Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The pinochet era in chile
The cold war and the americas ib
The pinochet era in chile
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The pinochet era in chile
The U.S. and Pinochet
In 1961, in response to the success of the Cuba’s Communist Revolution, President John F. Kennedy initiated the Alliance for Progress to discourage Marxist revolutions and to promote economic and social cooperation through democracy between the United States and Latin America . All throughout Latin America during the 1960’s Marxism had become the central philosophy and the future of democracy in the region appeared to be greatly threatened. Chile was viewed by the US as the ideal model for the Alliance for Progress program due its long history of constitutional democracy dating back to the nineteenth century. The Cold War fears of the Communist threat infiltrated the Chilean military when the United States funded a training school called the School of the Americas that specialized in teaching counterinsurgency techniques to Latin American militaries in order to combat guerilla warfare . Throughout these Cold War years the United States’ fear of Communism seemed dominate over rationality causing the US to act against their claimed beliefs in freedom, democracy, and basic human rights. That hypocrisy is most greatly evidenced by the United States foreign policy toward Chile during the 1960’s-the 1990’s.
In 1968, the CIA had approved a $350,000 expenditure to manipulate the election in favor the Christian Democratic candidate . They targeted women, the poor, and student voters by passing out pro-Conferación propagandist pamphlets and fliers and funding radio commercials that alluded to the dangers a Salvador Allende victory would bring. US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger declared “the consolidation of Allende in power in Chile, would pose some very serious threats to our interests and positions in the...
... middle of paper ...
...3 1974.” National Security Archive. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB110/index.htm (accessed April 26, 2014).
Ensalaco, Mark. Chile under Pinochet: Recovering the Truth. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvannia Press, 2000.
Kornbluh, Peter. 2003. "Chile, 9/11/73." Nation 277, no. 9: 19-23. The Nation Archive,
Scott, C.D. “Poverty Among Small Farmers under Frei and Pinochet, 1968-1986.” Pergamon Press (1997)
“Secretary's Staff Meeting, October 1, 1973.” National Security Archive. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB110/chile03.pdf (accessed April 25, 2014).
Sigmund, Paul E. The United States and Democracy in Chile. Baltimore, MD: Twentieth Century Fund, 1993.
Winn, Pete. “Chile's Revolution from Below.” OSU Carmen
“Overthrow of Democratic Chile Part 1.” January 9, 2011. Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6kkaIfy9wU (accessed April 25, 20
Winn, Peter. Weavers of Revolution: The Yarur Workers and Chile’s Road to Socialism. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. Print.
During the second half of the twentieth century, when the Cold War was on its midst, the United States played an important role in world affairs. The increasing military power that the United States had during the Cold War, allowed it to influence the political decisions that many countries had during this time. The United States directly opposed the idea of communism, which the Soviet Union promoted. This conflict between this two great powers, lasted for five decades, and it tremendously affected the political ideologies of the world. Both countries tried to push their political and economic interest to as many nations as they could, especially those close to their borders. During this time, Guatemala was undergoing a social revolution with communist ideas. The revolution happened as a response to the social injustice committed by the United Fruit Company. The United Fruit Company started to lose land, due to a land reform passed b...
Over the course of the history of the United States, specific foreign policies have affected the methods in which the U.S. involves itself around the globe. Specifically, certain policies have affected U.S. involvement in Latin America. It is the intention of this essay to explain the United States foreign policy behind specific doctrines. In order to realize current objectives, this paper will proceed as follows: Part 1 will define the Monroe Doctrine, Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 will concurrently explicitly explain the Roosevelt Corollary, Good Neighbor Policy, and the Nixon Doctrine, discuss how each policy resulted in U.S. involvement in Latin American countries, describe how it was justified by the U.S. government, respectively, and finally, will bring this paper to a conclusion.
Prior to his Chilean President Salvador Allende’s election, who ran on a ticket of socialist economic reforms, the US government spent millions of dollars in Anti-Allende propaganda and attempted to reason with military forces to stage a coup against him, not even caring of the ramifications of the destabilization of Chile and the ripple effect it would have on other Southern Cone countries. Considering the military dictator Augusto Pinochet’s ascension to power being riddled with gross violations of human rights including state sponsored torture against its citizens the connotations were that because the US prioritized its own security over an entire continent, “there is no doubt that Condor's ruthless operations against political opposition advanced the security agenda of the U.S. national security establishment in its war against communism and revolution in Latin America.” (Mcsherry, 41)
Rohter, Larry. "After 30 Years Argentina's Dictatorship Stands Trial." SIRS Issues Researcher. N.p., 20 Aug. 2006. Web. Feb.-Mar. 2014. .
Rabe, Stephen G. The Killing Zone : The United States Wages Cold War in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Filmmaker Oliver Stone embarked on a journey across the Latin American continent pursuant to the filling of gaps left by mainstream media about the social and political movements in the southern continent. Through a series of interviews he conducted with Presidents Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Cristina Kirchner and former president Nėstor Kirchner of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Lula da Silva of Brazil, Rafael Correa of Ecuador and Raúl Castro of Cuba, Stone was able to compare firsthand information from the leaders themselves with that reported and published by the media (“Synopsis,” n.d.). It gives light to the measures these leaders had to take in order to initiate change in their respective countries, even if their public identities were at stake. Several instances in the film showed the mismatch between these two sources, pointing at the US government’s interests for greatly influencing the media for presenting biased, groundless views.
The tropical island of Cuba had been an object of empire for the United States. Before the Missile Crisis, the relationship between Castro and the US were strained by the Bay of Pigs occurrence in 1961. This was where counterrevolutionary Cubans were American funded and tried to invade Cuba and overthrow Castro. However, the counterrevolutionaries failed. Castro then found an alliance with the Soviet Union and an increase of distrust that Castro had on the US. On January 18, 1962, the United States’ Operation Mongoose was learned. The objective would be “to help the Cubans overthrow the Communist regime” so that the US could live in peace. Consequently, Castro informed the Soviet Union that they were worried about a direct invasion on Cuba, thus longed for protection against th...
Third world countries became the perfect battleground for cold war proxy battles during the early 1940’s to late 1990’s. United States wanted to flex its political muscle and try to curtail the spread of Soviet Communism in the developing nations. Most of the nations in developed world had already made their political and socio-economic stand regarding the form of governance and leadership pursued. Underdeveloped nations in Asia, Latin America and Africa were still vulnerable and easily influenced in terms of ideologies and political direction. Most nations in Latin America like Chile were recovering from colonialism and thus logistic, economic and political aid from powerful nations to propel their economies which made it easy for Americans and Russians to act as their “saviors’”. The quest for global dominance had intensified between United States and USSR and the shift was focused to developing nations like Chile. Both Americans and Russians used different mechanisms to enhance their propaganda and support the regimes which were friendly to them and used any means necessary to topple hostile regimes. CIA used covert operations in Chile and most of the Latin nations to plant their puppet leaders in order to safeguard their foreign policy interests and maintain dominance. Military coups and social unrests were planned, orchestrated and executed with the assistance of CIA. The research paper tries to critical analyze the impact of the cold war on Chile and influence of United States.
“It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering the assassination. I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for
Before the coup, the United States had already invested heavily in Chilean democracy, starting with the Alliance for Progress initiated by John F. Kennedy in 1961, aimed at establishing economic cooperation between the U.S and Latin America. On pg. 12 of the introduction Kornbluh discusses how Chile had long been a country that attracted a case
American people remember 9/11 2001 as an attack on their country, these attacks were made by foreign terrorists because of their foreign interests. The Chilean people have their own remembrance of a similar incident, but it was in 1973. On this day, Augusto Pinochet and The United States lead a coup that overthrew the president Salvador Allende, of the Chilean government. The United States government “supported, trained, funded, and armed military tin-pot dictatorships in order to defend democracy and the free market from progressive movements made up of the workers in colonized countries” (“Cold War Killer” 1). This day went down in history as the beginning of the darkest days in Chile’s history. It is said that “Augusto Pinochet’s legacy
Powers N. R., 1992, The Transition to Democracy in Paraguay: Problems and Prospectus, University of Notre Dame
Before the arrival of Spanish conquistadors in the 16th century, Chile was home to the Inca tribe in the north and the Mapuche ruled central and southern Chile. Overtime the Spanish began to take over and drive out the native people. The Spanish ruled Chile until they were driven out in the War of The Pacific in the early 1800’s. Over the next few centuries Chile's governance was very unstable, changing rulers and governments every few decades. Things began to settle down starting in 1990 when Chile inaugurated a freely elected president. With this new government system Chile saw steady economic growth, the poverty rate was cut in half, and it began to establish itself as a stable, democratic nation. In January 2014, Chile acquired a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council for the 2014-2015 term (Central Intelligence Agency, 2014).
It is interesting that there are many diverse reactions to Pinchoet's rule in Chile. Two of the responses opposed Pinochet, while two supported him. The first woman spoke about how the regime attempted to kill her and was naturally very opposed to Pinochet's rule. The third woman spoke about how her son was "disappeared" and never found and also spoke of her opposition to the regime as a result. The second woman spoke about being a staunch supporter of Pinochet because she thought he was implementing good programs, such as helping the poor, and did not think that he was really "disappearing people". In the final account, the man also accepts Pinochet's rule because he believes it will be beneficial to the Chilean economy and also