Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My personal experience in cross-cultural communication
Insights into the ways in which culture influences communication
Impact of organization culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fons Trompenaars developed 'The Seven Dimensions of Culture', a model that gives scope into different cultures and why they are different (Trompenaars, 1993). This framework was chosen as it is a highly relevant theory that allows people to understand different cultures to reduce misunderstandings and allow us to work more effectively. Trompenaars found that cultures differ in very specific and predictable ways, and aren't just randomly different. But that cultures each have specific ways of thinking, values, beliefs and preferences for different factors (Trompenaars, 1993). To identify what distinguishes different cultures from each other Trompenaars developed seven dimensions of culture. Depending on where these different cultures fall …show more content…
They typically place rules before relationships but they try to deal fairly with people based on these rules (Trompenaars, 1993). The U.S. is typically a universalist culture.
• Particularism is the opposite where people dictate the rules they live by based on circumstances and relationships (Trompenaars, 1993). They consider what is happening at the moment, and whose involved and make their decisions based on this (Trompenaars, 1993). Russia, Latin-America and China are typically have particularistic cultures
2. Individualism vs Commmunitarianism
• Individualism is when people believe that must take care of themselves through making their own decisions. They also believe in personal freedom and achievement (Trompenaars, 1993). Countries whose culture are typically individualistic are the U.S., Australia and the UK.
• Commmunitarianism is where people find the group more important than the individuals. Loyalty is used in exchange for help and safety. The group is always placed before the individuals (Trompenaars, 1993). Communitarian cultures include Africa, Japan and Latin-America.
3. Specific vs
…show more content…
They very much value staying on schedule and have the 'time is money' attitude, if their schedule is thrown off they don’t appreciate it (Trompenaars, 1993). Cultures typical of this are Germany, the U.K. and the U.S.
• Synchronous time is when people do not plan as much and like to see the past, present and future interwoven. They view plans and commitments as flexible and like to work on several projects at once (Trompenaars, 1993). Japan, Argentina and Mexico are cultures that have this characteristic.
7. Internal Direction vs Outer Direction
• The belief that people can control their environment to achieve goals is known as internal direction. Teams within organisations are also included in this (Trompenaars, 1993). Cultures with this characteristic include the U.S., Australia and the U.K.
• Outer Direction is when people believe that their environment controls them. They believe in order to achieve goals they must work with the environment. They focus their actions on others and like to avoid conflict. They often need reassurance that they're doing a good job (Trompenaars, 1993). China, Russia and Saudi Arabia are examples of cultures they display this
Conventionalism is the only view of ethical relativism that grounds morality in the group or culture. Pojman states that conventionalists focus on the morality of their own culture, and do not need to concentrate on the culture of others. For example, a young individual in the United States who was raised in a certain religion, and chooses to have premarital sex. In the eyes of their religion they are wrong for their decision, but in the open-minded attitude of the U.
When you think of the word “culture” what comes to mind? Many elements can contribute to
The next communication gap concerns with the individualism- collectivism dimension, which is the degree an individual is integrated into groups in a society (Hofstede, 2001). Individualistic cultures like the U.S put a strong emphasis on individual autonomy and independence, whereas collectivist cultures like Vietnam believe in belonging, obligation
“Individualistic cultures, in the western-hemisphere, [such as the United States,] emphasize… personal identity and self-determination. Conformity is far less pervasive in individualistic societies because democratic choices and laissez-faire viewpoints are somewhat considered.”
Individualism and collectivism are conflicting beliefs with the nature of humans, society, and the relationships between them, however, these ideologies are not diametrically opposing since both are essential towards balancing beliefs from becoming extremes. The first source represents the idea of collectivism and suggests that the society must focus on moving their viewpoint from ‘me’ into ‘we’ in the interest of survival and progression. This perspective presents the idea that the individual’s advantage belongs not only to the person, but to the group or society of which he or she is a part of, and that the individual’s values and goals are for the group’s “greater good.” Likewise, Karl Marx’s principle of communism emphasizes in the elimination
Ruth Benedict discusses her views of culture as personality-writ-large in her famous novel “Patterns of Culture”. This means that a culture is a magnification or reflection of the personalities of the people in a group. In other words, what one could say about a group of people could also be said about their culture. Benedict believes that what constitutes culture is not the material or external aspects but stems from a shared mindset, stating that “what really binds men together is their culture—the ideas and the standards they have in common,” (Benedict 1934:16). Basically, traits of a culture rely on inherent and intrinsic natural instincts. She emphasizes the notion that the individual and their broader culture share a “consistent pattern of thought and action” constantly intertwined through their principal ideals, motives, values and emotions (Benedict 1934:46). It is through this shared system of beliefs that core...
It is human nature to see those who are different and group them into distinct categories. The distinction of Individualism versus Collectivism is one that is currently being studied extensively. On one side, individualism sees individuals as the fundamental unit of a society. Individuals are supposed to be unique, independent, and most importantly, willing to put their own interests above all others. On the other hand, collectivism views the basic building block of society as social groups, stressing the interpersonal bonds between people. Collectivist values dictate that group goals and values have higher precedence than an individual’s. Due to the seemingly polar opposite nature of these ideologies, it is inevitable that they will be compared to see which is more beneficial to the country and its people. Some might point to the success of the US, an extremely individualistic country, in support of individualistic values. They will point to the freedom of choice and diversity that individualism boasts of. Others stress the flaws of the US in response, and while both sides do have their truths, the costs that come with individualistic values are too great to be ignored. Highly individualistic attitudes have caused many large scale problems which have long been identified as difficult to resolve issues. These problems include, but are not limited to, promoting aggressive acts, creating an obsession with social power, and allowing a system of injustice to be born.
Individualism in today’s society is the “belief that each person is unique, special, and a ‘basic unit of nature’.” The individualism concept puts an “emphasis on individual initiative” where people act independently of others and use self-motivation to prosper. The individualists “value privacy” over community the individual thrives to move ahead in life (U S Values).
The notion of individualism is extremely important in exercising the duty people have to cease from the...
The first basic issue confronting all societies is to define the nature of the relation between the individual and the group. This dimension is frequently labeled as individualism versus collectivism (Hofstede, 1980, 1991). In cultures at the Conservatism pole of the dimension, Schwartz (1994) noted that the person is viewed as embedded in a collectivity, finding meaning in life largely through social relationships, through identifying with the group and participating in its shared way of life. Schwartz (1999) noted that this value type emphasizes maintenance of the status quo, propriety, and restraint of actions or inclinations that might disrupt the solitary group or the traditional order. Exemplary specific values are social order, respect
Individualism regards man—every man—as an independent, sovereign entity who possesses an inalienable right to his own life, a right derived from his nature as a rational being. Individualism holds that a civilized society, or any form of association, cooperation or peaceful coexistence among men, can be achieved only on the basis of the recognition of individual rights—and that a group, as such, has no rights other than the individual rights of its members.
I observe Universalism through expectations presented by school, church, and the US Government. Attending public school gave me many examples of Universalism styled thinking, for example, standardized testing is founded on the concept that every student can take a multiple-choice test. Also, public school claims that most every student can learn through the same teaching style. Church has a similar mindset toward how the Bible is taught, where most churches practice a lecture style Sunday surmon with little variation. The most obvious example of Universalism I observe in America is our government system that holds all citizens to the same federal laws and regulations, though an argument could be made against that in the case of race
This model is made up of six different chapters, each representing a commonality found amongst all cultural groups throughout the world (Giger & Davidhizar, 2002, p. 185). For a complete cultural assessment it is important to use each of these variables to ensure not missing any important information.
Societies with a high individualism index rating show a competitive relationship amongst employees where promotions are based on an individual’s skills and where the poor performance of an individual is a cause for disciplinary action and ultimately dismissal. The commitment level in individualistic countries is higher and emphasis is on the individual training to increase competency. On the contrary, societies characterized by a low individualism index rating are based on
In the end, what we learn from this article is very realistic and logical. Furthermore, it is supported with real-life examples. Culture is ordinary, each individual has it, and it is both individual and common. It’s a result of both traditional values and an individual effort. Therefore, trying to fit it into certain sharp-edged models would be wrong.