Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of fair value accounting
Is fair value accounting really fair
Controversy of fair value accounting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of fair value accounting
“From the accountants’ perspective, what does ‘true and fair’ mean? In your opinion, is the true and fair requirements useful, or necessary?”
Accounting is the measurement procedure and communication of financial information (Needles and Powers 2013) that allows companies to report on the economic performance of their business. It is these reports which bring the concept of ‘true and fair’ into play. True and fair is a central concept related with the use of Financial Reporting Standards and the conceptual framework in keeping financial reports standardized and reliable for the users, namely shareholders and investors (Waqas 2013). Fair value accounting as viewed by a large percentage of specialists and academics has been considered a ‘revolutionary approach’ to support shareholders throughout the decision making process as it represents the current market value of an economic asset or liability (Kaya 2013). Although some have applauded the power of true and fair value, contenders have highlighted the substantial absence of consistency, thus valuing historical cost as a complete structure built of solid foundations.
‘True’ relates to the reliability and the consistency of information enclosed within financial reports. The truthfulness indicates that all the figures and numbers quoted are precise or close to being accurate based upon the financial reporter’s understanding of the situation (Miller & Bahnson 2007). Numbers are generally rounded to make the reporting of the financial positions uncomplicated, yet these numbers must be by and largely spot-on. They do not solely include cash transactions but also the value of assets (REFERNCE).
According to the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 13 ‘fair value’ is def...
... middle of paper ...
...hnson P R, 2007,’Refining Fair Value Measurement’ Journal of Accountancy vol 204 Issue 5 p.30-6 (accessed 22-03-14)
McCollum T, 2009,’IASB Amends Fair-value requirements’ International Auditor April 2009 Vol.66 Issue 2, p14 (accessed 22-03-14)
Needles B E, Powers M 2013,’Principles of Financial Accounting’ Financial Accounting Series 12th edition, Cengage Learning (Accessed 19-03-14)
Penman S H, 2007,’Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or minus?’ Accounting & Business Research (Wolters Kluwer UK) Special Issue p.33-43
Skoda M, 2012,’How Appraisers Develop Fair Value’ Annals of the University of Petrosani Economics 2012 vol.12 issue 2, p.273-284
Waqas A, 2013, ‘Analysis of Factors Present in Financial Reporting Standards Leading to Manipulate True & Fair View of an Entity’s Financial Statements’ Social Science Electronic Publishing 2014, KPMG p.1
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1985). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86. Norwalk. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&blobwhere=1175820922177&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername2=Content-Length&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue2=189998&blobheadervalue1=filename%3Dfas86.pdf&blobcol=url
Siegel Ph.D. CPA, Joel G.; Shim Ph.D., Jae K. (2010-02-01). Dictionary of Accounting Terms (Barron's Dictionary of Accounting Terms) (p. 129). Barron's Educational Series. Kindle Edition.
Integrity in the accounting profession involves adhering to the rules and principles of the profession. This includes remaining free of conflicts of interest and maintaining client relationships in which the accountant can remain objective in discharging his or her responsibilities. This requires independence in fact and in appearance as mandated under section 1.200.001.01, Independence Rule the AICPA Code. In other words, no one should be able to view the accountant as being biased with respect to a client’s financial reporting due to an improper client relationship. Lack of integrity in accounting practices has been, and continues to be, a key element in the downfall of many institutions which has hurt the public trust in the accounting
According to the conceptual framework, the potential users of financial statements are investors, creditors, suppliers, employees, customers, governments and agencies, and the general public (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). The primary users are investors, creditors, and those who advise them. It goes on to define the criteria that make up each potential user, as well as, the limitations of financial reporting. The FASB explicitly states that financial reporting is “but one source of information needed by those who make investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions. Users also need to consider pertinent information from other sources, and be aware of the characteristics and limitations of the information in them” (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). With this in mind, it is still particularly difficult to determine whom the financials should be catered towards and what level of prudence is necessary for quality judgment.
Until late 2002, financial reporting standards (FRS) in New Zealand were developed based on a sector neutral approach. This meant a single set of accounting standards were applied to all entities regardless of which sector they were operating in. This was achievable because when FRS was created, the financial reporting standards board (FRSB) took into account that entities in the public sector, not-for-profit sector and private sector would be applying these standards. This included having to think about a broad range of transactions, different reasons for carrying out transactions, the readers of financial statements for all sectors, and the information that those readers needed (Brady, 2009). Not only did FRS account for the range of entities that would be applying the standards but it was also written in a language that was appropriate and made sense for all entities in each sector (Brady, 2009). However, since the decision to
Marshall, M.H., McManus, W.W., Viele, V.F. (2003). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
The hierarchy of fair value consists of three level, and level one is considered as the highest level. Level one is Price traded that are unmodified within the active markets for assets or liabilities which correspond to the entity so that the Commission could find them at the measurement date. The second level is an inputs with different prices from included in the first level one, where they are through which assets and liabilities are monitoring a straightforward manner and are (prices) or indirectly and is (derivatives prices). The third level is the unobservable inputs for the asset or
The ‘deficient standards gap’ refers to situations when the auditors are not required by the standards to report certain issues, whilst its counterpart refers to situations when auditors have not complied with the existing standards. This dissection is particularly important when I look at each of the problems separately later on and look for the respective solutions. The beginning Since the early 1970s, the auditing profession has been under increased pressure and scrutiny by government and users of audit reports. The phrase, ‘Audit Expectations Gap’ was first coined when the AICPA put the Cohen Commission together in 1974 to investigate whether the ‘expectations gap’ existed. However, the history of the expectation gap goes right back to the start of company auditing in the nineteenth century (Humphrey and Turley 1992).
(i) Judgement and materiality play a significant role in helping to ensure that the selection of accounting policies in presenting the financial statements for a true and fair picture of the company’s financials. This means that entities should provide the financial statements with comparability, consistency and clarity to users of these statements. Entities must follow accounting policies required by IFRS and AASB should be relevant to particular circumstance.
Professional judgement is a necessary skill for preparers, auditors and regulators of financial statements to have. A professional accountant with good judgement will be able to serve the needs of businesses, the public and investors in the best way possible. Principle-based accounting will help preparers and auditors make and document significant accounting judgement. Guidance is also provided for regulators involved in assessing key judgements, and recommendations are made for standard setters in maintaining and producing principle-based standards which provide the scope for professional judgement. The framework is intended for different sized companies. The audit committees have a key role in challenging initial judgements. They speak to the auditors and make recommendations to approve key judgements. As business transactions become more complex, the validity and usefulness of financial reporting relies on good judgement to be made. We believe that a professional judgement reinforces the quality and integrity of the judgements made and also trust in the operation of principle-based financial
In the case of Level 3 fair value estimates, managers have private information concerning appropriate values underlying economic value of items in the financial statements. This organization’s information creates two different problems, moral risk and adverse selection. Also in the more realistic setting, neither the balance sheet and income statement reflects fully all fair value relevant information although management discretion can reduce from its relevance. The risks of fair value accounting disclose no basis for recognizing income but realized gains and losses. While the concept of core earnings may provide value relevant information to financial statement users, the concepts of earnings and fair values have no correlation (Barth & Landsman,
Marshall, D., McManus, W., & Viele, D. (2004). Accounting: What the numbers mean. [University of Phoenix Custom Edition e-text]. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
In the Summary of Statement No. 157, FASB says the conclusions of fair value measurements follow these parts of the Conceptual Framework: No. 1 Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprise, No. 2 Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information, No. 6 Elements of Financial Statements, No. 7 Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurement (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006, para. 12). Both the U.S. GAAP and IFRS adhere to Objective No. 1 in that they are striving to provide an increase in the disclosure, recognition, and presentation to the end users of financial statements. Even though some individuals may feel that the fair value measurement creates volatility with reporting statements, the
The Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) defined conceptual framework as a consistent of underlying concepts and the ideas that describe the nature and general purpose of financial reporting which may lead to consistent standard in accounting (Deegan 2010). The role of the conceptual framework is to ensure that financial statements in accounting are free from bias and to provide useful information that is useful for user’s decision making. The standard-setting board also formulated a range of perceptions and theories related to accounting to trigger the objectives of financial reporting. The standard-setting board keeps issuing the conceptual framework over time to ensure that the conceptual framework’s objectives are improving to provide useful financial information. The innovative work on conceptual framework was embraced in the United States by the FASB in the early 1970s. The FASB accomplished disappointment in attempting to generate a standard that at the outset might not appear to present, especially testing theoretical issues. Regardless, while attempting to achieve concession on Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, tending to the theoretical issues produced critical matter for the board members. In this manner, throughout the outset the FASB understood the requirement for an obvious conceptual framework. Based on Hines’s argument, the conceptual framework is mean to provide the ability to increase self-regulate of a profession in order to neutralizing government interference from arising. Whether this argument has been accepted or not will be discussed in more detail with supported evidence to clarify the main point about Hines’s argument. Further details about this argument will discuss below.
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.