Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical contexts of macbeth
Historical contexts of macbeth
Macbeth and Elizabethan culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical contexts of macbeth
“Come what come may, time and the hour runs through the roughest day, (Shakespeare 1.3.153-154). After hearing the witch’s prophecy that he will become king, Macbeth pushes the thought of "murder", in which his wife placed, from his mind and says he won't harm King Duncan, his cousin, but will instead leave his future to "chance." Too bad that resolution doesn't last. Within the past two centuries, the world has seen a man with high authority, much like Macbeth, through Joseph Stalin, who used his power to exile and kill old party leadership. Even though Macbeth is simply a figure in the literary work of “Macbeth”, a tragedy written by Shakespeare in the 16th century and set in Scotland, his ambition was not far from that of Joseph Stalin, a horrific man who let millions of people die during his ruling of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. Joseph Stalin was born Josef Vissarionovich Djugashvili on December 21, 1879 in Gori, Georgia. Both Macbeth and Stalin had unorthodox ways in which they rose to power, leading to an unhealthy ambition of …show more content…
authoritative position and a subsequent downfall. Both men had increased similar strengths alongside numerous weaknesses, however the two weren’t alike in many ways. At their start, both Macbeth and Stalin grew up differently but eventually became very much alike as time progressed. Stalin, living and ruling in the 20th century, was much different than the 11th century Macbeth. In Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth was a noble and valiant warrior. He was established by an officer as dominating the battlefield, ”For brave Macbeth-well he deserves that name-/ Disdaining fortune, with his brandished steel, / Which smoked with bloody execution, / Like valor’s minion carved out his passage” (Shakespeare 1.1.16-19). Before even becoming King of Scotland, Macbeth held a high position as the Thane of Glamis, and after the first battle in the tragedy, he is named the Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth is grateful towards King Duncan, his cousin, for being named Thane but eventually commits an act of ultimate disloyalty towards the king. Much unlike that of Macbeth, Stalin was not born into nobility. Son of a cobbler and a washerwoman, Joseph was a poor and frail peasant boy. He became increasingly involved in criminal activity in his early years, and joined Messame Dassey in 1898 to his devote time to the revolutionary movement. Having become involved in revolutionary politics, “Stalin set out to destroy the old party leadership and take control” (Joesph). Joseph Stalin did just that after Vladimir Lenin, the founder of the Russian Communist Party, died in 1924. Being men of authority, both Macbeth and Stalin were spun onto paths which showed the world of their true strengths, and their underlying weaknesses. Macbeth had a thirst for power that even the title of Thane of Cawdor and Thane of Glamis couldn’t quench. His wife, Lady Macbeth, persuaded the killing of King Duncan so that Macbeth could take his place as King of Scotland. Macbeth lost his grip on humanity when he became king and had a taste of true power. Concerned for his own safety and security, Macbeth hires three hitmen to target and murder his close friend and comrade Banquo. Macbeth, being strung with guilt, proceeds to see the ghost of his old friend during a banquet. Lady Macbeth, seeing the expression on her husband's face, tells the guests, ”it, worthy friends. My lord is often thus and hath been from his youth. Pray you, keep seat. The fit is momentary; upon a thought He will again be well. If much you note him, You shall offend him and extend his passion. Feed and regard him not” (Shakespeare 3.4. 55-61) When Macbeth is later threatened by Macduff, he has Macduff’s wife and children killed as ambition slowly begins to consume his life, “give to th’ edge o’ th’ sword / His wife, his babes, and all unfortunate souls / That trace him in his line” (Shakespeare 4.1. 151-154). Macbeth kills off Macduff’s family so that he has no heir and no one to love. Macbeth slowly becomes excessively prideful and over confident as his tragic flaw of ambition takes control of him entirely and becomes blinded by the idea of glory. Much like Macbeth, Stalin had strengths in which guided him to power, and weaknesses which eventually tore him down. Stalin is described as a, “Hearty Georgian who brought a dark eyed and iron willed presence to the Bolshevik party” (Rosenberg). He used his cunning persuasive ability and intelligence to rise in politics. Upon Vladimir Lenin’s death, Stalin rose to power as General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and was effectively the Dictator of the State. Stalin used this new high power to kill many generals and others of high ranking in paranoia of being overthrown, and not wanting anyone to be close in power. This paranoia led to a Great Purge, “Stalin forced rapid industrialization and the collectivization of agricultural land, resulting in millions dying from famine while others were sent to camps” (Biography). This paranoia sent a once confident man into a downward spiral. Much like that of Macbeth, Stalin’s ambition led him to do inhumane and treacherous things. The real tragedy of Macbeth and Stalin are their downfalls. Macbeth’s downfall is caused by the persuasions of Lady Macbeth, prophecies of the three witches, and his own actions. Macbeth’s sense of over-confidence and ambition sent him on his frightful and murderous journey to power. Killing many, Macbeth gained power but eventually started drowning in a sea of his own guilt. This path of destructiveness ultimately turns to karma as he is killed by Macduff at the end of the Shakespeare tragedy. Joseph Stalin also had a significant downfall. Stalin’s actions of treachery did not ease with age, he continued his purging and reigns of terror even in his later years. “He established communist governments throughout Eastern Europe, and in 1949 led the Soviets into the nuclear age by exploding an atomic bomb. In 1950, he gave North Korea’s communist leader Kim Il Sung (1912-1994) permission to invade United States-supported South Korea, an event that triggered the Korean War” (Joseph). Stalin’s heavy set of paranoia grew immensely within his last years, until his death on March 5, 1953 when he died of a cerebral hemorrhage, a type of stroke. The over-confidence and ambition both Macbeth and Stalin shared greatly impacted and added to their later downfalls. Whether in recent history or simply 16th century literature, those in power search for one thing, more power.
Alongside money, Macbeth and Stalin showed the world that a root of all evil is power and authority. Both men serve to show and remind us that even throughout history, there are power seekers who will go against morality to gain the upper hand. Although Macbeth and Stalin led different childhoods, both men rose to power by killing innocent people. A tragic hero such as Macbeth or a brutal man such as Stalin fell due to their few strengths, excessive ambition and over confidence. The power hungry Macbeth is ultimately overthrown by his internal conflict, guilt, while Stalin fell due to his paranoia and death. Both Macbeth and Stalin’s actions serve to us as reminders that authority and power is a privilege and shouldn’t be taken for granted, because it could be taken away as easily as it was obtained or
given.
In William Shakespeare’s Macbeth it is taught of how one’s ambition can take the wrong turn to be confused for greed. Macbeth used the advice of the witches to determine his journey of becoming king. Throughout the story Macbeth takes the prophecy of the witches and acted in an evil manner by going on a killing spree. In order to become king he thought that the easiest way was to annihilate anyone that could stop him from doing so. Everyone has some sort of ambition to become the best of the best as no one would like to fall short to anyone. Donald trump was a man with a vision that he thought could possibly become president of the United States. Trump used his multi-millionaire company to help him get ahead in his journey of reaching his goal. Both titles of King and President can be compared as one because the president and king is ultimately above all. Donald Trump and Macbeth are two people that share the same characteristics of how they used their ambition and greed to come out on top to ultimately become kings. Both men are well known in society today for their ability to overcome obstacles, their ability to degrade
In The Tragedy of Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, we see Macbeth, a loyal soldier, turn into a complete monster by killing innocent people for the sake of power. This eventually leads to Macbeth’s mental breakdown, descending into madness as a cold blooded murderer, until his fateful death. There have been many Macbeth-like figures who have followed in his footsteps throughout our history, such as Julius Caesar, Joseph Stalin and especially Maximilien Robespierre, in the French Revolution. Robespierre killed many people, including one of his colleagues, to gain political power. The selfishness and greed that is shown in Macbeth Robespierre, and other historic
As what critic Joseph White accurately describes as “more vicious and less pitiable,” Rupert Goold’s Macbeth is perceived by the viewers of film as a Stalin-like dictator. The halls of his palace are decorated with murals of his face. The film also illustrates the large masses of crowds. Through this perspective of Macbeth, Rupert Goold emphasizes the theme of the corrosive power of unbridled ambition.
As the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare went on, the friendship and comparison of Macbeth and Benito Mussolini grew. Both of their actions forced them into power and made them the historical features they are today. The cause of their terrible actions lead them to their death. Throughout the play Macbeth, Macbeth shows many similarities to Benito Mussolini because both used other people to push them to power, lost that power and were both brutally killed.
Humans are always fascinated by power. Sadly, they do not realize the danger of it until it is too late. In the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare's underscores how Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are both consumed by power. In the beginning, Lady Macbeth dominates Macbeth, manipulating him to kill Duncan. After the death of Duncan, Macbeth becomes ambitious, and hires murderers to kill Banquo without notifying Lady Macbeth. Even though he is a decorated soldier, when Macbeth rises to power, he becomes ruthless. On the other hand, Lady Macbeth becomes weak, and insane. Shakespeare illustrates how Macbeth’s obsession with power undermines his moral judgement, leads to his mental deterioration, and ultimately results in his death.
William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a tragedy in which the main characters are obsessed by the desire for power. Macbeth’s aspiration for power blinds him to the ethical implications of his dreadful acts. The more that Shakespeare’s Macbeth represses his murderous feelings, the more he is haunted by them. By analyzing his hallucinations it is possible to trace his deteriorating mental state and the trajectory of his ultimate fall. Throughout the play Macbeth is never satisfied with himself. He feels the need to keep committing crime in order to keep what he wants most: his kingship. The harder Macbeth tries to change his fate the more he tends to run into his fate. His ambition and struggle for power was Macbeth’s tragic flaw in the play. Macbeth’s rise to the throne was brought about by the same external forces that ensure his downfall.
An idea such as power establishes itself in most societies throughout the world. Power sets the basis for order and civilization, but it also causes chaos and collides with other human instincts such as greed and ambition. Power presents itself in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth in a confusing manner. Macbeth yearns to gain power and has the means to gain it, but the method of his gaining of power have been questioned by critics since its inscription in 1623. Macbeth, while tyrannical in gaining his power in the murdering of Duncan, sets the premise of the story and in this murder makes a name for himself on his leadership qualities. A man’s gain of power should not determine who they are as a ruler or even
William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a play centred around opposing forces trying to gain power in the succession for the throne of Scotland. Macbeth, in the beginning, is known to be a noble and strong willed man, who is ready to fight for his country. However, one may see that Macbeth has a darker side to him, he is power hungry and blood thirsty, and will not stop until he has secured his spot as King of Scotland. Though Macbeth may be a tyrant, he is very nave, gullible, and vulnerable.
Ambition can consume leaders, nonetheless some leaders can handle the pressure that comes with having to lead individuals like Abraham Lincoln. However some leaders like Adolf Hitler and Macbeth allowed their ambition to get the best of them and cause harm. Hitler allowed his ambition to drive him to make catastrophic decisions such as trying to conquer other (stronger) countries, make dangerous weapons, torturer, and kill millions of innocent people. Whereas Macbeth allowed his ambition to kill the people that loved and supported him the most in order to gain control of the kingdom. Both Macbeth and Hitler illustrate leadership, but turned mad in order to consume more power.
The Relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth Throughout the play of "Macbeth" written by William Shakespeare there is an on-going relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. This relationship is one of the functions of the play that creates most of the actions, reactions, moods, feelings and attitudes. Macbeth's relationship with his wife was not always great. This is shown in one of there conversations; MACBETH: "We will proceed no further in this business: He hath honour'd me of late; and I have bought Golden opinions from all sorts of people, Which would be worn now in their newest gloss, Not cast aside so soon. "(Macbeth,I,vii, )
Typical of Shakespeare’s works, the play Macbeth has a protagonist who ultimately experiences a downfall that lead to his demise. The protagonist or tragic hero of this play is Macbeth, once brave and honorable, who eventually becomes tyrannical and feared by many due to what Abrams describes as his “hamartia” or “error of judgment or, as it is often…translated, his tragic flaw.” In this case, Macbeth’s tragic flaw proves to be ambition; however, he cannot be held solely responsible for his downfall. As a result of many outside influential factors, including the witches’ prophecies and a rather coaxing and persuasive wife, one should not hold Macbeth entirely culpable for his actions and tragic end.
In the play, Macbeth by William Shakespeare has a strong theme of power. Macbeth is a king who is given three predictions from three witches, one of which is that he will become king. The one problem is he doesn’t know what he has to do in order to become king. His wife then decides that in order for him to become king, he must kill the current king. This one murder then leads to others in order to cover the original murder up. Once Macbeth becomes king, he doesn’t want anything to change, he wants to stay king until he dies. He then begins to kill again, but instead of killing to cover something, he is killing anyone who stands in his way of staying king. Macbeth’s fate is affected by the personality trait of bravery, his ability to be manipulated, and his determination.
William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, first published in 1606, is an endearing tale outlining the dangers of unchecked ambition and moral betrayal. In the subsequent centuries after first being performed, Macbeths critics have been divided upon whether Macbeth himself was irrevocably evil, or if he was guided by the manipulation and actions of the women in the play to his ultimate demise. Although Lady Macbeth and the witches were influential with their provocations in the opening acts, it is ultimately Macbeth’s inherent immorality and his vaulting ambition, that result in the tragic downfall. It was Macbeth’s desire for power that abolished his loyalty and trustworthiness and led him down a path of murder. It is evident through his actions and words
William Shakespeare’s classic tragedy Macbeth is driven by goals and ambition. When one is working towards the achievement of power, a different mindset is developed, sometimes for the worse. Once Macbeth disregarded his conscience, he could achieve his goal by whatever means necessary. Though Lady Macbeth also wanted to gain power, she took a different approach. Rather than physically removing people from the picture, she implemented tactics of manipulation. Though Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are both working towards a common goal together, they go about it in different ways.
In the play Othello and the play Macbeth, Shakespeare uses the main characters in both plays as warriors. Both characters in each of their plays, had constant outside voices seeping into their minds which ultimately contributed to the fate of both Othello and Macbeth. The witches in the play Macbeth had more of an effect of Macbeth’s actions then Iago had on Othello’s actions in the play Othello. Each character had a lot of pressure on them throughout the play however the witches influence on Macbeth resulted in more destruction than Iago’s influence on Othello.