Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jfks approach to the vietnam war
Involvement of the US in the Vietnam war
Consequences the vietnam war had on america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Jfks approach to the vietnam war
A common mistake among the general public is to talk about the Vietnam War. Technically, it never was declared a war; President Johnson never asked for a declaration of war. It was called the Vietnamese Conflict. He instead only asked for a resolution that would give him the authority to take "all necessary measures to repel any armed attack" against U.S. forces and "to prevent further aggression" (Dougherty). So, with this kind of all-powerful resolution, was there even a necessity for declaring war? Some believe there was a necessity, and that there should have been a declaration of war; others would disagree and say there was no need for a declaration of war. But who really knows the right answer? That question can only be answered on an individual basis. And before anyone can make a decision on these issues, the context must be understood.
In 1963, John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and then Vice-President Lyndon B. Johnson became the President of the United States of America. When he stepped into that position, he was given the job of not only leading the American people, but of handling the situation in Vietnam (Turner 287). He tried his best to keep the government running, as Kennedy would have; he even kept Kennedy's administration personnel. He wanted to be known for being successful in areas such as domestic policy, civil rights, and medical care. But Vietnam was a ghost that would haunt Johnson for the rest of his life (Turner 176).
According to Robert McNamara, in his first meeting with President Johnson on November 24, 1963, "...his instructions [on Vietnam] were clear: Win!" (McNamara 117). The mood of the United States in the late summer of 1964 was becoming more anxious; whereas before August of 1964, American...
... middle of paper ...
...s. San Diego: Green Haven, 1998.
Frankel, Benjamin. U.S. Military Intervention in Vietnam: History in Dispute April. 1999: 331+.
Mc Master, H.R. Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson. Robert McNamara. the Joint Chiefs of Staff: and the Lies that Led to Vietnam. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1997.
McNamara, Robert S. In Retrospect: The Tragedy's and Lessons of Vietnam. New York: Random House Publishers, 1995.
Moise, Edwin E. Tonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1996.
Morrison, WIlbur H. The Elephant and the Tiger. New York: Hippocrene Books, Inc., 1990.
Turner J., Kathleen. Lyndon Johnson's Dual War. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Thomson, James C. Jr., Home page. April 1968. 23 Oct. 2002.
<http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/68apr/vietnam.htm>.
Anderson, D. (2002). The Columbia guide to the Vietnam War. New York: Columbia University Press.
The Vietnam War: A Concise International History is a strong book that portrays a vivid picture of both sides of the war. By getting access to new information and using valid sources, Lawrence’s study deserves credibility. After reading this book, a new light and understanding of the Vietnam war exists.
In the early 1960s the U.S. began sending military advisors to South Vietnam beginning the Vietnam War, arguably the most controversial war in United States history. This incident followed Vietnam gaining its independence from the French Empire’s Indochina in 1954. The nation soon split, creating a communist North Vietnam, and a noncommunist South Vietnam. In fear of communism spreading the U.S. supported South Vietnam and sent troops. As the incident dragged on it caused a huge anti-war movement and a lot of political turmoil.The troops were withdrawn in 1973, the whole country fell to communism, and the U.S. failed. How did a superpower such as the U.S. take defeat from a small country like Vietnam? Many have wondered and continue to wonder
This unfortunate legacy of failure in Vietnam carried far past the end of his service as Secretary of Defense. For years after, there have been ongoing debates as to what factors led the outcome of the Vietnam War. It wasn’t until 1995 that Robert McNamara contributed his own viewpoint on where the responsibility for the result of the war fell. McNamara’s memoir, “In Retrospect”, chronicles his perspective on the role he played as Secretary of Defense. It is apparent in his memoir that the public image associated with McNamara is vastly different from the McNamara he presents. Ironically, this infamous war he was so commonly know for may have been a war that privately he did not support.[1] This raises the question—was this hawk actually a
JOHN F. KENNEDY IN VIETNAM There are many critical questions surrounding United States involvement in Vietnam. American entry to Vietnam was a series of many choices made by five successive presidents during the years of 1945-1975. The policies of John F. Kennedy during the years of 1961-1963 were ones of military action, diplomacy, and liberalism. Each of his decisions was on its merits at the time the decision was made. The belief that Vietnam was a test of the Americas ability to defeat communists in Vietnam lay at the center of Kennedys policy.
Raymond, Michael W. "Imagined Responses to Vietnam: Tim O'Brien's Going After Cacciato. Critique 24 (Winter 1983).
Robert S. McNamara's book, In Retrospect, tells the story of one man's journey throughout the trials and tribulations of what seems to be the United States utmost fatality; the Vietnam War. McNamara's personal encounters gives an inside perspective never before heard of, and exposes the truth behind the administration.
Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th president of the United States, is not one of the most well-known presidents to have ever served in office though he did do some good things during his presidency. The vice president’s journey to the presidency began after the assassination of the beloved president, John F. Kennedy. Before serving as president, he was the youngest Senator to ever serve as a majority leader and he sat in the House of Representatives. Although Johnson served two terms as president, he only ran in one election because of the death of Kennedy. However, the one election he ran in, he won in by a landslide (Ridings & Melver 231). Lyndon B Johnson, the Democratic president, who served from 1963-1969, might have been infamous for the decisions he made during the Vietnam War, but his Great Society and Civil Rights Act helped shape the nation in a good way.
This book would be an excellent source for anyone wanting to understand this period of the entrance into the Vietnam War. It is a great look into the character of each of the participants. It also would benefit those who are studying and learning how to develop strategy and policy for future wars that the United States may involve itself in. Works Cited McMaster, H. R. Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam. New York: HarperCollins, 1997.
The conflict in Vietnam for the United States started when President Dwight D. Eisenhower went along with the domino theory and sent in military advisors in South Vietnam to stop the communist movement from taking place in South Vietnam. The Vietnam conflict was between the communist’s and the United States. North Vietnam was led by Ho Chi Minh, and Ho Chi Minh led the Viet Cong, a guerilla group to help spread communism. The United States were supporters of the South Vietnam because they wanted them to maintain their government rather than falling to the domino theory of communism. After Eisenhower’s term ended John F. Kennedy became president and took control of the situation of Vietnam but on November 22, 1963, Kennedy was assassinated. Lyndon B. Johnson succeeded presidency and the problems of Vietnam were left to himself. In 1963, the Tonkin Gulf incident occurred where, the U.S.S Maddox was attacked by North Vietnamese naval ships on august 2 1964. Two days later an even more controversial attack happened where it was reported another ship was attacked again but has later been proven false. Johnson used these events to gain congressional approval to enter into Vietnam. However the Tonkin Gulf Incident was questioned to have even happened which makes the war undoubtedly questionable Immediately after the incident . Many troops were killed in Vietnam and the United States eventually lost the war and does not achieve their goal to stop communism. Despite the large amount of conflict in Vietnam that needed to be resolved, escalating the war was the wrong idea by Johnson, as the many consequences of the war for the United States outweighed the potential spread of communism.
In 198 women filed a total of 3,661 charges of sexual harassment and exploded to 14,420 in 1994, and continue to grow. This has brought on a lot of lawsuits that the Equal Emplyment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) got involved to make sure that sexual harassment to be a form of gender discrimination. They recommend that Human Resources staff should get involved immediately to resolve the problems but many times the person has already contacted an lawer and then claim legal remedies.
The research focuses on the use of different branding strategies, particularly brand equity, in order to retain brand loyalty. China is the fastest growing consumer market in the world, the study of Chinese consumer’s perception, attitude and purchasing behavior will assist in realizing the value of branding and it is important to implement the knowledge when striving to understand any particular subject. When the subject is put to practical use it is better to comprehend and find a logical conclusion. Every research has its own impacts and thus, it can be used as an increment of facts and ideas. Brand equity and loyalty highly contributes in obtaining a major edge in increasingly competitive markets therefore, it is essential to understand the importance of branding and how firms market themselves to build brand equity and attain brand loyalty. The primary purpose of this research will be to investigate the relationship between brand equity and brand loyalty and their significance as it is a crucial part of a firm’s marketing activities and how the research will be conducted using pertinent methodology and appropriate research paradigm along with its proposition.
A behavioral loyalty approach involves repeating the purchase and recommendation of a brand to others, and the attitudinal approach includes the intention to purchase the brand and the commitment to it, despite the provision of consistent services and extensive marketing efforts by competitors. The third approach is derived from the combination of attitudinal approach and behavioral approach (Chen, 2001). One point to note is that Some people believe brand loyalty is the ultimate goal of brand equity. Still, brand loyalty, regardless of its relation to other dimensions of brand equity (perceived quality, awareness and brand association), can not be ascertained. However, although loyalty may be affected by other dimensions of brand equity, loyalty can be created independently of other dimensions. For example, instead of a high-quality brand, a person may be loyal to a low-quality brand for personal reasons. Therefore, many researchers believe that loyalty to the brand is both output and input of brand equity, that is, in addition to being affected by other dimensions of special value, brand loyalty is conditional on brand shopping and experience, while other dimensions of brand equity are also generated for brands that have not yet been used. In the Acer brand equity model, loyalty is a business leverage to reduce marketing costs, attract new customers (in the form of awareness raising and reassurance), and time
Customer loyalty is a behavioural state, which reflects value, confidence and commitment between the supplier-customer relationships (Buttler, 2002). Hence, developing a strategy that would retain and boost loyalty from customer has become the objective of most companies nowadays (Duffy, 2003). Many see it as primarily an attitude-based phenomenon; therefore, offering customer relationship management initiatives such as customer loyalty programs can be significantly influenced by it (Uncles, 2003).