To The Christian Nobility Analysis

747 Words2 Pages

The saying absolute power corrupts absolutely stands the test of time. This has been shown in many writings prior to the protestant reformation. Martin Luther’s letter “To the Christian Nobility” and Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales” addressed the corrupt Catholic Church. Comparable to the Catholic Church corruption, Joseph Stalin’s reign over Russia showed the attrioties that were the result of a man with absolute power. Accordingly, the negative effects of absolute power was seen in Martin Luther’s letter “To the Christian Nobility”, Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales”, and Joseph Stalin’s reign as Premier of Russia.
Martin Luther was a German priest who opposed the Catholic Church. He felt the church was corrupt and did not uphold the values. This is seen in his letter “To the Christian Nobility” …show more content…

Joseph Stalin rose to power after the death of Vladimir Lenin and controlled the country unopposed by any other people’s influences. He was highly paranoid man who often imprisoned many without cause. Manus Midlarsky’s article “Territoriality and the Onset of Mass Violence: The Political Extremism of Joseph Stalin” described one of the results of Stalin’s paranoia when saying “Massive purges of Party members and others suspected of disloyalty again were found first in the Soviet Union in the 1930s (the Great Terror of 1937–38 yielded 681,692 deaths),38 and later in China and Cambodia”(Midlarsky 271). Stalin was able to cause those 681,692 deaths, because he had absolute power similar to the Catholic Church’s. Both had the ability to exile those of dissenting views and had unquestioned power over millions. Martin Luther saw these consequences during his life, by being excommunicated by the Catholic Church for his discrimination of the Pope. While Chaucer saw the corrupt aspect of manipulating millions into paying

Open Document