Compare And Contrast Leadership And Foreign Policy

2218 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Personality theories on decision

LEADERSHIP AND FOREIGN POLICY: Contrasting between the liberalist and realist views, discuss the role of a leader in influencing foreign policy.

Introduction
In foreign policy, decision making is guided by different a leader that is from presidents, cabinets, parliaments and groups such as communist party of Soviet Union and the standing committee of the communist party of china and Central Intelligence Agency of USA. One cannot run away from the fact that a leader’s personality can affect foreign policy. Maoz and Shayer believe that one cannot underrate or ignore the role of personality in decision making as it plays a huge role. By examining ones foreign policy, we can understand foreign policy better (Jensen, 1982). If a leader is aggressive then there are certain traits he will exhibit such as paranoia, manipulation, thirst for power high intensity of nationalism, (Hermann, 1980). Hitler was one leader who led to world war when he challenged the treaty of Versailles by adopting an aggressive foreign policy. The opposite is true for a mild leader for example George …show more content…

Whilst one may say USA is the highest power around the world therefore there is balance of power, others may say USA appears to be the dominant one only because it has most resources and influence compared to other nations. Realists agree with the fact that huge countries should be given attention as they have most influence around the world.

The term balance of power had to be adopted after the devastating Napoleonic wars. Today, powers which oppose USA accuse Obama of trying to be the hegemony and dictating to other nations thus disregarding the term balance of power. China further says that despite their growing economy and military, they can never be a bully to other nations by trying to be hegemony. In the UN, China has been known for voting against resolutions such as interventions and imposing of sanctions.

Show More
Related

  • National Security Structure Development in Steven Hook and John Spanier's Book, American Foreign Policy Since WWII

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of President Eisenhower's Foreign Policy

    1713 Words  | 4 Pages

    All of the history of the United States, foreign policy has caused many disputes over the proper role in international affairs. The views, morals and beliefs of democracy in Americans, makes them feel the need to take leadership of the world and help those countries whom are in need. The foreign policies of President Eisenhower will eventually led to the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. President Eisenhower’s role with these policies were based on his military type strategies to safeguard a victory in the Global Cold War. President Eisenhower’s foreign policies led to an effective involvement in the Cold War and enviably the Vietnam War from an American perspective. President Eisenhower’s foreign policies when implemented would facilitate the goal of containing communism, and also

    Read More

  • Conservative and Liberal Ideologies in Regard to Health Care

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    Liberalism is an ideology which advocates equality of opportunity for all within the framework of a system of laws. It includes a belief in government as an institution whose primary function is to define and enforce the laws. Furthermore, a Constitution, must be developed not solely by one ruler but by representatives of the elite groups. Therefore, liberalism invariably involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. The Constitution then defines ...

    Read More

  • The Five Strategic Goals Of Woodrow Wilson's Foreign Policy

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson was the 28th President of the United States and held the office from 1913-1921. He became known as “the Crusader” due to his foreign policy theory that America should be a beacon of liberty and aggressively pursue the spread of democracy throughout the world. His policy would enable America to prosper economically and develop an international security community through the promotion of democracy in other nations. While former Secretary of State Kissinger writes in his book Diplomacy that 20th century American foreign policy has been driven by Wilsonian idealism, an analysis of 21st century US foreign policy reveals that, in fact, US foreign policy has been influenced by ideals that can be characterized as Hamiltonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian as well.

    Read More

  • How Is John D Eisenhower And Eisenhower's Leadership Style

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Eisenhower and Kennedy were affected to various levels in governance issues by the previous administrations of Harry Truman and Franklin Roosevelt. However, Kennedy’s leadership style was closely attached to FDR than to Eisenhower. While there were various corresponding viewpoints, the discrete and idiosyncratic values and leadership styles of the two presidents could not be so much dissimilar. Their primary forms of leadership can be classified into formal and informal styles while their foreign policy based on the foundation of either symmetric or asymmetric approach. Essentially each and every nation’s president has a purpose behind his presidency, marked by unalterable commitment.

    Read More

  • Wilsonian Realism In America's We Saved The World

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    Realists critique the idealist that a international body can fight and prevent aggression. For example, the failure of the League of Nations did not prevent WWII. Germany and Japan still started WWII. Realists critique the idealist on the role of the U.S. in the world. They can argue that it is not to be the “world police,” and they can argue that entangling alliances, like the League of Nations, hinders American sovereignty. Realists critique the idealist for thinking that the U.S. foreign policy is about morals and democracy. Most importantly, what is the role of the United States? What will its national interest be? The United States can engage in real politik and use force. This would re-define the character of the U.S. because values are sacrificed at the expense of real politik. That’s the tension between idealism and realism that still continues today . .

    Read More

  • The Political Spectrum

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    - Liberalism is a form of political structure where the powers of the government are limited against the people and their property

    Read More

  • Comparing Classical vs. Modern Liberalism

    1802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberalism is an ideology and due to the changing views of historical persons, who have each viewed themselves to be Liberals, is difficult to define precisely. There are five agreed defining tenants of Liberalism. The most important of these, percolating through the ideology, is the ‘Importance of the Individual’, and closely interlinked with this is ‘Freedom’, which leads on to the concept of ‘Individual Freedom or liberty’. Liberals believe that humankind is a rational species, and thus ‘Reason’ is a third tenant. Furthermore Liberalism advocates that the principle of ‘Justice’ and Toleration’ are fundamental in the well being of society and each of these aspects relates directly back to the quintessential first tenant. Liberalism, according to Habermas “emphasizes individual freedom from restraint and is usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard; c: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.” As an individualist, rather than a collectivist ideology the individual is placed as the building block of society. J. S. Mill says ...

    Read More

  • Understanding International Relations

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.

    Read More

  • What Are The Three Types Of Political Realism?

    1875 Words  | 4 Pages

    It goes all the way back to ancient Greece and BCE. Thucydides (460-411 B.C.E) wrote History of the Peloponnesian War and it has inspired scholars today and also Thomas Hobbes. History was more than just a timeline of events, it explains how decisions were made. Realism was shown in the first speech in a debate in Sparta right before the war took place. Realism is also shown in History while Thucydides explains the causes of the war. Machiavelli (1469-1527) challenged the realist tradition and created the foundation for modern politics. He talked about the “effectual truth” and how it should make the individual and country stronger. Another famous realist is Thomas Hobbes (1588-1683). Hobbes attacked the belief that humans know what is right and wrong and can make the right decisions. He also did not believe that humans are naturally social. He believed that “a perpetual and restless desire of power after power, that ceases only in death” (Leviathan XI 2). Hobbes believed that is is every man for himself. He thought that most important thing is the relationship between the individual and state. He believed that individuals need to give up their freedom to the state and that everything would be okay. Realism appeared after World War II. States believed that there was a thing called natural harmony and everyone would be giving to one another so they signed the Kellog-Briand Pact that made war against the law to settle

    Read More

  • A Constructivist View of North Korean Nuclear Proliferation

    2007 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nye, Jr., Joseph S. “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy.” In Paradox of American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 4-17. Print.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and the Realist School

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    The realist school is based on the thought that human nature is not perfectible. Human nature is viewed as evil and something that cannot be trusted or counted on. In order to have a successful society the citizens need to be controlled by a strong sovereign government. This strong government would be the only thing able enough to control human nature and the evils it produces. If a strong central government did not exist a state of chaos would be created by the people of the land. One of the leading philosophers of the realist school was Thomas Hobbes. He elaborated on many of the concepts of realism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Brexit

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    Regarding Brexit, realism and liberalism have different viewpoints. Particularly, since realism claims that a state’s ultimate goal is power, realism suggests that

    Read More

  • The Realist Approach to International Relations

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    Realism is one of the important perspectives on global politics, it is a notion about the conservative society and political philosophy (Heywood 2011: 54; Shimko 2013: 36). Besides, Gilpin (1996) claims that “realism…, it is not a scientific theory that is subject to the test of falsifiability, therefore, cannot be proved and disproved.” (Frankel 1996: xiii). The components of the realist approach to international relations will be discussed.

    Read More

  • The Impact of Liberalism on International Relations

    2018 Words  | 5 Pages

    To start, Liberalism traces its roots back to the Enlightenment period (Mingst, 2008) where many philosophers and thinkers of the time began to question the established status quo. Such as the prevailing belief in religious superstition and began to replace it with a more rational mode of thinking and a belief in the intrinsic goodness of mankind. The Enlightenment period influenced Liberalism’s belief that human beings are thinkers who are able to naturally understand the laws governing human social conduct and by understanding these laws, humans can better their condition and live in harmony with others (Mingst, 2008). Two of the most prominent Liberal Internationalists of the Enlightenment period were Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham who both thought that international relations were conducted in a brutal fashion. It was Kant who compared international relations as “the lawless state of savagery” (Baylis and Smith, 2001, pp 165). It was also Kant who believed nations could form themselves into a sort of united states and overcome international anarchy through this (Mingst, 2008). This was probably the beginning of a coherent belief in a sort of union of sovereign states. Toward the end of the seventeenth century William Penn believed a ‘diet’ (parliament) could be set up in Europe, like the European Union of today (Baylis and Smith, 2001). We can see much of this liberal thinking today in organizations such as the United Nations.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Leadership And Foreign Policy

Open Document