Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Celebrity have right of privacy
Privacy and celebrity
The role of media in celebrities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Celebrity have right of privacy
A celebrity's life source is publicity without it they cease to be famous. Celebrities and their lifestyles are often promoted through the media which is devoted to satisfying the public’s interest in celebrities. With this said, magazines, newspapers, and television, scrutinize celebrities life's to reveal candid photos and confidential stories about failing marriages, romances, and drug abuse. Celebrities should not be entitled to privacy because they chose a career that they knew would put them in the constant way of the spotlight, they use media to their advantage, and they influence their behavior through media onto our youth’s minds and attitudes whether it be developmental or consequential. When making the decision of becoming a celebrity, people open the doors to a life without privacy. When first starting out celebrities hire agents and publicists that will use the media to expose and increase their fame. So before choosing that career path, they should think about whether they will be able to handle the media or not. They should also think about whether they will be able to handle not having any privacy because when seeking celebrity status, their life’s privacy is reduced to that of living in a fishbowl. According to Source A, the “waiver theory” holds that celebrities have given up their privacy by choosing to appear in the public eye. This is basically stating the celebrities know that the consequence of getting “lifelong fame is the lifelong loss of privacy” (Source A). As mentioned earlier, celebrities use the media to their advantage. One of the biggest factors in establishing their images is social media. Social media like Twitter and Facebook allow celebrities to inform fans about upcoming events, albums, tour... ... middle of paper ... ...at everyone is entitled to the protection of the law, even the publicity seeking celebrities. However, in society's eyes celebrities are not viewed as ordinary people. Source F states that “Although private individuals can usually claim the right to be left alone, that right is not absolute. For example, if a person who is normally not considered a public figure is thrust into the spotlight because of her participation in a newsworthy even, her claims of a right to privacy may be limited.” Since celebrities chose a career that they knew would put them in the constant way of the spotlight, they constantly use media to their advantage and to influence behavior onto our youth’s minds and attitudes they should not be entitled to privacy. “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Benjamin Franklin).
A celebrity is not a person known for his/her talent or achievement, but an individual recognized for his/her reputation created by the media. The phase of stardom is slippery, and media may choose to represent celebrities varying from exaggerated admiration to mockery. The three texts chosen, movie "Sunset Boulevard", feature article "Over the Hilton" and television show "Celebrity Uncensored Six" are texts presenting different perception of celebrities than their usual images - either corrupted by the encircling media, overloads oneself with self-indulgence, or just mocks celebrity in a broad spectrum. Such media items empower and impresses the audience by perceiving celebrities as people who pay the price of privacy to gain well knowness, signifying the vanity of stardom from the commonly accepted images.
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
The quandary is that some celebrities can't understand that when one is out in plain view of the public, one cannot reasonably expect privacy. Privacy is a right reserved for when one is in private.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
In each of the cases discussed in this report, the court is presented the challenge of deciding whether to protect a celebrityʻs right to publicity or to protect and artistʻs constitutional right to free speech. These protections are at conflict because the First amendment encourages the unencumbered exchange of ideas and public discourse, which celebrities are an inextricable part of. Yet, the right to publicity entitles a celebrity to profit from their reputation and prevent others from doing so. Despite the similarities present between these cases, the evidence presented as well as the circumstances surrounding each case distinguish them from each other. For example, the first two cases involve the argument of a videogame companyʻs use of
There has always been a need and a desire to tap into the celebrity lifestyle. The paparazzo is our window into this world. While the paparazzi are important in getting the stunning images of celebrities smiling on the red carpet, they overstep boundaries when they snap images of said persons without makeup as they ask their private houses. Consider the vital issue of paparazzi reform. The job of paparazzi is stressful on the body and mind; being a celebrity with your life broadcasted at every second has similar effects. The physical and mental problems faced by the men and women responsible for the photos are frightening. There is a real privacy issue when talking about the paparazzi. Celebrities lose the luxury of a quiet home when they have a string of photographers outside their homes. Safety is imperative for those in any way involved with the paparazzi. Limitations should be applied to the paparazzi for the safety and sanity of all included.
This is one of the main reasons why famous people like celebrities and personalities are very private when
The deception of media consumers allows for the abuse of economic infrastructures of society. An obsession with celebrities’ lives passifies ordinary people in accepting the stratification of the elite businesses and the ordinary citizens. Though pseudo-events and celebrity worship may not be exactly complementary, the similarities of both leaves the public to be utterly vulnerable unless they begin to critically think for themselves.
Does the public have a right to know everything about a public figure’s life? If you turn on your television, the primetime program will have lots of news about celebrities. By the time you have to pay at the register at the supermarket, you can appreciate your favorite public star on the cover of a magazine, or if you open up a new window on the internet browser, a celebrity gadget will appear at the beginning. It is irresistible not to read about the personal lives of the various famous people with pictures, or watch what is happening in the showbiz. In fact, it makes entertainment for a while boring.
Bennett, Courtney. "Fan Club Confessions: Teens Underestimate Influence of Celebrity." Psychologytoday.com. Sussex Publishers, 1 Apr. 2005. Web. 29 Jan. 2014.
In addition, if someone was fallowing you, taking pictures and bullying you every day single day, you would instantly report them to the police and they would without a doubt get the stalkers arrested, and they would get a restraining order. But if a celebrity calls the cops saying that there is someone following them and harassing them, no one is willing to protect them, because they are not able to stop the paparazzi for good. It 's like all celebrities are being punished for being rich and successful. Nobody deserves
of the view of the general population. Social media is a great way for celebrities to advance or
SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 Feb. 2014. Sisto, Joseph. " Do Celebrities Forfeit the Right to Privacy?"
When it comes to the topic of should the private lives of famous people be off limits to the media, most of us will readily agree that no private life should be entirely off limits. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how the media always finds their way into the life of the artist. Whereas some are convinced that the media should not interfere into the private lives of the celebrity, others maintain that because even if they make a lot of fans happy, they can always live a life of loneliness. I agree that the private lives of a famous person should be off limits to the media because they might have everything in the world but underneath all that they might be living their life melancholy and loneliness.
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.