Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis hunting essay
Rhetorical analysis hunting essay
Rhetorical analysis hunting essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Paper #1: The Usual Suspects
“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” The film begins with a scene of two men surrounded by fire and dead bodies on a boat in San Pedro, California. The two men talk for a while, then a mystery man shoots a man named Keaton, then sets him on fire. FBI agents appear the next day to investigate the crime scene and interrogate the two survivors of 27 killed men. One survivor is a Hungarian is describing a man named Kieser Söze to a sketch artist. The other survivor is Verbal Kent who is telling the police everything he knows for immunity. When Kent begins his story, it fades into six weeks ago in New York City where the NYPD gathers five different criminals that are suspected
…show more content…
of a car-jacking. There, they plan revenge on the NYPD and to rob a corrupt police taxi cab service that escorts drug smugglers.
They later meet a man named Kobayashi and blackmails them into destroying a ship filled with cocaine coming from San Pedro. The film climaxes on the night that the four men attack the men at the pier. They discover that there’s no cocaine on the boat and soon everyone of the four men left are killed except Keaton and Verbal. The scene ends when presumably Kieser Söze shoots Keaton. The falling action is in the present when Verbal finishes his story, admits to the FBI agent that the whole setup from the beginning was Keaton’s idea and that he was actually the mysterious Kieser Söze. The resolution of the movie ends with Verbal leaving the building, not being held by the police anymore. But the FBI agent is realizing that details from Verbals story was actually words appearing from various things around the interrogation room. He quickly realizes that it was all made up and chases after Verbal, but he is already entering a car that is being driven by …show more content…
Kobayashi. Verbal Kint is Keyser Söze. Aiming to be a neo-noir film, The Usual Suspects was extremely well thought out and well edited to create an intense, exciting plot.
In the end of the movie, every little detail that was brought up didn’t seem important at the time but became very important in the end. The beginning was very good at setting up the film and what type of movie it was aiming to be. It gave explanations of the main characters and explained their aims for the movie.. For example, the scene where they’re plotting revenge on the NYPD, it explains their motives for the movie and their character traits. However the beginning was very slow in the storyline and in pacing, the plot hard to keep interest in up until the climax. As soon as the plot got more intense and there was more action, the editing changed from close ups and slow pacing shots to quick moving, cross-cutting shots that made the events more intense. Such as the very last scene when the twist is revealed, the emotions were highlighted by the dramatic shots of the FBI agent chasing Verbal Kent (Kaiser) out of the building. The plot events were extremely interesting as the plot began to twist, and the ending was a realistic but surprising to the film
type. The editing in this movie accentuated the important details throughout the movie and intense and emotional plot twists in the end. Although, in the beginning, it was very slow pacing and hard to remember all the details that were said that would be important in the end. For example, the scene were the five men plot their revenge on the NYPD, it was a long talking scene in medium shots. They were talking pretty fast and it was hard to keep up with. However, after the climax is when the pace started to pick up. There was a lot more action and intense scene so there were a lot of different shots very close together. In the scene of the attack on the boat, the editor did a lot of cross-cutting to people shooting people, main characters dying, the boat catching fire, etc… Also, the editing throughout the movie, switching from the present time to “six weeks ago” was very effective in keeping the viewers attention. And lastly, showing the ending from the beginning was a very creative editing choice and made the ending twist a lot more dramatic and revealing. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone who is interested in plot twisting dramas. When I first started the movie I was really interested because my dad said it was a really good movie, I have never really heard anything about the plot of the movie, so my expectations were pretty high. When I started the film, I lost interest fairly quickly because I thought it was full of action and intense scenes, but most of the first half was kind of boring to me; I was also focused on taking notes on the editing and plot so I could have been more distracted than I wanted to be. But when things started to get more intense and unravel, I quickly became very interested again. To conclude, the further along the movie went, the more you realize it’s not how it seems; The Usual Suspects had excellent casting, an intense plot, and creative editing that made the movie a thrilling classic.
Joy Harjo uses a metaphor throughout the memoir Crazy Brave , in order to express her emotions about how she feels about art, her classmates , and the books she has read .
Media such as movies, video games and television, in general, are all created to support some form of social context. This helps with generating popularity because people are able to relate to the form of media. In Greg Smith’s book What Media Classes Really Want to Discuss, he describes 6 different representational strategies that justifies people’s way of thinking. The trope that I will be amplifying is the white savior tactic. In addition, I will connect this strategy to the movie The Blind Side. There are clear examples throughout the film where racism and low-income cultures exist in which the white family is there to help. The Tuohy family from the movie “The Blind Side” serves as the white savior for the progression of Michael
The film’s plot flowed well throughout the majority of the movie, with the exception of a scene at the end of the movie. In
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
Months have passed and Rico’s career has been destroyed. He sleeps in a extremely cheap hotel and has started drinking a lot He becomes angered when they read out that that the police detective called him a coward. He soon calls the police and is found when they trace the call back to him. The detective discovers him on a street and shoots and kills him through a billboard, which ironically was advertising Joe and Olgas dancing.
tension and suspense. I found it had greater suspense, especially at the time. the beginning, with Fettes and Macfarlane arguing over something that people do not know about their secret past lives that we have yet to find out about the.
I think the performance delivered the message and intent perfect. I was not once confused, but it is that which starts out some what at the end and uses flashbacks to tell the full story.
Lighting, editing, camera angles/movements and sound are used in many different ways. Ness didn't know what the bookkeeper looked like, this initially raised the tension and it continued to rise when he had to deal with the baby. All the elements together work red in different ways showing different things to the audience and helped to bring them into the scene. I think the movie was very successful, it had a lot of dramatic scenes which made me feel excited and tense. The actors and script were excellent, I learnt a lot about this period of American history and also the type of fashions that were popular.
The movie is set within a short space of time (almost real time) in which we see Four of the Six active members of a jewelry heist gone wrong dealing with the repercussions of their crimes. Amongst them is Mr. Orange, or, Undercover Cop Freddy Newendyke, as he’s revealed to be toward the end of the movie. He is the Undercover Cop, The Rat that everyone is talking about. Orange single handedly destroys their operation and essentially Joe Cabot’s criminals-for-hire business seeing as he died by gunshot in the end. However the operation costed Orange his life, or presumably so. That’s something I’ll get to later.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
This movie robs the audience of any sort of explanation about why they spent an hour and a half watching it. There are only two basic questions that need answering: did they make it to Coney Island and were the real murderers exposed? There's no resolution or gain at the end, the conclusion was so basic anyone could guess how it ends. Nothing enlightening can be gained from this movie, there are no questions that remain unanswered, there are no motives that can be questioned and it's disappointing to come to the end and notice a void of satisfaction due to the simplicity of the of plot and motive. There was a sense of too much resolution that it became basic and meaningless.