Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An esaay on punishment
An esaay on punishment
The impact religion has on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
An Analysis of Divine Justice in King Lear: What the Character’s Deaths revealed about Justice
In the period that King Lear was written, the concept of Divine Justice was a source of heated political debate. Blurred lines existed between church and government and political and religious power. Religious based laws were prominent in the government system. The intertwining of government and religion caused society to question who, or what truly held power. (Heinemann, 2008) The concept of Divine Justice suggested that a greater being held the master plan and determines a person’s fate based on an analysis of their life actions. If Divine Justice was the true power logic would suggest that evil characters would receive all punishments or deaths. However, King Lear dispelled that thought showing that the good characters are often punished and killed alongside their evil
…show more content…
counterparts.
There is an aspect of action and punishment within the plot of King Lear. Characters who look for external control may attribute their punishment to the work of Divine Justice. The tragic fates of the “just” characters in King Lear show that fatal power comes from human choice, not Divine Justice.
In King Lear, Gloucester internally struggles between his legitimate son, Edgar, and his illegitimate son, Edmund. He is unable to appropriately place trust in his sons and this leads to Gloucester’s punishments. Gloucester banishes Edgar despite that Edgar remained loyal to his father. Shortly after Edgar’s banishment, Cornwall blinds Gloucester while revealing to him that Edmund
actually the son who betrayed him. The blinding of Gloucester serves as punishment for his infidelity that led to Edmund’s birth. If natural justice was truly in the hands of Divine Justice Gloucester’s blinding would be the end of his suffering. However, Gloucester’s blinding was also his moral suffering for his misplaced trust in Edmund. It is at this point that Gloucester believes he is able to control his fate since he has both reconciled the mistreating of his sons and having an affair. Gloucester claims that “As flies to wanton boys are we to th’gods;/ They kill us for their sport”. (4.1.37-38) He believes that the natural world does not follow the period’s preconceived ideas of Natural Justice. His punishments which are never-ending and excessively harsh while his treasonous son, Edmund, continues life without any repercussions. This new-found realization leads to his attempted suicide. Before “jumping”, Gloucester makes a claim that his death will be just if there are gods. While Gloucester has determined that the gods’ actions do not follow natural justice, he does not abandon faith in his gods. His attempt to commit suicide is his way of trying to avoid future conflicts. Gloucester believes future conflicts are inevitable because he cannot leave a cycle of suffering. His suicide is unsuccessful and Edgar cares for him from this point until his death. Gloucester’s actual death is a result of shock after he finds that his banished son, Edgar, was the man who had cared for him. Ironically, this unexpected death occurs shortly after Gloucester begins to contemplate suicide again. Upon hearing the news that Lear’s troops have fallen Gloucester calls to the gods to finally end his suffering. Edgar, upon seeing the death of his father, believes that is father’s and brother’s death are just since “The gods are just, and of our pleasant vices/ Make instruments to plague us./ The dark and vicious place where thee he got/ Cost him his eyes”. (5.3.170-174) Though this reflects Edgar’s belief that human punishment for justice is under the gods’ control, it is based on his assumption that Gloucester’s punishment is because of his treason and fathering of a wicked child. However, Gloucester earlier receives proper punishment for both his treason and affair. The actual death of Gloucester, and his several attempted suicides highlight the fact that his continued misfortunes were a result of his own actions and power. He chose and affair, he chose to attempt suicide and he chose to place his trust in Edmund rather than Edgar. Though he says that the gods do not follow natural justice he continues to call on them for approval and relief. The constant call to an external power is the root of Gloucester’s suffering. The fatal flaw of many characters, including Gloucester, is that they lack to “judge for themselves of matters usually considered ‘mysteries of state’”. (Heinemann, 2008) Gloucester does not attempt to reconcile his actions and thus continues to suffer through the poor choices he has made in life. Lear’s suffering stems from his “rash haste, his violent impetuosity, (and) his blindness to everything but the dictates of his passions”. (Hazlitt, 2008) He treated his daughters unjustly in attempts to reach success and power. He is abandoned and left to die because of his actions of hatred towards his daughters. Turned away by his daughters, Lear calls to the gods to fix his problems and cast punishment on them. “O heavens,/ If you do love old men, if your sweet sway/ Show obedience, if you yourselves are old,/ Make it your cause. Send down, and take my part”. (2.4.185-188) It is at this point that Lear places his faith in the natural forces rather than taking responsibility for his own actions. This choice to turn to Divine Justice leads to an irreversible course of actions which caused betrayal within Lear’s family. This human choice ultimately causes his and his daughter’s death. Rather than punishment being cast on his daughters, as Lear would hope, a massive storm occurs with Lear in its midst. Lear elects to stay in the storm and “does not merely observe that the storm mirrors his own turmoil; on the contrary, he calls upon the storm to reflect it”. (Lawrence, 2005) The storm serves as a pivotal point in which Lear begins his path of redemption for his unjust actions. He becomes aware that his rashness and blindness to everything, other that his personal pursuits, have placed him in this situation. At this point, Lear begins to work on acting more refined and just to those around him. He particularly focuses on his loyal daughter, Cordelia. After Lear has reconciled with Cordelia and those in his court, he meets his death. His death seems particularly painful as he dies of a broken heart from the image of his daughter’s corpse. Divine Justice would suggest that his suffering would end after his journey in the storm and his attempts to reach out to the people around him. However, after Lear’s realization, he is still treated poorly and ultimately has to face the dead body of his most loved daughter. This excessive punishment points to the idea that social and natural justice are non-existent. Instead, suffering is the result of “human conflicts, not ordained as fate”, and that a person’s actions and choices are the driving force in fate. (Heinemann, 2008) The lack of Divine Justice is most evident the death of Cordelia. Her death is a direct reflection of the “horror of a society divided between extremes of…the powerful and the powerless…and the impossibility of real justice and security in such a world”. (Heinemann, 2008) Cordelia remained loyal to her father despite his brutish acts against her and the king of France. She is hanged in prison by Edmund because of her loyalty to Lear. Cordelia in no way acted unjustly and did not “parish in a just cause, contrary to the natural ideas of justice”. (Lawrence, 2005) Albany furthers the tragedy with a call for “the gods (to) defend her!-Bear him hence a while”. (5.3.256) Immediately after the call to the gods, Lear enters carrying the body of Cordelia. This external call to the gods is immediately met with the confirmation that the gods hold no power. Cordelia’s death is the cause of human choice. She chose to stay loyal to Lear and Lear did not choose to reconcile with his daughters. These choices, while having good intentions, show indefinitely that there is no Divine Justice presiding over human action. Goneril, Lear’s traitorous daughter, serves as an example of a character who assumes responsibility for their death. She never called to an external power and “say if I do, the laws are mine, not thine./ Who can arraign me for’t?”. (5.3.158-159) Goneril recognized that her feelings and punishments were the results of the choices she made throughout her life. This self-assumed responsibility makes Goneril able to commit suicide. “For every other character, death seems strangely unattainable. Most die, but not if they’re trying”. (Lawrence, 2005) The successful control over her own death shows that Divine Justice is a human construct devised to give comfort to those who do not assume responsibility for their actions. Throughout King Lear, there is a constant “tug of war of elements of our being and faith”. (Hazlitt, 2008) The calls to a higher power by Lear and Gloucester serve to show that faith reduces the perception of human control and power since there is a lack of personal accountability for actions committed. Divine Justice causes humans to attribute their misfortunes to judgments made on them by gods for their improper actions. By partaking in this external power they give their power to the gods. This construct makes it easier to say that suffering is caused by gods rather than by the result of one’s choice. King Lear showed the success of the wicked characters in either avoiding death or receiving death at the time and manner in which they wish. Despite their life actions, the success of the evil characters with the continued misfortunes of the good characters does not follow the principle of Divine Justice. There is no external power in King Lear which maintains the balance of right and wrong. Rather, justice is executed through the human judgment of right versus wrong with perceived injustice persecuted. The play King Lear could have only concluded justly if all characters would have been just in their actions.
Through Lear, Shakespeare expertly portrays the inevitability of human suffering. The “little nothings,” seemingly insignificant choices that Lear makes over the course of the play, inevitably evolve into unstoppable forces that change Lear’s life for the worse. He falls for Goneril’s and Regan’s flattery and his pride turns him away from Cordelia’s unembellished affection. He is constantly advised by Kent and the Fool to avoid such choices, but his stubborn hubris prevents him from seeing the wisdom hidden in the Fool’s words: “Prithee, tell him, so much the rent of his land comes to: he will not believe a fool” (Shakespeare 21). This leads to Lear’s eventual “unburdening,” as foreshadowed in Act I. This unburdening is exacerbated by his failure to recognize and learn from his initial mistakes until it is too late. Lear’s lack of recognition is, in part, explained by his belief in a predestined life controlled completely by the gods: “It is the stars, the stars above us govern our conditions” (Shakespeare 101). The elder characters in King Lear pin their various sufferings on the will of...
The similar theme of justice throughout Inferno and King Lear both depict the eventual consequence of ones actions throughout their existence. Often causing more harm than good, the actions in which they preform tends to damage them more than the action itself. In William Shakespeare King Lear, King Lear decides to disown Cordelia, the youngest of three daughters from owning any part of his kingdom due to the fact that Lear wanted to see which daughter loved him more in which Cordelia replied, “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave, My heart into my mouth: I love your majesty, According to my bond; nor more nor less.” (Shakespeare 9) Although C...
The play of "King Lear" is about a search for personal identity. In the historical period in which this play is set, the social structure was set in order of things closest to Heaven. Therefore, on Earth, the king was at the top, followed by his noblemen and going all the way down to the basest of objects such as rocks and dirt. This structure was set up by the people, and by going by the premise that anything that is man made is imperfect, this system cannot exist for long without conflict.
Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.
Absolute in every child’s mind is the belief that they are right, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Until children grow up to raise children own their own, a parent’s disputation only inflates that desire to prove. Part and parcel to this, as one may find out through personal experience or by extension, cruelty towards parents is a reflection of a child’s own inadequacy (whether in large or small scale). In this sense, King Lear is a story of children with a desire to break past their hierarchal status. Whether it is the belief that a woman shall take a husband, and with that guard her inherited land, or what role bastards truly deserves in a society that preemptively condemns them. Cruelty at the hands of children accounts for almost
King Lear is a perfect demonstration of the great consequences one man's actions can cause. While there are certainly religious Christian elements to the story, the story is not one of morality or hope. King Lear is a lesson, making an example of what can come of a single, foolish, egotistical action. King Lear's action is the surrendering of his throne to his daughters.
King Lear is often regarded as one of Shakespeare’s finest pieces of literature. One reason this is true is because Shakespeare singlehandedly shows the reader what the human condition looks like as the play unfolds. Shakespeare lets the reader watch this develop in Lear’s own decisions and search for the purpose of life while unable to escape his solitude and ultimately his own death. Examining the philosophies Shakespeare embeds into the language and actions of King Lear allows the reader a better understanding of the play and why the play is important to life today.
Humans, like all creatures on the earth, have the privilege of the freedom of choice. There are two broad ranges of factors that affect the decisions a person makes. The first factor that affects decision making is internal and includes a person's character and intellect. The second factor is external such as environment and interaction with other people. Naturally, each decision a person makes results in a repercussion of some degree, usually either helpful or hindering, and rarely inconsequential. The concept of justice is based on the fact that decisions are always followed by consequences. It strictly adheres to the rewarding of good deeds and the punishment of evil. King Lear, a play by William Shakespeare, is a grave tragedy that is a prime example of the Elizabethan conception of justice. Lear's kingdom turns to chaos because of a break in the "Great Chain of Being" and restores to order when justice prevails. Its tragic labelling stems from the prevalence of death the just punishment for many of its characters. The deaths of Lear, Goneril, and Edmund are prime examples of justice prevailing for evil, and in Lear's case unnatural, acts.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s works, one can see what true evil is such as Macbeth and Richard III. Shakespeare portrayed evil in his works to make the world aware that evil exists everywhere you look. For instance in Macbeth, Macbeth killed MacDuff and blamed it on his servants, and in King Lear Goneril kills her sister, Regan. As the story of King Lear unfolds, a tale of evil and villainy is shown to the audience. Many characters can be separated respectively in groups of good and evil, evil outweighing the good. The lust for power is the backbone of the story and is the ultimate reason for the downfall of the characters involved. Evil characters are domineering at the beginning of the play, and soon the good begin to be on top.
King Lear is at once the most highly praised and intensely criticized of all Shakespeare's works. Samuel Johnson said it is "deservedly celebrated among the dramas of Shakespeare" yet at the same time he supported the changes made in the text by Tate in which Cordelia is allowed to retire with victory and felicity. "Shakespeare has suffered the virtue of Cordelia to perish in a just cause, contrary to the natural ideas of justice, to the hope of the reader, and, what is yet more strange, to the faith of chronicles."1 A.C. Bradley's judgement is that King Lear is "Shakespare's greatest work, but it is not...the best of his plays."2 He would wish that "the deaths of Edmund, Goneril, Regan and Gloucester should be followed by the escape of Lear and Cordelia from death," and even goes so far as to say: "I believe Shakespeare would have ended his play thus had he taken the subject in hand a few years later...."3
King Lear as a Tragedy Caused by Arrogance, Rash Decisions and Poor Judgement of Character
The Consequences of Decisions in King Lear by William Shakespeare King Lear is a detailed description of the consequences of one man's decisions. This fictitious man is Lear, King of England, who's decisions greatly alter his life and the lives of those around him. As Lear bears the status of King he is, as one expects, a man of great power but sinfully he surrenders all of this power to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him. This untimely abdication of his throne results in a chain reaction of events that send him through a journey of hell. King Lear is a metaphorical description of one man's journey through hell in order to expiate his sin.
Edmund lusted for all of his father’s power, lying to his gullible brother and father aided him in his plan for total authority along with destroying their lives. As bastard son of Gloucester, Edmund wanted to receive all of the power destined for his brother, Edgar, who was Gloucester’s legitimate son. Edmund stated his disapproval of his brother, “Wherefore should I/ Stand in the plague of custom, and permit/ The curiosity of nations to deprive me/ For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines/ Lag of a brother? Why bastard?”(1.2.2-6). Edmund wanted the respect and love that Edgar received even though he was Gloucester’s bastard son. He claimed that he was not much younger or “moonshines lag of a brother” therefore he should be considered just as smart and able-minded as any legitimate son. He built up hatred toward Edgar and in order to get rid of him he convinced his father that Edgar had betrayed him through a letter. The letter that Edmund made read, “If our father would sleep till I waked him, you/ should enjoy half his revenue for ever, and live/ the beloved of your brother, Edgar”(1.2.55-57). Edmund portrayed Edgar as the son that would kill Gloucester only to inherit his money and share his inheritance with Edmund. Gloucester believed Edmund, sending out guards to kill Edgar for his betrayal...
King Lear, the protagonist of the play, is a truly tragic figure. He is driven by greed and arrogance and is known for his stubbornness and imperious temper, he often acts upon emotions and whims. He values appearances above reality. He wants to be treated as a king and to enjoy the title, but he doesn’t want to fulfill a king’s obligations of governing for the good of his subjects.
It is said that no other playwright illustrates the human condition like William Shakespeare. Furthermore, it is said that no other play illustrates the human condition like King Lear. The story of a bad king who becomes a good man is truly one of the deepest analyses of humanity in literary history; and it can be best seen through the evolution of Lear himself. In essence, King Lear goes through hell in order to compensate for his sins.