Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interpretation in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the battle between good versus evil, good normally comes out on top. When it comes to trickster that divide is very unclear. In different myth, religions, and cultures, trickster are perceived to be the sign of evil. By examining different books and articles, the audience can see that trickster are not just viewed as the villain, but in some cases they can be the hero as well.
The word trickster refers to a dishonest, cunning, even deceptive person or thing. The form of a trickster tend to change based on a certain religion, culture, or myth, it can be an animal or a person. In The Trickster Paul Radin defines trickster as “at one and the same time creator and destroyer, giver and negator, he who dupes others and who is always duped himself.
…show more content…
He wills nothing consciously. At all times he is constrained to behave as he does from impulses over which he has no control. He knows neither good nor evil yet he is responsible for both. He possesses no values, moral or social, is at the mercy of his passions and appetites, yet through his actions all values come into being” (Radin xxiii). Lewis Hyde agrees with Paul Radin in his book, Trickster Makes This World: Mischief, Myth, and Art, and gives his definition of a trickster as “a boundary-crosser/ the creative idiot, therefore, the wise fool/ the mythic embodiment of ambiguity and ambivalence, doubleness and duplicity, contradiction and paradox” (Hydes 7). From all these definition readers are prone to believe that trickster are evil. The trickster most commonly found in religion, most specifically Christianity and the Bible, is the devil. The parable about Adam, Eve, the serpent, and the fall of man is common knowledge for people even outside of the faith. The belief behind the story is that the devil, who was represented by a serpent, tricked Eve into eating forbidden fruit that would cause catastrophe and chaos for all the years to come. In Genesis chapter 3, verses 1-5, the serpent is questioning Eve and the instructions that she was given from God. In verse 1, the Bible describes him as a “beast” who was, “more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” (King James Version, Genesis 3:1) The serpent’s role and main purpose in this story was to distract Eve and to make her eat of the fruit that he knew would cause disruption to God’s word and the world He created. In congruence to what Radin’s definition of a trickster is, the serpent is a “creator and destroyer, giver and negator, he who dupes others and who is always duped himself”.
He created the idea in Eve’s mind that she was of course able to eat the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, but he also knew of the curse of the world that it would herald; hence being a creator and destroyer. He gave Eve security in her decision even when he knew of the consequences. As seen throughout the Bible in many other parables, the devil, who comes in many different form and elements, shows no regard for the people he effects. His main purpose, as stated in John 10:10, is to “…steal, and to kill, and to destroy…” (King James Version, John 10:10). Now in some cases, Eve can be perceived to be a trickster because of the way she had to influence Adam to eat for the Forbidden Tree of Knowledge. Knowing God’s would be displeased with her, she disobeyed him once again getting Adam to partake in the indulging of the apple. This showed people that even the Eve cared and loved Adam trickster can come in the form of friends, family, even …show more content…
spouses. While the devil is the most referred to trickster in the Bible, there are also others.
Delilah, lover of Samson, is a well-known tale about a woman of greed who tricks her lover into a behavior that grants her money. In the book of Judges, chapters 13-16, the Bible explains this as a love story gone wrong. The Philistine used Samson’s love for a beautiful, Delilah, to trick him into exposing his “true” weakness. Delilah, technically the philistines, wanted to know what Samson’s secret to his strength was. The Lord told Samson to never tell what made him so strong. The temptress, Delilah, played as an uncover spy taking back whatever Samson said would make him weak to the ruler of the Philistines. Delilah’s main purpose in this was to lie and deceive Samson, two main conation directly related to the definition of trickster. She nagged and nagged saying, “How can you say, ‘I love you’, when you won’t confide in me?” (King James Version, Judges 16:15) Knowing the consequences and the repercussions of his action Samson shared his knowledge with her, “No razor has ever been used on my head, because I have been a Nazirite dedicated to God from my mother’s womb. If my head were shaved, my strength would leave me, and I would become as weak as any other man.” (King James Version, Judges 16:17) That night Delilah waited till Samson fell asleep and shaved his head, causing God to leave him. For his disobeying God Samson was caught and his eyes were gauge out, Delilah was never to be
seen again. The trickster came cause chaos and left the story untouched, leaving a blind weak Samson behind and locked up in captivity. When a Christian thinks of a trickster these two examples are normally what comes to mind. Not saying the Bible does not have any more tricks or tricksters these are the most infamous accounts.
The show Supernatural revolves around the lives of two brothers Sam and Dean. Sam and Dean are hunters of all things mythical, evil, or supernatural. When the pair first meet the Trickster in the show, he is disguised as a janitor at a university (Shiban, John). Unbeknown to the brothers, he is wreaking havoc on the school and the town through a series of dangerous jokes and tricks. The trickster in Supernatural is eventually identified as a demi-God, Loki who is very similar to the Norse god Loki in the Prose Edda. They share the power to conjure images and imaginary events up, just for the fun of it. The trickster is able to rebuke Sam
Tricksters are very important to many stories. They are the energy of mischief in the three tales we read, which are: How Stories Came to Earth, Coyote Steals Fire, and Master Cat. The tricksters add a desire to change to the story. Some of the elements in these trickster tales are anthropomorphism, cleverness, and the use of brain over brawn. These elements are often in stories, you just may not recognize them immediately when you read.
All of these types of stories survived by being “performed in Africa, the West Indies, and the American South.” These tricksters cause disharmony, which is part of the audience’s enjoyment. The main characteristic of the trickster in these tales is “signifying,” the “ability to use cunning words to turn the powerful into dupes.” Usually, a trickster makes a contract with a dupe, but betrays him. He does this because he gets his strength by violating social boundaries. Other times, the trickster plays tricks and is caught, which leads to humiliation. Some of the stories in this section are “Why the Hare Runs Away,” “The Ant’s Burden,” and “Tricking All the Kings” In “Why the Hare Runs Away,” we know the trickster makes a contract when “it was decided” was said, and we know the trickster breaks that contract when we see “he refused.” The trickster is punished for breaking the contract by being captured by the other animals. In the story “The Ant’s Burden,” we see Anansi trying to make Kweku his dupe when “he wondered how he could fix the blame on someone else.” This tale also takes on the characteristic of a trickster’s contest because Anansi loses and, in return, is made the dupe, for which he “was condemned.” “Tricking All the Kings” is about outwitting a plantation master. Although the king seems to dominate at the beginning of the story, he is later made to be the dupe. We see him becoming the tricksters first dupe when Buh Nansi says “oh, Massa King, you mean to pitch me in that blue, blue sea…,” and we see the contract being made when the king says, “No, I wouldn’t, I’ll have you drowned.” In this story the trickster beats the dupe because the king couldn’t have done him a “better favor”
Paul Rodin has said that a trickster “is at one and the same time creator and destroyer, giver and negator, he who dupes others and who is always duped himself…He possesses no values moral or social, is at the mercy of his passions and appetites.” Trickster tales feature character types that can be found in the literature of many different cultures throughout history. The coyote is often portrayed in Native American myths as being a trickster. This is revealed in Morning Dove’s “Coyote and the Buffalo.
Tricksters are prevalent in multiple folktales and mythological accounts worldwide. Despite variation differences, each of the roles played originate from cultures. Often ostentatious, the persona of a trickster is the opposite of mundane. Coyote and Hermes are two trickster gods that share the common themes of responsibility, gender roles, intent, and morale through diverse personas; their main differences are in translations and impact on Ancient Greek and Native American cultures.
What is a trickster? A trickster typically breaks the creeds of the divine or nature, most of the time this is doomed maliciously, but sometimes with positive results. More frequently than not, the rule-breaking will capture the pattern of tricks, or thievery. Tricksters are generally cunning, foolish, or perhaps both. They are usually very funny even when they are scared. In diverse cultures the trickster and humanizing hero are often merged in one. Tricksters are particular to their own cultures. However, tricksters are naturally bound by undeniable attributes no matter what their religion is or what culture they have come from. It is thought that all of us have some type of trickster within us, whether it may be conscious or subconscious. One of today’s best known tricksters is perhaps the infamous Wile E. Coyote. Even though Wile E. Coyote is a trickster whose tricks never seem to work, he is considered to be a modern-day fictional trickster because he is always plotting and cheating to catch the road runner, two of the most common attributes of a trickster. However, there are many other common elements to a trickster.
Now, to the untrained eye, it may be possible to interpret the aforementioned text as having certain "scheisty" tendencies coming from both the serpent and, believe it or not, God himself. As possible as it may seem, the main theme of the passages of Genesis are not trying to show God as being greedy with the knowledge of good and evil. It isn't like God was worried that Adam and Eve would gain knowledge that would empower them and make them as gods. That is almost preposterous to think that God, the almighty creator of heaven and earth, would be worried about two mortals obtaining a little bit of information. In all actuality, that idea is incredibly far from the truth. God gave Adam and Eve the world, literally. This perfect world, a "heaven on earth", was just given to them out of the goodness of his heart. All they had to do was look over God's creations and enjoy true eternal bliss. As a matter of fact, the only rule that God gave to Adam and Eve was to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. All they had to do to live in the eternal paradise, with all the cookies and milk they could stomach, was to follow that one freakin' rule. Acknowledging the fact that the serpent (a.k.a. Satan Incarnate) did do its part in persuading Eve to eat the fruit and to give the fruit to her husband. Even still, Eve should have realized that she was risking eternal happiness for the words of a snake.
In Paradise Lost, one of the differences God is aware of the betrayal his creations unlike Frankenstein. There is a point where Adam desires a companion to share the world with, thus God creates Eve from one of Adam’s ribs. He is in a predicament now, due to there are now two beings to love now, but who deserves the more affection. He “can neither love himself adequately nor love Eve as himself unless have love God adequately – and so make his love for Eve, the unity of their shared self, an expression of that higher love” (Gross 95). This scene displays one of Adam’s limitations of his free will. Thus creating her in being the submissive which eventually became her downfall, Adam’s and the rest of humanity. Eve is flawed, she has the inclination of self-love, a quality she should not be capable of possessing or acting upon. The only love that she should be expressing is her love for Adam in a way also loving God. This becomes their weakness. Satan learns about this weakness and exploits it as his advantage to enact his scheme. He influences a susceptible Eve, by coercing her into eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge. He claims to Eve about the fruit “By the fruit? It gives you life To knowledge by the threat’ner? Look on me, Me, who have touched and tasted; yet both live” (Book 9 l. 686-688). Satan is able to persuade them to consume the fruit that provides them
Tricksters are both and neither argents of chaos or justice, right and wrong, yin and yang. The Joker within the Dark Knight exemplifies all aspects of what a traditional trickster is. The Joker is very anomalous to what most people would think a veteran of the armed forces is. The cookie cutter definition of what a veteran in the US is would be someone that stands up for social morals and defends the rights of the people whom he shares his country with. The Joker is very much the opposite of this and tells everyone that he is just that. He stands up for the people and organizations that do not support social norms. Throughout the movie the Joker is constantly playing tricks on people and deceiving everyone around him, it is comedic in how much deception he employs throughout his time in the story/movie. Although the movie is supposed give audiences the feeling that this could be real the Joker takes on many different disguises throughout the movie. From masked clown, to police officer, to female nurse demonstrating that no costume is too ridiculous for him. In his exchange with Harvey Dent/Two-Face the Joker tells us himself that he invents situations, albeit on a whim, showing that he is exemplifying the 4th trait of a traditional trickster. The Joker doesn’t hold anything sacred but he does show that he is a messenger of chaos. We know that mythologies have different gods that embody the qualities of chaos or directly represent chaos as their power to manipulate. It is not that much of a stretch to think that the Joker is merely acting as an agent of these gods making him a messenger of something they would hold holy and sacred to themselves. Lastly the Joker is very much a jack-of-all-trades as he has the skills to use many different weapons and explosives and even understands the inner-workings of criminal
First off, Knowing that the trickster characters are common in stories these characters are almost always similar in one or more ways. The stories “How Stories Came to Earth”, “Coyote Steals Fire”, and “Master Cat” have one of the ways they are in common and that is the
While in the Garden the serpent says to Eve, “… but God knows that as soon as you eat of it your eyes will be open and you will be like divine beings who know of good and bad” (Genesis 3.13 Line 5). The serpent makes an appealing temptation to Eve, saying that they can have what God has, and can be like God. This temptation caused Eve to eat the fruit and also gives it to Adam. The serpent was not lying when explaining this to the woman but put the thought into her head. Being God like, and having the knowledge of good and bad could be an appealing thing to have, so Eve ate the fruit disobeying
All in all the actions of Eve were neither good nor evil, but instead necessary. Through her actions she brought to light the evils of the world, and as a result man is able to appreciate that which is good. Moreover one cannot blame Eve for what she did because although as we have seen God did instill upon mankind free will, he used his threats as a means of manipulating this gift. Although there were many trees in the Garden of Eden, having the tree of knowledge of good and evil forbidden created mystery for Eve, and therefore drew her to it over the tree of life. And once both Adam and Eve choose with their own free will to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil immortality is no longer an option. Now that man is knowledgeable enough to appreciate immortality, God removes it as an choice. In a way this story shows us the flaws of both man and God. Man in that he is tempted by that which is forbidden and does not always respect the orders of those in a position of authority; And God is shown to be somewhat devious and perhaps even malicious at times.
Foil's [No ' H-50] are minor character's [No '] in a story who by their similarities and differences with more important characters, helps [SV - 1] the audience to better understand the main character in that story. Also another purpose of a foil is to provide the more meaningful character with simply someone to talk to. In "Hamlet" [Titles] there are many foils used but I am going to only speak of those who lend to the fact that Hamlet and Claudius represent good and evil. [3 sic] One of Hamlet's foil's is [No '] The Ghost of his father, the former King of Denmark. One of their similarities is their relation and knowledge of one another by being father and son. When Hamlet and The Ghost meet (Act 1, Scene 2, Line 10) the reader learns that the ghost is in fact Hamlet[']s father when he says "I am thy father's spirit." Another similarity is their intelligence. The play gives many examples of Hamlet's quick witted yet smart way of speaking. And when we meet the ghost he speaks with the same intellect, only without the sarcasm used frequently by Hamlet. The main similarity is their longing for revenge. The ghost beg's [No '] Hamlet to revenge his death[,] and at the time Hamlet seems to honorably agree. By this honor the audience instantly stereotypes Hamlet as being heroic and good.
Ask anyone to draw Satan and you 'll get a red snake-like figure with horns and a pitchfork. Satan, as introduced in the Hebrew bible is an unworthy adversary of God. His longing to be like God is quickly recognized and dealt with. God banishes him from Heaven and sends him to Hell. That 's the last we see of him until he talks with God about his faithful servant Job. In each interaction we see Satan in, we get only a glimpse of who he really is. Satan 's motive is not developed and we assume he does evil simply because he is evil
3.1-5). God’s forbin law stated that, “Ye [Adam and Eve] shall not eat of it [the tree of good and evil], neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die (Gen. 3.3).” With the law in the forefront of Eve’s mind, Satan still deceived the women into eating the forbidden fruit by saying, “ye eat...then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil (Bowers 273 & Gen. 3.6).” Satan's deceptive nature convinced Eve to eat from the restricted tree, leading to her own, Adam’s and mankind’s separation from God (Bowers 265). This disobedience presented sin to the world and strengthened Satan's goal to, “wage by force or guile eternal war (Milton 309).” Although the Serpent destroyed the perfect relationship between God and man, by causing Eve to sin, both accounts of the fall gives mankind future hope of redemption (Rosenblatt 28 &