Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Metaphor in the tempest
Essay about feminism in shakespeare
Metaphor in the tempest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Metaphor in the tempest
Significance of The Tempest in the modern world
The Tempest by William Shakespeare is a pastoral tragicomedy written in 1611 during the renaissance period. The particular context that Shakespeare intended and the audience interpreted when the play was written are different to the audience interpretation today. The ideas we understand from viewing the play today are different to the ideas the first audience understood from viewing the play 400 years ago. For example, the derogatory manner in which Shakespeare portrayed women may seem unacceptable in a modern play. The various meanings in The Tempest demonstrate the difference in the distinct readings found in the text today and the meanings simulated by viewing the text from a historical context.
One meaning that is applicable in the same way during the 17th century and modern times now, is the idea of how there are always lessons to be learnt about your true nature and always ways to improve upon yourself. The ruler of the magical island and central character, Prospero, largely influences this idea. Prospero, as the self-proclaimed mentor of the people who have recently entered the island, teaches everybody a lesson about themselves in order to make them better people. For example, it is uncertain exactly how much love Ferdinand and Prospero’s daughter Miranda share and how much of the love was engineered by Prospero, but by using love, Prospero turns the otherwise arrogant Ferdinand into a respectable young man. Prospero gives Ferdinand menial tasks to do such as carrying firewood, freezes him with his magic wand and keeps him in chains for a while. In doing this, Ferdinand realizes to what extent he would go to win Miranda over as his wife and exclaims ‘…might I but through...
... middle of paper ...
... of island, was the apparent heir until Prospero came along. Caliban exclaims, ‘This island's mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou tak'st from me’ and this is also another example of the taking of power. However, this is not indicated wrong in the text since Prospero is a cultured man who is displacing nothing but a ‘monstrous tortoise’. In a more modern interpretation, Prospero could be seen as a racist slave driver, keeping Ariel too as his servant. Prospero could also be seen as an overprotective father who ruled his daughter’s life. At that period of time this behavior of his would be considered normal so it is important to keep context of the time and place the play was written in. Miranda, however, is closer to the modern image of a ‘maiden’ as she is outspoken and never taught to behave quiet and self reserved as women those days were expected to act.
The innumerable freedoms that movie producers have taken while adjusting The Tempest are clarified by the way this is "one of Shakespeare's most unrealistic plays". The Tempest has experienced a wide range of changes in the hands of various directors who have approached the play. In this film we see a colossal reconsideration of Shakespeare's dramatic measures, for example, magic, and his themes, such as the Renaissance disclosure of the 'New World' or the power of the Renaissance ruler and patriarch. One pleasure this film offers is the acknowledgement of such unique Shakespearean elements in their modern cinematic appearance.
The first two acts of The Tempest share a couple of inconsequential similarities and have some very contrasting differences. The similarities are, on the whole, superficial: Both acts consist of just two scenes and both acts are of a similar length. However, the similarities end there.
In this brief examination of the Tempest, it becomes obvious that the play is a mirror image of the progression of events in the Bible. This use of Christian elements in the play is not obvious upon first reading the play, but becomes undeniable as the action progresses. The motif of Christianity in other Shakespearean works is not as structured and in-depth as the motif found in the Tempest.
In Act I of the play, Prospero finally tells Miranda the woeful story of how she and he arrived on the island. From the beginning, Prospero plays his subjects and his sympathetic audience as pawns in his game of manipulation. He explains that twelve years ago he was the Duke of Milan, but being enthralled with his studies, he left most of the governmental responsibilities to his brother Antonio. Antonio, hungry to be "Absolute Milan" himself (1:2, p.6), proceeded to betray him with the help of King Alonso of Naples. When Miranda asks why they were not killed, Prospero sighs, "Dear, they durst not,/ so dear the love my people bore me" (1:2, p.7). From the beginning, Prospero portrays himself as a distinguished scholar and beloved leader unjustly victimized by his power-hungry brother. Who would suspect such a humble man of being psychologically manipulative? Prospero succeeds in deceiving many with this credible guise.
In Shakespeare’s play, "The Tempest," an underlying theme of barbarism versus civilization appears. Shakespeare creates characters that exemplify symbols of nature or nurture. The symbolism of the characters is derived from their actions. These actions show Shakespeare’s view of the uncivilized and the civilized, as well as help the reader develop his own opinion of each side.
Allan Gilbert’s article summarizes about the multiple parallels that can be found in Shakespeare’s The Tempest. While some of these parallels are more obvious in The Tempest, some require a scholar to fully comprehend them.
Shakespeare’s The Tempest is a story that has many themes and motifs that parallel one another while helping the story overall to progress. The most interesting aspects about Shakespeare’s The Tempest is how the central concepts of ulterior motives and power, that are both in full effect throughout the story, are concepts inherent to mankind and our evolution for survival. Our entire civilization is built on the idea of ruling and being ruled and The Tempest is a story which explores these fundamentals and mankind’s desire to be on top by any means necessary. The goal of this paper is to explore how The Tempest displays the power of ulterior motives, how Ariel continues to spoil plans of conspirators, and the role of marriage in the story.
Ariel is always helping Prospero with all of his needs and does not ask for anything in return, except for his freedom. Caliban does not necessarily help Prospero during the time of the play, but may very well have aided him with all the in’s and out’s of the island when he first washed up on shore twelve years before. But, Prospero does not view his servants with reasonable eyes and therefore thinks it is morally permitted to keep them as his servants. “How now? Moody?/ What is’t thou canst demand?/ My liberty./ Before the time be out? No more./ I prithee,/ Remember I have done thee worthy service,/ Told thee no lies, made no mistakings, serv’d/ Without or grudge or grumblings. Thou did promise/ To bate me a full year. (I.ii. 244-250)” Ariel states multiple good reasons why he should be released from Prospero’s rule, but Prospero overlooks all these deeds that Ariel has done for him, and treats Ariel as a lowly being. By overlooking everything that Ariel has done for him, Prospero shows how he lets his power get to his head, and does not use his power within reason. By keeping Ariel and Caliban as his servants, he is metaphorically overstaying his welcome. It is fair that Ariel helps Prospero because he did save Ariel from the evil witch Sycorax, but Ariel fulfils his duty yet is still Prospero’s slave. Ariel should have been let go a while ago, but Prospero continues to
William Shakespeare’s The Tempest provides dialogue that portrays the social expectations and stereotypes imposed upon women in Elizabethan times. Even though the play has only one primary female character, Miranda, the play also includes another women; Sycorax, although she does not play as large a roll. During many scenes, the play illustrates the characteristics that represent the ideal woman within Elizabethan society. These characteristics support the fact that men considered women as a mere object that they had the luxury of owning and were nowhere near equal to them. Feminists can interpret the play as a depiction of the sexist treatment of women and would disagree with many of the characteristics and expectations that make Miranda the ideal woman. From this perspective, The Tempest can be used to objectify the common expectations and treatment of women within the 16th and 17th Centuries and compare and contrast to those of today.
In the Tempest the author asserts traditional values thought the story. Moreover, the evidence shows that women are seen as property to the men. For example, Prospero states,“ I ratify this my gift, O Ferdinand, Do not smile at me that I boast her off”(5.1.8-9). Accordingly the implication of Miranda’s treatment shows that she is property to Prospero and when she gets married she will now be property of Ferdinand.
In order to understand the characters in a play, we have to be able to distinguish what exactly makes them different. In the case of The Tempest, Caliban, the sub-human slave is governed largely by his senses, making him the animal that he is portrayed to be and Prospero is governed by sound mind, making him human. Caliban responds to nature as his instinct is to follow it. Prospero, on the other hand, follows the art of justifiable rule. Even though it is easy to start assessing The Tempest in view of a colonialist gaze, I have chosen instead to concentrate on viewing Caliban as the monster he is portrayed to be, due to other characters that are not human, but are treated in a more humane fashion than Caliban. Before we meet Caliban, we meet Ariel, Prospero’s trusting spirit. Even though Ariel is not human either, he is treated kindly and lovingly by his master who calls him “my quaint Ariel.” Caliban, on the other hand, is called a “tortoise” and a “poisonous slave” by Prospero. As Caliban enters in Act 1 Scene 2, we realise his fury at both Prospero and Miranda. He is rude and insulting and Prospero replies with threats of torture. Prospero justifies his punishment of Caliban by his anger at the attempted rape of his daughter, something Caliban shows no remorse for. Miranda distinguishes herself from Caliban by calling him “a thing most brutish” and inadvertently, a thing that has only bad natures. She calls his speech “gabble,” but doesn’t stop to wonder whether it was she that didn’t understand him because she didn’t know how to speak his language. Surely Caliban communicated verbally with his mother for the twelve years before Prospero killed her? It seems that Prospero and Miranda expect Caliban to be grateful for the knowledge of their language, but Caliban has just learned “how to curse” and justifies his anger by claiming rights to the island. Even though they obviously detest each other, Prospero needs him, as he tells Miranda: “We cannot miss him: he does make our fire/Fetch in our wood, and serves in offices/That profit us…,” Caliban stays on because he is afraid of Prospero’s “art…of such power,” making Prospero the feared conqueror ad dictator. Prospero is the “right duke of Milan” and Caliban is the “savage and deformed slave.” They represent two different extremes on the social spectrum: that of the natural ruler,...
In this process, Miranda is also falling in love with Ferdinand and she is so sad when his father is rude to Ferdinand. In this scene, there is a pianist on the scene and he plays piano softly. When Ferdinand draws the sword, pianist presses the major musical notes and increases tension. And Prospero do magic and Ferdinand petrifies. When Ferdinand resigns himself to losing this challenge, piano plays smooth music and the three of them and Ariel slowly move out of the scene.
Shakespeare was intending to represent several different groups of people in society through his plays and “The Tempest” was no exception to the rule. I aim to show how the “human” relationships in the play reflect real life relationships within Shakespeare’s own society (as well as his future audience), for which his plays were written and performed.
The resolution of conflict in The Tempest is thus naturalised and constructed as an inevitable consequence through the use of moral and ethical concerns in the play, including the 'divine right of kings', the 'great chain of being', courtly love,
Miranda’s unwitting question provokes a strange response from Prospero. He admits to relying on his wife’s word that Miranda is his daughter. In doing so, he reveals his alienation from Miranda’s birth and the possibility of illegitimacy. Miranda’s mother’s power to bear children exerts a threatening cont...