Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature of friendship
A friendship is a bond of mutual affection. To me, friendship is a bond that people share in which they have mutual kindness, loyalty, respect, and equality. According to Aristotle there are three types of friendships. They are utility friendships, pleasure friendships, and goodness friendships. Allow me to elaborate on what they mean; a utility friendship is when you can benefit from the other. A pleasure friendship is based upon admiration and desire to be in someone’s company. Lastly, a friendship based on goodness is the desire to see the other do better and succeed. It’s the longing for the other party to be a better him or her. It’s a “one hand washes the other” bond. For example, I have a really good friend and our main goal is to make sure that we are both good and are always on the up and up. We keep each other moving forward to become better people. In our friendship, there is no sugar coating of anything. If I have done anything wrong, she tells me to make me better and vice versa. I am honored to have her friendship because I know that there is a high chance at a long lasting friendship. Aside from the categories of friendship, I am going give you further knowledge. In this essay, I am going to be addressing some questions that may arise about friendship and the a few things that can affect it. Some questions about friendship is whether people of different levels should remain friends, can you have more than one friend, how are friendships affected by technology and can men and women platonically be friends.
Aristotle believes in many things about friendship. One of the many things that he believes is that friends who are on different levels shouldn’t be friends. This is because their needs and pleasures may change...
... middle of paper ...
... Cited Page
Amie. "Technology: Good or Bad for Today's Youth?" Teen Ink. Emerson Media, 27 Apr. 2011.
Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W. D. Ross. The Internet Classics Archive.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Copeland, Libby. “Is Facebook Making Us Sad?” Slate. 26 Jan. 2011. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Lewis, C. S. The Four Loves. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1988. 57-90.
Kirsch, Jen. "Is Technology Helping or Hurting Your Friendships?" How Technology Helps and
Hinders Your Friendships. Canadian Living, 2013. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
McElroy, Molly. "Friendship 2.0: Teens’ Technology Use Promotes Sense of Belonging,
Identity." UW Today. N.p., 22 Oct. 2012. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Meilaender, Gilbert. "Men and Women- Can We Be Friends." Article. First Things, June-July
1993. Web. 05 Dec. 2013.
The audience can empathize easily with Sue and the death of her youngest and this allows the audience to understand the usefulness of Facebook “friends”; however, Dailey’s shift to present the other side of the argument with Bugeja’s forward truth of the flaws in online social networks. Bugeja convinces the reader that reality provides a more intimate level of support that the virtual world can never offer. Dailey could have ended the article on a stronger note that Facebook “friends” only serves as an additive to friendships to reality. In reference to Henry Adams infamous quote, Facebook “friends” cannot be made but built from existing
The essay by technology reporter for the New York Times, Jenna Wortham, titled, “It’s Not about You, Facebook. It’s about Us” discusses the idea that Facebook has helped shape emotions and now leaves its users emotionless. Although Wortham brings in several sources she does not support these sources with statistics and her personal feelings stand in the way of getting her main points across. In addition, she has a weak conclusion that leaves readers trying to grasp the actual message that Wortham is attempting to convey. Wortham fails to effectively support her thesis that society feels that it can not live without facebook.
One of the things Aristotle discusses is the need to limit the number of friends we have. He states: “So the right course is perhaps not to seek to
Aristotle regards Virtue Friendship as perfect. He does not comment on the potential negatives, whereas Lewis more realistically presents possible dangers of his highest form of friendship. Lewis believes that the birth of friendship proper from companionship reveals friendship’s dark and idolatrous side. Lewis comments on the sense of inclusiveness between friends that can create an “us/them” tension that can be potentially dangerous. He believes there is danger in the sense that a partial indifference or deafness to the voices of the outside world may develop and morph into dangerous perversions of
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
Friendship is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the books of Aristotle’s ethical principles. Aristotle takes the idea of friendship to a serious degree. He categorizes them into three groups or types of friendships. This report will attempt to define each type of friendship as well as identify the role of friendship in a society.
II In Books VIII and IX, Aristotle discusses the role of friendship in the good life.
In the writings of Aristotle, seen in Nicomachean Ethics, it is evident that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a virtuous and therefore happy life. I believe that this is accurate due to the similar conditions necessary for a complete friendship and a happy life. It is also evident that friendship is useful in achieving a happy life because friendship can make performing virtuous actions easier. His interpretation can be misunderstood and mistakes in practice can be made, so we will need to discuss these follies as well, in order to understand all the effects of friendship on achieving a happy life.
Aristotle first explains what all entail friendship. That it is a feeling similar to that of necessity and a good overall pleasure-filled feeling, though some like me may disagree on this. Friendship is that which consists of a given mutual feelings towards one another. These feelings would consist of goodwill. Then Aristotle continues on to the three kinds of friendship. The first kind of friendship is that being one based on utility. At this point this is where both people coming together would gain some sort of benefit from one another. The second kind of friendship is one that is based on pleasure. This is where both people
Aristotle wrote on many subjects in his lifetime but one of the virtues that he examines more extensively is friendship. Aristotle believes that there are three different kinds of friendship: utility, pleasure, and virtuous friendships. He also argues that a real friendship should be highly valued because it is a complete virtue and he believes it to be greater than honor and justice. Aristotle suggests that human’s love of utility and pleasure is the only reason why the first two types of friendships exist. Aristotle also argues that humans only set up these types of relationships for personal gain. But when he speaks of the virtuous friendships, Aristotle states that it is one of the greatest attainments one can achieve.
Konnikova, Maria. "How Facebook Makes Us Unhappy." The New Yorker.., 10 Sept. 2013. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. .
Owens, Michaella. “Youth Perspective: Pros, Cons to a Generation Raised on Technology.” Magic Valley [Twins Falls, Idaho] 5 Jan. 2014: Web.
Most beautiful kindred of all of humans are the companionship. Without excitement, confusion, tangles and commitment life becomes a cake-walk if people have a hand of a friend to hold on. Can everyone imagine if there is no friendship in the world? Nobody will care about one another. Friends are the pillars of strength that give support and comfort in life "A hedge between keeps friendship green”. Friendship is the one of the medium that can build unity among community. As Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of United States, once said, “Friendship is the only cement that will hold the world together”, I strongly agree to his statement because friendship teach to help one another, learn to accept each other and build trust and faith towards each other.
Technology use was on the rise but has shown a significant increased rate in recent years. Technology was a beneficial tool that was used on a daily basis. Technology industries had developed many devices like computers, laptops, smartphones, iPods, and many other devices that made technology easier to access from anywhere and anytime. Technology expanded every day and the usage increased which had an effect on society especially targeting teens. Teens abused the use of technology that caused them to have serious problems mentally and physically. Teens mainly focused on technology use and caused a social disconnection from the real world. Technology use has a negative effect on teens by causing health problems and social disconnection.
Marche, Stephen. “Is Facebook Making us Lonely? (Cover story)”: 8 (10727825) 309.4 (2012): 68. Academic Search Premier. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.