The Usefulness of the Analogy Between Society and a Biological Organism One set of sociologist that use the Biological or Organic analogy of societies are the Functionalists. Functionalism first emerged in Europe in the 19th Century. The French sociologist Emile Durkheim was the most influential of all the early functionalists. The theory became the dominant theoretical perspective in the 1940's and 1950. The functionalist theory is that within society there are many small parts that have to work together to maintain the society. I will be assessing how useful this analogy is to show the likeness between society and a biological organism. The functionalists argue that society can be described by using the biological analogy as a model. The key points can be summarized by a comparison drawn from biology. If biologists wanted to know how an organism such as the human body worked, they might begin by examining various parts such as the brain, heart, lungs and liver. However they would be unable to determine how life was maintained if they studied the various organs in isolation from each other. To discover how life was maintained they must examine the organs in relation to each other because they work together to maintain the organism. Functionalists adopt this perspective. The various "organs" of society are seen to be interrelated to form a complete system e.g. Structure and Function In biology the human body's structure is governed by the skeletal structure of the body. The function of the skeletal system holds up the body into a form and also provides restrictions of mov... ... middle of paper ... ...the consideration of power and who has it. Functionalist, of course agree with it as their theory of the causes and effects of the various parts and functions that maintain the system. In conclusion I believe that the usefulness of the biological analogy is very useful because the logic behind it is just in that the system does need the organs to work together in order to produce social harmony. It explains how the different functions are related to society in their jobs and how they are related to the biological functions e.g. the function of the skeletal system holds up the body into a form and also provides restrictions of movement. In relation to society the values are this skeletal system and the norms and roles are the ligaments and joints, providing flexibility, as I mentioned previously.
Functionalism views society as the stability and assimilation of a range of forces that function within it. While society is a separate entity with a life of its own, there are individual elements contributing to that stability. Functionalism as a sociological theory emphasizes assimilation rather than the dissociation of society. Therefore, the society is seen as a whole that is compromised of parts which give one another their identity and their function. The part, whether that is education, such as a school, or sports, such as a football team, operates in relation to the other parts, and cannot be entirely understood in isolation from the other parts. All the parts are interrelated, and when there is a disturbance in any one of the parts, is when you can see the interdependence. But what is important about this theory is that “there will always be some reorganization and tendency to restore equilibrium” (Wallace and Wolf 17). Functionalist do not believe it’s crucial that the people involved in the society to be aware of this interconnectedness anymore than the brain and heart consciously realize that they work together as an organism.
Humans generally hold a cynical perception of ants carrying some dust and crawling on a negligible distance in a courtyard. However, that is one small task for an insect, but one giant leap for the building of the nest. Like social insects, men working together sets up a whole fascinating mechanism. Everyone plays a role in the global society, and one citizen is not microscopic among billion others, as it may be thought. To reinforce that theory, the persuasive essay entitled “On Societies as Organisms”, written by Lewis Thomas, argues that human societies have much to learn from the communal accomplishments of other life forms. Using various rhetorical patterns, such as analogy, enumeration of processes and figurative language, the author
Functionalist state they do not concentrate on conflict or division within society. However, Durkheim does mention society is together by certain parts of the social system sharing values. If any of the above fails to work together, functionalists explain this as a ‘loss of social solidarity, a lack of integration or a loss of equilibrium’ (Jones 2003 p.38) the key conc...
Functionalism is a theory in which various social institutions and processes in society serve a significant function in order for society to continue
The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominan...
Functional theory is the defined as a framework for building theory that sees society complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. Augusta Comte and Herbert Spence looked at society as a living organism. For example, an animals or person has organs that function together so does society. Organic solidarity is social unity based on a division of labor that results in people depending on each other. Emile Durkheim developed organic solidarity to explain individuals’ workers to specific bodily organs and a group of people to a body. Different bodily organs serve different functions, without these organs the body would die, and so would the individual organs. Some of the different functions are education, religion, economics, and family. In a society individual workers perform different kinds of labor, without which society could not function, nor could individual workers succeed.
"The functionalist perspective is a sociological approach which emphasizes the way that parts of a society are structure to maintain its stability,"(Schaefer & Lamm, 1998). This perspective looks at a society in a positive manner and sees it as stable, with all the parts working together. Under the functionalist view every social aspect of a society contributes to the society's survival, and if not, the aspect is not passed to the next generation.
According to feminists and advocates for social justice, biological essentialism is pseudoscience operating under the pretense of rigorous scientific research. Rather than contribute to our scientific understanding in important issues, such as race and gender, critics believe that instead it serves to validate past and current social arrangements, and undermine social justice efforts. Biological essentialism argues that there are fundamental differences between groups of people, mediated and dictated by biological and genetic differences. Controversy arises because a corollary of this theory is that instantiations of inequality might not be due to social factors but rather by immutable characteristics. Any ideas that support and emphasize innate group differences, are diametrically opposed to the General Social Science Model (GSSM) espoused by social justice advocates. John Locke’s theory of “tabula rasa,” the idea that people are born as a “blank state” ready to be filled by external environmental
“Survival of the Fittest.” A theory based on the outcome of competitions between social groups such as plants, animals, and the human culture. And it comes from the term social Darwinism. Social Darwinism could be simply summed up in the term above in that only the strongest and fittest in this world will survive. This is supported by believers of social Darwinism who stand by that phrase and justify the arguments of racism, power of individuals, and who is fit to survive. Herbert spencer, a sociologist, brought the ideas of social darwinism to the public which he based off of Charles Darwin’s studies of evolution, hence the name.(Banister, 1) Social Darwinism can be seen in the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” written by Richard Connell.
Functionalism is the oldest and most commonly used theoretical approach used to understand social issues. Functionalism is a macrosociological perspective that presents the idea that society consists of different components working together to help a society function as one. Sociolog...
Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.
The structural-functionalist perspective looks at society as a complex system composed of various parts much like a living organism. Each aspect of society contributes to society's functioning as a whole. Social institutions play a key role in keeping a society stable. All societies need certain things to survive (Newman 2010).
Many parents teach their children to be kind and helpful to one another. This will educate their child to learn how to be proper in society. Further, the child will understand that it is important to have this quality so they can be treated with respect by society. Being kind and helpful is a significant quality that someone can have because society will view them as a respectable person. To clarify, society may like a person who seems kind, presentable, and caring as opposed to someone who is the opposite. Examples of helpfulness can be shown in the collection of profiles of activists, Do It Anyway, which includes stories of activists who show a way of helping others. Since being helpful is a good quality to have, everyone should be helpful
We see many of fields of society for example; government, educational, cultural and many more. Sociology is importantly the basis for almost all policies and idea which shape the world we are in. For example; Harriet Martineau, first female sociologists brought attention to ignored topics such as marriage, children, domestic and religious life and race relations. Without this idea being brought it up it would have always been an issue from society. Solving topics are so beneficial to making our society a better place. On a personal level it’s really changed my vision in the world. This enables us to understand paradigms. Structural functionalism was inspired partly by Durkheim, he stated that society is defined as a social system, with structures organized in an orderly way to form an organic, stable whole. This system enables us to understand and meet the circumstances in order to
Madison grant defines good society as a society that balances social order and the right to self government. Throughout the history of the United States of America different governing method, different presidents have tried to create a society that is ideal in having equality and justice for all. Good society depends on good governance meaning reliability, predictability and accountability of the government. The government from the 1920s to present has tried to promote good society through equality and justice for all people in the country. The government has created a better society but not a good society yet.