Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An examined life Socrates
The philosophy of socrates
Introduction to socrates essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An examined life Socrates
1. In the document “The Trial and Death of Socrates,” Socrates was Plato’s teacher who Plato looked up to. Socrates is charged with not recognizing the gods of the state, talking and writing about new deities, and destroying the young people’s mind in Athens. Socrates is found guilty of these charges. The jury convicted Socrates and sentenced him to death. Socrates states, that no one, but the gods know what happens after death and he does not fear the unknown. “The Buddha’s Fire Sermon,” I took from the readings, is that after a death the individual will either be reborn or will enter nirvana. To enter nirvana the individual must achieve enlightenment. In the document, Buddha talks about the fire which I perceive to be bad. For instance, Buddha states about the fire of old age, infatuation, death, grief. Which I feel are things people necessarily wish to not have. While giving his speech, the minds of many priests became free and delivered from their depravities; which then would mean that they have reach enlightenment and may then go into nirvana. Death and life is considered as nothing. In the Bhagavad-Gita there is no such thing as bad or good. It is simply nothing. Arjuna is set to battle the kingdom per say to claim the kingdom. In doing so he ask Krishna, who is instructed to take him into battle, pretty much for his viewpoint …show more content…
about the battle. Krishna states, that Arjuna is a warrior who must restore good into his kingdom and that his karma needs this. Krishna states, that death means attainment of heaven and that victory is the enjoyment satisfaction of completing the duty. Hinduism from what I understood is that every action will have a positive or negative reaction in the universe. The negative reaction would cause for individuals to be reborn; until the cycle of birth and death until karma is fulfilled. 2. “The Trail and Death of Socrates,” Socrates is very passionate about teaching is beliefs; that are very different from the states belief. Socrates fears nothing about death. I gathered from the readings is that Socrates was not afraid of death or the afterlife. He did not fear the unknown of death or the afterlife. I feel that Socrates would tell individuals to always ask questions and to stand tall on the beliefs of individuals. “The Buddha’s Fire Sermon,” in this life it does influence the afterlife. If the individual overcomes the desires which is the root of evil or suffering he or she will continue to have a restless cycle of rebirth or recreation and will always suffer. Once the individual reaches no desire to the materialistic world and all its offerings is when the individual will fully be free. At the end of his speech thousands of priests became free of all things. Bhagavad-Gita the individual must do what he or she is called to do. For example, Arjuna does not want to fight, but must fulfill this. If not his actions will cause him to have to do the same actions over until his debt is paid. In Hinduism, life is considered to have an action and reaction. To be reborn the individual does not want to continue to live out the bad debts, eventually one wants to have dharma which is to have life restore and have a balance of karma. Option B Life, Death, and Afterlife “The Trail and Death of Socrates,” Socrates is a very passionate person who believes that a person can have an open mind.
Socrates spoke to the young people of Athens about the many other teachings that are present not just the ones that the state taught. In life he provoke thought, reason, and always question ever thing, even if the questions were hard to ask or answer. In his death Socrates did not fear. He did not fear death, because no one had ever come back from the dead to tell him if it was a bad or good experience. He did not fear the afterlife, because no one had ever told him about his or her experience in the
afterlife. “The Buddha’s Fire Sermon,” life has too many desires that make being a happy person difficult to achieve. Buddha or the “awakened one” realized that to overcome suffering that the person must fully overcome any desire to truly be freed form anything. Whether that is a person, place, or thing. In death the person will continue to have rebirth if he or she does not overcome desire. If desire is still present, the afterlife will be reincarnation. The Bhagavad-Gita, in life one must do the right thing that he or she is supposed to do. If not, the person will continue to be reborn and will never have rest. Arjuna, does not want to fight his family, but must so that he must restore balance and good in the world. In death, if he chose not to fight he would be reborn to repay all of his debts. In the afterlife the person wants to live beyond the physical world or the results, but wants to live in the larger cycle or karmic cycle. I feel that “The Buddha’s Fire Sermon” and Bhagavad-Gita have more in common with how if the person does not fulfil a certain issue that rebirth will be in the persons fate. This is scary to me to think that a individual could keep relieving the persons past mistakes and that every action will have a action that takes place. Socrates is very different. He feared nothing and stood his ground. He believed and taught more than what was expected. All the documents are beautifully written and mean so much to people’s beliefs.
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
In the book one of Republic Socrates was concerned about what is justice. He forms a complex analysis of justice by discussing it with Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Thrasymachus. He refutes each proposition said by them, presenting implicit contradictions coming out of these man's arguments. All of this is to reach to, the Sophist, Thrasymachus. According to what's discussed in book one; Socrates sees that the Cephalus's and Polemarchus's common thinking for justice is insufficient. By entering into the dialogue in an aggressive way, Thrasymachus says that he can better explain the issue of justice. The right thing to do here is disregard justice. He blames Socrates for saying nonsense and for just questioning individuals' answers. Thrasymachus
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
Socrates was accused of being a sophist because he was "engaging in inquiries into things beneath the earth and in the heavens, of making the weaker argument appear the stronger," and "teaching others these same things." (Apology, Plato, Philosophic Classics page 21) Socrates is also accused of denying the existence of the gods, and corrupting the youth. Socrates goes about trying to prove his innocence. The jury that Socrates was tried by was made up of 501 Athenian citizens of all classes of society. While he fails to convince the Athenian jury of his innocence, he does a wonderful job in this effort. I personally believe that Socrates is innocent, and that the Athenian jury made the wrong decision.
The trial of Socrates in Athens is both similar and different from the trial of Jesus of Nazareth. The trials could be compared in three main areas: the evidence and reasons provided for their executions, their last messages to their accusers, and the two leaders’ thoughts about their impending deaths. For both figures, there is no evidence to support their convictions and they are convicted for similar reasons, though Jesus is given less time to defend himself. Both Jesus and Socrates warn their accusers that they will suffer for their actions. However, Jesus views his accusers as ignorant and Socrates views his as vengeful. Both men conclude that it is G-d’s will for them to die. However, Socrates is more secure about death than Jesus. Despite the differences that exist between the two trials, Socrates and Jesus face similar predicaments and deal with death in comparable ways.
Is there a such thing of unjust, and just laws? If these unjust laws actually exist, should one disobey these laws if unjust. These questions can be applied to Socrates, a wise philosopher, who is on death row, for disobeying the law in the novel “Five Dialogues”. revised by John M. Cooper. Socrates believes that if he broke an unjust law, then one should still be penalized for these actions, even if that law that is being broken is considered unjust. Socrates would rather die than to actually escape from his wrongdoing. Is Socrates theory of the situation infact not conclusive? In this paper, I will argue that Socrates’ argument of what is unjust and just is not persuasive, but he contradicts himself and his arguments, and one should not succumb
The Trial and Death of Socrates by Plato talks about Socrates time before his death. Plato talks about everything to Socrates trail and to the moment of his death. In the book Socrates is accused of creating new gods, not recognizing the gods, and corrupting the youth with his ideas and beliefs. Through the four dialogues in which Socrates story is recorded we see him question justice in every aspect of life. Through the four dialogues Socrates talks to Euthyphro who is on his way to pursue his father for murder. During this discussion one of the biggest themes is brought up is the nature of piety and holiness when interacting with justice. In Apology Socrates is speaking to the politicians of Athens pleading his case during this we see what
that it is because of the gods that things are as they seem to be. "Do you
Upon being put to death for teaching false doctrines and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates said something before being put to death that would eventually be known as one of the most illustrious quotes throughout philosophy, which would seem to echo into the generations to come. Socrates said the “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Palmer, 33). The significance to this statement can be interpreted in many different ways but despite its ambi...
In 399 BC, Socrates, the great philosopher in ancient Greece, was put to death under the hands of his Athenian fellow-citizens to whom he had a strong attachment, after a final vote with over two-thirds of jurymen against him. We cannot experience the situation where Socrates gave his final argument in the court of law. From Plato’s Apology, we admire Socrates’ brilliant rhetoric and rigorous logic, while at the same time feel pity for him and indignant with those ruthless jurymen. However, the question of what exactly caused his death and why was Socrates, such a remarkable thinker sentenced to death in the very society that valued democracy the most is not easy and straightforward to answer. There are multiple elements involved that finally caused this tragedy in which “a person of high moral principle is confronted step by step with a situation from which there is no escape” (38). First of all, the moral principle and belief in divinity held by Socrates are inconsistent with those of the Athenian society, implying the very crimes charged upon Socrates were not completely groundless. Secondly, the imperfect juridical system of Athens played a role in causing this tragedy. What’s more, Socrates himself, could have offered better defense in the court, also had a hand in his own death by his stubbornness regarding to his own interpretation of wisdom and piety. His rebuttal, though brilliant and insightful, was not persuasive enough to move the fellow-citizens for his wrong approach and sophistry in his cross-examination on Meletus.
The charges against Socrates were brought upon him by a man names Meletus. Meletus was a young man that Socrates did not know very well. These charges brought on by Meletus caused the indictment of Socrates. One of the charges in the affidavit written by Meletus against Socrates is that he is "corrupting the youth." Another charge that is brought upon Socrates is that of he is making up new Gods and disregarding the old Gods the Athenians believe in. These were the charges brought on Socrates.
In the reading, it explains that Socrates is wealthy, educated, has a high status and honored, but Socrates believes all of it is worthless, harmful and damaging to the soul. The soul is all that matters because it is eternal. When he was on death row, he didn’t really fight to save his life. He knows his potential and is refusing to take control and live up to it. He truly doesn't care whether he dies and is willing to throw hi...
Socrates discusses that people should not fear death because we do not know the qualities of death. Even though we do not know what death is, he makes some suggestions for the possibilities after death. He suggests that maybe death is just an endless sleep without dreaming, it is where we can finally come to peace with ourselves. He also suggest that maybe in the afterlife he will be able to meet heroic people in the past, where he can share his experience and question people to see whether they are wise. Even in death Socrates is still going to practice philosophy even if the place is bad. Even if he did not live a just life that he thought he did, he can examine what he did wrong and fix the problems in the after life. I agree with Socrates
However Socrates does not seemed to be bothered by the idea of death. He is shown to have his goods under his control that even death cannot disturb his happy life. So what were Socrates goods? What were the goods which are not effected by what is feared the most by men? As said before, Socrates was a philosopher. Philosophy is a word which comes from the Greek words philo-, which means the love of, and sophia- , which means wisdom and knowledge. Therefore a philosopher is a person who loves wisdom and knowledge, and as Socrates is a philosopher he is a lover of knowledge and wisdom. It seems that Socrates valued knowledge/wisdom and love above everything. He questioned everything and looked everywhere to understand what he didn’t know or wanted to know. In the book ‘The Trial and Death of Socrates’, Socrates questions Euthyphro about piety when Euthyphro claims he is an expert in the subject. Socrates does not seem to care about his reputation as a weird man who questions and annoys people when he asks anyone anywhere to gain knowledge for himself. Furthermore, in the book ‘Symposium’ it is evident that when Socrates wants to know
Socrates was an insightful philosopher who had an opinion on all the basic fundamental questions. He had very strong beliefs that he willed others into believing through questioning and proving ignorance in others beliefs. He has particular views on every fundamental question and particular views on how people should live their lives. He says God has spoken to him about philosophy and says that it is his destiny and it is his calling in life. Through philosophy he searches for answers to the fundamental questions and gains wisdom and knowledge. The fundamental question of condition is the question of what, if anything, has gone wrong with the world? The question of solution is what can fix the problem? Then there is Death which asks what happens