Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Indian culture vs western culture
Indian culture vs western culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Indian culture vs western culture
Three artists represent nearly 3,000 individuals from the New Delhi colony, Kathputli, in Jimmy Goldblum and Adam Weber’s documentary Tomorrow We Disappear, which premiered at the Tribeca and Hot Docs International Documentary Festivals in 2014. Over the course of three years and through the three protagonists featured, viewers are shown what it’s like living in a poor, yet beloved community fabricated from these artists' very time and hands that is soon to be destroyed when the government sells the land to wealthy developers. As the eviction approaches we are witnesses to the manipulations of powerful intuitions, the struggles that parallel with unconventional and unsupported career paths, but mostly, we see what this community and their art provides—a rarity that remains true and constant throughout: beauty, love, and dedication. “If something is precious, you shouldn’t let it die,” says protagonist and street magician Rahman Shah in …show more content…
the beginning of the documentary and his profound insight seems to act like a silent mantra for the Kathputli colony over the course of these three years. Quickly, we see his statement tested when the artists are told their land will be used for luxurious complexes, a highly regarded skyscraper and mall, while they are placed in temporary two-year housing. The future of their art looks grim and uninviting, mostly because much of the materials the magicians, acrobats and especially puppeteers use cannot fit in these temporary homes. Except it's the internal struggle that places their art in perhaps even more jeopardy. Our three protagonists' frustrations are all revealed in different ways. Puppeteer Puran Bhatt is very instrumental in the meetings involving the colony, the government and the developers. He writes letters, creates blueprints and proposals regarding the two-year housing the government is forcing them into. The results after Bhatt’s requests for a sound water system, studio and storage space is always the same. The government only proves their ignorance regarding what the Kathputli people need in order for their art to survive, which for some means their very own survival. While Puran relays on Rahman for support, his longtime friend decides to no longer participate in the meetings or help with the eager compromises Puran selflessly presents. Instead he nearly hides, avoiding the government and the imminent future. As we continuing watching Puran smoke his cigarettes in dark corners, walking away after being denied a performance spot on the streets, we see the defeat begin to surface but can only hope he will follow his own suggestion about keeping the treasured talents alive. While Rahman and Puran resist or dread the government’s plans, third protagonist and acrobat Maya Pawar succumbs, in hopes her life will change and a teaching opportunity will arise.
Maya is the only artist represented among the slum that is not angry, but rather curious as to what prospects this will open for her art, as well as the colony’s credibility and representation. But whatever the state of mind may be among the three there seems to be one commonality. They are trying to do the very thing Rahman spoke of: nurture their precious God given gifts and enable them to expand. Except it’s during these meetings, arguments and conversations where we feel the absence of what the film so beautifully opened with. Instead of the slow motion sequence that forced us to watch the art unfold in a new and appreciated way with images of dancing puppets, tight rope performances and acrobats picking needles up with their eyes, we now see the distressed artists sitting in apprehension, waiting to what role their art will play, if any at
all. The desire from the government to assimilate the street artists in New Delhi so they won't have a choice but have a different lifestyle, reveals itself though the filmmakers’ input of several media clippings of an interview with the head developer. However, the most magical aspect captured in this documentary is when and how the artists’ creativity is fueled by the harshness of this reality. For example, in between the colony meetings with the developers Puran holds a small wooden puppet in front of the camera. Like the audience, the camera becomes a member, watching a soundless performance as the puppet’s hand wipes away invisible tears. These movements continue after the contacts are signed and a young artist places a huge wooden mask over his head, floats across the dirt floor of his slum, silently wiping away similar tears and dances a new dance the Kathputli colony now knows by heart. These gripping, silent performances tie in with what Puran says halfway through the documentary about their art being half dead and Rahman's comment from the beginning about letting their art live vividly. But despite what Puran claims, we see the creativity continue, especially among the artists' children. Their art comes to represent more than that it possibly ever had. Flying bird costumes are made for protests, standing taller than anyone else, flapping their wings, singing out: “We are the flying birds, here today, gone tomorrow.” And just like the young artist who wore the wooden mask, improvising to express himself, more children follow suite and create larger puppets to dance in front of the developers’ bulldozers. They stand their ground by using their most precious armor. ART. It again is magician Rahman, after removing himself from the meetings and waiting for the foundation of his art to carry him onward, that he points out one of the films’ most prominent, yet universal messages about poor artists not being insignificant people. It's something all creatively wired intellectuals should remind themselves when inadvertently told by larger establishments that their work means nothing. Because even in the horrible circumstances like those the Kathputli colony faces, their art will live and so will the traditions, inventions, performances and creativity and the first word that probably comes to mind for most after seeing Tomorrow We Disappear is not insignificance. Perhaps it’s power, truth, beauty or formation. As proved, these last longer and offer much more than any other expensive infrastructure.
Analysis of CAFOD (A Charity Organization) The charity I am going to analyse and explain is CAFOD. CAFOD was formed in 1961when the National Board of Catholic Women decided to carry out a family fast day, because the people of the Caribbean Island of Dominica had requested help for a mother and baby health care programme. A year after the family fast day the Catholic bishops of England and Wales decided to set up the “Catholic Fund for Overseas Development” or “CAFOD”. The main aim of this charity was to bring together the vast number of smaller charities and to educate Roman Catholics in England and Wales about the need for world development and also to raise money for developing countries. Even now CAFOD is still helping all around the world thanks to the support of Catholics in England and Wales.
In the etching, most of the people are unaware of the others. At the center, a partially dressed woman raises her arms and leans forward as if to display her body; in the foreground, another woman is reaching out to the clothesline, and right above her head shows a male figure’s silhouette, facing the windows across away. “Its subject is certainly voyeurism, but who is the voyeur? The man on the roof, the artist, the picture's viewer, or all three?” ( Zurier, 281) Looking at the work, it is hard to determine who is the spectator and who is being spectated, as the relationship between them is intricate and interactive. Here, Sloan not only portrays his observation, but also critiques the action of urban watching
The idea that art can be a service to people- most importantly a service to poor and disenfranchised people is one that may be disputed by some. However, Elizabeth Catlett and other artists at the taller de Graffica Popular have proved that art could be made to service the poor. Catlett in particular is someone who has always used her art to advocate for the poor and fight injustices. While her activism and political views were very impactful, they were also very controversial. Catlett`s art and activism influenced African American and Latin American art by changing the narratives of Black and Brown working class women. In their books titled Gumbo Ya Ya, The Art of Elizabeth Catlett, African American Art: The Long Struggle, and Elizabeth Catlett: Works on Paper authors Leslie King-Hammond, Samella S. Lewis, Crystal Britton, Elizabeth Catlett, and Jeanne Zeidler speak of the work of Catlett. In a paper titled -----, ---- also speaks of the work of Elizabeth Catlett and her legacy as an activist.
The 21st Century appears to be headed towards a future of vast corruption and exploitation as a result of the often inhumane and uncivilised individuals who, over the years have become desensitized to poverty, war, consumerism, racism, mental illnesses and political corruption. As the world moves towards further democracy, and decentralization it is vital that art is given the opportunity to stimulate people’s awareness, participation and judgment. Arts purpose is not only to be a fulfilment of society’s visual needs but is needed be utilised as a function to alert people to society’s problems. Australian born George Gittoes, works within war zones to create confronting paintings, film, photography and prose that frequently portray man’s inhumanity to man. Gordon Bennett, also Australian, paints images that depict his own self questioning about his identity and the injustice towards Aboriginal Australians since the time of settlement.
So I attempted to use this mentality whilst exploring the Highline, allowed the mindset to fill me with energy and then reflected on what I liked and didn’t like about the limitless attitude once I walked back towards Gansevoort Street. When I saw Kathryn Andrews’ “Sunbathers II” piece, I went inside the piece, and smiled while my cousin took a photo of me. I then continued to roamed through Chelsea while observing the people, billboards, paintings and the skyline, and was struck by the Sleepwalker sculpture. When Zadie Smith comes face-to-face with Corona’s “Find Your Beach” advertisement, she begins to analyze and find possible interpretations of the billboard sign. I then began to examine the Sleepwalker sculpture and discussed several potential inferences towards Manhattan the artwork might have with my cousin Michelle. I then got some stracciatella gelato, and Michelle got a coffee. With my recent purchases in hand, I was taken surprise by Andrews’ “Sunbathers I”. Michelle and I laughed
This movie has been reworked from Maya Angelou’s best selling novel and the story takes place in a bigoted town in Stamps, Arkansas where Maya and her brother, Bailey, grow up with their grandmother and uncle. The Angelous were African Americans, they had to deal with racism from the infamous Ku Klux Klan and the other Caucasians in town. Despite disdain from the Caucasians, Maya also has familial problems. She travels back and forth between her mother’s and grandmother’s house not being able to situate herself in either’s home. However, Maya perseveres. She begins school and excels in academics. The turning point of the movie is when Maya is sexually assaulted, consequently, she withdraws into total silence. It is with the help of her kind teacher that Maya is mentally restored to herself: enthusiastic, joyful and bright. She makes an emotional valedictory speech at her graduation where she expressed her feelings and emotions towards her friends, fellow classmates, teachers and life at Stamps. Her eventful time from her youth to her graduation serve to teach a person to define themselves, not for others to define a person.
However, the way this is seen to “non-artists” it is seen, but through the eyes of an artist there is nothing puerile about the power Basquiat’s work has to communicative different thoughts and meanings. These “childish” paintings depict themes varying from drug abuse, jazz, capitalism, bigotry, and mortality. Amongst these topics, those that are the most pervasive throughout his artwork include themes of racial and socioeconomic inequality. After thoroughly searching for key points in Basquiat’s brief but memorable career, the impact on imagery, textual and visual, within and among his paintings also helped to create a superior impact on the society. In each of Basquiat’s paintings, there is an immediate lesson shown and it provides a different view through which we can examine urban beauty and decay, and the social unfairness’s that patiently wait in the
Many of the catadores were of lower middle class that, due to unfortunate turn of events, had to work in the landfill. The Muniz’s female subjects worked in the landfill because it was the only viable employment opportunity outside of prostitution. Instances of domestic violence also pushed women out of their homes into the life of the landfill. The catadores are not blamed for their poverty, nor are they defined by it. Circumstance shaped them, to be sure, but Walker effortlessly captures the depth of their character, rather than wallow in their poverty. Furthermore, Muniz underscores how these people are not their poverty by offering the story of his own humble beginning. While at times this feels to be more a justification of his wealth and an affirmation of his humility, it succeeds in portraying both the artist and his subjects as equal human beings. Interestingly, despite the goal of humanization, Muniz’s photos are positioned and constructed. He re-shoots pictures in his studio, even dressing up one his subject and her children as saints. The photographed catadores are attractive and young or offer an older aesthetic of resilience and strength. Despite the selective nature of Muniz’s portraits, Walker’s representation of the process offers a captivating insight into the world of garbage and those who live in
‘Most artists have critical and productive relationships with their culture’. The statement above can be considered through the art of Jean Michel Basquiat and Ai Wei Wei as they attempt to depict their own cultures. Both artists demonstrate this in a critical light in response to world events and issues through their art. This is reflected expressively through Jean Michel Basquiat’s “Per Capita” and Ai Wei Wei’s “A study in perspective”.
Within the German Democratic Republic, there was a secret police force known as the Stasi, which was responsible for state surveillance, attempting to permeate every facet of life. Agents within and informants tied to the Stasi were both feared and hated, as there was no true semblance of privacy for most citizens. Directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, the movie The Lives of Others follows one particular Stasi agent as he carries out his mission to spy on a well-known writer and his lover. As the film progresses, the audience is able to see the moral transformation of Stasi Captain Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler primarily through the director 's use of the script, colors and lighting, and music.
In the late 1970's and early 80's, The Great Wall of Los Angeles was hardly a scar, but rather a vibrant rebirth of a poverished, low income neighborhood in the San Bernadino Valley. The community was united and transpired by the colorful creative collaborative work on this long mural that transended the Tujunga canal for almost a mile. Sewn from the creativity and passion for California history, muralist Judy Baca, along with other artist, and the Social and Public Art Resource Center (SPARC) began the "beautification efforts" of this otherwise run down poverished neighborhood.
The action is located in a single location of the slums, made known by the dirty water and surroundings of mud and bricks, and denotes as the set manufactures real life, it is shot using a panning bird’s eye view. The place and time is made obvious by the set design and costume. The scene begins with the conveying of summer, there are clear blue skies and bright surroundings. Its immense heat is made clear as we see young Jamal and his friends play in the water of the slums. There are sounds of people talking, laughing, water splashing, and trains passing by, as women do laundry, giving the audience a look into everyday life in the slums. Woman’s ...
Abraham Cruzvillegas and Jessica Stockholder are both famous and successful artists. Cruzvillegas makes most of his art and sculptures within the landscape of his former home (walkerart.org). Stockholder’s art is made in a similar fashion. Artnet.com states that every one of her art pieces “is created specifically for the site in which they’re placed”, something known to Stockholder as “installations”. Both artists base their paintings and sculptures on their environment, not just their emotions or feelings.
“Hope is like the sun, which, as we journey toward it, casts the shadow of our burden behind us”(Samuel Smiles). The book, Behind the Beautiful Forevers, written by Katherine Boo, depicts a troublesome slum that is trapped in a rapidly revolving culture. Where time is progressing continuously for the rest of the world, the slums of Annawadi are stuck in it’s backlash. In a place invisible to ignorant eyes, the future of Annawadi was doomed from the start. Annawadi was polluted by society and the people who call its slums their home. Annawadi can even be called an eternal illusion that traps and manipulates its people. In a place where misery and pain is guaranteed, a light a created to keep out the dark. Hope falsely created by the people of
In Time is a science-fiction movie that was released in 2011 that starred Justin Timberlake. In the movie, the citizens are genetically modified to stop aging at twenty five years old and their clock starts at one day, signaling that they have one day left to live. The only way the citizens can gain more time is by earning it, borrow it from others, or steal it. The time on their arm not only signifies the citizen’s time left, but it also equals currency in this system. Will Salas, played by Justin Timberlake, is the main character and lives in the ghetto division of the society. In the division, the citizens have to work their butts off just to earn a couple days or maybe a week’s worth of time left on their clocks. Also, crime is very common in this division of the society and it is not