The Success and Intentions of Galileo

747 Words2 Pages

“Galileo has been depicted variously as a cynical opportunist, patient genius or lucky engineer, and dies a coward or a modern Socrates.” I agree that he is a patient genius, and lucky engineer, but I do not agree that he is a cynical opportunist, coward or a modern Socrates.
Galileo was a mathematician and a natural philosopher, who converted Copernicanism, which states that the earth revolved around the sun, into philosophy and the world’s true nature. By introducing new knowledge and using science to prove existing theories, he had caused a revolution by changing how people perceive the world during the last few hundred years and to doubt the authority of the Church, so as to spur on more people to confront the Church’s interpretations of the Bible and generate more knowledge.
He was an opportunist, but not cynical. He believed that his ideas were beneficial to the society as a whole, so he did not only think about himself. He was an opportunist, no doubt, as he decided to take action and published the book The Starry Messenger that recorded his findings and observations of the stars and planet, thus changing the old mindset of the Earth being the only planet with satellites and the heliocentric theory. He also had plans ready in case opportunities turn up so he could grasp them. For example, when Baberini became the Pope and Bellarmine died, he immediately drafted a debate between the old sciences, which were Geocentrism and other beliefs that the Church had, and the new sciences, which were Heliocentrism and other things that Galileo discovered. He was a Catholic, and believed in searching for the truth of the world, thus he was not researching for his own sake, but for the world’s. In such circumstances, he was an opportunis...

... middle of paper ...

...to his beliefs, and continued penning down his discoveries like Two New Sciences, during house arrest. He believed that if he had admitted to his wrongdoings, he could still continue to work towards his goal of finding the true nature of the world, and benefit the society like that, instead, if he had gotten killed, he would not have the chance to continue his legacy, and other people in the future might be afraid to go against the Church. Furthermore, if he was really a coward, he would have given up his studies long time ago when critics went against him. Thus, Galileo was not a coward.
All in all, I believe that Galileo has contributed a lot to the entire scope of knowledge as he voiced out his opinions and dared to go against the Church. Thus, he was a patient genius, lucky engineer, and an opportunist, but he was not cynical, a coward or died a modern Socrates.

More about The Success and Intentions of Galileo

Open Document