Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes of justice in king lear essay
The theme of justice in king lear
King lear theme of Justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Themes of justice in king lear essay
The Theme of Justice in King Lear
Justice is a balance of misfortune and good fortune; right and wrong
according to motives and circumstances of the individuals under
judgement. To be just we must consider why they did it and balance out
all the evidence and facts and decide on a punishment depending on
these. Types of justice that exist in society include criminal
justice, legal justice, vigilante justice, natural justice and divine
justice.
As King Lear is a brutal play, filled with human cruelty and many
awful disasters, the play's terrible events raise an obvious question
for the characters, namely whether there is any possibility of justice
in the world.
Various characters offer their opinions. Towards the end of the play
Gloucester says:
"As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; / they kill us for their
sport,"
Here, he has realized it is foolish for humankind to assume that the
natural world works in parallel with social or moral justice because
ultimately, the gods will do with us what they will regardless of
whether or not it is just. Edgar, on the other hand, insists that:
"the gods are just," optimistically believing that individuals must
ultimately get what they deserve. However, in the end, we are left
with only a terrifying uncertainty; although the wicked die, the good
die along with them, leaving us with the awful image of Lear cradling
Cordelia's body in his arms unable to accept the fact that she has
suffered such an inexplicable injustice. There is goodness in theworld
of the play, but there is also madness, evil and death, and it is
difficult to tell which triumphs in the end. The purpose o...
... middle of paper ...
...n are clever-or at least clever enough to
flatter their father in the play's opening scene-and, early in the
play, their bad behaviour toward Lear seems matched by his own pride
and temper. But any sympathy that the audience can muster for them
evaporates quickly, first when they turn their father out into the
storm at the end of Act II. Goneril and Regan are, in a sense,
personifications of evil-they have no conscience, only appetite. It is
this greedy ambition that enables them to crush all opposition and
make themselves mistresses of Britain. Ultimately, however, this same
appetite brings about their undoing. Their desire for power is
satisfied, but both harbour desires for Edmund, which destroys their
alliance and eventually leads them to destroy each another. Evil, the
play suggests, inevitably turns in on itself.
Timothy Findley and Shakespeare use the theme of appearance versus reality in their texts: The Wars and King Lear. Characters in the novel and the play: Robert, Goneril, and Regan, intentionally appear to be something they are not in order to achieve a goal. However, they differ in where it leads them by the end, as in King Lear the characters die, unlike in The Wars where Robert cannot escape his true self and goes back to follow his personal morality.
Disobedience in William Shakespeare's King Lear "How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child". Filial disobedience is a key theme in the play 'King Lear' and in both the times it was set and written, children were not expected to disobey their fathers. Jacobean England was an extremely hierarchical society meaning that respect should not only be shown to the powerful and rich but also to parents and the elderly. Seventeenth century England would have been more devout in terms of religion than today and undoubtedly a Jacobean audience would have been familiar with the fifth commandment, 'Honour thy father and mother'.
In Chapter 4 of a book titled Escape from Freedom, the famous American psychologist Erich Fromm wrote that "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction" (Fromm 98). Fromm realized that avarice is one of the most powerful emotions that a person can feel, but, by its very nature, is an emotion or driving force that can never be satisfied. For, once someone obtains a certain goal, that person is not satisfied and continues to strive for more and more until that quest leads to their ultimate destruction. For this reason, authors have embraced the idea of greed in the creation of hundreds of characters in thousands of novels. Almost every author has written a work centered around a character full of avarice. Ian Fleming's Mr. Goldfinger, Charles Dickens' Scrooge, and Thomas Hardy's John D'Urberville are only a few examples of this attraction. But, perhaps one of the best examples of this is found in William Shakespeare's King Lear. Edmund, through his speech, actions, and relationships with other characters, becomes a character consumed with greed to the point that nothing else matters except for the never-ending quest for status and material possessions.
Importance of the Parallel Plot in King Lear Literature can be expressed using many different techniques and styles of writing, some very effective and others not as much. One of the methods chosen by many is the use of so called "parallel" plots. "Parallel" plots, or sometimes referred to as minor, give the opportunity of experiencing a secondary storyline going along with the main plot that otherwise would be unmentioned. William Shakespeare shows excellent use of a parallel plot in his play "King Lear", but some question it's essentiality by asking: Is it really necessary?
Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.
Absolute in every child’s mind is the belief that they are right, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Until children grow up to raise children own their own, a parent’s disputation only inflates that desire to prove. Part and parcel to this, as one may find out through personal experience or by extension, cruelty towards parents is a reflection of a child’s own inadequacy (whether in large or small scale). In this sense, King Lear is a story of children with a desire to break past their hierarchal status. Whether it is the belief that a woman shall take a husband, and with that guard her inherited land, or what role bastards truly deserves in a society that preemptively condemns them. Cruelty at the hands of children accounts for almost
this play so unique is the fact that Shakespeare incorporates all of these issues in just one tale.
King Lear is at once the most highly praised and intensely criticized of all Shakespeare's works. Samuel Johnson said it is "deservedly celebrated among the dramas of Shakespeare" yet at the same time he supported the changes made in the text by Tate in which Cordelia is allowed to retire with victory and felicity. "Shakespeare has suffered the virtue of Cordelia to perish in a just cause, contrary to the natural ideas of justice, to the hope of the reader, and, what is yet more strange, to the faith of chronicles."1 A.C. Bradley's judgement is that King Lear is "Shakespare's greatest work, but it is not...the best of his plays."2 He would wish that "the deaths of Edmund, Goneril, Regan and Gloucester should be followed by the escape of Lear and Cordelia from death," and even goes so far as to say: "I believe Shakespeare would have ended his play thus had he taken the subject in hand a few years later...."3
King Lear as a Tragedy Caused by Arrogance, Rash Decisions and Poor Judgement of Character
In King Lear, Shakespeare portrays a society whose emphasis on social class results in a strict social hierarchy fueled by the unceasing desire to improve one’s social status. It is this desire for improved social status that led to the unintentional deterioration of the social hierarchy in King Lear. This desire becomes so great that Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall were willing to act contrary to the authority of the social hierarchy for the betterment of their own position within it. As the plot unfolds, the actions of the aforementioned characters get progressively more desperate and destructive as they realize their lack of success in attaining their personal goals. The goals vary, however the selfish motivation does not. With Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall as examples, Shakespeare portrays the social hierarchy as a self-defeating system because it fosters desires in its members that motivate them to act against the authority of the hierarchy to benefit themselves. A consideration of each characters actions in chronological order and the reasons behind such actions reveals a common theme among the goals for which morality is abandoned.
King Lear is the protagonist within the play, he wears the label of a successful
King Lear by Shakespeare portrayed the negative effects of power resulting in destruction caused by the children of a figure with authority. Through lies and continual hatred, characters maintained a greed for power causing destruction within their families. The daughter’s of Lear and the son Gloucester lied to inherit power for themselves. Edmund the son of Gloucester planned to eliminate his brother Edgar from his inheritance.
No tragedy of Shakespeare moves us more deeply that we can hardly look upon the bitter ending than King Lear. Though, in reality, Lear is far from like us. He himself is not an everyday man but a powerful king. Could it be that recognize in Lear the matter of dying? Each of us is, in some sense, a king who must eventually give up his kingdom. To illustrate the process of dying, Shakespeare has given Lear a picture of old age in great detail. Lear’s habit to slip out of a conversation (Shakespeare I. v. 19-33), his brash banishment of his most beloved and honest daughter, and his bitter resentment towards his own loss of function and control, highlighted as he ironically curses Goneril specifically on her functions of youth and prays that her
The concept of Marxism is a popular one which is still being implemented in modern times, a prime example being within literature. When observing and analysing a text from a Marxist literary viewpoint, one must interpret the text as the author commenting on their society, culture and the political issues that were prevalent at the time; thus the background of the author must be researched. Marxism focuses more on the ideological and sociological aspects of the text as opposed to a psychological viewpoint of each character within the text. Marxist critics also reflect on texts in different ways, believing that literature is created as a product of ideology and not the desires of the authors/playwrights themselves. In the three texts King Lear,
In both literary works, the protagonists are able to successfully repent and seek redemption. In the texts King Lear and The Sisters Brothers, the protagonists conquer their mental struggles and pursue a more ethical lifestyle. Their intellectual complications are overturned as they interact with ethical characters that influence them to practice their morals rather than continuing to commit numerous sins. Furthermore, as the protagonists are stripped of their authority, they are able to relate to lesser characters forcing them to witness a new perspective on life that involves being ethical. Moreover, as the protagonists suffer from loneliness, it becomes evident to them that their sinful lifestyle repels any possible relationship with a