Impact of IFRS on sector neutrality and public sector in New Zealand Until late 2002, financial reporting standards (FRS) in New Zealand were developed based on a sector neutral approach. This meant a single set of accounting standards were applied to all entities regardless of which sector they were operating in. This was achievable because when FRS was created, the financial reporting standards board (FRSB) took into account that entities in the public sector, not-for-profit sector and private sector would be applying these standards. This included having to think about a broad range of transactions, different reasons for carrying out transactions, the readers of financial statements for all sectors, and the information that those readers needed (Brady, 2009). Not only did FRS account for the range of entities that would be applying the standards but it was also written in a language that was appropriate and made sense for all entities in each sector (Brady, 2009). However, since the decision to …show more content…
This meant that communication amongst those drafting the standards and those affected by the standards could easily exchange information (Devonport & van Zijl, 2010). Devonport & van Zijl (2010) outlined some advantages of having sector neutral accounting standards including, a strong accounting connection between the public and private sectors and the transition between the two sectors would be easier for professional accountants. Although the adoption of IFRS has caused New Zealand to slowly move away from sector neutral accounting standards because it was proven to be too difficult in adapting IFRS to make them sector neutral; Bradbury & Baskerville (2007) conclude that considering public sector issues can result in a set of standards being more robust and hopes that this value is not lost even when sector neutral standards are
The goal of the Codification is to simplify the organization of thousands of authoritative U.S. accounting pronouncements issued by multiple standard-setters. To achieve this goal, the FASB initiated a project to integrate and topically organize all relevant accounting pronouncements issued by the U.S. standard-setters including those of the FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
John Cage has always been known as a controversial and new age composer. Some say that his pieces lack the very structure that makeup classic forms. I argue that John Cage’s work Living Room Music, despite instrumentation with no set pitch, has conclusive harmonies and is in the style of a Baroque suite. This is a strange concept for some because pitch has become such a focal point around harmonic analysis when in reality it can be determined simply by ensemble texture and dominate features.
One of the most debatable topics in the accounting industry today is the extent in which we should make the financial statements understandable to the general population. The FASB currently gears its reporting standards toward...
The effectiveness of tax auditing means that the tax auditors had performed an effective work without any impact on the tax payers. There are five factors that considered as the determinants for the effectiveness of tax auditing, which are audit quality, management support, organizational setting, attributes of the audited party and organizational independence. The tax audit effectiveness also refer to the ability and capability of a tax audit to provide useful findings of auditing and recommendations which would attracted the management’s interest. The management that support with resources and implement the recommendations of tax audit is essential for reaching the tax audit effectiveness. Besides, the organizational setting in operations
A consolidated financial statement can be defined as the financial statements of a parent and its subsidiaries combined to form a single economic entity (AASB 10, 2011). The entity, which acquires the other entity, is known as the parent and the entity, which has been acquired, is known as the subsidiary. Consolidation financial reports arise when one entity purchases another entity, to then form a group.
Managerial accounting has changed over the years. Managerial accounting focuses on more than the financial aspect. We will be looking at how managerial accounting affects the business world today. Business also look to the economy, federal taxes, and the financial market so it can make the best decisions for their business.
The New Zealand (NZ) Framework for Financial Reporting is in the process of changing since 2009, as a result of the review of the statutory reporting requirements in New Zealand by Ministry of Economic Development (MED) and the Accounting Standard Review Board (ASRB). The mainly recommendation was to remove small and medium sized companies from the statutory reporting framework (Ernst & Young, 2013, p.11). This New Zealand Framework for Financial Reporting 2010 (NZ Framework) was issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board of the External Reporting Board (XRB) in 2011. The changes of framework pull open the NZ financial reporting standards that comprise NZ Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP) setting movement from ‘rule-based’ approach to ‘principle-based’ approach. Then comes to the question: Whether the application of NZ GAAP is supported positively by the NZ Framework with the appropriate underlying principles, or it preserved a largely ‘rule-driven’ approach? From my perspective, NZ Framework provides parts of applicable underlying principles in guidance of NZ GAAP but there are rooms for improvement.
Cardinal virtues and ethics have long standing relationship with each other. They are “Two sides of a coin” and highly dependent on each other for the purposes of effective corporate governance. Accounting ethics is no exception to the cardinal virtues and they are embedded in APES 110, code designed for the accountants and includes guidelines for members in the public practice as well as for members in business. This assignment analyses the application of cardinal virtues in alignment with fundamental principles of APES110 Code of Accounting ethics with relevant examples and discusses the specific sections where cardinal virtues are applied in relation to the examples. Virtues are those character traits that dispose a person to act ethically
Positive accounting theory is arguably an explanatory of accounting practice; economic based theory. RL Watts and JL Zimmerman developed positive accounting theory in 1980s at the William E School of Administration at the Rochester University. People do not know what they want at times. So there are different options available to accountants. There are some logical facts to choose one specific method. On choosing one specific method, accountants will maximize their own benefit first, and then company benefit, shareholder benefit and at last social benefits. A specific method will allow accountants to feel better to do their work as they like them the way they know and they way they are best at doing (Jayne Godfrey). For instance, accountant will write accumulated depreciation on asset value side for big company whereas when a poor balance sheet, it is better to put accumulated depreciation on credit side, so the company will have extra money in their debit (Ken Leo, John Hoggett, 2012). Accountants will use choice of accounting method depending on the situation. Positive accounting theory consists of different types of hypothesis such as bonus plan, political cost and debt hypothesis, which allow the managers to choose one specific method over another. It is accountants’ theory and it is descriptive and accountants will tell what to record.
The globalization of business has resulted in the need for compatible accounting standards that can be used internationally for financial reporting. As a result, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to unify the various financial reporting methods and create a single accounting standard which can be applied to any financial statement worldwide (Byatt). The global standardization of financial reporting will increase the readability and enhance comparability of globally traded companies’ financial statements, without the need of conversion or translation. There are a few main differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S GAAP). The increasing recognition and acceptance of the International Financial Reporting Standards by accounting professionals in the United States, will affect the way in which the U.S will record financial statements in the future.
The accounting cycle is a series of steps starting with recording business transactions and leading up to the preparation of financial statements. This financial process demonstrates the purpose of financial accounting–to create useful financial information in the form of general-purpose financial statements. In other words, the sole purpose of recording transactions and keeping track of expenses and revenues is turn this data into meaning financial information by presenting it in the form of a balance sheet, income statement, statement of owner’s equity, and statement of cash flows.
Accounting dates back as far as first centuries, is the language of business. As everything has gone through many changes, accounting has also changed many times through out the centuries. It went from the use of abacus to the most advanced softwares, and computers. With these drastic improvements nowadays accounting, financial accounting and management are facing big challenges. From the presentation of the reports to communication to the users, investors, and owners, the accounting field has gained totally a new shape from two decades ago. Today with the dynamic change in every aspect of life, the accounting field has to act fast and be able to adapt these new changes and challenges in order to survive.
The Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) defined conceptual framework as a consistent of underlying concepts and the ideas that describe the nature and general purpose of financial reporting which may lead to consistent standard in accounting (Deegan 2010). The role of the conceptual framework is to ensure that financial statements in accounting are free from bias and to provide useful information that is useful for user’s decision making. The standard-setting board also formulated a range of perceptions and theories related to accounting to trigger the objectives of financial reporting. The standard-setting board keeps issuing the conceptual framework over time to ensure that the conceptual framework’s objectives are improving to provide useful financial information. The innovative work on conceptual framework was embraced in the United States by the FASB in the early 1970s. The FASB accomplished disappointment in attempting to generate a standard that at the outset might not appear to present, especially testing theoretical issues. Regardless, while attempting to achieve concession on Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, tending to the theoretical issues produced critical matter for the board members. In this manner, throughout the outset the FASB understood the requirement for an obvious conceptual framework. Based on Hines’s argument, the conceptual framework is mean to provide the ability to increase self-regulate of a profession in order to neutralizing government interference from arising. Whether this argument has been accepted or not will be discussed in more detail with supported evidence to clarify the main point about Hines’s argument. Further details about this argument will discuss below.
Accounting aids the government and organisations in decision making for their financial stability. This numerical data helps solve real life problems and contributes to how the economy and businesses perform.
Modern information system is now popular all over the world, it also change the accounting area. Instead of the old manual analysis, many companies making effort in developing a fitted accounting information system for themselves, as they realize the advantages that the new technology brings in - more efficient and accurate in processing, integrated data, detailed record etc. However, even though there are so many benefits, the functional system also brings challenges, making new requirements to the accountants and auditors. This paper will discuss the impact of technology to the accounting information system, as well as the necessary capability ethics that the accountants should learn in this 21th century.