Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of cultural assimilation
A conclusion on acculturation among societies in America
Essays on assimilation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The consequences of cultural assimilation
“Assimilation is a process in which formerly distinct and separate groups come to share a common culture and merge together socially. As a society undergoes assimilation, difference among groups decrease” (Healy, 43). Assimilation theory argues that racial inequality emerges from the inability to “be like” the dominant group/culture. Assimilationist believes that once we reach assimilation racial disparities will be less prevalent. Omi & Winant also provides a good definition of this theory. The ethnicity paradigm suggested that “racial minorities could be incorporated into American life in the same way white ethnic groups had been and the assumption of a fundamental, underlying American commitment to equality and social justice for racial minorities” (Omi & Winant, 12). It’s an idea of all cultures peacefully simmering in the great “melting pot”. Nevertheless, assimilation theory fails to recognize that not all cultures/races will …show more content…
“For groups that immigrate to the United States, acculturation to the dominant Anglo-American culture may include {as necessary) learning the English language, changing eating habits, adopting new value systems, and altering the spelling of the family surname” (Healey, 47). I believe immigrants are forced to assimilate, losing culture and language. “First-generation immigrants, who are most authentically steeped in ethnic culture, tend to throw it away, often with both hands, as they pursue the opportunities that led them to come to America in the first place. Decades later, their largely assimilated children engage in desperate, but usually futile, efforts to recover the very culture that their parents relinquished” (Steinberg in Gallagher 2012, 322). Why must one give up a part of their culture? What are we assimilating into? Does assimilation guarantee racial equality? Do we have to assimilate? What’s so great about the dominant culture that it’s worth assimilating
For hundreds of years, America has been not only a country, but an idea. An idea that anyone with ambition and good values can rise up from wherever they are, come to America, and achieve success. All that was required of them back them was a command of the language and a goal. So why do we, today, demand such a steep price to be an American? The ideal American shouldn’t have to sacrifice their native language, culture, or heritage to become a part of society. Culture and language are elements of a unique identity, and they should be encouraged in today’s society: diversity is what makes America so unique. Spanish language, Japanese traditions, Chinese manners, and other aspects of foreign societies aren’t ‘un-American’; the want to sleep all
This model examines the relationship between the dominant culture and one with minority status, such as Latinos. Attitudes towards self, same minority group, different minority groups, and the dominant group are examined through five stages within the model. These include conformity, dissonance, resistance and immersion, introspection, and integrative awareness. The stage most pertinent to Antonio at this time is the Dissonance stage. During this stage, one starts to acknowledge the existence of racism, that he cannot escape his own heritage, and experiences conflict between shame and pride felt for his culture. This same shame versus pride conflict is also extended to members of his own minority group. Held stereotypes about other minority groups are now questioned as well. One in the Dissonance stage is also starting to realize that not all beliefs held by the dominant group are valuable or even accurate (Sue & Sue, 2003). Because of the two incidents Antonio endured during his freshman year and their emotional impact on him, he is becoming aware that even though he has “assimilated,” others of the majority group will still identify him as different. Antonio is also experiencing conflict between what members of the minority group (his parents) and the majority group feel are important; his parents believe he
...d not assimilate to accepted American culture. However, by the time society learned which ethnicities were ‘unassimilable’, the cultures had already begun to take root in America. At first America had a knee-jerk reaction to this realization and began passing more resolutions preventing ‘non-whites’ from entering the United States. However, as America experienced the increase in cultural communities in reaction to prejudice formed by immigration laws, the government learned that only through a loosening of immigration law and lessening of prejudice would America become a true melting pot. The mid-1900s saw this manifestation in America, as immigration laws allowed more people from around the world to immigrate. As prejudice lessened, the cultural communities sprinkled throughout America that created a mosaic became less prevalent and have begun to form a melting pot.
concerns racial equality in America. The myth of the “Melting Pot” is a farce within American society, which hinders Americans from facing societal equality issues at hand. Only when America decides to face the truth, that society is not equal, and delve into the reasons why such equality is a dream instead of reality. Will society be able to tackle suc...
This essay will discuss the intrinsic relationship between diversity conceptualization and social integration presenting a response against David Brooks’ essay entitled “People Like Us.” In order to do this I will discuss four crucial elements: the influences of different definitions of diversity in cultural unification, Brook’s ideas about social groups working together and social groups coexisting together, the importance of diversity, and the influence of diversity in social changes. I will examine why some people have the perception that our American society ignore or see as unworthy diversity. Thus, I will dispute Brook’s view stating that our society disregards diversity, and Americans just pretend that it is important to them.
Following the 1890’s, the world began to undergo the first stages of globalization. Countries and peoples, who, until now, were barely connected, now found themselves neighbors in a planet vastly resembling a global village. Despite the idealized image of camaraderie and brotherhood this may seem to suggest, the reality was only discrimination and distrust. Immigration to new lands became a far more difficult affair, as emigrants from different nations came to be viewed as increasingly foreign. In the white-dominated society of the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the only way to truly count oneself as American was to become “white”. For this reason, the idea of race, a socially constructed issue with no real physical basis, has become one of the most defining factors which shape immigration and assimilation in the United States.
...accomplished the assimilation into one race, it consists of people sharing a similar identity. In the words of Richard Rodriguez, ?We are gathered together-but as individuals?we stand together, alone,? thus people will assimilate but as individual ?Americans?.
Students attending American schools are taught clearly about the United States’ image as a melting pot; however, there is evidence to support that, while there is not an official federal stance on the matter (Sengupta), the amount of assimilation required to be legitimately considered a “melting pot” is not being reached. Although similar, there is often confusion about the differences between “multicultural” and “assimilated” communities. By definition, assimilation is the complete “merging of cultural traits from previously distinct culture groups” (Dictionary), while multiculturalism is delineated as the “preservation of different cultures or cultural identities within a unified society, as a state or nation” (Dictionary). Early to mid-1900’s America entertained the idea of a melting pot, where people from all parts of the world would join together and assimilate. It seems, however, that the growing trend has been to treat America as more of a “salad bowl” (Porter), in that people are joining together but instead of merging as one unit, are maintaining a majority, if not all, of their primary culture with little attempt to adapt. This underachievement has left America to unintentionally become a multicultural society. The clear differentiation between expectation and reality brings vast amounts of controversy among the nation’s people.
Multiculturalism vs Assimilation America is a place where many cultures and races co-exist, so there are many different opinions and beliefs. Of course there is bound to be tension and misunderstandings, which unfortunately escalates (in some cases) into violence that we hear about in the media. So what is the solution? Should we all assimilate to one standard or should we recognize our individual cultures and consider ourselves multicultural? The answer is not an easy one to define.
Culture is a part of everyone's life, whether we choose to express it in our everyday lives or to just be aware of its presence. A major part of one's culture is a defining language. The topic of assimilation versus multiculturalism directly relates to culture in America, and even more specifically to the power of language in American culture. Since language is the basis of communication I think that all immigrants must assimilate to a certain degree by speaking English, while preserving their heritage if they choose to do so.
Unlike Skerry, I am truly indifferent about this statement because, on one hand, I believe that once someone assimilates into a dominant culture, that culture will change them as a person mentally, physically, and socially. It would be hard to spend years trying to fit into a society and then one day go back to your original heritage because your mind will not forget all of the new things one has picked up. On the other hand, One has to consider the possibility that, if the person has the willpower and initiative to go back to their native society then they can. It will be difficult but with the right person and the right mindset, it is
Times are changing and I feel like I am forced to conform to the everyday social norms of America, which makes me feel impuissance. Racial identity, which refers to identifying with a social group with similar phenotypes and racial category, is the only experience that I have with life (Organista, 2010). Racial ethnicity was used to build my self-esteem and to keep me in the dark when it came to how society treats individuals of darker complexion. However, once I left the confines of my family and neighborhood, I was forced to befriend and interact with individuals that had different cultural values and beliefs than me. This experience caused me to learn how to appreciate other racial and ethnic groups and their cultural values and belief. This is an accurate definition, of acculturation because I was able to understand and fit in with individuals different from me, while maintaining my own culture and ethnic identity. Therefore, knowing the importance of my ancestry, while acculturating and developing my own identity was all used
Although immigrants need to assimilate into the new country, they should not be forced to do it. There are variety of reasons why new immigrants need to assimilate. The first reason is the communication barrier. People need to interact and communicate with the new society that they have been exposed to. The second reason is that immigrants need to respect and understand the new society’s culture and traditional lives.
Assimilation is when a minority group must merge to become a part of the majority; however, acculturation is when cultures join together to form one but still maintain markers of the original cultures. American success is viewed by expatriates as an achievement of white people; these expatriates feel alienated by society and left out of progress. To explain why he assimilated, Eric Liu writes, “I came to identify not with white people in general but with that subset of people, most of them white, who were educated, affluent: going places” (3). Eric Liu, along with many Americans, chose to achieve success in his academic endeavors through assimilation because he felt as if he could not achieve it otherwise. Obama reaffirms this idea by declaring, “But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it –those who were ultimately defeated… by discrimination” (4).
In 2014 when addressing immigration, former president Barack Obama said, “My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of immigrants. We were strangers once, too.” This powerful statement has a unique approach on what it is to be American- accepting our different cultural identities. However, for many minorities including myself, it is difficult to embrace the roots of our culture because of the fear of oppression. Through the pieces of literature we read in class, my understanding of American identity broadened because it showed how embracing your culture is powerful in taking a stand against societal injustices.