Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on Hobbes political philosophy and morality
Social contract theory of Hobbes
Social contract theory of Hobbes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Thomas Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy (1588-1679) Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher in the seventeenth century. He was a politically influential philosopher with a variety of interests. He supported a range of materialist, nominalist, and empiricist views. Materialism is an idea that everything is made up of matter or dependent upon matter for existence in nature. Materialism tends to reject the existence of a spirit or anything of nonphysical form by Wolff, 2011. There are at least two kinds of Nominalism, one that maintains that there are no universals and one that maintains that there are no abstract objects by Rodriguez-Pereyra, Hobbes believes that only universal things are names. Empiricism is the theory that all human …show more content…
knowledge comes from the evidence of our five senses, and therefore we can never know more, or know with greater certainty, than our senses will allow by Wolff, 2011. Hobbes set out to write three treatises for his philosophical work including: matter or body, human nature, and society. Hobbes’ work was influenced by a reaction against religious authority and the scholastic philosophy that defended the religious authority. Next, Hobbes took a liking to the involvement of the scientific method with a focus in geometry. The political problems in his home country inspired him to focus on society first. Hobbes published the highly controversial, Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society. Hobbes also expressed controversial views on God and religion by Williams, n.d. In 1951, Hobbes wrote the publication of Leviathan his most influential work.
Hobbes calls the government an organism, showing how each part of the government functions similarly to parts of a human body. At this point in Leviathan, Hobbes describes his views on human nature. He described human nature using a metaphoric approach. He believes that all human acts are ultimately selfish. Regardless if the acts appear to be good deeds. There is always some type of personal gain or ulterior motive. According to Hobbes, without any form of government to mediate, it is human nature to act self-serving way. He believes that all humans are psychologically and physically equal. Humans are naturally susceptible to fight each other because of the equality. Where one lacks in strength, they make up for it with wisdom and vice …show more content…
versa. He cites three natural reasons that humans fight; which is competition over material good, general distrust, and the glory of powerful positions. Hobbes comes to the conclusion that humanity's natural condition is a state of continuous war, constant fear, and lack of morals. In Leviathan, Hobbes writes that morals consist of Laws of Nature. Laws of Nature are understood through social agreement through the reasoning to preserve human life. Hobbes declares his laws of nature; which are derived from geometry. With the following five principles he came up with fifteen laws. The five general principles are: that human beings pursue only their own self-interest, that all people are equal, the three natural causes of quarrel, the natural condition of everlasting war, and the motivation for peace. Hobbes believed that the responsibility of the people lies with government. This is where he came up the title of his book Leviathan. The thought of the best government would have the power of a sea monster, or leviathan. He saw the king as a necessity of leadership and authority. He felt that democracy would never work because people are only motivated by self-interest. He saw humanity as being motivated by a constant need for power, and to give power to the individual would result in a war of every one against the other that would make life "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." The more powerful the government the better. Hobbes concludes that a king with limitless rights should rule, retrieved from The European Graduate School, 2015. Major philosophical problems with Thomas Hobbes’ views are that he believes we should give up certain liberties to ensure security by submitting ourselves to the rules of the government.
To an extent government is in place to protect the people. In reality, the government are people with the same self-centered body with unlimited powers. The government can also be influenced by its own selfishness. The United States is a fine example that democracy is effective. Also, Hobbes work in Leviathan doesn’t offer a state of physiology and phycology during his time period. All of Hobbes’ views are limited and biased based on his own perspective. His works are centered on solving the problems of political
philosophy. References Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2015, April 1). Nominalism in Metaphysics. Retrieved July 25, 2015. Thomas Hobbes Biography. (n.d.). Retrieved July 26, 2015, from http://www.egs.edu/library/thomas-hobbes/biography/ Wolff, R. (2012). About philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Bibliography Duncan, S. (2009, March 11). Thomas Hobbes. Retrieved July 25, 2015. Williams, G. (n.d.). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved July 25, 2015.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke have authored two works that have had a significant impact on political philosophy. In the “Leviathan” by Hobbes and “Two Treatises of Government” by Locke, the primary focus was to analyze human nature to determine the most suitable type of government for humankind. They will have confounding results. Hobbes concluded that an unlimited sovereign is the only option, and would offer the most for the people, while for Locke such an idea was without merit. He believed that the government should be limited, ruling under the law, with divided powers, and with continued support from its citizens. With this paper I will argue that Locke had a more realistic approach to identifying the human characteristics that organize people into societies, and is effective in persuading us that a limited government is the best government.
Hobbes was best known for Leviathan, which was published in 1651. During this time, the monarchy had come to an end. England was under the rule of Parliament. The message received by the people from the Leviathan was that a “royal authority that will protect them from any sort of disorder should govern the people of England”(Hodges 2000). This did not go well with Europe. It became an issue on government and religion. There were so many arguments ...
We will give Hobbes’ view of human nature as he describes it in Chapter 13 of Leviathan. We will then give an argument for placing a clarifying layer above the Hobbesian view in order to account for acts of altruism. Hobbes views human nature as the war of each man against each man. For Hobbes, the essence of human nature can be found when we consider how man acts apart from any government or order. Hobbes describes the world as “a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man.”
The final sentence of that passage, “And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short,” seems to sum up what Hobbes has been leading up to in the first twelve chapters of Leviathan: that without a sovereign power, without Leviathan, the natural life of man is simply horrible. It is a life in which people naturally and constantly seek to destroy one another.
Human nature, according to Thomas Hobbes, is a base and narrow kind of nature. In Leviathan he argues from a mental absolutist standpoint: an absolute ruler is the best form of government, although not in response to a Godly proclamation. In his opinion, it is the only form of rule which uses human kind’s totally self-interested nature to its advantage, and shows benefit to the people. Giving up certain liberties for the sake of safety while living at the whim of an absolute ruler may sound absurd these days. However, in this kind of society, Hobbes believed, the rational course of action is for the citizens to act peacefully with each other. In class we discussed the similarities to the mafia. In this society, live peacefully and don’t
In sophisticated prose, Hobbes manages to conclude that human beings are all equal in their ability to harm each other, and furthermore that they are all capable of rendering void at will the covenants they had previously made with other human beings. An absolutist government, according to Hobbes, would result in a in a society that is not entirely focused on self-preservation, but rather a society that flourishes under the auspices of peace, unity, and security. Of all the arguably great philosophical discourses, Hobbes in particular provides one of the surest and most secure ways to live under a sovereign that protects the natural liberties of man. The sovereign government is built upon the idea of stability and security, which makes it a very intriguing and unique government indeed. The aforementioned laudation of Hobbes and his assertions only helps to cement his political theories at the forefront of the modern
Hobbes explanation of the state and the sovereign arises from what he calls “the State of Nature”. The State of Nature is the absence of political authority. There is no ruler, no laws and Hobbes believes that this is the natural condition of humanity (Hobbes 1839-45, 72). In the State of Nature there is equality. By this, Hobbes means, that there is a rough equality of power. This is because anyone has the power to kill anyone (Hobbes 1839-45, 71). Hobbes argues that the State of Nature is a violent, continuous war between every person. He claims that the State of nature is a state of w...
In The Leviathan Thomas Hobbes argues for the establishment of a society that does not contain the elements of its own demise. Hobbes views civil war as a society’s ultimate demise, and the only way to avoid it is for the citizens initially to submit to an absolute political authority. For Hobbes, civil war is inevitable in every type of government except an absolute government. In order to sustain this absolute government, the citizens not only must submit to the absolute political authority, but they must also not partake in activities that actively undermine the absolute political authority’s power. For these reasons, it is clear that Hobbes believes in political obedience and its ability to influence the peace of a society. Furthermore,
In his book Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes describes the nature of man as functioning solely upon the pursuit of desire for power and of war. Every emotion is a variation of desire, and these desires motivate us to act. He describes the natural condition in which humans are being without political authority. Living in a chaotic and unjust society where every man lives by his own desires, Hobbes argues that humans must use reason and follow the laws of nature. According to these laws, which I will explain further in depth, reason will cause individuals to search for peace, and cause people to appoint a sovereign, a “leviathan”, to administer peace.
����������� Thomas Hobbes is an important political and social philosopher. He shares his political philosophy in his work Leviathan. Hobbes begins by describing the state of nature, which is how humans coped with one another prior to the existence of government. He explains that without government, �the weakest has the strength to kill the strongest� (Hobbes 507). People will do whatever it takes to further their own interests and protect their selves; thus, creating a constant war of �every man against every man� (Hobbes 508). His three reasons for people fighting amongst each other prior to government include �competition,� �diffidence,� and �glory� (Hobbes 508). He explains how men fight to take power over other people�s property, to protect them selves, and to achieve fame. He describes life in the state of nature as being �solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short� (Hobbes 508). Hobbes goes on to say that if men can go on to do as they please, there will always be war. To get out of this state of nature, individuals created contracts with each other and began to form a government.
The main critics of Thomas Hobbes’ work are most often those with a more optimistic view of human nature. However, if one is to really look at a man’s actions in depth, a self-serving motivation can always be found. The main problem with Hobbes’ claims is that he does not account for the more Darwinian perspective that helping one’s own species survive is at the same time a selfish and unwar-like act. Thus his conclusion that without a governing body, we are essentially at war with one another is not completely true as years of evolution can help disprove.
In The Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes talks about his views of human nature and describes his vision of the ideal government which is best suited to his views.
Hobbes was a strong believer in the thought that human nature was evil. He believed that “only the unlimited power of a sovereign could contain human passions that disrupt the social order and threatened civilized life.” Hobbes believed that human nature was a force that would lead to a constant state of war if it was not controlled. In his work the Leviathan, he laid out a secular political statement in which he stated the significance of absolutism.
Hobbes wrote the Leviathan during the civil war where he had experienced horrendous visions of violence. “Thomas Hobbes lived during some of the most tumultuous times in European history -- consequently, it should be no surprise that his theories were thoroughly pessimistic regarding human nature.” This may support his view that he would rather have any higher authority rather than none no matter how corrupted the government actually is. He wrote that the people “should respect and obey their government because without it society would descend into a civil war ‘of every man against every man’.” However, this may have been the cause for a bias view. To elaborate, a war is an extreme depiction of the potential volatility in human nature. Therefore making one aspect of humanity seems pre-dominant.
Hobbes believes that if there is no government then it will lead to a state of war. This is because the people can have different judgement which cause them to not have an agreement on what the government should contain. This means that the people did not view each other as equal and did not have the same morals as Locke would believe in. It can also lead to a state of war if the people don’t have the right to property since it will cause the peace to break. However, the only type of state Hobbes believes in is the Leviathan state that has only one