Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Real property law
Real property law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Real property law
For land to be registered to a person in Australia it must be registered under the Torrens Title Registry; a sector of government that holds the entire land title register and thus is evidence to prove the fee-simple ownership rights (freehold title) as the owner. The Torrens Title is ‘a system of title by registration’, meaning a buyer can only receive the title of a parcel of land if it is first registered (Breskvar v Wall, 1971). Once an owner is registered into the title of the land, the owner has indefeasibility, meaning that once a title is registered to the registered proprietor it cannot be effected by any previous defects that may have existed in the title prior to registration (Stewart, C. 2009). The significance of this registration …show more content…
system has been ‘to provide third parties with the information necessary to comprehend the extent or state of the registered title to the land in question’: Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (2007). This report will delve into the Torrens Title System, covering the history of the conversion from the Registration of Deeds to the Torrens System and overarching strengths and weaknesses of both systems. Later, the report will discuss how it has effected economies ranging from local to international; and what the effects have been on developers and consumers raising finance and establishing property values. History of Torrens Title The main objective that prompted the beginnings of the Torrens Titling system was the need to ensure the land purchaser would be secure in acquiring the certificate of title for the registration of the land and the incontestability of the title (The Principles of the Torrens Title, Introduction to the Land and Water Allocation Registries, Queensland Land Title Practice Manual [0-0190]). Prior to this titling system, the recognition of ownership of property in Australia was ‘chaotic’, leading to many law suits as people were never guaranteed ownership of their property (Altavas, n.d.). The Torrens’s Title was devised by Sir Robert Richard Torrens in 1857 within his Bill for the Parliament reform when he was the House of Assembly of South Australia (Australian Dictionary of Biography, 1976).
Torrens previously had worked as the Collector of Customs in Adelaide dealing with ships and found the system of regulation simple and efficient (South Australian Government, 2018). Many years later, the plan for land titling was submitted for approval and soon after adopted by the South Australian Government in 1858 under the Real Property Act (1858) (Torrens Title System, Introduction to the Land and Water Allocation Registries, Queensland Land Title Practice Manual, [0-0180]). Although, in the Acts of 1860 and 1861 the system was adjusted but still demonstrated indefeasibility of title and is how it stands now (The Transformation of Torrens’s Title to the Torrens Title, 1962). This amended act is what other states and countries adopted. The first state in Australia to follow the Torrens System was Queensland in the Real Property Act 1861 (Queensland Land Title Practice Manual (QLTPM, [0-0190]). Although, Queensland based their act off the 1860 South Australian Act, rather than the more developed 1861 Act (The Transformation of Torrens’s Title to the Torrens Title, 1962). Over the next 15 years, Victoria, New South Wales, New Zealand and Western Australia had modelled their own acts based off updated versions of the South Australian Real Property Act 1861, each within their varying names of acts but all with the general scheme of indefeasibility of title. Outside of Australia, the first American state to adopt the Torrens Titling was Illinois in 1897. It was said that “(the Torrens System) will surely sweep over the country”, although this did not occur and only 4 other states adopted the act (Le, 2000). Other countries to have adopted the Torrens title by registration system include: Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong, The Philippines, Fiji, New Zealand,
Kenya, Vietnam, Croatia, Canada and Thailand (Mills, 1999). In the Land Title Act of 1994, a computerised register was established to replace the paper-based Register, that held 2.6 million paper titles [QLTPM, [0-0300]. By the next year the conversion from paper to the Automated Titles System (ATS) was complete (QLTPM, [0-0310]. Deeds Prior to the Torrens Title, the registration of deeds was the method of land title by registration worldwide. This registration system “creates a lengthening chain of title, never any stronger than its weakest link, and piles up unending bits of evidence which must first be found and fitted together before any figure can be made out” (Chaplin, 1898). The deed system involved little amount of governmental scrutiny – which was the entire issue with it. In addition, deed registration was not accompanied by plans of survey, thus reference to boundaries of a property were made by description using compass bearings and distances between reference points (QLTPM, [0-0050]).
The amendments to the Land Title Act 1994 introduced in s. 185(1A) and s. 11A requiring reasonable steps to be taken to ensure the person who executed the instrument as mortgagor is identical with the person who is, or who is about to become, the registered proprietor of the
In Palgo Holdings v Gowans , the High Court considered the distinction between a security in the form of a pawn or pledge and a security in the form of a chattel mortgage. The question was whether section 6 of the Pawnbrokers and Second-hand Dealers Act 1996 (NSW) (‘the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act’) extended to a business that structured its loan agreements as chattel mortgages. In a four to one majority (Kirby J dissenting) the High Court found that chattel mortgages fell outside the ambit of section 6 of the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act. However, beyond the apparent simplicity of this decision, the reasoning of the majority raises a number of questions. Was it a “turning back to literalism” as Kirby J suggested, or was it simply a case where the court declares that parliament has missed its target?
The roots of Australian laws are similar to traditional Aboriginal laws, dating back to before the Norman Conquest in 1066, where each separate village had their own laws developed to their own customs. This changed however, after a centralized legal system was established after 1066. A common law was formed, that applied to all of England. This was later combined with equity law and mercantile law, which is the basis of Australian law today, known as ‘statute law’.
The National Apology of 2008 is the latest addition to the key aspects of Australia’s reconciliation towards the Indigenous owners of our land. A part of this movement towards reconciliation is the recognition of Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders rights to their land. Upon arrival in Australia, Australia was deemed by the British as terra nullius, land belonging to no one. This subsequently meant that Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders were never recognised as the traditional owners. Eddie Mabo has made a highly significant contribution to the rights and freedoms of Indigenous Australians as he was the forefather of a long-lasting court case in 1982 fighting for the land rights of the Torres Strait Islanders. Eddie Mabo’s introduction of the Native Title Act has provided Indigenous Australians with the opportunity to state claim to their land, legally recognising the Indigenous and the Torres Strait Islanders as the traditional owners.
...d for you to sign and the land will be yours... no-one will bother you on your land” (pg.105). This incident leads to a long chain of corrupt acts. All community members signed, rather, finger printed the document and we’re assured “they could rely on this paper as it is the title to the land” (pg. 105). Two years passed and they returned with the document in hand, claiming the land was no longer theirs to live off of. The signed document was in truth an agreement to live on the land for a mere two years and a promise to uproot once the two years expired. In conjunction with the Labour Unions, Rigoberta’s father fights this upheaval, however the landowners bribe the judges lawyers and interpretors involved in the crooked legal battles, twisting the communities stance says the landowners offered a great deal of money to the judge through -machines/market/lawyers
In Australia, there are two systems for registration of interests in land; the general law and Torrens systems. Today, the Torrens system is used in every Australian jurisdiction, being introduced in Western Australia on 1 July 1875.
Throughout the Salem Witch Trials, a man named Samuel Parris had purchased a slave named Tituba who would then be accused of being a witch(Rebecca Brooks, 2013).. The Salem Witch Trials involved many people put to blame for being witches is they acted different, or acted out of the norm within their society. The witch hunts all began in the year of 1692 within the area of Salem. During the year of 1692, many people were being accused of being a witch and being thrown into jail. There were some conformations that Tituba was a witch as well from the people who lived around her.
Land rights now referred to the continual legal exertion to reclaim ownership of the land and waters that was called home prior to British colonisation (Creative Spirits, 2011). Australian Museum (2015) and Creative Spirits (2011) acknowledge the struggle to gain legal recognition and ownership of Indigenous land is difficult and expensive. Furthermore, the history behind the struggle in earlier years often resulted in violence as Indigenous Australians were dispossessed of their land (Australian Museum, 2015). Subsequently, the struggle for land rights continued through the legal and political systems; as demonstrated in 1982 when Eddie (Koiki) Mabo and four other Meriam people decided to pursue declaration of their customary land rights in the High Court of Australia (Hill, 1995). Based on the findings of Creative Spirits (2011) Indigenous Australian land rights appeared promising in 1983 when the Hawke Government promised legislation to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s land rights are protected throughout Australia. The legislation was said to permit Indigenous Australians to exercise the right of control over mining on Indigenous Australian land to ensure sacred sites are protected (Creative Spirits, 2011). However, in 1984 the mining companies fought back to repossess control over land. Mining and pastoral industries were considered too powerful and
Australia’s Indigenous people are thought to have reached the continent between 60 000 and 80 000 years ago. Over the thousands of years since then, a complex customary legal system have developed, strongly linked to the notion of kinship and based on oral tradition. The indigenous people were not seen as have a political culture or system for law. They were denied the access to basic human right e.g., the right to land ownership. Their cultural values of indigenous people became lost. They lost their traditional lifestyle and became disconnected socially. This means that they were unable to pass down their heritage and also were disconnected from the new occupants of the land.
Land rights are defined as the entitlement to inhabit and use the land. Indigenous Australian communities seek to gain land rights or “Native Title” over certain parts of Australian land. This allows the Indigenous Australians the right to hunt, fish and inhabit the land and also gives them the right to contribute to decisions over construction, fishing or mining of...
Deemed as Latin America’s Marlene Dietrich, Andrea Palma was a versatile theater, film and television actress in Mexico, Hollywood and Spain. Born as Guadalupe Bracho on April 16, 1903 in Durango City, Mexico, she was one of eleven children. Palma was not the only member of her family to pursue a film career during the Golden Age of Mexican Cinema . Her brothers, Julio Bracho and Jesus Bracho, were a director-writer and set designer working in the Mexican Studio System and her cousins were one of Hollywood’s most well known “Latin Lovers,” Ramon Novarro, and Latin American to Hollywood crossover star Dolores Del Rio.
Quentin Tarantino’s auteur is one that speaks of gore, racism, and certain shot techniques. Above all, the aspect that Tarantino is best known for in his long history of filmmaking is the fact that he only uses traditional, or analog, filmmaking techniques. In fact, Tarantino believes that digital cameras used to shoot film will lead to the eventual demise of filmmaking. His views and ideas of digital vs. traditional filmmaking and how his films could be impacted if they were shot in a digital format are explored.
The term Land Acquisition means the process of taking over of privately held land and other immoveable properties by the government for various ‘public purposes’. The owners are compensated for their loss via a rate that is fixed by the government appointed arbitrators. The definition of the term ‘public purpose’ is extremely vague. A few of the purposes that necessitate this process of Land Acquisition are often notified to the public through land acquisition laws. Some of the aforementioned purposes are defence projects, industrial corridors etc.
...uplication .Consequently, land records are not reliable, land disputes are common, land registries are overwhelmed with associated problems, and integrated reliable land information is almost impossible to obtain. Land Administration services are costly for both the government and the people. Moreover, the people are hardly satisfied with the quality of the services (Ibid).
Generally, Real Estate in related to ‘immovable property’ which is defined as following under Section 3(26) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 :