Trent-Severn Waterway

2305 Words5 Pages

Since its inception well over a century ago, the reality of a navigable waterway that extends from Lake Ontario to Georgian Bay has been a central part of the fabric of Ontario. Constructed between 1833 and 1920, the Trent-Severn Waterway was designated to be of “national importance” in 1929 by the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and was considered to be an engineering marvel at the time. It was initially built for two specific purposes: to provide a useful watercourse that would enhance the logging industry and to provide a transportation corridor in the southern part of the system. The system currently contains 44 locks, the world’s tallest hydraulic lift lock, a marine railway, approximately 160 dams and water control structures and forty one reservoir lakes in the Haliburton Highlands that provide supplementary water to ensure that navigation levels are maintained. Geographically, it is Canada’s largest national historic site with more physical assets than any other, serving a regional population in the millions and supports the economies of more than 100 communities throughout its watershed. However, after nearly 180 years, it seems all is not well in this vast region of South-Central Ontario. The original waterway mandate, which focused purely on navigation, is now challenged to meet the expanded needs of a modern era. The TSW (Trent Severn Waterway) has always had its critics but it is now confronted by a multitude of stakeholders with sometimes diverse demands, and it’s response seems to fall short.

To begin to appreciate some of the problems, the initial mandate of the waterway and how it has been traditionally facilitated must be examined. From the beginning, the basics of the system were clear...

... middle of paper ...

...
For almost two centuries the TSW, in dealing with public pressure, has pointed to its original mandate. The concern is that in doing so it fails to recognize that increasingly, the entire waterway is an expanding recreation base, which not only requires water for navigation but also requires an equitable supply of water to support recreational uses and to maintain and enhance the natural environment. The TSW, although maintaining their original position, has over the years made provision for “new” uses of water including diverting vast amounts to white water canoeing events, water filtrations plants and increased municipal uses. Clearly times have changed and the TSW must recognize that it must adapt through not only a change of mandate but also a change of governance that would recognize and better co-ordinate the vast amount of stakeholders within the system.

Open Document