Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mexican culture and globalization
U.S. imperialism and the Mexican
Compare aztecs to another civilzation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mexican culture and globalization
The polished, naturalistic visage of an effigy mask of Coyolxauhqui conveys the significance of transnational and transhistorical cultural exchange to the Aztecs at Tenochtitlan. The mask, discovered at the Templo Mayor at Tenochtitlan, is displayed in the exhibition “Golden Kingdoms: Luxury and Legacy in the Ancient Americas” at the J. Paul Getty Center in Los Angeles. Its presence emphasizes both the importance of the Aztec ceremonial center at Tenochtitlan and the significance of the mythology of Coyolxauhqui to the Mexica. The spatial narrative at the Templo Mayor is rooted in the Coyolxauhqui story. Vanquished warriors were ritually sacrificed at the Templo Mayor, and then tumbled down from the top of the Templo to the Coyolxauhqui stone, …show more content…
mimicking the fall of the deity herself. This spatial narrative vindicated the territorial conquests and power of the Aztec Empire. As an extension of this mythology, the Coyolxauhqui mask itself inspires inquiry into the Aztec relationship to their Olmec predecessors, because although made by an Aztec craftsperson, the mask invokes distinctive stylistic traits of Olmec art. This mask thus embodies the function of Olmec art as a creative catalyst for the Aztecs, and the ways in which the Aztecs honored the Olmec people through a tradition of antiquarianism. Through formal analysis of the Coyolxauhqui mask, the comparison of its features to other Olmec-style masks found at the same site, and an examination of the worth of art in Aztec society, I will explore how the mask manifests themes of conquest, heritage and exchange in material form. The mask is made of a light, bluish-grey greenstone. The surface is smooth and glossy. The lines of the mask are curved and organic. The face of Coyolxauhqui has realistic musculature and facial features, with high cheekbones, a broad nose, wide, fleshy lips, a furrowed brow and and half-open eyes (see fig 1). Her open mouth and half-open eyes depict her as dead, which is in keeping with the conclusion of her mythology, in which she is dismembered and thrown off a mountain by her brother Huitzilopochtli. She has ornate ear decorations, and a strap across her nose connects to two teardrop shaped bells on her cheeks - a reference to her name, “Bells Her Cheeks.” Greenstone and jade masks similar to the Coyolxauhqui effigy mask discovered at the Templo Mayor have a long history in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, reaching back to the Olmec. Research about jade objects in Mesoamerica connects the tradition of the craft through eras and regions. “Evidence at Teotihuacan and in the Maya area indicate that both cultures were aware of Olmec jades as representative of a distinct style… In Teotihuacan murals, the jades pour from hands in streams of water, indicating the same associations as in Aztec times [because the Aztec also associated jade and water]. The explicit depiction of Olmec jades indicates that their antiquity also had significance.” This scholarship traces the connection between jade craftsmanship and Mesoamerican antiquarianism. Antiquarianism is defined here as the “collection of ancient objects and creation of archaizing copies.” This was a practice of the Aztec, exemplified in the caches of objects from pre-Aztec antiquity discovered at the Templo Mayor. Proof of further Aztec antiquarianism also exists in the form of the obsidian-inlay greenstone mask (see fig. 5) displayed in “Golden Kingdoms…” The mask was made in Tenochtitlan by Mexica artists. It has been deemed by the curators of “Golden Kingdoms” to be an imitation of art from Teotihuacan, an important pre-Aztec civilization. It is clear that jade masks formed a special link between Olmec and Aztec art. The Coyolxauhqui effigy mask is yet another example of Aztec antiquarianism. The musculature of the Coyolxauhqui mask conjures up the naturalistic features of the Colossal Heads crafted by the Olmec. These Colossal Heads were some of the first monumental structures created in Mexico. The Coyolxauhqui mask’s plump lips and flat, broad nose are reminiscent of Colossal Head 5 (see fig. 2, fig. 3). The physiognomy of the Coyolxauhqui mask also evokes the stylistic traits of an Olmec heirloom mask found buried near to it at the Templo Mayor. Displayed next to the Coyolxauhqui mask in “Golden Kingdoms…” at the Getty Center, this Olmec style mask is made of a similar greenstone jade. The mask’s furrowed brow and high cheekbones mirror the physiognomy of the Coyolxauhqui mask (see fig. 4). The material of the Coyolxauhqui mask is also evocative of the type of jade work that was highly valued in Olmec times. Aztec craftsmen had the opportunity to choose from a wide range of materials. Thus their choice of jade for this mask forges a transhistorical connection with the Olmec. Although the Olmec civilization flourished thousands of years before the Mexica were prospering in Tenochtitlan, “Olmec jades were also buried in graves in Guerrero, the source of so many other greenstone objects in Tenochtitlan. Thus the Mexica could have been exposed to enough Olmec objects to recognize them as a distinctive style.” The similarities between the Coyolxauhqui mask, the Olmec Colossal Heads and the Olmec style mask discovered at the same site act as proof that the Coyolxauhqui mask contains direct stylistic references to Olmec art. The function and use of the Coyolxauhqui mask is complicated by “The Function of Art in Mesoamerica”, in which art historian Esther Pasztory argues that art in Aztec society functioned as a method of wealth accumulation. There was no formal type of currency used in Aztec culture. Informal types ranged from mantles given as tributes from subjugated states to cacao beans. But wealth accumulation in the Aztec Empire was most distinctly characterized by the accumulation of art objects. This argument is based in the findings at ruins like the Templo Mayor, where offerings consisted of art objects, including heirloom ones from Olmec and Toltec ruins, such as the Olmec greenstone mask discussed in this paper. This function of art objects as commodities expands our understanding of what is embodied by the Coyolxauhqui mask. The Templo Mayor, where the Coyolxauhqui mask was discovered, was also home to the famous Coyolxauhqui stone.
The Coyolxauhqui stone is a crucial part of the narrative of the Templo Mayor. At the Templo, vanquished soldiers were sacrificed daily. After being slaughtered, they were thrown from the summit of the Templo to the bottom, tumbling down the structure of the Templo, which was built to mirror the Serpent Hill of the Coyolxauhqui legend. In the mythology of Coyolxauhqui, she is angered by her mother, Coatlicue “Serpent Skirt,” after she becomes pregnant with a child who is a potential threat to Coyolxauhqui’s inheritance. Coyolxauhqui then musters her four hundred brothers to fight against her mother. But before she is able to slay Coatlicue, her new brother, Huitzilopochtli, springs from Coatlicue’s womb, fully grown. He then dismembers Coyolxauhqui and throws her to the bottom of Serpent Hill. The daily sacrifice at the Templo Mayor was meant to mimic this mythology. Because Huitzilopochtli was a Mexica culture hero, this daily imitation of his victory creates a spatial narrative of conquest at the Templo Mayor. This ritualistic and spatial narrative functions to justify the territorial narrative of the Aztec empire. The importance of this narrative to the Mexica highlights the gravity of the Coyolxauhqui mask being an emulation of Olmec art style. By paying homage to a predecessor culture with a symbol that functions to justify their empire, the Mexica are emphasizing the importance of a cultural antecedent in their present. It is also imperative that they are relating their cultural heritage to their possession of an empire, and the subjugation of their tributary states. Not only did an emulation of their cultural antecedents matter in terms of their contemporary culture, but it also was relevant towards their status as rulers of an
empire. The Aztec Empire was an entity which flourished as a result of exchange: wealth was exchanged in the form of art objects, cacao and mantles from tributary states to the Mixtec ruling power; the hearts of conquered soldiers were exchanged in return for the sun’s daily rising and setting; culture was exchanged between states, and history was communicated through art and architecture. Art objects are polysemic: cultural heritage, territorial conquest and economic commodification are all revealed in this mask of Coyolxauhqui. The mask specifically references the economic exchange of art objects as currency and the artistic transhistorical exchange of style between the Olmec and the Aztec. The Coyolxauhqui mask clarifies the fluid transfer of these phenomena across societies and time. The mythological narrative of Coyolxauhqui contributes to the cultural narrative of the triumphs of the Mexica. The site on which it was found functions as a physical location with a spatial narrative that further justifies the territorial conquests of the Aztec Empire. And the stylistic properties of the mask, harking back to the Olmec, express the cultural and historical understandings of the Aztec at Tenochtitlan, and the recognition that they paid to the civilizations that came before them. Altogether, the mask of Coyolxauhqui clarifies the transnational, transhistorical and transcultural artistic traditions of the Aztec at Tenochtitlan.
Before the 15th century, the Indians in the Americas were not connected with the world and would remain that way until Columbus's exploration. In the beginning of 15th century, the Aztecs were the dominant group in Mesoamerica leaded by Montezuma, the last leader, before the Spanish conquest. In 1519, Hernan Cortez led the Spanish mission to explore and conquer the New World. This paper will compare three primary sources about this event. First, an informing letter sent from Cortez to King Charles V, the king of Spain. Second, the Broken Spears which is an Indian recollection about the conquest of Mexico. Lastly, Bernal Diaz’s (one of Cortez’s men) account was written by him to share his experience with Aztec civilization. Moreover, this paper will show the credibility of Diaz’s account compared to the other sources because the objectivity of his tone, written after a while of the event, and the author’s great experience and his independent purpose of the source.
Anais Nin once said that “we write to taste life twice: in the moment and in retrospection.” In his book, Seven Myths of Spanish Conquest, Matthew Restall tries to change our perception of the past in other to open our eyes to what life was really like during the colonial period. As Restall puts it, the main propose of the book is to “illustrate the degree to which the Conquest was a far more complex and protracted affair” (p.154) than what was supposed in the latters and chronicles left by the conquistadores. Each one of Restall’s chapters examines one of seven myths regarding the mystery behind the conquest. By doing so, Matthew Restall forces us to look back at the Spanish conquest and question
In this section his initial thoughts show through. “But losers matter, especially in the history of early America.” Many different regions of early America are examined in their years of early conquest when native populations started their descent. The biggest theme throughout the section is the effect that conquistadors and explorers had on the native population in their search for gold and glory. The information that is given is not typical of what is learned of early America, but tries to really focus on the most important figures of the time and there voyages. For example, when talking about the Plains nations and there explorers, Coronado and De Soto a tattooed woman woman is brought up who had been captured by both explorers at different times and different places, but little is known about her. “Of the tattooed woman who witnessed the two greatest expeditions of conquest in North America, and became captive to both, nothing more is known.” This point captures the main idea of the theme and what many know of this time. Horwitz aims to point out the important facts, not just the well known
... will”, which gives Cortes all the power of the kingdom. Plus, Moctezuma is willing to give all the gold to Cortes without interfer. After all the lecture, Moctezuma take off, Cortes and his soldiers rest. All this was recorded during the presence of the great Moctezuma and the conquistador Hernan cortes, which later on would conquer Aztec’s empire, a thing that Moctezuma was afraid.
The downfall of the Aztec Empire was a major building block of the Spanish colonial empire in the Americas. Spain’s empire would stretch all the way into North America from the Southwest United States all the way up the Pacific Coast. The unfortunate side effect of this was the elimination of many nations of indigenous people. The three major themes shown in this conquest really give deeper look into the anatomy of this important historical event. Without context on the extent of native assistance given to Cortez in his fight with the Aztecs, a reader would be grossly uniformed. The Spanish conquest was closer to a civil war than an actual conquest. Until reading detailed personal accounts of the fighting it is difficult to judge the deadly effectiveness of the Spaniards technological superiority. Without it is difficult to imagine 500 conquistadors holding thousands of native warriors at bay. Once the greed of Cortez and greed in general of the Europeans one understands that if it wasn’t Cortez if would have just been a different man at a different time. Unfortunately fame and prosperity seem to always win over cares about fellow human beings
Aztec and Latin American art has only recently gotten the credibility it deserves and it has done become very popular because Aztec and Latin American Art has gradually begin to grow through the mainstream media. Latin American and Aztec art has also found its way into modern art is by targeting the mainstream media through some very powerful trends, such as art, fashion, and graphic designs. These fields have been stricken with what some people call the “Aztec bug.” Everything, from patterns, illustrations, ornaments, shows the Aztec infiltration into modern mainstream media, and it has become an extremely popular trend. Young people all over the world are beginning to wear Aztec patterns on their clothing and footwear.
The perspective of another society is always subjective, especially when two completely different cultures interact for the first time. In Bernal Diaz del Castillo’s The History of the Conquest of New Spain, the first-hand account illustrates a barbaric and pagan society where sacrifices are pervasive in everyday life. However, David Carrasco’s essays titled “The Exaggeration of Human Sacrifice” and “Human Sacrifice / Debt Payments from the Aztec Point of View” shed a significant amount of insight into the religious roles that human sacrifice played in Aztec society, rather than the cruel and barbaric connotations which Daz heavily implied. Based on the readings of Bernal Diaz del Castillo, Carrasco’s essays offered an outside perspective into the ritualistic practices of human sacrifice and in doing so, introduced the concept of nextlaoalli as well as the commonality of the ritual human sacrifice in Aztec society.
A major element of Aztec life was religion, as often is in the case in ancient civilizations. The Aztecs were a polytheistic people, and they often made use of human sacrifice to please their gods. Diaz often makes reference to the blood-stained walls of the Aztec temples in his account of the conquest. In reference to the success of Cortes and his soldiers, an anci...
They say a picture is worth a thousand words. However, what words are being told in the Codex Mensoza 1964, Lám (Brumfiel 1991: 224) and more importantly what influential role did the Spanish heritage have in the artifacts? These credentials were offered as form of resolute of Aztec women’s productive activities in Mexico. Nevertheless, Bromfiel paint a different picture of the Aztec women. In these sketches, Brumfiel draws our attention to the background in which the women are performing their “productive activities.” (Brumfiel 1991: 224) At first glance, these images are portraying Aztec women. However, after careful scrutiny of the photos, I noticed several an uncanny discoveries. In the first two portraits, both of the weaving instruments appear to be bound to Roman and/or Spanish columns (to my untrained eye). In the last two illustrations, I observed “productive activities” (Brumfiel 1991: 224) of cooking being performed, in what appears to be in a non-traditional work environment that does not correspond with the “productive activities” (Brumfiel 1991: 224) of the women in that era. One appears to be working in luxury room while the other seems to be overlooking the mountains from a balcony. Although these duties were performed in a residential setting, the pictures fail to emphasi...
Mexican civilization is very much affected due its contact. with France, New Orleans of the USA.”Design, style and gastronomy are expressions that show the vibe of Yucatan, sentiment relevance more than its personal kingdom.”(4).
Grandjeat, Charles Yves. “ Nationalism, History and Myth: The Masks of Aztlan,” Confluencia, Vol6, No. 1 (Fall 1990):19-32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27921957
The Toltec civilization was one of the greatest Mesoamerican civilizations, prospering between 900 to 1150 CE. The Toltecs preceded the legendary Aztec civilization in Mesoamerica, who regarded them as their “great intellectual and cultural predecessors” (ancient.eu). They played a key role in maintaining the Mesoamerican culture that was passed down by several older civilizations including the Olmec, Teotihuacan, and Mayan civilizations. Much of what is known about the ancient Toltecs is derived from Aztec along with other Mesoamerican texts which document even older oral descriptions of historical events. The accuracy of these events, especially that of the Aztecan documents, has been questioned due to the tendency of the civilization to hyperbolize the feats of the Toltecs by combining historical truths with cultural myths. However, it cannot be argued that the Toltec civilization was vital in preserving the culture and ideology of the Mesoamerican region.
The Aztec civilization was a very complex society that was feared and known well for their various gory sacrifices done to please their many gods in their polytheistic religion. The much feared civilization began by the exile of one of the two Toltec leaders, which lead to the decline of the Toltec state that was later replaced by Mexica, or the Aztecs. According to the Aztecs, the land chosen to build their main city was chosen by the portrayal of an eagle perched on a cactus with a snake in its mouth. Through military might, the Aztecs managed to become the most powerful civilization in the mid-fourteenth century. They maintained their power through military might and the fear they caused other civilizations because of the human sacrifices they performed on their captured victims.
Because of this, his enemies realize that the empire is weak, and they attack him. He proclaims that the most successful soldier in the war would receive his daughters hand in marriage. Popocatepetl wins the competition, but jealous soldiers tell the emperor that Popo is dead. This causes Ixtla to die of heartbreak. When Popo returns, he kills the jealous soldiers and builds two stone piles. One made for Ixtla’s grave, and one made for him to watch over her for eternity. The story intention is to explain the existence of the volcanoes Ixtlaccihuatl and Popocatepetl. Although “Tenochtitlan: Inside the Aztec Capital” does not explain the volcanoes, it does, however, explain how the city itself was
Taube, Karl. “The major Gods of Ancient Yucatan.” Studies in Pre-Columbian Art & Archaeology 32 (1992): 11-27. Print.