Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
New and old imperialism comparison
Compare and contrast imperialism
Compare and contrast imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: New and old imperialism comparison
Nineteenth century British literature cannot be properly understood, as Spivak points out “without remembering that imperialism, understood as England’s social mission, was a crucial part of the cultural representation of England to the English”.(Ashcroft et al, 269) The British imagination, however, responded to the Empire in different ways. Even during the heyday of the Empire, there had been conflicting attitudes towards the Empire. In 1883, Sir John Seeley wrote in The Expansion of England:
There are two schools of opinion among us with respect to our Empire, of which schools the one may be called the bombastic and the other the pessimistic. The one is lost in wonder and ecstasy at its immense divisions,…this school therefore advocates the maintenance of it as a point of honour or sentiment. The other is the opposite extreme, regards it as founded in aggression and rapacity…a kind of excrescence upon England…this school therefore advocates a policy which may lead at the earliest possible opportunity to the abandonment of it. (qtd. in Smith 36)
Seeley’s analysis lays bare the unpalatable fact that one section of the British population viewed the Empire as a potential subject for assault and would prefer its dissolution. If patriotism is the watchword for Charles Kingsley, Alfred Austin, Henry Newbolt, William Ernest Henley figures like C. A. Parnell, Wilfrid Scawen Blunt, Robert Buchanon, Hilaire Belloc raised their voice against the imperial enterprise. Between these two opposite extremes literary analysts are often at pains how to place Kipling. The majority of critics applaud or castigate him on the same premise that Kipling expresses a form of jingo-imperialism in his works. In the recent years we have the authority of Jeff...
... middle of paper ...
...il Ching-Liang. White Skins/ Black Masks: Representation and Colonialism. 1996.London: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. Print.
6. MacKenzie, John M. Orientalism: History, Theory and the Arts. 1995. New Delhi: Viva Books, 2012. Print.
7. McClure, John A. Kipling and Conrad. Massachusetts and London: Harvard UP, 1981.Print.
8. Poe, Edgar Allan. The Complete Tales And Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. New York: The Modern Library, 1938.Print.
9. Pollin, R. Burton. Poe’s Seductive Influence on Great Writers. Lincoln: Universe Inc.,2004. Print.
10. Said, Edward W. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient.1978. New Delhi: Penguin, 2001. Print.
11. Smith, M. Van Wyk. Drummer Hodge: The Poetry of the Anglo-Boer War 1899-1902. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978. Print.
12. Sullivan, Zoreh T. Narratives of Empire: The fictions of Rudyard Kipling. London: Cambridge UP, 1993. Print.
Poe, Edgar Allan. The Collected Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. New York: The Modern Library 1992
Shields, David S. Oracles of Empire: Poetry, Politics, and Commerce in British America, 1690-1750. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990
Canny, Nicholas: The Oxford History of the British Empire,vol I, TheOrigins of the Empire (New York 1998)
... century. In conclusion, The Empire Builders can be interpreted through a postcolonial perspective since it produces many elements of the hierarchy of difference.
Rudyard Kipling’s poem “The White Man’s Burden” articulates the imperialism of the English empire into India, Cambodia, China, and Africa. The English thought it their duty to go out and take over these barbaric nations to civilize them. They justified their act of westernizing and destroying others’ cultures as the “burden’ they were born to bear. “And when your goal is nearest the end for others sought, watch sloth and heathen folly bring all your hopes to nought.” They blamed the ineffectiveness of their efforts on the native’s laziness. They are the ones whose whole world is being flipped upside down; being submerged in a new culture with new laws and strange people. Yet, somehow they are the lazy ones and despite the trails for the white man at the end of the day it is beneficial to the savages.
Ingram, John Henry. Edgar Allan Poe: His Life, Letters, and Opinions. New York: AMS Press, Inc., 1965.
Pratt, Mary Louise. “Narrating the anti-conquest”. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London and New York: Routledge. p.38 – p.68.
...us today, but Kipling seemed to marvel at the very thought that these people would not jump up in thanks to their "civilizing" conquerors. Rather than bring together to different people this work just created a larger divide between the two. It doesn’t seem though that Kipling intended the poem to be viewed as support of the imperialist endeavor; in fact, reading carefully the way he phrases the lines would reveal that Kipling was offering warnings to anyone who decided that such ideas needed to be carried out. He warns against laziness and debauched behavior as it can quickly derail noble goals and intentions. He also cautions the need of patience, and tries to make it clear that this kind of work (raising a people to a more civil culture) is difficult and can be quite burdensome – as he writes it is the “toil of serf and sweeper,” not the “tawdry rule of kings.”
Nineteenth century Britain was a dominate empire across the globe. Despite the country’s loss of a major colonial force — the United States — the country still dominate world trade, allowing for a sense of pride to be installed within the hearts of the English. As exposed throughout Virginia Woolf’s, Mrs. Dalloway, the mindset of the British was one of grand superiority. Due to the success of the British empire's colonial expeditions, many British citizens felt as though their country was the greatest and most advanced in the world, creating a sense of superficial, self-centered, pride, as reflected through the character of Clarissa. This pride, however, had many dangerous side effects later in history. British Imperialism, combined with unnecessary pride, caused many racial issues for England that would be fought over for centuries to come.
Quinn, Arthur Hobson. Edgar Allan Poe: A Critical Biography. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1941. Internet.
Rudyard Kipling grew up in a very unstable home and environment in India, Bombay. He was bullied as a kid and had a bad family life. He turned to writing and reading as a way to cope with his abusive childhood and published his first book in 1902 (Stewart, britannica). His books display a variety of imperialist thoughts that revolve around racist intentions as well. Although Kipling can be read as a well-intentioned imperialist, his stories demonstrate that he is also a racist because he portrays the natives as savages, unclean and an inferior race and believes the help can help the “inferior races” civilize.
Said, Edward. ?Orientalism.? Literary Theory: An Anthology. Edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers Inc. 1998.
Bolt, Christine. “Race and the Victorians,” in British Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century, ed. C.C. Eldridge. St. Martin’s Press: 1984.
Yet apart from power and intrigue, Kipling’s portrays many aspects of the Empire as dull, lifeless and cruel compared with Indian culture. Kim’s first encounter with the British is characterized by the callous way in which a Protestant priest treats the lama, and his ignorance and disrespect towards native custom. Kim’s three years at boarding school are oppressive and the author only deigns to recount the boy’s holidays, when he takes to the road or learns practical skills from his mentors. All his schoolmates seem to do is administer beatings, boast, or look down on the
Thompson, E.P. The Romantics: England in a Revolutionary Age. New York: The New Press, 1997.