Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unequal funding in public schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Unequal funding in public schools
Bethel-Tate is working on passing levy issue 14, it is a 6.6 mill five-year emergency school levy, generating 1.1 million per year. The levy will cost a $100,000 household $20 a month. The Bethel-Tate school district has not had an operating levy since 1989 and they added a new school building in 2002 and are still operating on the same rate as in 1989 ( Tiger pride community wide). The levy is a big deal in Bethel-Tate and there are two solutions to this issue and it is simply you either are for the levy or against it. There are many reasons and many different opinions as to whether people should be for or against the levy and these will affect what happens to the Bethel-Tate school district. There are three sides in the community, you are either for the levy, against the levy or you don't care because it does not really matter to you. The people who want it to pass are most likely those whose children are students at bethel-Tate or they work for the school. Those who are against it are most likely the people who are possible older and just …show more content…
There was a lot of talk in the community of Bethel-Tate this year on where the schools money goes, this chatter was a result from the fall sports because parents were upset because they thought that some teams got more money than others. Some of these parents are most likely still skeptical on what happens with the money and do not want to give up more because they think that the same thing will happen with the sports teams again. Most parents do not want to give up their hard earned money to a school if they are not sure it will benefit their child or not. With the school not telling these people where their money is going, they have no reason not to vote
Highland Springs is not known for its money, unfortunately it is quite a poor school and since track and field isn’t one of the most popular sports so not much money is received in that department. When Lamont found out about this he immediately wanted to start fundraising for the track team so they can have more money sent in. This can lead to more out of state
I talked with a teacher of mine at Chapman University by the name of Les Clements, PhD, to see how he felt about Proposition 13 and he had a lot to say. He felt that this was an idea whose time had come. He also felt that it was totally outrageous to cut programs like music, art and everything except the essentials. "What got me was that it so favored the landlords and the big business owners they got away with paying only one percent so it saved them a bunch while th...
The cost is estimated at around $160 million. In addition, the federal government has recently announced that it will allot each of the “for” and “against” arguments $7.5 million to make out their respective cases. So, the cost is definitely high. None the less, I would argue that the cost needs to be put into perspective. This is a once only cost that will determine the issue for a very long time. Secondly, if we do not ask the community directly to indicate what level of support there is for making the change, then whatever decisions are taken in the absence of consulting the community will undoubtedly be challenged and disputed by those who are not happy with the outcome. The cost of such challenges and disputes is not easy to determine, but it must be significant. A lot of time and effort has already been spent by both the “for” and “against” camps on advocating their respective points of view, which has already had a cost to the community. Although we cannot guarantee that a plebiscite will eliminate challenges or disputes by disgruntled members of the community, it is very likely that there will be fewer of them and that they will be less severe than if there is such
The Ohio Vouchers program was created to respond to the failing of Cleveland’s public school system. With this program however, the vouchers are not supporting students to attend public school in the Cleveland school district. The surrounding school districts can accept the vouchers but have not done so since the program has started. This program is hurting the Cleveland public school system by diverting money that should be going to improve public schools but instead being put in private schools which are largely religious schools. The program continues to hurt not only the public school district but also the parents of the students who try to take advantage of the program. Parents are left with no alternative than to choose a nonpublic school and even then a religiously private school.
The state’s contract with the company that produced the CAHSEE was about to expire and education officials wanted to avoid spending millions of dollars to renew the contract for a test; some people think the test was outdated because it did not align with the new common core standards. According to Gov. Jerry Brown’s office “Students who’ve been accepted into college should not be prevented from starting class this fall because of a test cancellation they could not control,” said
...he surrounding area are required (and thus get more funding from local property taxes), by law and Education Code, to give a portion of their funding to school districts that are “poor” in order to boost the “poor” school districts performance; this idea of taking from the rich and giving to the poor is why it is dubbed the “Robin Hood” plan (Smith, Schools are Reassigned to Robin Hood, 2011). This bill was the first in a long series of proposed bills that was ruled as a constitutional solution for the 1989 Texas Supreme Court case Edgewood v. Kirby, but it is also the reason for the not only the current lawsuit filed by approximately 600 school districts (both wealthy and poor), but also the 2003 school funding lawsuit (Texas School Finance History, n.d.). It has been ruled unconstitional several times throughout its history, yet it still remains in practice today.
These small, mostly private schools are spending millions on Football fields, Gyms, indoor and outdoor tracks and student recreation centers. This battle seems almost unnecessary considering almost zero of these athletes will become professionals and in most cases athletics takes away around 20-25 hours of school work time to there student athletes. Looking at the research there seems to be three reasons why schools sell the idea of how a new facility can bring more then a large bill to the school. These points are first recruiting success that leads to athletic success and the enrollment bump in not only the student athletes but also the student population as a whole. Finally how the sch...
Local governments rely on property tax as a source of revenue to pay for school. Yet people in the urban areas pay the higher tax than suburban and wealthy communities, states on the other hand, relies on The Average Daily Attendance (ADA), which calculates state aid to school districts, tends to discriminate against urban school districts with high absentee rates by automatically, and excludes 15 percent of its student aid. Therefore, in many urban areas, the state ratio of funding remains significantly lower than 50 percent out of the tree entities the federal government allocates the least amount of funding. Residents in these areas who are under edu...
The majority of colleges do not have their priorities straight and that needs to change as well. There is proof that many colleges put athletics above academics. A survey done of 97 public schools that have major football programs revealed that spending on athletics between 2005 and 2008 increased at a rate of 4 to 11 times more than the spending on academics (Carey 1 of 2). What is worse is that if major programs continue in the direction they are headed, it will only cause athletic spending to rise and there will be an even greater imbalance in fiscal priorities (Ca...
They did not spend this money on new school facilities, or fixing apartment buildings, or building safe areas for children, but rather they spend it to “paint the back and sides of the buildings so that people driving to the suburbs will have something nice to look at” (Kozol page 31). This is yet another way the city tried to cover up the people in the Bronx, while at the same time not doing anything to help them. The people there are still starving, or doing drugs, but heaven forbid a tourist get offended by the blatant disregard of the city’s most disenfranchised people. The money spent on that mural could have gone into actually aiding the community, perhaps through bettering the hospitals or repairing housing units that had elevators and electrical systems that killed people. The city was more focused on making people believe that places like the Bronx were not as bad as they actually were than they were with actually fixing the problems.
Last issue is, what about the kids who are actually paying the full tuition or partial tuition to go there, where is their money going? The whole thing is college athletes have been getting played since before I was born and it needs to stop soon. It’s just a loose loose situation for student athletes right now and that is no fun. Paying them would make their lives way easier and keep them out of trouble.
This is probably due to so many being traditionalist holding beliefs that the spirit of school sports will be ruined. Not to mention the population seeing college sports as amateurism, similar to unpaid internships and so forth (“Paying College Athletes Pros…” 1) According to a poll only 33 percent who took part believed that student-athletes should be payed. Opposition nearly double that number at 64 percent, not to mention that 47 percent were STRONGLY against the concept of "pay-to-play" (Prewitt 1). ESPN analyst, Jay Bilas, finds the apparatus of the scholarship program "Laughable, but it 's not funny". He further claims that schools aren 't even "out a nickel" when providing college athletes with their all expense paid vacation to to free education (Prewitt 1). What’s “Laughable, but it’s not funny” is this blatantly obnoxious response to the issue. Though there should be acknowledgement given to the amount of money coaches earn, that 's their profession. They train these young athletes to perform on the level they do and bring profit from it. Without coaches there would be no gain. Critics, such as Bilas, try to make points such as the salary of college coaches yet only 19 percent of the population agreed with him in the polls (Prewitt 1). With such unheard of public support, it’s very unlikely for a paycheck for college athletes to go
Collecting funds from the state’s taxes is an effective solution because students get more academic support programs, which decreases dropouts. In Discounted Dreams, journalist, John Merrow interviews Kay McClenney who explains, “I do think it's a concern students tell us year after year that the most important service is academic planning and advising”....
Why is the school district going to spend more money to just build a new campus for we can be separated i think they should just save the money they can just leave us alone in the same campus instead of changing us into
Some states want to have separation when it comes to the income of these schools. States argue that high class, wealthy, school districts should have more money than the lower class districts, because of the tax payers wants or because there are better opportunities for students to grow in the wealthier areas. According to the U.S. Department of Education, more than 50 percent of lower end schools are not receiving the amount of money they should get from the state funds (U.S. Department of Education). This is what is preventing school districts in these areas from helping students with their education. The schools are forced to cut back on programs such as extracurricular activities that are suppose to encourage students to be active, or they would have to cut back on supplies where in some cases there are not enough textbooks for each student to have his or her own. The U.S. Department of Education also stated that teachers that are less paid and have less years teaching are often the ones dealing with the students in poverty. (U.S. Department of Education). This only prolongs the problem with children receiving the proper education. If they are taught by teachers who don’t know what they are teaching or those who don’t have enough experience, then the students are not going to learn the correct information or any information at all. While there are some schools