Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Functionalist theory vs conflict theory
Research work on the concept of social deviance
Functionalist theory vs conflict theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Functionalist theory vs conflict theory
Theoretical perspective of Crime and Deviance
Crime and deviance are two social phenomena’s which require the utilization of various theoretical perspectives to interpret. The explanation of criminal and deviant behavior is unable to be explained without the application of theory since there is no concrete evidence. Criminological theory is also used to identify deviant behavior prior to its manifestation into crime. Criminal and deviant behavior are two separate components for analysis, however, functionalism and conflict theory provide a precise explanation of the occurrence of both. Throughout the essay, the construction of crime and deviance will be interpreted using the functionalist and conflict theory approach. The strength and weakness
…show more content…
Conflict theorist view deviance as rules applied by those in power to coerce normalcy in society. Conflict theorist view crime and deviance perilous to those in power, therefore, law is an instrument use to control powerless groups of people. According to Spitzer (1975),” Problem populations tend to share a number of social characteristics, but most important among these is the fact that their behavior, personal qualities, and or position threaten the social relations of production in capitalistic society” pp.642. Conflict theorist argues law is a resource, groups of power utilize that resource to their own benefit, false consciousness. Conflict theorist view crime as a struggle between the classes the haves and the have-nots. A person desire for social mobility increases the likeliness of crime and deviance if the person is unable to reach societal goals through legitimate channels. A person’s inability to achieve social mobility may result in drug use or violence which is the foundation of conflict …show more content…
A., & Alder, P. (2016). General Introduction. Constructions of Deviance Social Power, Context and Interaction (pp.3). Boston. MA: Cengage Learning.
Alder, P. A., & Alder, P. (2016). General Introduction. Constructions of Deviance Social Power, Context and Interaction (pp.254). Boston. MA: Cengage Learning.
Ferrante, J. (2015). The Sociological Imagination. Sociology A Global Perspective (pp.26). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Jones, T. (1981). Durkheim, Deviance and Development: Opportunities Lost and Regained. Social Forces, 59(4), 1009-1024. doi:1. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.twu.edu:2069/stable/2577978 doi:1
Spitzer, S. (1975). Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance. Social Problems, 22(5), 638-651. doi:1. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.twu.edu:2069/stable/799696 doi:1
Williams, F. P., III, & McShane, M. D. (2014). Conflict Theory. Criminological Theory (pp.127-144.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Schaefer also described social control as techniques that prevent deviance (Schaefer, 2013). With Schaefer’s defin...
"Sociological Theories To Explain Deviance." Sociological Theories To Explain Deviance. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2013. .
Adler, Patricia A., and Adler Peter. Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomas/Wadsworth, 2009.
Crime is an irrelevant concept as it is tied to the formal social control mechanism of the State; deviance is a concept that is owned by sociology thus our study should be the sociology of deviance, rather than criminology
Goode, E. (2011). Constructionist Perspectives of Deviance. Deviant Behavior (Ninth Edition ed., ). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall, Inc..
There exists conflicting theories among sociologists in the area of determining why a person is considered to be a deviant, and the reasons behind why he or she has committed a deviant act. From a positivistic perspective, deviance is based on biological or social determinism. Alternatively, from a constructionist perspective, deviance is created and assigned by society. Both perspectives seek to give a theory for why a person may become known as deviant. Although they both view similar acts as deviant, the basic differences between positivists and constructionists theories are clear.
The second is related to status and respect. This type of status can change even between subcultures and may result in crime in order to achieve this s...
The two theoretical approaches I have chosen to compare to the study of crime are Functionalism and Marxism. I have done so, as I believe both theories are important/ significant to the study of crime and differentiate from each other. I will do this by writing a critique the advantages and disadvantages of both of the theories and thus, resulting in my own personal opinion in the conclusion.
...tter how hard they work, they cannot achieve the desired levels of wealth which they have been taught to aspire to, deviant behaviour may result. Howard Becker's approach to the labelling of deviance, outlined in Outsiders views deviance as the creation of social groups and not the quality of some act or behaviour ( Howard Becker website). According to Becker, researching the act of the individual is irrelevant as deviance is simply rule breaking behaviour that is labelled deviant by those in a position of power. Richard Quinney concentrates more on the development of a capitalist economy in the creation of deviants. He views the introduction of capitalism as condition where struggle is a natural component. In the book " Class, State, and Crime", Quinney states that deviance is a product of the condition of the social structure (p107) (Richard Quinney website). He believes that that the state maintains the capitalist order through the creation of laws. The state exists to serve the interests of the capitalist working class. The criminal law is merely an instrument of that class to perpetuate the current social and economic order and is used to repress those who are less powerful.
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
Criminology is the study of crime and criminals; a branch of sociology. More accurately, it is the study of crime as a social trend, and its overall origins, its many manifestations and its impact upon society as a whole. That makes it more a form of sociology than a law enforcement tool. But the trends it studies have a huge impact on the way the police do their jobs, the way society treats its criminals, and the way a given community goes about maintaining law and order. The writer will describe and give examples of the three perspectives of viewing crimes. The perspectives that will be highlighted are the consensus view, the conflict view or the interactionist view. Each perspective maintain its own interpretation of what constitutes criminal activities and what causes people to engage in criminal behaviors (Siegel, p.12).
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
Deviance. (1998). In Robert D. Benford Macmillan Compendium: Social Issues ().New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA. 20 May 2010, Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center via Gale:
Hayes, T. A. 2010. Labelling and the Adoption of a Deviant Status. Deviant Behaviour, 31 (3), pp. 282-297.
... 86). Hence why I believe that criminal behaviour is influenced by mixture of a persons social background, life chances and pathology