Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Competitive analysis of uber
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Competitive analysis of uber
Ever since the idea of Uber have been created , the near global car-hailing app, have been published in 2011, the taxi fleet's days have seemed numbered. Uber is not the only new source of competition for taxis. But, it is even another source of having extra money other than your job. The new statistics allow for an opening answer to the enormous debated question of whether Uber is merely filling the gap in an artificially under-served market,as the company claims, or whether it's army of part-time drivers is displacing full-time holder, as the taxi industry maintain. Although, Uber has not shared statistics for 2013, a leak to Business insider last year have revealed an average of 140,000 Uber trips per week in the city during December 2013. While Uber expanded approximately tenfold over the past two years, from a bit-over an estimated 300,000 rides in June 2013 to 3.5m in June 2015, yellow cabs' hail volume has fallen by 2.1m during the same period. A further indication that Uber bears significant responsibility for the drop in cab hails is that the decline is …show more content…
most pronounced in the middle of the night, when passengers place the greatest value on Uber's advantages in convenience and comfort. Medallion prices are forward-looking just like shares of companies are, and presumably reflect expectations that the bite Uber has taken out of taxi earnings is likely to grow. Analysis: This concept applies under the subject of “trade-off” Because, people have traded of their money and time with riding an Uber cab instead of a normal taxi cab. The opportunity cost is that the price is a fixed price and the total price is not very expensive. Anybody can be a driver and get extra money. Also, that the car is safe and secured. Also, the other connection between the lessons that I took that relates to this is shared profit because, Uber gives the driver 20% of the total price and 80% for the company. In addition, a profit incentive because, it made more drivers and more people get more money and by that more people were happy and wanted to work more into this type of business. The connection between this article and economics is the competition between the two sides.
The competition ends with jealousy and envious from one side. That side is the taxi companies because, they’ve been starting losing many money and firing many labors and selling some capital. Additionally, the Uber business is now one of the most famous businesses other than “Ali baba”. The article that is related to this type of article is, about how online businesses like “Ali baba”or“e-bay”. Are evolving because, people want to work more than making others work and nowdays, people think about how to get money without working much. Like, Uber people get their own personal car and drive others to their destinations instead of leaving them to taxis where they earn money. Now, people would do anything to earn money. So, any business that gives a chance to others to work in and get money they’ll do
it.
Economic because customers may choose what transportation service, if any, to use. Legal power because customers have a right to file a lawsuit against Uber if they so choose. • Taxi companies, other ride sharing companies (Lyft) have political and legal power because they may lobby government for fair competition like supporting the App-On Gap law. Legal power because they can sue companies that compete unfairly. • California App-Based Drivers Association, American Insurance Association, the public, attorneys for consumers, the Government, and internet based companies all have political power because they can network or work together in groups to lobby, present arguments for and publically support proposed legislation like the App-On Gap law.
In 2007, Harley Davidson was the world’s most profitable motorcycle company. They had just released great earnings and committed to achieve earnings per share growth of 11-17% for each of the next three years. Their CEO of 37 years, James Ziemer, knew this would be an extremely difficult task seeing Harley’s domestic market share recently top off at just under 50%. The domestic market was where Harley’s achieved the most growth over the past 20 years and with it leveling off, where was Harley going to get the 11-17% was the million dollar question.
The reaction and effectiveness of this poster might have been different in today’s society because Americans take full advantage of carpooling. The creation of Uber and Lyft are methods Americans use to carpool. This poster marked the beginning of a new tradition in American culture. Carpooling since 1945 has been a method to save gas and money. Overall during my analysis, I was able to put myself in the mindset of an American citizen during this time period. In today’s society, this poster would be effective to Americans including myself because we actually take advantage of carpooling in our daily
He shows that he is contemplative by letting us know that thought long and hard about this topic and that he has done his research prior to writing this article. The assertive tone is brought into this paper when we realize that Clark shows the readers his confidence on his stance throughout the article. He makes certain that the readers know his authority and that he will not back down on his belief that the L. A’s bike-share system is
Have you ever felt stuck? Wherever you are, it’s the absolute last place you want to be. In the book Into the Wild, Chris McCandless feels stuck just like the average everyday person may feel. Chris finds his escape plan to the situation and feels he will free himself by going off to the wild. I agree with the author that Chris McCandless wasn’t a crazy person, a sociopath, or an outcast because he got along with many people very well, but he did seem somewhat incompetent, even though he survived for quite some time.
Jonathan Kay’s “Fare Share” has many weaknesses that make his argument not effective when writing his article. Kay’s argument talks about how Uber is stealing taxi drivers of their livelihoods and how Uber is taking over the taxi monopoly. Weaknesses found in this article was when Jonathan Kay makes Uber look bad when talking about their flashy app which seems to kind of promote it even more, and with a little more research he can find other taxi apps. To add on he seems to write it very tongue-in-cheek. Furthermore, Kay also lacks evidence to support what he says because some of his arguments are weak and basic. Another weakness would be that he left the reader wondering what he is trying to prove in his argument about Uber, he seems to be all over the place with his argument. Overall, this was a weakly written article.
Privatizing the public transport is not a good idea but it will help to improve the city transport much better and convenience to the public. The downside of this solution is rider fare will increase frequently, but the city can regulate competition between privatized in order to keep prices down for consumers while the city can save more and also people can get much better transportation
Some companies in the industry seems to be worrying about the demand for freight, but most companies have the problem of finding drivers to accommodate the growing demand for drivers. There are analysis out there that think the shortage could grow to some 150,000 drivers over the next few years. The best strategy to solving this problem could be to give driver a more competitive salary and better benefits.
After 2020, though EV will be more popular compared to traditional vehicles, fiercer market competition can affect the growth of Tesla’s
Overall, both Los Angeles and New York City realize that public transportation is lacking and are working to improve it slowly. Funding seems to be the main issue for both cities, which is why strategic and innovative planning is necessary for taking any steps toward major improvement.
IT has provided the tools that have enabled companies to simplify their processes, and when done right, allowing them to greatly improve customer experience, which is part of what should lead to profitability. But, as the tools become more accessible and affordable, small businesses and start-ups are able to compete with bigger, established corporations. This, in my opinion, leads to too many players in the field. So companies, big and small, have to find ways to differentiate themselves from the competition. This is where the challenge of innovation comes in. As companies research and develop their products and services, the innovations that arise from that will either be sustaining or disruptive. When a disruptive innovation comes along, it creates a new market, and although profits will most likely be low in the beginning, once it’s adopted by the mainstream, it will overtake the existing market. In the same manner, established (old) business models can be infused with new life, even becoming disruptive, with the application of new innovative technologies. Uber is a perfect example of how a company applied the innovations in information technology to create a disruptive strategy that is redefining an old business model. Apple has become the model company for how to successfully employ disruption in a business strategy in the long-term. Not only did Apple disrupt the music industry with iTunes and the iPod, but they self-disrupted with the iPhone, and how its sales have overtaken the
There are a lot of positive reports about the benefits working for Uber has compared to working for a taxi company. Cab drivers have to pay exponential rates to lease cabs; Uber drivers have the freedom to drive cars they own. Many former cab drivers have switched to Uber due to the personal financial benefits (“Uber isn’t Just Good For…”). There have been some reports of inappropriate
There must be an optimal amount of drivers for Uber to effectively operate. A shortage of drivers would cause Uber’s renowned convenience and speed factor to dissipate due to longer wait times for rides. This weakness needs to be overcome to pursue opportunities, and requires that proper incentive and promotion is required to ensure a decent quantity of drivers before entry into Canada.
In fact, during the year ended December 31, 2012, Tesla recognized total revenues of $413.3 million, an increase of 102% over total revenues of $204.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Automotive sales revenue of $385.7 million increased 160% from the year ended December 31, 2011, driven mainly by commencement of Model S deliveries in North America. (Tesla Annual Repor, Exhibit) As a matter of fact, new products had been proved to have a direct relationship with increases in net sales. In addition, by 2014, with the innovative dual motor all-wheel drive system, Model X being introduced, and the intent to develop the third generation electric vehicle which will be produced at higher volume at a lower price. We expect a minimum 25% increase in net sales from new products alone by 2015.
Economies thrive on the ability of mobility. Mobility allows people to go to work, attend school and travel far and wide by using some form of transportation. It allows people and ideas to mix more freely. Over time, mobility has taken many forms, from the backs of animals, to carriages and now the automobile. Since the invention of the automobile, we have been able to decrease transportation costs, travel vast distances and decrease travel times. We are able to facilitate relationships, foster trade between places and find better jobs. However, due to the inaccurate pricing of the roads, driving cars has turned from an innovation to pure frustration. The problem is traffic congestion; the increased usage of cars has created slower speeds and longer travel times due to greater demand for the road than the road has to offer. Roughly 3.4 million Americans endure extreme commutes, in which the trip to work and back eats up at least three hours of each day (Balaker, Staley 2006). Congestion slows life down by causing massive delays, eating away at valuable time and productivity. This has become a major issue because people are stuck in traffic when they do not need to be and conditions will only continue to get worse without government intervention. Many solutions have been offered and discussed but few have been implemented. This paper will serve to outline the economic theory behind traffic congestion, alternative policy options there are for dealing with traffic congestion and ultimately what the best strategy is to solve this problem. The solution I propose is to price the highways accurately to achieve the optimum number of vehicles on the road.