Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of analysing poetry
Theories of analysing poetry
Theories of analysing poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of analysing poetry
1. What metaphors did you use, and of all the possible choices, why did you use these metaphors? At least two metaphors must be used, and no more than three may be used.
The metaphors I used were, “Our friendship was a beautiful necklace of pearls” and “Your lies were the yellow pearls in our necklace.” I used these two metaphors because I wanted to tell a story about how a friendship was once beautiful, but then turned awful. Out of all the metaphors I could have done with these two objects, these two metaphors conveyed my message in the clearest way and in a way that gave the poem rhythm.
2. How did you use them in the poem? Explain what the metaphors represent, and comment on how the use of the metaphor works.
The metaphors I used represent a friendship that was once beautiful like a necklace of pearls. However, later on one of the friends could not be trusted anymore. This caused the pearls in the necklace to turn yellow, which is what actually happens to pearls when they become dry and lose moisture. Thus, these metaphors work in the poem because they represent the story being told in an interesting way since they let the reader view the story in a different point of view. The readers can see it as a beautiful necklace with white, shiny pearls, which represents a
…show more content…
There is not one specific lie that drives the poem, instead there are several. The lie’s mentioned in the poem are about a friend lying to another friend about how they can be trusted and that all their secrets are safe with them as well as a lie about how pretty the other friend is. Overall, the story inside the poem is about a friendship that was once beautiful like a necklace of pearls. However, later on one of the friends finds out the other friend has been lying to them the whole time and this causes the pearls in the necklace to turn yellow, thus also causing the necklace, which represents the friendship, to turn
Both poems are set in the past, and both fathers are manual labourers, which the poets admired as a child. Both poems indicate intense change in their fathers lives, that affected the poet in a drastic way. Role reversal between father and son is evident, and a change of emotion is present. These are some of the re-occurring themes in both poems. Both poems in effect deal with the loss of a loved one; whether it be physically or mentally.
In this poem called “Creatures” by the author Billy Collins there is a literary device called a metaphor when the reader is reading this poem. A metaphor is a comparison of two unlike things without using the words like or as. In lines one (1) through...
When writing poetry, there are many descriptive methods an author may employ to communicate an idea or concept to their audience. One of the more effective methods that authors often use is linking devices, such as metaphors and similes. Throughout “The Elder Sister,” Olds uses linking devices effectively in many ways. An effective image Olds uses is that of “the pressure of Mother’s muscles on her brain,” (5) providing a link to the mother’s expectations for her children. She also uses images of water and fluidity to demonstrate the natural progression of a child into womanhood. Another image is that of the speaker’s elder sister as a metaphorical shield, the one who protected her from the mental strain inflicted by their mother.
A good example would be when the mother in the story talks about her life using a metaphor of a staircase. In the beginning of the poem, the mother says, "Well, son, I’ll tell you: Life for me ain’t been no crystal stair. It’s had tacks in it, And splinters, [...] But all the time, I’se been a-climbin’ on" (Hughes lines 1-9). This metaphor describes the mother's life experience, the reader can infer was hard, but the nice part of this excerpt is the final lines, where the metaphor of continuing to climb on the staircase is used to symbolize the mother's goal to persevere, no matter how tough life gets because she believes her efforts will accomplish something good.
Figurative Language in used throughout poems so the reader can develop a further understanding of the text. In “The Journey” the author uses rhythm and metaphors throughout the poem. “...as you left their voices behind, the stars began to burn through the sheets of the clouds..”(25-27). The author compares the star burning to finding your voice. Rhythm also develops the theme of the poem because throughout the story rhythm is presented as happy showing growing up and changing for the better is necessary and cheerful. In “The Laughing Heart” the author uses imagery and metaphors to develop the theme throughout the book. “There is a light somewhere. It may not be much light but it beats the darkness”(5-7). Always find the good out of everything, even it
Vladek and Guido use their skills and intelligence to endure a genocide that killed over 6 million Jews and 11 million people in total. Although sadly Guido did not make it through the Holocaust, his wife Dora and Son Giosué survived, thanks to the help of Guido. Vladek survived by using his many talents in the prison camps whereas Guido survived by his cunning intelligence and positive attitude. In the Books Maus I and II by Art Spiegelman, the author uses his fathers story of survival to create a book that unleashes vivid imagery of Vladeks time in Auschwitz, in addition to how it has affected him since. In the movie Life Is Beautiful Directed by Roberto Benigni, Guido was an average Jewish man living in Italy. When his family got taken to a Natzi death camp he managed to keep his son Giosué hidden, while doing so he jeopardized his own life. Both of these works display two brave men withstanding the worst race extermination in history.
Throughout Elizabeth Winthrop’s short story, “The Golden Darters,” are symbols of how Emily, the main character, is growing up. The most obvious symbols are Emily piercing her ears, her father’s table where he works on the flies, and the golden darters.
... overall themes, and the use of flashbacks. Both of the boys in these two poems reminisce on a past experience that they remember with their fathers. With both poems possessing strong sentimental tones, readers are shown how much of an impact a father can have on a child’s life. Clearly the two main characters experience very different past relationships with their fathers, but in the end they both come to realize the importance of having a father figure in their lives and how their experiences have impacted their futures.
Phrase like “stink like rotten meat” and “or crust and sugar over like a syrupy sweet” are remarkable examples of figures of speech because their use in not a literal sense yet they give you the depiction as what he means by each line. ‘Fester like sore” would also fit under this category. Fester, being the visual word, provokes images of pus and irritating, the whole phrase plays huge part as to contributing to the descriptions of the texture and visual of the sore or what the sore represents (the dream) also the understanding of the poem. Both the imagery and figure of speech forms used were intense yet simple enough to give the poem a lighter, not too serious feel than maybe some of Langston’s other works but still just as substantial if not
In the first stanza, “one leaned on the other as if to throw her down” symbolism has been used to show the intensity of the embrace between the two. In stanza two, “and finally almost uprooted him” symbolism has been used to show how much the female dominates in this relationship. “He was thin, dry, insecure one” this symbolized that the male did not have much power nor say in the relationship.
A metaphor, depending on its construction, can pack a powerful punch. Metaphors use comparison, but are not the same thing as similes. Metaphors make comparisons by saying that one thing is another, and by doing so, having a different meaning than what is said. An example of this comes from the poem, from lines 85 and 86, “And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker, And in short, I was afraid.” The eternal footman is a metaphor for death. By saying he has seen the eternal Footman hold his coat, and snicker, he is saying that he is close to death, he knows that it is close to his time to go and he knows that death is waiting on him. By saying he is afraid, he means he is afraid to die. Another example of a metaphor from lines 124 and 125 is, “I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think that they will sing to me.” By saying this, the speaker is saying that he has heard the mermaids singing, heard them singing to each other, calling each other home. By saying that he does not think they will sing to him, does not think that they will call him home, tell him it is his time to die. Another example of metaphor,coming from lines 129, 130, and 131 is,“We have lingered in the chambers of the sea By sea girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown Til human voices wake us, and we drown.” He is saying that he has spent too much time lingering on death, he had lost all track of time. He does not know what is going on, he is confused, he has let his fear of death take over his life. By the time he realizes he has let his life pass him by, by the time he wakes up, it is too late. He drowns in his sorrow, and dies. This could be the meaning. It could be because it sounds like there is supposed to be more, like the poem is supposed to continue, but it doesn’t. It just stops. “Til human voices wake us, and we drown.” is
Throughout history, poets had experimented with different forms of figurative language. Figurative language allows a poet to express his or her meaning within a poem. The beauty of using the various forms of figurative language is the ability to convey deep meaning in a condensed fashion. There are many different figures of speech that a poet can use such as: simile, paradox, metaphor, alliteration, and anaphora. These examples only represent a fraction of the different forms, but are amongst the most well-known. The use of anaphora in a poem, by a poet, is one of the best ways to apply weight or emphasis on a particular segment. Not only does an anaphora place emphasis, but it can also aid in setting the tone, or over all “feel” a reader receives from a poem. Poets such as Walt Whitman, Conrad Aiken, and Frances Osgood provide poems that show how the use of anaphora can effect unity, feeling, and structure of a poem.
In the poem “A song of Despair” Pablo Neruda chronicles the reminiscence of a love between two characters, with the perspective of the speaker being shown in which the changes in their relationship from once fruitful to a now broken and finished past was shown. From this Neruda attempts to showcase the significance of contrasting imagery to demonstrate the Speaker’s various emotions felt throughout experience. This contrasting imagery specifically develops the reader’s understanding of abandonment, sadness, change, and memory. The significant features Neruda uses to accomplish this include: similes, nautical imagery, floral imagery, and apostrophe.
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
As I did research on how others interpreted the story, the same conclusion would pop up. The necklace was used as a symbol of higher class of wealth. We use symbolic items to try and fit into societies belief of “fancy”. The deeper meaning is within the true value of the necklace. It is a fake just as she is! She is trying to be something she is not and ends up losing the necklace which holds a false value as well. This is why a person should not take everything as it