Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the theme of change in literature
Fate in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss the theme of change in literature
There are many beliefs on the concept of fate. Some philosophers believe everything is destined to happen, and others express the contradictory: that everything happens by random, and people cause everything that happens. In The Assault, Harry Mulisch uses symbolism, and the circular structure of symbols to show how Anton Steenwijk is confronted with the idea that there is no fate, and that his life was changed because of the actions of human beings. Mulisch uses the symbolism of dice to represent chance. On the night of the assault, Anton has dice in this pocket: “He noticed that he was still holding one of the dice in his hand and put it in his pocket” (Mulisch, 19). The dice symbolize the chance that it was Anton’s neighborhood where Ploeg …show more content…
was shot, and that it was by chance that the body of Ploeg was moved to their house. This is an instant of chance because it was people that made that decision to move the body to the Steenwijk’s and it is people who roll dice. In the symbolism of the dice, the theory that fate is non-existent is explained. This theory states that there is no fate, and that everything that happens in the world is a chain of random events set off by humans, not an unseeable greater force. This fact haunts Anton, and we see that, while he is experiencing a panic attack. One of the things that stands out in his mind as his minds spins are the dice. “Gasping, he entered the house and stepped on red tiles… The black eyes of the dice! He knew that he should control himself and breathe regularly, so it wouldn’t get the better of him” (156). Some symbols, such as the dice, appear at several points in the book, giving them a cyclical nature. The dice appear both in the beginning of the story, during the assault, and as Anton is experiencing a panic attack. During this panic attack, Anton sees the mirror as well at the dice: “…Above the fireplace hung his old mirror…” (156). The mirror has appeared in other parts of the book where there is significant action or conflict. The first time the mirror appears is on the night of the assault. “Anton heard the mirror shatter, the one with the two carved elephants over the little side table with the twisted legs” (24). The next time the mirror appears is the next ‘climactic’ point in the book: when Anton is interacting with Fake Ploeg. In the middle of their conversation, where the tension is highest, Anton suddenly focuses on a mirror. “Now, Anton realized, every word mattered. Above the mantlepiece hung a tall mirror with a intricately carved frame, bought fora song at the flea market to make his room look bigger. In the weathered glass he saw that Fake had closed his eyes” (90). Later on in their conversation, Fake becomes violent after the tension, and the mirror, as well as the allusion of a safe reality, is destroyed. “Fake took aim and threw it straight at the mirror. Anton ducked. With averted face he saw the glass break into large piece that landed in splinters…” (93). In the three pages between these two quotes, there are two instances of the mirror. The mirror could symbolize several things, and one of those is the concept of reality. With the stone that Fake threw, the mirror shattered, as well as Anton’s perception of Fake. Anton may have first perceived this reunion as fate, but it was completely by chance that Fake was involved in the riot. And it was pure coincidence that he ran into Anton. It was not fate that brought them together again, but their own actions. These circular structures cannot be ignored, because Anton is dogged by them for the rest of his life, and it is these reappearing objects of the mirrors and dice that torment him so. Anton seems to attempt to blame things on fate in the beginning of the novel, but by the time he interacts with Karin, there is no way for him to blame fate any longer.
The symbol of the lizards now comes into play. “‘When we heard those shots and he saw Ploeg in front of the house, what he said was, ‘My God, the lizards!’’ With wide eyes disbelief Anton looked out over her head. The lizards…Was it possible? Could everything be blamed on the lizards? Were they the culprits in the end? ‘Do you mean,’ he said, ‘that without those lizards, none of this would have happened?’” (181). In this quote, we see the moment that Anton realizes exactly who is to blame, and the culprit is not fate, but the lizards that Mr. Korteweg had cherished more than the lives of his neighbors as Karin explains: “I believe it had something to do with Mothers’s death, but don't ask me what. You should have seen how much trouble he took to keep them alive through that winter of hunger. It was almost the only thing he still cared about” (181). The lizards, to Korteweg were a symbol of his deceased wife, and more importantly, his sanity. As long as they were alive, so would the memory of his wife be. To Anton, they symbolized the complete destruction of fate. With the knowledge of the lizards, he knew what had happened to his family and why, and he had no human to blame any
longer. Anton is continually given snippets of information about the assault and why Ploeg was shot, and he never seems to be searching out the information when he receives it. From Fake, to Takes, to Karin, it seems like fate is bringing them together, but the information that Anton receives from these people make the events of the assault seem less and less like the work of a higher power, and more like the work of human beings attempting to serve the greater good. The symbol of the dice helped him to understand chance, and the cycle of the mirror continually shattered his perception of people like Fake. The lizards forced Anton to come to terms with who was truly responsible for the death of his parents, and how the reptiles meant everything to one man who eventually killed them, making the actions that caused the death of his family to be completely meaningless, not some high power’s grand scheme. When humans do not understand something completely, it is very easy for them to blame things on fate, but when all the facts of the matter are discovered and the puzzle is solved, there is no room for fate in the actions of humans.
Task #1 In War Gives Us Meaning Author Chris Hedges outlines a few points that give light to the whole book. He outlines three main points. War is part of our culture, we have a myth behind what is actually there and finally, we use war as a crusade. These three main points make up the entire book.
There are many unpredictable and ungovernable accidents, coincidences, and chances that drive the universe and can ultimately affect the events of a person’s life. One of the main concepts surrounding David Guterson’s novel, Snow Falling on Cedars, is the power of free will vs. fate. The last sentence of the novel: “accident ruled every corner of the universe except the chambers of the human heart” explains the lack of control that humans have on the forces surrounding them compared to the control they have over their actions or decisions and the impact that it has. Snow Falling on Cedars looks closely at the effect free will and fate has through the murder trial that occurs post World War II in the story where a Japanese American, Kabuo Miyamoto, is charged with the murder of an American, Carl Heine. As the trial takes place, the story interconnects the characters one of who is Ishmael Chambers, a journalist who may be Kabuo’s only hope but struggles with the decision to do what’s right as he was left burned by Kabuo’s wife and his childhood love, Hatsue. The notion of chance and free will can be seen especially in the character of Ishmael who struggles against the effects of the war and Hatsue leaving him. And as a Japanese American during the war, Hatsue herself displays the power of free will in her self-acceptance and in creating a balance in her life. Apart from the portrayal of free will vs. chance in the development of the characters, certain events in the novel such as the case of Carl Heine’s death and the war itself exhibits similar themes. However, unlike Carl’s death, the war shows that there are instances where circumstance may be the result of human actions. In David Guterson’s Snow Falling on Cedars, the events tha...
In Harry Mulisch’s novel The Assault, the author not only informs society of the variance in perception of good and evil, but also provides evidence on how important it is for an innocent person experiencing guilt to come to terms with their personal past. First, Mulisch uses the characters Takes, Coster, and Ploeg to express the differences in perspective on the night of the assault. Then he uses Anton to express how one cannot hide from the past because of their guilt. Both of these lessons are important to Mulisch and worth sharing with his readers.
Fate is “something that unavoidably befalls a person; fortune; lot,” while free will is “the doctrine that the conduct of human beings expresses person choice and is not simply determined by physical or divine forces.” Kurt Vonnegut uses Billy’s experiences in Slaughterhouse-Five to display the idea that free will is all but an illusion; all decisions in life are made by influences, whether from within or from
Fate plays a significant role in the Old English epic poem Beowulf and William Shakespeare's play Macbeth.. The major events of the poem, such as the three killings by Beowulf and his own death, are said to have been predestined. In Macbeth, fate is so significant that it is personified by the Weird Sisters, who drive the action of the play. But if predestination exists, then there must be an agent that determines destiny. In Beowulf, God plays this role, and fate is generally accepted as God's will. In John Gardner's Grendel, a novel which serves as a commentary on the poem, fate is totally predetermined, and is the will of no being. By contrast, Macbeth's agents of fate are the Witches, who generally go against God's will.
In “War and Massacre” by Thomas Nagel, Nagel argues that there are limits on what can be done to an enemy even its for the sake of overall good. He believes that such an idea is grounded on the principles of Absolutism, where morality is determined by the action itself (deontology). This is contrary to the view of Utilitarianism, which relies on the premise that Morality is determined by its consequences (Consequentialism). Although could one in fact generate such a moral structure around war? Do the ends justify the means in War? Through identifying with a real-life example, I will look to expand on Nagel’s account where an action taken by a country in war would be prohibited even if it were for the overall good.
In society, people have varying opinions on fate. Many question whether life’s events are pre-determined by fate or whether people have a destiny to serve a greater purpose. Fate versus free will is an archaic topic among philosophers that is ultimately up for interpretation.The question on whether or not something else is controlling life’s events or if they are simply a coincidence faces us in some point of our lives. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare plays with the idea of fate and its control on the events in the play. He forces us to realize the destiny between Romeo and Juliet involves the fate between the two opposing households as well. Shakespeare blurs the line between fate and free will in his play Romeo and Juliet to show that the outstanding cause of Romeo and Juliet’s tragedy was not something decided- it was fate. It is evident by the events in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet that fate was the main cause of the tragedy in the play, and that Romeo and Juliet held the destiny to finally end the feud between the Capulets and the Montagues.
Fate is the development of events beyond a person’s control. Essentially it means that there are certain events in everyone’s life that are predetermined and completely unavoidable. In The Iliad, fate is even unchangeable by the gods. The belief is that there is a fixed natural order to the universe and that
Fate can be defined in many different ways. Webster's Dictionary defines fate as a power that supposedly predetermines events. Fate is synonymous with the word destiny, which suggests that events are unavoidable and unchangeable. Whatever happens in life is meant to be and cannot be changed by mankind. In Shakespeare's Macbeth, fate plays an important role in the lives of Macbeth, Lady Macbeth and Banquo.
...that fate. Events that lead to other events will eventually lead one to their fate. “Oedipus the King” is a great play that sets an example of what fate is. Oedipus chooses to flee from home, in attempt to avoid the god’s statement of his fate from coming true. However, Oedipus’s decision for fleeing is what was necessary to make his fate come true. Undoubtedly, this is what was meant to happen because Oedipus allowed it to. Perhaps if Oedipus ignored the god and never did a thing then perhaps the outcome could have been different for Oedipus. However it did not turn out that way and the choices that Oedipus made is what led him to his doom.
Our lives consist of luck and how we act upon the consequences, whether we like these consequences or not depends on how we move on forward. This is the point that Harry Mulisch, the author of THE ASSAULT, is trying to discretely make in a complex way. Anton Steenwijk is seen throughout the book to not have a say in his fate or what happens next in his life – particularly when he was younger. As seen in the book, the dice with which Anton and his family are playing with before the tragedy, reappear in various scenarios. The dice in the story, just like in a game, define chance. The author uses the dice to illustrate how Anton’s fate is similar to a game of chance and he cannot directly control or affect any of the consequences that occur. Through
Strong, C. A. "Fate and Free Will." The Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods.Vol. 15, No. 1 (1918): 5-9. JSTOR. Web. 08 May 2014. .
Humans enjoy choices. Whether the decision is putting on a coat in the morning or participating in an exhilarating activity like skydiving, every decision starts with the ability to make a choice. That ability to decide reflects a state of free will. Free will tells us we are essentially is in charge of our choices. Fate guides those who have no control over their choices. While the origin of fate and free will remain a mystery, these ideas can be traced back for centuries and found in our daily lives: in our code of ethics, politics, and religions. Kurt Vonnegut wrestles with the coexistence of fate and free will, ultimately arguing fate dominantes.
The concept of fate has existed since the time of the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed very strongly in fate, which can be defined as either a power beyond human control that determines events, or the outcome or end. In "Oedipus Rex," King Oedipus lives and dies by fate. Fate influences the entire plot, thereby allowing for some interesting developments that may be unpredictable to the audience.
We are all guided by the things that happen to us and what we think about them. If one were to think that everything happens for a reason, or if they thought everything is mere chance, this could influence the way they see it and in what