This Is Not Coincidental-Atwood's The Republic Of Gilead

628 Words2 Pages

Many of the characters, being in an oppressive situation, face the decision of what is more crucial: safety in complacency, or freedom. Gilead, with all of its many faults, was allowed to form due to complacency in allowing horrible things to happen to other people because they were “other.” This is not coincidental- Atwood is suggesting that, in the words of Danita Dodson,“a better world that truly recognizes human rights will transpire only when we empathetically descend to the Other's hell and then reawaken to the atrocities of the present” (2). Essentially, the only way to prevent modern society from falling on a path eerily similar to Gilead’s oppressive regime “to give voice to suppressed histories” (Dodson 18). Offred, though not alone, …show more content…

However, her eventual recognition of her prior faults and her promise to remedy them when given the opportunity show her growth as a character. The Republic of Gilead offers freedom from the dangers present in modern society, and the citizens of Gilead are lead to believe that freedom from is as important as what those in the times before Gilead would call freedom. “There is more than one kind of freedom...in the days of anarchy, it was freedom to. Now you are being given freedom from. Don’t underrate it” (24). The “freedom from” offered by Gilead is safety. The “freedom to” prohibited by Gilead is what could rightfully be called freedom itself, and its absence is what makes Gilead so oppressive. The characters within the novel, primarily those that are female, must choose between having “freedom from” and remaining safe, or refusing this and fighting to have freedom to choose virtually anything about their lives, which could very easily put their well-being in …show more content…

Her voice trembled with indignation” (118). Aunt Lydia’s indignation is ironic, considering that, while the things she described are by no means justified, Gilead essentially sees women as outlets of reproduction and is almost certainly worse than the society that she is condemning. Regardless of the legitimacy of her statement, it shows how Gilead maintains order- through fear. It shows the Handmaids that any attempt at rebellion will be not only met with scorn, but bring with it the lack of safety that Gilead associates with its predecessor. By telling the Handmaids that the times before included a lack of respect and safety, they encourage complacency and fear of rebellion. Even the Commander, one of the founders of Gilead, is aware of the lack of freedom caused by complacency, which suggests that complacency is intrinsically detrimental. “Better never means better for everyone, he says. It always means worse, for some” (211). The Commander shows that, unlike Aunt Lydia, he is aware of the fact that Gilead has declined the quality of women’s lives. However, he remains concerned with what he believes to be the way to better society as a whole, which is the complacency of those whose lives have been

Open Document