Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious approaches to environmental ethics
Issues in the tragedy of commons
Issues in the tragedy of commons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious approaches to environmental ethics
Tragedy of the commons has affected many communities over the generations. Tragedy of the commons is when a community exploits a common resource. Tragedy of the commons is usually exploited because of self interest and greed. Most people do not realize Tragedy of the commons until the exploited resource is overused and ruined. The Lorax and easter island will be compared using these three points that go with Tragedy of the commons that are finite resources showing that our resources are not infinite, depletion of resources such as energy showing how we lose our resources when we over exploit them, and population versus resources showing how as the population increase our resources decrease.In the article The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett …show more content…
They are thinking that resources are infinite so they can keep on building heads.
In the Tragedy of the Commons article it is said that “Population, as Malthus said, naturally tends to grow... in a finite would this means that the per capita share of the world's goods must steadily decrease” (Hardin 1243). In the Lorax the population of the forest with theTruffula Trees, the population of people is very low so the exploitation of the trees is low. But when the once-ler brings all of his family to make money off the Truffula Trees so by him doing that they increase the population of the area overexploiting the common resource (Seus). Thesame
…show more content…
In easter island the population of Rapa Nui was too many which means that each family made a head for there religion depleting their resources affecting the population of the Rapa Nui (History.com Staff).In the Tragedy of the Commons article Hardin says “To live, any organism must have a source of energy” (Hardin 1243). In the lorax the pollution in the lakes made all the fish leave the area (Seus). With all the fish gone because of population what ever organism that would eat the fish for a source of energy would have to leave the area to find more food. In Easter island the Rapa Nui deplete their food resources by them exceeding the carrying capacity (History.com Staff). So as a way to get energy to survive they had to go to cannibalism as a resource for food. The Tragedy of the Commons is a less none topic that is played in everyone's life everyday. In the lorax you can see many example of this. The trees was exploited which in turn destroyed the land that was once beautiful. Easter island was also a great example. They destroyed their land for greed and religion. They also ate each other because they could not manage their land and food. In summary Tragedy of the Commons is a mental under thought that the people of the world do not
In the essay Island Civilization: A Vision for Human Occupancy of Earth , Robert Frazier Nash discusses the past and present human impact on the environment and offers solutions for the distant fourth millennium.
Although Leopold’s love of great expanses of wilderness is readily apparent, his book does not cry out in defense of particular tracts of land about to go under the axe or plow, but rather deals with the minutiae, the details, of often unnoticed plants and animals, all the little things that, in our ignorance, we have left out of our managed acreages but which must be present to add up to balanced ecosystems and a sense of quality and wholeness in the landscape.
The Lorax and Easter Island are similar and different in many ways. First of all, an obvious difference is that one is fictional and the other is reality. Even though this is true they both have a lesson to be taken away from them.
The narrator meets with Ishmael many times to better understand the cultural history of humans. According to Ishmael there are two groups of humans the “Takers” and the “Leavers”. Takers are the majority people in society and see themselves as the rulers of the worlds. The Takers feel their destiny is to dominate with the aid of advances in technology and expansed exponentially. The culture of the Takers is in a downward spiral destined to crash now it has gained all of the natural resources the plant has to offer. Ishmael feels that the culture of Takers took off with the Agricultural Revolution. Where as the Leavers choose to live life simply and follow the Nature’s populatio...
The Barbiloo bears had to leave their homes because the trees provided food for the bears. Also the birds were forced to leave after the air had become contaminated with awful gases that filled the air. The fish also played victim, the water had also been contaminated from all the toxins being thrown into the water. The Lorax and The Silent Spring tell close to the same story and have the same story. They look at what having factories, communities and, humans and what it can do in an environment without out our
of that place. Nature magazines, photographs, and films all contribute to the removal of our wild
“It is a vision, a dream, if you prefer, like Martin Luther King’s, and it means clustering on a planetary scale.” (Nash) In Historian Roderick Nash’s essay entitled “Island Civilization: A vision for Human Occupancy of Earth in the Fourth Millennium,” Nash not only proposes the ideology of Island Civilization but also challenges readers to be informed of the rights of nature. Gaining insight on the options of preservation and nature from masterminds like John Muir, Henry David Thoreau, and Wallace Stegner. Nash devises a plan of action for Earth during the fourth millennium. Realizing the illustrate of our worlds “wilderness” Nash educates on the ways in which the natural world will evolve one thousand years from now.
In the book “Collapse” written and theorized by Jared Diamond, historical societies known for their peril due to environmental and human catastrophes. Jared Diamond analyzes the root causes of failed societies and uses his knowledge to depict today’s warning signs. The main focus of this book is to present clear and undeniable evidence that human activities corrupted the environment. To prove this Diamon used past societies, modern societies, and social business societies as a foundation. The most specific and beneficial theories that Diamond analyzes would be the decline of biodiversity on Easter Island, the deforestation of the Greenland Norse, the mining mismanagements in Australia and big businesses.
It is easy to deny the reality that the state of the environment plays a large role in the survival of society. People who argue to protect and preserve it are seen as “hippies” or “tree huggers” and discarded by society. On the other hand, those who support deforestation are seen as “killing us all.” This conflict that is often portrayed on modern media is actually one that span all the way back to the beginning of civilization. Jared Diamond, recipient of the Lewis Thomas Prize and physiology professor at UCLA School of Medicine, his essay “Why do Some Societies Make Disastrous Decisions” published by Edge on April 26, 2003, argues exactly how societies can doom themselves. Diamond creates his own roadmap as to how and why problems occur. He shows the various ways of how a problem may arise and be
... harvest fruits and berries and grains from the island. This will supplement the food that can be grown and harvested on the island. Everyone on the island will share the food available equally. If a point comes where there is more food than what the people can eat, at that point we will dry grains, fruit, and vegetables for use later. Even meat can be thinly sliced and smoked and dried to preserve it.
This pursuit of individual advantage is admirably connected with the universal good of the whole. By stimulating industry, by rewarding ingenuity, and by using most efficaciously the peculiar powers bestowed by nature, it distributes labor most effectively and most economically: while, by increasing the general mass of productions, it diffuses general benefit, and binds together, by one common tie of interest and intercourse, the universal society of nations throughout the civilized world.”(The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation pg.
Leopold defends his position the advent of a new ethical development, one that deals with humans’ relations to the land and its necessity. This relationship is defined as the land ethic, this concept holds to a central component referred to as the ecological consciousness. The ecological consciousness is not a vague ideal, but one that is not recognized in modern society. It reflects a certainty of individual responsibility for the health and preservation of the land upon which we live, and all of its components. If the health of the land is upheld, its capacity of self-renewal and regeneration is maintained as well. To date, conservation has been our sole effort to understand and preserve this capacity. Leopold holds that if the mainstream embraces his ideals of a land ethic and an ecological consciousness, the beauty, stability and integrity of our world will be preserved.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
It is a melancholy object to those who travel through this great country to see isolated corners of this fair realm still devoted to protecting the environment. The wretched advocators of these ideals are frequently seen doling out petitions and begging at their neighbours’ doors to feed their obsession, which keeps them in the contemptible poverty that they so richly deserve.
The Tragedy of the Commons “is a problem that occurs when individuals exploit a shared resource to the extent that demand overwhelms supply and the resource becomes unavailable to some or all” (Wigmore, 2013, August). He explains if by using an example of herdsman caring for their cattle in a common land owned by others. Everyone in the land have the same number of cattle they are allowed to have. If one herdsman was being self-centered things and had more cattle because he was thinking of his needs would then damage the community by “overloading it, erosion set in, weeds take over, and he loses the use of the pasture. He would just worry about his goals now and not the overall outcome which not only affected him, but the other herdsmen as well. (Hardin, 1974,