Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of apartheid in south africa
History of apartheid in south africa
History of apartheid in south africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of apartheid in south africa
How significant was the Zulu Kingdom in the creation of South Africa?
David Santana
IB Global History: Historical Investigation
May 13, 2014
Word Count: 1729
Part A: Plan of Investigation
South Africa had been the center for conflict in 1815-1910 and it had been caused by, the colonies of the British, The Boers, and the rise of the Zulu kingdom. In 1910 the union of South Africa was created. I will focus on the creation of South Africa, before the union. In 1815 and influential leader appeared within the Zulu Kingdom. Shaka Zulu in 1816 created the Zulu Kingdom. The impact of the small kingdom that grew to dominate a large part of South Africa will be analyzed through the research question, how significant was the Zulu Kingdom in the creation of South Africa? They were led by Shaka Zulu; during his brief reign more than a hundred chiefdoms were brought together in a Zulu kingdom. The Zulu kingdom had been created in 1816 and had succeeded until 1897 when the kingdom was annexed by the British.
Word count: 147
Part B: Summary of Evidence
Main Idea 1: The Rise of the Zulu Kingdom
• Shaka devised innovative tactics and weapons to establish nineteenth-century Zulu dominance of Africa and increase his control over a population that began at 1,500 and grew to more than 250,000.
• The Zulu people grew in power and expanded their territory under their leader, Shaka. The expansion was also a response to drought, putting pressure on the Zulus to find new land.
• The Zulu Kingdom remained and independent state for seven decades and through that period five monarchial figures reigned.
• Military strategies, such as the "horn" formation by which Zulu regiments encircled their enemies, were created.
Main Idea 2: ...
... middle of paper ...
...the Zulu Kingdom had been very significant the creation of South Africa. The way I had answered this was with the many sources I had gathered. My evidence is very evident with the conclusion of my question. It had proved that there are different opinions of the Zulu Kingdom but they did have an impact on South Africa. Shaka Zulu the leader of the Zulu’s had proved the research question to be true since they were the only tribe to expand into such a large region of Africa. There is also information that is evident in my research question of the Zulu Kingdom having an impact in South Africa. The Zulu’s had managed to make a provisional government when they were combined with the colony of Natal and after the many years of their existence they had managed to keep their tribe name. Shaka Zulu and the Zulu kingdom had been very significant the creation of South Africa.
The Zulus displayed discipline at the battle at Rorke’s drift and the battle at Isandhwana. Depicted early in the chapter by Victor Davis Hanson he explains what discipline the Zulu worriers displayed by crawling through grass, and thorn bushes to get to the British while their guard was down. That took incredible discipline. In the battle at Rorke’s the Zulu warriors show discipline as well. The Zulu warriors marched so may miles and went days without food or water and waged war with the British. It also took disciple for the warriors to keep fighting British solders that they heavily outnumbered as well when they were still dropping like flies in the field. The discipline displayed by the British at the battle at Rorke’s drift was outstanding to say the least. With the injuries and the numbers they had it was by beyond belief that the 139 British solders with 35 wounded and 80 sharp shooters that they won. It took incredible mounts of discipline and focus to take down 4500 charging Zulus that came from 3 different locations at Rorke’s drift(Hanson pg. 296). The British didn’t back down, didn’t fold, and Victor Davis Hanson depicts that well in this
To be a great leader one mustn’t be egoistic rather they should be assertive and considerate for their people’s benefit. For example, the Portuguese lusted after the slaves because they needed them to work on the sugar plantations in Brazil, and saw Ndongo as a valuable entree into this lucrative trade, however, Queen Nzinga risking her own life did whatever she can to protect her people from being enslaved. Although Queen Nzinga fought many battles, however, she did try to keep alliances w...
Thornton is a graduate from Millersville University, Pennsylvania. He is an American historian specialized in the history of Africa and the African Diaspora. He is also a history professor in Boston University. My paper speaks about the legitimacy of Nzinga’s coming to rule. I use Thornton’s piece for information about her rise to power.
Although it is usually 19th century European imperialism that appears in Western literature, Africans have felt pressure from outside powers for over a thousand years. By the year 1200, most of Northern Africa had adopted Islam, and the population consisted mainly of a blend of Arab and Berber peoples. It was at this time that the enslavement of black Africans along the eastern coast of the continent by Arabian pirates began. This slave trade, however, met fierce resistance from the flourishing African kingdoms of Kush and the Somali king, Nagus Yeshaq, who was a Christian Becker). Because the strength of the Arabic incursions was based mainly on conversion, the Islamic armies never penetrated deeply into sub-Saharan Africa.
studied South African history to any extent would be remiss not to take notice. The
... Their existence proves that Africans were capable of managing their own affairs and creating noteworthy civilizations long before Europeans appeared on that continent. They left a legacy that continues to influence the lives of Blacks in Africa and abroad today. BIBLIOGRAPHY Koslow, Philip.
...w its power from its strong appeal to the Afrikaner race. The Afrikaners had once thrived, and the British had taken that power from them. Now that they had declared independence from Britain, the British politicians stood no chance against the aggression of a race of people feeling put down. This strong racial identity that stood with the party naturally shifted; after escaping the trenches of powerlessness the national party had to continue on the route of being supreme, as any political party does. This becomes a problem because having a strong racial identity is one thing, but when using it to gain power it becomes your race against all other races. The strive for dominance in power and politics drove the National Party to put down non-white people in the population, and eventually enact pro-white legislation, specifically the Apartheid rules and regulations.
...and are known as one of the oldest tribes there is. They are very well respected and have traditionally been a very dominating tribe in South Africa. The total Zulu population is about 10 million people in eastern South Africa and Shaka Zulu. Their language is called Zulu and has been derived from Bantu. Most Zulu people practice Christianity but a lot of people like to practice their traditional form of animism.
References Vince Crawley (January 2010) Isandlwana – Historic Zulu Victory in 1879 http://vincecrawley.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/isandlwana-historic-zulu-victory-in-1879/ Dr. Saul David (February 2011). Zulu: The True Story. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/zulu_01.shtml#eight
Supporting fact two: The economy of the country continued to grow, despite the sudden change of power. South Africans salaries increased: there used to be 12% of workers payed 2$ a day and after the abolishment of the apartheid, it went down to 5%. (http://www.bbc.com/news/business-23041513)
South Africa really began to suffer when apartheid was written into the law. Apartheid was first introduced in the 1948 election that the Afrikaner National Party won. The plan was to take the already existing segregation and expand it (Wright, 60). Apartheid was a system that segregated South Africa’s population racially and considered non-whites inferior (“History of South Africa in the apartheid era”). Apartheid was designed to make it legal for Europeans to dominate economics and politics (“History of South Africa in the apartheid era”).
As the title infers this essay is an explanation of the event of Apartheid and Separate Development, but to understand this fully some brief history on Apartheid is required, hence this paragraph will be the introduction to the events that transpired before the formation of Separate Development. The idea of Apartheid was born because of the fact that white supremacy was already instituted into South African policy because of the strong European influence. The Land Act of 1913 was what instigated the momentum of Apartheid however. It forced the Africans to live on plots of land that were undesirable and less than twenty percent of the total land even though they were clearly the majority, where the eighty percent was given to the white minority. Eventually restrictions became worse such as, forcing the Africans to carry identity documents authorizing their occurrence in areas that were otherwise restricted, not allowing non-whites to obtain certain jobs, not allowing any contact between whites and non-whites, and eventually forbidding participation by non-whites in government. The paragraphs that follow will outline the emergence of Separate Development, who was responsible, what Separate Development is, and why it happened.
Apartheid was considered a necessary arrangement in South Africa, as the Afrikaner National Party gained a strong majority political control of the country after the 1940’s and the economic dependence on their fertile natural resources, such as diamond and gold mines and other metals such as platinum. This required intense labor and the white dominant control over the repressed black majority allowed for an
Chieftainship was also considered the most common form of political structures in Southern Africa. Prior to the apartheid era chiefs and kings were very influential on the people in the Zulu, Pedi, Swazi, Ndebele, the Transkei tribes and other tribes in South Africa. In their political system chiefs and kings were seen as superior figures in the society and most individuals living in their clan had to follow orders conveyed by the chief and king. This essay will consider the role of chieftaincy in a democratic South Africa
The Zulu people are a tribe in South Africa that form part of the greater Nguni speaking people. The brunt of their number is situated in the Kwa-Zulu Natal Province of South Africa on its Eastern Coast.