Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case of individualism versus collectivism
Case of individualism versus collectivism
Case of individualism versus collectivism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case of individualism versus collectivism
1. What is meant by: individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity/femininity, time orientation, and fatalism (locus of control)? How might each play a role influencing leadership? Individualism is characterized a person's self and moral worth and individual. It depends on political philosophy, belief system and social setting of a person. The concept of individualism may influence administration in that the authority which is more jogged around self will search for the interests that best fulfill the initiative himself/herself. Collectivism then again is the inverse of individualism. It manages political philosophy, social standpoint and belief system of a group all things considered. The goals and gathering
These negative results incorporate the gathering thinking to be lessened to the pioneer's vision. The appealing pioneers sparkle so splendidly sometimes that it influences the adherents and other colleagues driving them to smother their convictions and qualities. The pioneers with moxy, for example, cause other individuals not to have their thoughts and innovative arrangement since they figure their ideas won't be on a par with the pioneers or won't be dealt with similarly. This makes the group have less imagination in the aggregate exertion and more reliance on the pioneer's capacities and abilities alone.
7. What is transformational leadership? What are the different dimensions of transformational leadership Transformational leadership is one which concentrates on adherents, spurring them to abnormal amounts of execution, and all the while, enable devotees to build up their particular leadership potential. They change associations and change individuals. The primary component is to be a Positive Role Model. In leadership language, this is called "Glorified Influence." The pioneer fills in as a good positive example for adherents. Additionally, the pioneer is respected because she or he "stroll the discussion" as it were, the pioneer wouldn't request that adherents accomplish something that he or she wouldn't do, and the pioneer never says a particular something and does
Transformational leadership serves to improve the inspiration, morale, and employment execution of devotees through an assortment of systems; these incorporate interfacing the supporter's feeling of character and self to a venture and to the aggregate personality of the association; being a good example for adherents so as to move them and to bring their enthusiasm up in the undertaking; testing devotees to take more prominent proprietorship for their work, and understanding the qualities and shortcomings of adherents, enabling the pioneer to adjust supporters to errands that upgrade their
Transformational leadership is defined as a “process whereby a person engages with others and creates a connection that raises
Transformational leadership describes a leader moving followers beyond immediate self-interests through idealized influence (charisma), inspiration motivation, intellectual stimulation, or individualized consideration. Transformational leaders are change agents. They influence the mission and objectives to make way for a brighter future for the organization. Followers are motivated to do more than is originally expected because of their feelings of trust and respect for the leader.
Bass (1990) states that transformational leadership is identified by different patterns of behavior. Firstly , transformational leadership delivers the charisma to be a leader in order to gain respect and trust. Secondly, the characteristics of a leader show efforts to change a purpose of the transformation process and to effectively communicate. Finally, transformational leadership proposes that leaders treat employees individually to show them attention and provide them coaching and advice to show that you care about your employees. However, Wang and Howell (2010) claim that transformational leadership is in every individual.This means an individual can develop their potential to enhance their abilities and skills to improve and overcome any weaknesses. In relation to group work transformational leadership helps to grow common values and beliefs, and to inspire group members to reach their group goals. In this type of situation, leaders treat equally towards members and to make them feel comfortable. However, on occasions problems occur during team work which puts a leader into a situation to overcome the condition. For example, if one of my team members has no belief in me to lead the group, my attitude towards the group and the member will change as they have shown a lack of confidence and interest in teamwork. According to Novicevic, Harvey, Buckley, Brown & Evans (2006) explains that authentic leadership is when a leader shows their individual responsibility in what they were responsible for in their organization. Novicevic, Harvey, Buckley, Brown & Evans (2006) discusses a particular style of leadership which is the matrix of executive leadership. This style of leadership occurs when a leader has lost confidence in them self. The
Transformational leadership consists of few components which are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, management by exception and contingent rewards (Ahmad et al.,
Hypothesis: “We hypothesize that the performance of individual members in such situations is likely to be highest when the members hold both individualist and collectivist orientations toward their work” (Hollenbeck, Humphrey, Meyer, Wagner, 2012, pg. 947).
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
Transformational leadership refers to a process where the leader tends to the needs and motives of followers so that the interaction raises each to high levels of motivation and morality. The leader is a role model
Transformational Leadership is a style of leadership that has the ability to make change within an organization. This leadership style is new compared to some of the other leadership styles. This style not only changes the organization, it also can change the followers within the organization. Within Transformational leadership the leader identifies change that needs to be made and together the organization thinks of a plan that can execute the change. Support, motivation, and inspiration are key factors of this leadership style that the leader creates within the organization and amongst the followers.
According to brighthub.com, “transformational leadership encourages change through intellectual stimulation aimed at self-reflective change of values and beliefs”. Transformational leaders are not scared to discuss any challenges with their followers and will seek their followers’ help to resolves issues as they arise. For example, leaders can create an environment that encourages innovation and creativity. This will allow individuals in a group to feel as though their leadership are open to new ideas, are receptive to change and will not be discouraged from sharing their
Transformational leadership can be termed as a leadership approach that causes and alteration in people and social systems. When transformational leadership is in it's implemented in its ideal form, it creates a valuable and positive change in the followers of the leader, and the end product is developing leaders from the followers. When transformational leadership is enacted ideally, it enhances the morale, motivation and performance of the team members through some mechanisms. According to Liden et al. (2015)some of the main intrinsic characteristics of transformational leaders are the basic motivational drivers that are behind the effective behaviors of their team members.
Transformational style of leadership can have a positive effect on the group. They become role model for the team and demonstrate the standards that they expect from others. Bass (1990)
Transformational Leadership Transformational leadership is a process in which the leaders take actions to try to increase the awareness of what is right and important. As well, it is a process to raise motivational maturity and to move beyond the persons' own self-interests for the good of the school or society. These types of leaders provide others with a sense of purpose that goes beyond a simple exchange of reward. The transformational leaders, in many different and unique ways, are proactive. These leaders attempt to optimize not just performance, but development as well.
Transformational leadership strives to unite people in order to create a better future for the individuals involved as well as the organization. The only way this can be done is by reaching out to others and first establishing positive relationships. Weaknesses My first weakness as it relates to transformational leadership is showing favoritism for one follower over others.
This extra brings to another censor, the lack of abstract clearness. The transformational leadership covers an inclusive range of actions like motivation, inspiration, building trust and furthermore, this creates misunderstanding in terms of idea when compared to other leadership model, as Bryman (1992) pointed out that transformational and charismatic leadership are often measured to be equal with admiration to their abilities. The fourth is about magnitudes of transformational leadership as not obviously stated. A scientific research by Tracey and Hinkin (1998) has shown extensive connections among the measurements of transformational leadership; it notifies that the