Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis essay on movies
Literary film analysis essay on movies
Literary analysis essay on film
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis essay on movies
Movies and books can vary in a multitude of ways. Notably, a book can often communicate more details than movies and most of the time, books are even better than the movie representing the reading. Additionally, in the book Stardust by Neil Gaiman, the book presented a theme that indicates how circumstance changes, however, for the movie Stardust directed by Matthew Vaughn, the movie exhibits a theme of how people are never who they seem to be. To say nothing of, the novel Stardust uses Tristran’s relationship with Yvaine in a third-person perspective to push forward the theme of how circumstances changes, however in the movie Stardust, the director utilizes the setting to shape the characterization of Tristran to push forward the theme of …show more content…
to be yourself and do not change yourself to please other people. Definitely, the movie setting and shaping Tristran’s characterization is more effective in presenting the theme than the book. Notably, in the novel Stardust by Neil Gaiman, the author utilizes Tristran’s relationship with Yvaine to forward a theme.
Additionally, the changes of circumstances of the relationship are seen through communication between Tristran and Yvaine. In detail, when the two first met as strangers, Yvaine called him many names including “Cretinous, verminous oaf,...” (105). However, the circumstance between Tristran and Yvaine is exhibited through a third-person perspective regarding Yvaine perspective, “The star sat by the sleeping man… and she wondered where her hatred had gone.” (216). Ultimately, this presentation of Yvaine’s thoughts from a third-person perspective presented the theme that circumstances changes. Nevertheless, the movie of Stardust differed by pushing forward a differing theme by using setting to shape the Characterization of …show more content…
Tristran. Accordingly, in the movie Stardust directed by Matthew Vaughn, the movie uses the setting of Tristran getting a haircut and wardrobe change to shape Tristran’s characterization as a changed character from a boy to a man.
Additionally, the usage of the setting on the boat getting his haircut changes indicates a change in Tristran’s perception and character when he replies to Captain Shakespeare, “I don’t understand that… Why fight to be accepted by people you don’t actually want to be like?” (1:08:58-1:09:05). In addition, Tristran’s characterization changes as he receives a haircut and change of wardrobe (1:07:16-1:09:05) indicating that he is growing from a boy to a man. All in all, Tristran’s perception and change of characterization communicate be yourself and do not change yourself to please other people, however, I felt that theme from a third-person perspective is more effective than the theme deriving from setting and characterization in the movie.
To say nothing of, the book’s third-person perspective of Yvaine thoughts is straightforward and readers are more easily able to detect the theme through how descriptive the book is more than the movie. Additionally, the movie lacks details detecting a theme in the movie Stardust feels more arduous than if viewers were to read the book. Nevertheless, both movie and book are superb. Although, If I had to choose between the two, I would choose reading the book over watching the
movie. Ultimately, movies and books can vary in a multitude of ways. In particular, the book Stardust by Neil Gaiman, the book presented a theme that indicates how circumstance changes, however, for the movie Stardust directed by Matthew Vaughn, the movie exhibits a theme of how people are never who they seem to be. Additionally, the movie and book display a difference in how the resources represent the theme, such as in the movie the theme is represented through Tristran’s change of characterization and interaction of setting and in the book the theme is presented through Yvaine’s thoughts through a third-person perspective. Although both resources are great, I specifically enjoyed the novel more.
This is my view on the movie and book. I likes the movie better the book because the
I like the reading book better than watching the movie because there are more facts in the book than the movie. Maybe I just like reading books better than watching movies. That’s my opinion. What’s yours (if you’ve read the book and seen the movie)?
Although there are similarities and differences in the novel and the movie, I liked that Gene was crazy because he caused Finny. Both works of art demonstrated a good representation of the true message from John
The book Hoot and the movie Hoot are very alike and very different. Some people like them both but some people only like one, or neither.
...d coloring of certain images. The novel, however, puts much greater emphasis on the imagination and creativity, and on the main character Tita. The novel really makes the reader feel Titas pain and grow with her as she discovers her freedom, whereas the movie failed to achieve this. Moreover, the movie tends to ignore the significant of 3 integral motifs, cooking, tears and sensuality.
The movie lacks a lot of insight onto the other characters in the book, it mostly focuses on Ponyboy. For example, in the movie there was a lack of detail on characters such as Darry and Sodapop even Dally. Dally was a major character in the book but his death in the movie seemed a bit minor because there wasn’t much detail for viewers to get attached to his character. I felt as if his death was glazed over and easily forgotten in the movie while in the book it was described for at least two pages.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
When novels are adapted for the cinema, directors and writers frequently make changes in the plot, setting, characterization and themes of the novel. Sometimes the changes are made in adaptations due to the distinctive interpretations of the novel, which involve personal views of the book and choices of elements to retain, reproduce, change or leave out. On the contrary, a film is not just an illustrated version of the novel; it is a totally different medium. When adapting the novel, the director has to leave out a number of things for the simple reason of time difference. Furthermore, other structures and techniques must be added to the film to enhance the beauty and impressions of it. Like a translator, the director wants to do some sort of fidelity to the original work and also create a new work of art in a different medium. Regardless of the differences in the two media, they also share a number of elements: they each tell stories about characters.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Another example is when Chance watches television. In the book, the narrator explains that when Chance changes the channel, he feels like he is changing himself. As he changes the channel, he gets caught up in all the different images he sees. In the movie, all you see is a man watching television, which doesn't explain too much. In the movie, the only time we find out what Chance thinks of television is when he is talking to someone else.
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.