ‘climb the ladder to success’ on their own and the opportunity to get there is present, the journey there is based on circumstance, and not everyone can get make it. Welfare programs can generally be very beneficial to those who need it, and I feel strongly on the maintenance on it. As I feel strongly about equality and liberty, another issue that I am passionate about in my liberal perspective is immigration. I do not agree with the conservatives belief in opposing any amnesty for people who have entered the U.S illegally and have long since built a stable home here. I would be willing to compromise on rejecting any amnesty for those who have ‘recently’ arrived here illegally. I understand their belief in that those who enter the U.S. illegally don't reserve the right to have the same rights as those who entered legally, but I feel that it is unfair to arrest millions of undocumented immigrants, especially those who have been present for years and have no family or outside connections within their homeland. I feel that they should be allowed to stay and have the same privileges as American citizens. However, I also feel that, because they broke the law, they be penalized and should be required to undergo the same process of gaining citizenship that others have had to do legally.
The message of political alignment is a vast and varying concept, one that will be debated for as a long as party divisions exist. This divide however exists in not just the Christian community. We begin with the metaphor of a shepherds flock, blindly following what an individual says over ones own thinking. Boyd furthers this concept of alignment and how “many who left sincerely believe there is little ambiguity in how true Christian faith translates into politics. Since God is against abortion, Christians should vote for the pro-life candidate, they believe- and the preacher should say so” (Boyd 2). This blind adherence to one topic, one issue is unfortunately a failure on an intellectual level of all people, whether Christian or not. The
When it comes to my political beliefs, I am indecisive between being a Republican or a Democrat. The reason for this, is because I never really showed enough interest into learning more about politics. As for my politically ideology, I feel that I am more liberal than I am conservative. In theory, ideology is defined in two ways, “(1) Organized set of political attitudes based on underlying principles”, and “(2) a cohesive set of beliefs that form a general philosophy about the role of government” (McAtee). An Individual’s political ideology can be formed from public opinions and agents of socializations (McAtee). According to the quiz I took on “Politopia.com”, the results showed that I was “Centerville”, which means that I am in between of being a Democrat or a Republican, or that I support both sides and yet oppose to both sides.
For centuries philosophers have debated over the presence of free will. As a result of these often-heated arguments, many factions have evolved, the two most prominent being the schools of Libertarianism and of Determinism. Within these two schools of thought lies another debate, that of compatibilism, or whether or not the two believes can co-exist. In his essay, Has the Self “Free Will”?, C.A. Campbell, a staunch non-compatiblist and libertarian, attempts to explain the Libertarian argument.
Due to my family makeup I have in interesting history of cultural background stemming from both rural American culture and native Mexican culture. Since both of my parents came from farming communities: one from Mexico and one from South West Missouri, they actually have similar values despite the geological difference of the cultures. My family has no religious affiliations and tends to lean toward liberal ideas. However both of my parents, having grown up in conservative families, still have some conservative ideas about gender-rolls, economics, and family dynamics. Another thing that I ...
Faith groups and institutions should not be allowed to form political parties and they should not attempt to gain influence in the workings of government for their views and values by entering the realm of political discourse and attempting to elect their own politicians.
that it was up to them to shape the way this new land would function,
Liberal is defined as "one who is open-minded or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established forms or ways." (Webster's dictionary) A conservative is defined as "one who adheres to traditional methods or views." (Webster's dictionary) The definition of these words have changed throughout history. A liberal in older days was not what one would be today; they were considered a person whom sought to use change, while a conservative is one who opposed change. The differences between a liberal and a conservative is a wide gap that focuses upon the fundamental beliefs of those within each group.
The conservative movement has played a crucial role in American politics in the post war era. Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie indentify various elements of the American conservatism. These elements include challenging authoritarian governments and modernist culture, upholding tradition, Christian religion and the rule of law, defending western civilization, and supporting republicanism. American conservatism has been characterized by competing ideologies and tension throughout history. The Americans who are politically liberal and economically conservative favor free trade, minimal state intervention, low taxes, and a small government. On the other hand, conservatives hold the view that American traditional values are normally undermined by secularism. Social conservatives have always opposed same-sex marriages and abortion, and instead have been supporting the idea of integrating prayer into the school curriculum (Story and Laurie 1).
Indeed, in this diverse country, there is no flawless right or wrong belief; nevertheless, there are extremes on both ends. In the long run, everyone wants a favorable outcome on all issues; the dilemma arises when we cannot agree on which road to take to reach that outcome. For me, a position almost dead center between liberalism and conservatism is the best fit.
Conservative and liberal have different beliefs on most everything. At the most basic level liberals are considered to be open to change while conservatives hold traditional views and prefer the status quo. These differences in base beliefs have an enormous effect on their ideas of the role of government. Liberals believe that the government should provide for and help people. By providing for the people they believe that it will create a level of equality between all classes. Liberals also believe that it is the government’s job to be involved in the nation’s social problems and guide change. For liberals it all culminates in the belief for a larger, more involved government. Conservatives on the other hand believe in a government that focuses on people’s individual responsibility and freedom. By doing so they believe that people will work to better themselves and provide for themselves. Conservatives also believe in a limed government that only provides basic functions for the people. For conservatives it all culminates in the principle of a smaller, less involved government. The basic large versus small government mentality is evident in many of the differencing views of
Throughout the course, the ideologies that resonated with me most are conservatism and parts of liberalism. I can see how the way I live and view things are similar to the ideologies present in these readings. Furthermore, I can greatly relate to the concepts and definition presented in these readings, as liberalism and conservatism are two major political ideologies not just in the U.S., but also in many other parts of the world. The readings on these subject have challenged today's view of the two ideologies.
Few people know their own political beliefs. Although this sounds strange I truly believe it, considering the varying political opinions that are constantly being thrown at us from the television, the news, the radio, magazines, our families, and even the president. So much influence makes it hard to maintain personal political views; your own opinion can easily be swayed. The media often presents information on current issues that may cause someone to stray from their original, authentic position. In order to reestablish a personal opinion, everything else must be set aside, and all outside influences disregarded. Having done this, and having taken several political quizzes, I was surprised to find myself, according to the political quizzes, considered a centrist- a moderate or middle grounder. Prior to exploring my own political views I considered myself a conservative. Having been influenced by the media and especially by my family I thought of myself as a true conservative in every way. Until recently, I never even bothered to have my own political views; what I heard from family members I accepted as true and learned what I could from the media. Although I still passionately support the Republican Party on many issues, I discovered that with all other influences set aside, I have more moderate, and surprisingly several liberal opinions than I ever would have acknowledged.
Modern liberalism and modern conservatism are both political outlooks that involve acceptance or support of the balance of the degree of social equality and social inequality; while they tend to avoid political changes that would result in extreme deviation of society to either side. Modern liberalism and modern conservatism tend not to be as centrist or middle-of-the-road ideologies as they once could be. Ideology is a set of ideas and beliefs that guide the goals, expectations, and actions of a group (Webster’s Dictionary). Individuals who are conservative or liberal tend to have views that align within a political party, whether it be Republican or democratic, but this is not always the case. There are conservative democrats, such as, Jim Costa and Jim Cooper and there are liberal republicans, such as, Nathaniel Banks and George Washington Julian. Another name for conservative democrats would be blue dog democrats while the nickname for liberal republicans is the Rockefeller republicans. These two ideologies tend to be more of the centrist ideologies. Modern liberals tend to be members of the Democratic Party because they support a wide range of welfare programs and government support of the public sector and tighter corporate regulations (PP Modern Liberalism). U.S. Conservatism evolved from classical liberalism, which makes them similar, yet there is many differences between modern conservatism and modern liberalism. There are principles and tenets that govern each ideology. A tenant is a belief or idea that is held as being true from a group (Webster’s Dictionary). In understanding both ideologies, it is imperative to have an understanding of classical liberalism. Classical liberalism was built on ideas from the seventeenth ...
In this essay I will be arguing about 2 political ideologies; this essay will be highlighting the comparison and contrast between the 2 ideologies and their elements. The 2 ideologies that will be discussed are liberalism and conservatism, the essay will explain what ideology is, a brief explanation of their elements and the comparison between them. In my opinion the best between both ideologies is liberalism, the reason I think that is because liberalism places an ontological supremacy upon the individual and has no value more important than freedom because man’s natural state is when he is free unlike conservatism that has a very pessimistic view of humans and claims that individuals are morally corrupt.
strive for have made us, again as a unity, divides. I asked myself exactly how