People have looked at technology innovations as a thing that has helped the world in more ways than one. In reality, technology innovations such as machines and mass assembly have made people become lazy and not want to learn more than what they need to use these innovations. “Many modern writers were paradoxically repulsed by aspects of modernization” because they felt it was “weakening the influence of organized religion” (Greenblatt 1890). As technology advances increase, people during the romantic period, victorian period, and modern age were becoming more ignorant. The World it too Much With Us, The Idea of a University, and The Waste Land were written by their authors to show how these advancements have negatively affected people's mind. …show more content…
It is about the clash within nature and humankind. He states “The world is too much with us; late and soon, Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers” (Wordsworth 1-2). Wordsworth is stating in this sonnet man is blowing away his chance on earth by not acknowledging the nature around him. It is as if he is warning people that they are dismissing what is important in the world which Wordsworth believes is nature. He hopes for a considerably less complex time when the advance of humankind was tempered by the limitation nature forced. He felt like people were absorbing themselves in material things more than they should be. He believes that material things are getting to be the most important thing to people and thinks it is a ignorant belief. Wordsworth believes that “human connection with nature has been lost in the materialism of modern culture” (Constantakis 302). People are losing touch with what connects them to humanity and this shows how people are becoming ignorant because they have started to ignore real life and live in a modern imaginary world. Worldworth believes that …show more content…
Eliot, a modernist, wrote The Waste Land to show how people were getting more ignorant as modern advances were coming along. Eliot wanted to expose the standards of Modernism with his exact portrayals of society to highlight the reality of the real world. He asks “What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images” (Eliot 19-22). He utilized language as a way to remove the not as educated working class from understanding what he was talking about in his poem to show they needed more education. Eliot believed that people in the modern age did not care about anything and were becoming lazy. He does not understand what they could get out of the modern world. They are living in a industrialized society that does not have tradition. The explanation behind society's fall is the amnesia that numerous individuals have a tendency to not remember about their social past. They act as if the past never happened and go along with all the modernism that they have began to rely on. This also shows how religion has been smashed or broken into sections by advancement, and Eliot has a feeling of uneasiness that covers the spiritual world. With these advancement making it easier to get ahold of information, people can easily read something about a religion and believe it because they are so naive. Eliot felt that because of this people were becoming out of touch
When read for the first time, The Waste Land appears to be a concoction of sorts, a disjointed poem. Lines are written in different languages, narrators change, and the scenes seem disconnected, except for the repeated references to the desert and death. When read over again, however, the pieces become coherent. The Waste Land is categorized as a poem, but exhibited visually, it appears to be a literary collage. And when standing back and viewing the collage from afar, a common theme soon emerges. Eliot collects aspects from different cultures or what he calls cultural memories. These assembled memories depict a lifeless world, in which the barrenness of these scenes speak of a wasted condition. He concentrates on women, including examples of violence committed against them and the women's subsequent lack of response to this violence, to show how apathetic the world is. But The Waste Land is not a social commentary on the plight of women. Rather, the women's non-reaction to the violence against them becomes a metaphor for the impotence of the human race to respond to pain. Violence recurs throughout time, and as Eliot points to in his essay "Tradition and Individual Talent" in the epigraph, we can break this cycle of violence and move ahead only by learning from the past and applying this knowledge to the present.
Everyone believes something different. Many people believe society has a large impact on today’s world. Many people believe you should read a book by its cover and not allow any underclassmen into your life due to their class in the world. While today many people are not punished for what they have done, in the olden day in age, everyone of everyone was punished for every crime that wasn’t allowed. Society has changed so much through the years, it has helped and also harmed our small and very large communities greatly. The Scarlet Letter, The Crucible, and Of Mice and Men are great ways to show how society has affected today’s day in age.
...rning within society to undermine its flaws. Austen and Pope were great writers and observers of their time, and though they have passed, their writings continue to reveal the hidden follies of humanity. Humanity has not made any extremely valuable changes beside the obvious advancements that are expected through time. However, there will always be literature to magnify humanity's growth and regression, urging its readers to never hide from the truth.
Eliot’s “The Waste Land” I found that the meaning did not change due to the heavy cuts made by both Eliot and Ezra Pound. At first, I thought that the parts which were removed would have affected the meaning of the poem, but instead, it did not. All the large cuts from the poem involved around one person. For instance, in “The Burial of the Dead,” the original fifty-four lines only seem to be following the evening of one particular speaker which can be interpreted as a soldier, who appears at the end of the section in the published version. In “The Fire Sermon,” the large part that was edited out involved describing -- in rhyming couplets -- a lady named Fresca and the fourth section, “Death by Water,” involved a four-page tale about the Phoenician sailor. Each deleted part was unique in their own way but none significantly change how the poem is read. I found these deleted portions of text were either unnecessary or did not quite fit in with what Eliot was trying to convey about the postwar Europe and the type of wasteland it has become. However, when it comes to “The Waste Land” there seems to be no one true
2. In his preface to his notes on The Waste Land, Eliot writes, "Not only the title, but the plan and a good deal of the incidental symbolism of the poem were suggested by Miss Jessie L. Weston’s book on the Grail Legend: From Ritual to Romance (Cambridge). Indeed, so deeply am I indebted, Miss Weston’s book will elucidate the difficulties of the poem much better than my notes can do; and I recommend it . . . to any who think such elucidation of the poem worth the trouble" (68).
As humanity is modernized, we begin to lose our touch and love for nature. In the poem, “The World Is Too Much with Us”, by William Wordsworth, the speaker uses many different poetic devices to show how the world’s obsession with consumerism is overtaking the world. Through the use of paradox, personifications, and allusion, Wordsworth shows how people are now far too concern with superficial matters that they do not appreciate what nature has to offer. The author uses paradox to help emphasize how people now are much more materialistic.
Devil on the Cross shows the affects of the capital class. The age of Enlightenment dealt with reason and progress. Where the capital class tries to roadblock the ideas of the age of Enlightenment, it is up to the people to pick up the ball and succeed!
In this, issues of society, pressed by outside forces, are nearly disregarded. The act of suppressing the role of social conformity to the text shows the destructive quality of the nature of society, as well as equalizing importance of characters despite their economic standings or lineage. More than anything, this shows the blindness and purity of the love within the text and the ways in which individual fulfillment are reached outside of the boundaries of so-called
Modernism in T. S. Eliot's "The Wasteland" Modernism has been defined as a rejection of traditional 19th-century norms, whereby artists, architects, poets and thinkers either altered or abandoned earlier conventions in an attempt to re-envision a society in flux. In literature this included a progression from objectivist optimism to cynical relativism expressed through fragmented free verse containing complex, and often contradictory, allusions, multiple points of view and other poetic devices that broke from the forms in Victorian and Romantic writing, as can be seen in T.S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" (Levanson). The varied perspectives or lack of a central, continuous speaker uproots "The Waste Land" from previous forms of poetry; however, it is not simply for the sake of being avant-garde, but to espouse the modernist philosophy, which posits the absence of an Absolute and requires the interpretation of juxtaposed, irreconcilable points of view in order to find meaning. The first stanza illustrates this point. Within the first seven lines, the reader is presented with a "normal" poem that conforms to an ordered rhyme and meter.
The Wasteland is a poem Eliot wrote after his divorce with his wife Vivienne Haighwood. Critics say the title of the poem, the wasteland, comes from his thoughts on his marriage. This poem is considered to be “one of the most difficult poems in a difficult literary period”. The Wasteland is a poem that is said to be of his most influential work. At first glance, critics considered the poem to be too modern but then opinions changed as they realized the poem reflected Eliot’s disillusionment with the moral decay of World War I in Europe. T.S. Eliot in The Wasteland combines theme, style, and symbolism to explore life and death.
Wordsworth is deeply involved with the complexities of nature and human reaction to it. To Wordsworth nature is the revelation of god through viewing everything that is harmonious or beautiful in nature. Man’s true character is then formed and developed through participation in this balance. Wordsworth had the view that people are at their best when they are closest to nature. Being close creates harmony and order. He thought that the people of his time were getting away from that.
They encompass royal thrones, a bar in London, and even a desert; there seems to be no sense of organization for locations the poem is written. A reason behind such extreme settings could be these stories are more mental landscapes in one single observer, which make the understanding of The Waste Land a bit more realistic. Eliot depersonalizes Tiresias, the spectator in The Waste Land. “I Tiresias, though blind, throbbing between two lives, Old man with wrinkled female breasts, can see” (832, 219-218). Tiresias is given no defined sexual identity and is blind to all things around, thus has a lost sense of identity in society.
Throughout the poem, Longfellow uses metaphors and similes to convey the theme of making the most of the time you have on earth, to lead a satisfied life. In the first stanza, a young man is giving a psalmist guidance, he begins by saying, “Life is not but an empty dream!” by “empty dream” he means a meaningless illusion. Another metaphor is “For the soul is dead that slumbers” if one lives life as if it were a dream, than one’s soul would fall asleep and therefore would not be using time wisely to achieve one’s ...
He is writing the poem as if he were an object of the earth, and what it is like to once live and then die only to be reborn. On the other hand, Wordsworth takes images of meadows, fields, and birds and uses them to show what gives him life. Life being whatever a person needs to move on, and without those objects, they can't have life. Wordsworth does not compare himself to these things like Shelley, but instead uses them as an example of how he feels about the stages of living. Starting from an infant to a young boy into a man, a man who knows death is coming and can do nothing about it because it's part of life.
Wordsworth comprehends, in each of us, that there is a natural resemblance to ourselves and the background of nature.