On August 15, 2012, officers responded to a responded to a reported kidnapping by the victim. When officers arrived, they met with the victim who explained she had come to the house as a call out dancer. A male subject, later identified as Thomas Lundahl, the defendant answered the door and pulled her in the house then began talking to her. The victim told the officers Mr. Lundahl had a knife on his hip and was wearing a ball cap embodied with “FBI” (Federal Bureau of Investigation). Due to the hat the victim asked if he was FBI or a task force, the defendant responded that she was going to wish he was the F.B.I. An unidentified young female came out of a room with duct tape. The victim believing she was in danger attempted to use her telephone; but, Mr. Lundahl knocked it out of her hand. The young female taped up the victim’s calves, hands, and mouth; the tape was not secure very well on the victim’s hands or mouth. …show more content…
After removing $500.00 from the victim’s wallet, Mr.
Lundahl uncovered the victim’s breast from her clothing and put his mouth on them. The defendant told the victim she was “hot” and he wanted to rape her but he did not want to leave his DNA left behind. Mr. Lundahl and the unidentified female threatened to torture the victim in some caves for her bank information until she able to convince them she only had the money they had already taken. Mr. Lundahl exited the residence and moved the victim’s vehicle. When he reentered the house, he was carrying items out of her vehicle. The victim was told not to call police for an hour as they were going to Canada or Mexico. The defendant and the unidentified female left; the victim freed herself and contacted the
police. Using the information provided to the callout company, officers were able to discover the identification of Mr. Lundahl. His physical description matched the one provide by the victim. On April 8, 2016, the defendant was placed in-custody at Clark County Detention Facility on an unrelated charge. The investigating officer obtained a search warrant for a DNA sample to being conducted on Mr. Lundahl. On June 8, 2016, the results comparing the defendant’s DNA and the swab taken from the victim’s chest returned as “Major DNA profile is consistent with Thomas Lundahl”. On June 22, 2016, an officer requested for a warrant to be issued for the defendant. On July 6, 2016, Judge Sciscento signed an arrest warrant for Thomas Richard Lundahl. On August 15, 2016
On March 24, 2016, officers were dispatched to a scene where a male subject was trying to gain entry into a vehicle using a hammer. Upon arrival officers made contact with a male subject who was later identified as Keith Hunt, the defendant, and the victim. The victim explained to the officers she was standing near the trunk of her vehicle when Mr. Hunt approached, He attempted to keep into her vehicle without permission; so she confronted the defendant and tried to secure her vehicle. Mr. Hunt demanded she give him the keys and her wallet. The victim stated the defendant had a hammer in his hand and was threatening her with it while he was telling her to hand over the property. They began to struggle over the keys and the victim screamed
On the above listed date and time, deputies arrived at Hampton County Medical Center, and made contact with the complainant regarding the above listed incident type. Deputies gathered the pertinent information needed to complete this report. The complainant and his mother wrote a voluntary statement. Photos were taken while at the Emergency Room. The complainant was issued a Victim’s Right’s Form along with a case number attached. Deputies attempted to make contact with the subject, no contact was made. Deputies cleared the call and resumed normal patrol duties.
On the evening of Ms. Heggar¡¦s death she was alone in her house. Eddie Ray Branch, her grandson, testified that he visited his grandmother on the day that she was killed. He was there till at least 6:30 p.m. Lester Busby, her grandnephew, and David Hicks arrived while her grandson was still there and they saw him leave. They then went in to visit with Ms. Heggar. While they were there, Lester repaid Ms. Heggar 80 dollars, which he owed her. They left around 7:15 p.m. and went next door to a neighboring friend¡¦s house. David Hick¡¦s went home alone from there to get something but returned within ten minutes of leaving. Because he was only gone for 5-10 minutes, prosecution theorized TWO attacks on Ms. Heggar because he could not have killed his grandmother during this 5-10 minute period alone. At 7:30 p.m., 15 minutes after the two had left, an insurance salesman called to see Ms. Heggar. He knocked for about 2 or 3 minutes and got no reply. Her door was open but the screen door was closed. Her TV was on. He claimed to have left after about 5 minutes and then he returned the next morning. The circumstances were exactly the same. With concern, he went to the neighbor¡¦s house and called the police. His reasoning for being there was because the grandmother¡¦s family had taken out burial insurance three days before she had died.
On May 23rd 1957, three police officers representing Cleveland Ohio came to the door of Miss Mapp’s residence with the suspicion of a bombing suspect hiding out in her home. Miss Mapp and her daughter lived in a two family two story home. Upon their arrival at the house the police knocked on the door and demanded entrance from Miss Mapp. However Miss Mapp didn’t open the door and instead asked them to provide a search warrant after she called her attorney. The officers advised their headquarters of the situation and established surveillance of the home over the next few hours. The officers once again sought entrance three hours later when they forced open one of the doors to the home and went inside. It was around this time that miss mapp’s attorney arrived and witnessed the police officers enter the home. In their continued defiance of the law they did not allow Miss Mapp to see her attorney. At one point when the officers entered the hall Miss Mapp stopped them and demanded to see their search warrant. One officer held up a slip of paper claiming it to be a search warrant and Miss Mapp immediately grabbed it and stuck it in her bra. The officers wrestled Mapp to the ground and made her relinquish the paper through a struggle. The police then handcuffed her because she was being “belligerent”. The officers then escorted her upstairs and began searching through her drawers and belongings, even though they were looking for a bombing suspect. The police also looked at her photo albums and some of her personal papers. The search spread throughout the house. It’s possible that during this time they found who they believed was the bomber Virgil Ogletree inside the home. He said that he was there delivering laundry as he owned a dry cle...
A horrific murder happened in tiny Skidmore on December of 2004. Lisa Montgomery and Bobbi Jo Stinnett met and found out that they had much in common and became good friends (Nunes 85-86). Surprisingly, Bobbi and Lisa met in an internet chat room. Bobbi was into puppy breeding and she occasionally served as a judge. Lisa lived in Kansas where her close friends were shocked about what she was talking about. Of course, Lisa shrugged it off and she sent an email to Bobbi saying that she wanted to see the puppies (Nunes 85-86). When Lisa met Bobbi Jo she had a fake name which was Darlene Fisher because she didn’t want Bobbi to know her real identity. When Lisa sent Bobbi the email she had a criminal intent on her mind. She was planning to choke Bobbi into unconsciousness and then cut open her womb and steal Bobbi’s unborn baby. When Lisa arrived at the house she threw a rope around Bobbi’s neck and choked her until she was unconscious. That is when Lisa took a knife and started to cut open Bobbi’s stomach. Lisa had to cut through skin, fat, and muscle to get to Bobbi’s uterus. Bobbi’s baby was in eight-month gestation; Lisa cut and tied the baby’s cord. Lisa stole the baby and fled to her house in Kansas. Unfort...
A woman was raped at Central Park and was found unconscious. She recovered quickly after the incident but could not recall what happened on that day. On the same day that woman was raped all five teenagers were there but were at the opposite direction of where the rape incident happened. They were brought in by the police to be questioned and were asked about the incident. The police were interrogating the teenagers and yelled at their faces because they were getting frustrated that they were not getting the answers that they wanted to hear from them. The teenagers were getting tired from being questioned for about two days on something they knew nothing about and wanted to just get out of the place. The police told them to say certain things and told them things that they wanted to hear, which led to the teenagers believing that if they said what the police told them to say then they could leave. They ended up confessing to raping the woman on video and paper and that led to their arrest. Though there were no actual evidence proving they were there at the scene, it did not matter because the police just wanted the confessions, which was their goal from the
Many things that happen in this world are scary and totally out of our control. Child abduction is a horrifying and life changing event that has terrified many children, parents and love ones. Child abduction is every parent's worst nightmare. It could happen in the grocery store, yard or even your child's school. The horrifying truth is that child abduction could happen almost anywhere in the world. However, the most crucial part about their whole experience can be once they’re rescued and brought back to their loved ones. Many survivors tend to feel unsafe and in most cases, and just can’t be the same person.
On February 28, 2018, at approximately 1018 hours, Investigator Mems conducted a recorded interview with witness, Shirley Youngblood, at Pulaski County Criminal Investigations Division. Ms. Youngblood agreed to make a statement in reference to terroristic threatening which occurred at 915 McCoy Road in Little Rock, AR. What follows is a summary of Ms. Youngblood’s statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On January 10, 2017, at approximately 0153 hours, the defendant, Victor Manuel Cruz-Anaya, while at 1030 Ribaut Road Lot 6, Beaufort, South Carolina 29902, which is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Beaufort, did cause bodily injury upon the body of Sofia Chavez. The defendant commit this offense by placing his hands around the victim neck, choking her and by grabbing her wrist tightly restraining her from moving at her free will, during an argument. This action caused Chavez to fear for her safety. This altercation took place in the presence of a minor, 3 years of age. Affiant and others are witness to prove the same.
The accuser said she received a call that they needed a room and that it was the player, he arrived at the place and she said that she took them to her room and asked if she could give him a tour afterwards. She accepted. And he says he came back around 10:30 p.m. And she showed him the place ... and he says that after that everything started ... in one part of his statement he says he got up to leave and he asked for a hug and she gave it to him. and he kissed her and she left him and then he started to undress and she wanted to go but he did not leave her and he started to strangle her
P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that he was inside a McDonalds with friends (non-parties) when plainclothes MOS entered and began searching everyone. P alleges that one of the MOS pushed P’s friends towards the door. P claims that he stood up and MOS Schwarz pushed P back down and punched him in the face. P alleges that he was arrested then taken to the hospital for medical treatment. MOS state that Sgt. Schwarz, who is assigned to the anti-crime unit, received a call about a stabbing at church on Ft. Washington Avenue and large dispute in the area with knife and gun. MOS arrived at the McDonalds there was an altercation in the parking lot between teenagers and approximately 3 of the teenagers dropped a knife on the ground and
Your affiant interviewed the defendant who stated that she was involved in a verbal altercation with the complainant because she was buying cigarette and refused to give him her identification card. The defendant reported that she started to record the defendant with her cell phone and asked his name. The defendant further reported that the complainant got mad, attempted to grab her phone, and punched her head with a close fist. The defendant verbally identified herself as Brianna Jazmin Massey with a DOB
While searching for the location of the identified suspect, APLE workers witnesses the individual leading four young boys into a forest. However, by the time police arrived on scene, the suspect had disappeared into the trees. The four boys were subsequently taken to the police station for questioning, upon which three boys admitted to experiencing sexual abuse at the hands of the suspect. With testimony from the three boys, an arrest of the Montreal man was ordered.
Pipes, C., & Pape, D. (2001). Police Pursuits and Civil Liability . FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin , 70,7.
Pursuant to an undercover investigation on the Internet, defendant initiated two "instant messages" with a detective posing as a 14 year old boy. During the electronic conversations, defendant sent photographs, made an offer to engage in specific sexual acts and invited the boy to meet him at his house.