Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charles darwin essay on natural selection
Charles darwin conception of evolution essay
The influence of social Darwinism on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Charles darwin essay on natural selection
“Survival of the Fittest.” A theory based on the outcome of competitions between social groups such as plants, animals, and the human culture. And it comes from the term social Darwinism. Social Darwinism could be simply summed up in the term above in that only the strongest and fittest in this world will survive. This is supported by believers of social Darwinism who stand by that phrase and justify the arguments of racism, power of individuals, and who is fit to survive. Herbert spencer, a sociologist, brought the ideas of social darwinism to the public which he based off of Charles Darwin’s studies of evolution, hence the name.(Banister, 1) Social Darwinism can be seen in the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” written by Richard Connell. …show more content…
Social Darwinism can be seen in a conversation early in the story between Whitney and Rainsford.
Whitney brings up the thought of how maybe the animals being hunted experience fear and have emotions. Almost instantly Rainsford shoots him down with this quote, “ The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees. Luckily you and I are the hunters.” (Connell) Like the social Darwinists who believe that only the strongest will survive Rainsford has the same kind of thinking. He believes that only the strong will survive and that animals and lower class people have no feelings.
Following this General Zaroff shows a similar thought process but on how people are divided, not animals. In a conversation between General Zaroff and Rainsford Zaroff quotes this,” I hunt the scum of the earth--sailors from tramp ships--lascars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels--a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.” (Connell) When Zaroff says this he means that those people are weak and will not do well in this world. Zaroff believes that, like Adolf Hitler, that a group or groups of people are worthless and make no difference in this
world. Continuing with the relationship between Social Darwinism and Most Dangerous Game here is another quote from General Zaroff, “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be taken by the strong.” (Connell) How this quote relates to Social Darwinism is again similar to the term, “Survival of the Fittest” meaning that only the strong people in life will take it head on and survive. Social Darwinism is reflected among the characters and plot line in the short story, Most Dangerous Game, written by Richard Connell. In both the short story and Social Darwinism only the strong people survive, one person or a group of people view themselves as superior, and that the lower class and animal life have are not important. In conclusion, Social Darwinism is a key aspect in the short story Most Dangerous Game.
Robert Rainsford also goes through a dynamic change over the course of the story. Near the beginning of the story, Rainsford expresses that he doesn’t care how an animal feels because it’s just an animal. “‘Don’t talk rot, Whitney,’ said Rainsford, ‘you’re a big game hunter, not a philosopher. Who
Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.
If animals were humans, then General Zaroff would almost be as bad as Adolf Hitler. General Zaroff, a character in Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” should be considered a negative character because of the way the author portrays him though indirect characterization, such as what he does, what he says, how other characters react to him, and what he looks like. Although there is plenty of indirect characterization, there is little to none direct characterization.
In the beginning of the story, Rainsford has a conversation with his friend, Whitney, about hunting animals. Rainford does not care about the animals that he hunts. He believes hunting is only a sport to kill innocent creatures. “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels?’” (1) Showing the reader exactly what he thinks of hunting. Rainsford does not understand that the animals he hunts are like the people that Zaroff hunts. They are innocent, and he is murdering them when he hunts them. Rainsford thinks that Zaroff is insane for murdering people, but Rainsford is also a murderer. When Zaroff hunts Rainsford, the protagonist realizes the terror and pain the jaguars must have felt when he hunted them. Now the roles are reversed, and Rainsford is the one being hunted. “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. The general was saving him for another day’s sport! Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” (17) Rainsford has changed his feelings about hunting animals now, and he has become a better person. He now takes into account how his prey feels. His interactions with people will also be different, because instead of being extremely overconfident, he realizes that he is not perfectly adept at hunting, and everyone has feelings that matter. In conclusion, Rainsford is now more humble and less overconfident than he was when he began his
Whitney introduces the secondary theme, being that hunters usually have no empathy for their prey. This is one of the first uses of irony in the story. Metaphors and Similes are often used in this story, so the reader has a better image of the setting, this is something, and I find Connell did incredibly well, for instance when he refers to the darkness of the night as moist black velvet, the sea was as flat as a plate-glass and it was like trying to see through a blanket. Rainsford begins his epic struggle for survival after falling overboard when he recklessly stood on the guard rail, this is our first example of how Rainsford manages to conquer his panic and think analytically and there by ensuring his survival.
Social Darwinism is the central theme that dominated the novel “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair. Upton had demonstrated successfully how social Darwinism is not the way for a functional society to thrive, thus providing a solution like Socialism to the readers. Social Darwinism, putting into the simplest context, is the theory of society where the rich survives and the poor dies; whoever could make the most money and bribe the most power would win the game, while for the people who have to find job and money are the one designated to fail. Jurgis Rudkus was a Lithuanian immigrant that came to America seeking fortune for his family, thinking that he would achieve the “American Dream” if only he retained his diligence with work. Sadly he is not getting any prosperity, “The great corporation which employed you lied to you, and lied to the whole country—from top to bottom it was nothing but one gigantic lie.” (Sinclair 62) He soon found out he would not be able to gain success, but only through corruption and later Socialism.
Social Darwinism is a late 19th century term used to describe the application of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to social and political conditions. Late 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer tried to capture the essence of social Darwinism with his phrase “survival of the fittest”. This essentially meant that the strong would rise to the top while the weak simply died out. Social Darwinists eschew social responsibility and compassion, instead believing that some people are more fit to survive than others. Many social Darwinists advocated that the government should maintain a laissez-faire, or hands off, approach when it came to regulating economic competition and alleviating social inequalities. Social Darwinism was used to justify the consolidation of the majority of wealth by a minority of Americans. The term allowed people to rationalize capitalism, imperialism, racism, and even eugenics. The wealthy believed in social Darwinism because it allowed them to justify their oppressive business tactics and low wages for their labor force. Politicians believed in it because it allowed them to justify imperialism, or expansion of the nation. Affluent Anglo-Saxons believed in social Darwinism, believing themselves to be the superior race, and used it to justify ...
The example from the story is “Don't talk rot, Whitney,” said Rainsford. “You're a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels”(Pg 40). From this quote, we learn that that Rainsford considers himself more superior to the animals he hunts by not caring about their feelings. We can see that he is a supporter towards Whitey by not making her feel bad about herself by complimenting her. During the story, we learn that Rainsford is accustomed to a life of wealth and ease when we see him on a recliner, smoking his favorite pipe on a yacht. He feels that the world is divided into two types of people, the hunters and the huntees (civilized vs. uncivilized) and would be bestowed for it. To summarize this section, Rainsford will always consider himself civilized because of his wealthy lifestyle, thinking that he is more superior to the animals, and that he is a supporting characters when they need
The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.
Darwin has two theories on the key principles of theory of evolution. One is the natural selection, a species that attains characteristics that are adapted to their environments (Darwin, Charles). The other one is survival of the fittest, which is when an individual best adapts to their environment survive to reproduce, and their genes are passed to later generat...
In order to comprehend the present state of these two forces, it is necessary to analyze more completely the meanings of Social Darwinism and Social Welfare. Every since Charles Darwin published the Origin of the Species in 1859, social scientists have attempted to explain human behavior as a product of natural selection. In the 19th century, Social Darwinism held that history was about the "survival of the fittest" and "superior" social groups were evolutionary more fit to rule the world. Social Darwinism was at the heart of many pernicious theories of the past century, including scientific racism and eugenics (Goldfield, et al, 1998, p. 721).
In Thayer’s article, he makes an attempt to incorporate Darwin’s Evolutionary Theory into the international security studies. The article tries to answer a central question that what are the implications of Evolutionary theory to realist theory of international security and in what way can peace be achieved if warfare is part of human nature? This paper agrees with Thayer that Evolutionary theory provides a scientific theory foundation for realism and is an ultimate cause for war and ethnic conflicts, as well as the assumption that origin of war is intrinsic in human nature as part of their evolution history. This paper will also suggest that a balanced structure of the world could contribute to temporary peace. But it need to be noted that the theory is also limited since Evolution theory could not fully explain many other forms of security problems like civil wars and terrorism. To review Thayer’s article, first, the paper will briefly explain how Evolutionary theory act as an ultimate cause for realist theory in terms of two human traits: egoism and domination. Following that, the paper will discuss the implications of Evolutionary theory to international relations. This paper will also evaluate the theory by comparing it with Waltz’s and Gleditsch’s theory on peace and war. Finally, it will conclude the paper by summarizing main points.
As a man who lived on both sides of the economic spectrum of his time, Andrew Carnegie saw himself as a man of change and philanthropy. He believed himself to be the one to diminish the theory of Social Darwinism and help other lower class workers go from “rags to riches.” Carnegie recognized the fairness and legitimacy of America’s rising system of social classes, however he wanted to do his part to help those who were struggling because of his past as a lower class man. While Carnegie had good intentions, his actions were not made out to be as helpful as he had planned.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford said “don’t talk rot. Whitney who cares how the jaguar feels they’ve no understanding.” “Whitney responded by saying maybe the jaguar, even so I think they understand one thing. Fear.” “In High Noon Helen Ramirez says to Amy.
In October 1893, there was a murder in San Francisco. Sarah Collins was killed by her husband Pat Collins from multiple knife stabs. The reason of her death was to be known that she would not give her husband money. This sparked an idea in Frank Norris’ mind, thus creating the novel McTeague. In this novel, Norris shows change in social status and how it affects them through Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is the biological evolution of people in their social system, also known as survival of the fittest. The novel McTeague, based on the 1893 murder in San Francisco, Frank Norris exemplifies Social Darwinism by showing the fall of characters such as McTeague and Trina, and Zerkow and Maria, yet the survival of Old Grannis and Miss Baker by not changing their status.