Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of change on organisation
Forces of organizational change
Factors of organisational change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of change on organisation
The Strengths and Limitations of a Rational, Strategic Approach to Organisational Change
Introduction
Following the brief introduction of a model-ideal conceptualisation of
Organisational Goal-Directed-Activity, and the definition within the
perspective defined by this model of such terms like 'rational
(organisational) action system', 'strategy', and 'organisational
change', the first part of this essay presents a non-evaluative
summary of a selection of distinct approaches to organisational
change. Various approaches to strategy are similarly addressed in an
attempt to register and explore some of the links that have been
identified by a number of authors between positions on strategy
reviewed and corresponding approaches to organisational change.
The second part, bypassing the rather common practice of partitioning
the set of organisational change approaches into largely
non-overlapping rational and nonrational, strategic and nonstrategic,
subsets, identifies a number of distinct Rational and/or Strategic
Modes, associates them with the approaches to organisational change
reviewed in the first part, and attempts an integrated appraisal of
the distinctive strengths and limitations such diverse Modes confer to
the approaches to change that invoke and utilise them.
1. A Model-Ideal Conceptualisation of Organisational
Goal-Directed-Activity, Rationality, Strategicality, and
Organisational Change
When planned and goal-directed, fully rational organisational action,
like any other ideal form of goal-directed-action, relies on activity
generated by the decomposition of a goal-structure, a term that has
been defin...
... middle of paper ...
...ent Studies, 24(6), 649-70.
Quinn, J. B. (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism.
Homeswood, IL: Irwin.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 12972-80).
Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press.
Shapira, Z. (ed) (1997). Organisational Decision Making. New
York:Cambridge University Press.
Stacey, R.D. (2000). Strategic Management & Organisational Dynamics.
FT Prentice Hall.
Simon, H.A. (1957). Theories of decision-making in economics and
behavioural sciences. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
Simon, H.A. (1995). Rationality and Political Behaviour. Political
Psychology, 16, 45-61.
Whittington, R. (2001). What is strategy-and does it matter? Thomson
Learning
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Hughes, M 2006, 'Strategic change', in M Hughes (ed.), Change management: a critical perspective, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, pp. 52-63.
Sachs, A. (2010). Management, Plain and Simple. Time, 175(15), Global 4. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Cook, K., Levi, M., O'Brien, J., & Faye, H. (2008). Introduction: The limits of rationality. In K. Cook & M. Levi (Eds.), The Limits of Rationality (pp. 02-47). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7M82yReFf4sC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=social exchange and rational choice theory definition
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Rational organisation can and has reduced costs and gave management a greater control over the workforce. With bureaucratic methods workers can be monitored to make sure that they are achieving output targets and new methods to increase efficiency can be recorded and then implemented to the workforce. McDonalds undertakes a very strong rational...
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
In this essay I will argue that, contrary to Ordeshook’s claim, the “full value of this research” has actually been overstated; not for the lack of profundity in the assumptions and certain selected observations contained in the literature mentioned above, but for the failure of rational choice theory in explaining political phenomena empirically. This failure can be understood in terms of the fallacies associated with rational choice theory’s predictive and universalist aspirations, as well as in terms of the methodological misuse of the basic assumptions of rational choice theory when actually used in explanatory frameworks. As Donald Green and Ian Shapiro argue, the weaknesses of rational choice scholarship are rooted in the aspiration of rational choice theorists to come up with universal theories of politics, “which leads many rational choice theorists to pursue even more subtle forms of theory elaboration, with little attention to how these theories m...
James, William. "Pragmatism." Columbia University, New York. January 1907. Lecture. Web. 24 Feb 2012.< http://www.authorama.com/book/pragmatism.html>
Miles, R. (1975) Theories of Management: Implications for Organisational Behaviour and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
John G. S., 2008: Strategically thinking about the subject of Strategy [e-journal] 9(4) p.2 Available through:
Individuals when faced with any major change will be inevitably resistant and will want to preserve the status quo, especially if they think their status or security within the organization is in danger (Bolognese, 2010). Folger and Skarlicki believe that organizational change produces skepticism in employees which make it problematic and possibly even impossible to contrive improvements within the organization (as cited in Bolognese, 2010) Therefore, management must understand, accept and make an effort to work with resistance, since it can undermine even the most well-conceived change efforts (Bolognese, 2010). Furthermore, Coetsee states for organizations to achieve the maximum benefits from change they must effectively create and maintain a climate and culture that does not support resistance and rewards acceptance and support ( as cited in Bolognese, 2010).
Organizational changes are constant in both the public and private sector. Some changes are small and easily managed and others are large scale vision changes. With organization-wide changes, such as a redirection in the organizations vision, strong creative leaders are needed to ensure the vision is sold to the employees and that the change is implemented smoothly. The Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC) has recently changed visions to strengthen the way we create long term public safety. This change in mission and vision statements was a smooth process but has not been implemented without its share of issues.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Johnson, R. (1976). Management, systems, and society: An introduction. Pacific Palisades: CA, Goodyear Pub. Co.