Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British Imperialism in India
British Imperialism in India
British Imperialism in India
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British Imperialism in India
With many posts in Eastern India, the British were able to purchase and trade goods that would otherwise not be available, such as teas, opium, silks and porcelain. Before Governmental control, The British East India Company was able to strive economically as well as in the military. In the following pages I hope to explain how this trade company flourished between the 1600-1800 and the impact that the British government had on the abolishment of the Company.
The British East India Company was a trade movement starting in 1600 by Queen Elizabeth the I. There were earlier companies interested in trade with the East Indies such as the Duth East India Company. The English saw how trading the rare product that the others were could help them become wealthy. Because the Dutch had already started trade, the English would learn that they were not welcome. I believe that Queen Elizabeth was looking to make London more 'popular', because before then it was insignificant. Having been one of the most influencial trade companies within England, it was sad to see that it later was taken over by the British government and went down.
The shipmen were so excited about the new charter and being able to use their newfound talents in the act of sailing long distances. There was prior records of the British going westward, but this was new territory. The first voyage was in 1601 and was led by Sir James Lancaster, who was appointed by the queen. A total of £72,000 was raised which helped supply the four ships that were sent out in 1600. The five vessels were the Red Dragon which Lancaster was on, the Hector, the Ascension, the Guest, and the susan which in total housed 480 men. The Guest was added as a vessel to keep food and supplies that would h...
... middle of paper ...
...ns, 1857.
This source was pretty cool. It was a list of the Parliamentary Papers from 1857-58 and I was able to use that to explain the India Act of 1857
Roy, Kaushik . Army in British India : From Colonial Warfare to Total War 1857 - 1947. Huntingdon: Bloomsbury Publishing , 2012.
Roy has a crazy first name I would never try to pronounce, and was helpful with a breakdown of the sieges. He was pretty descriptive and I enjoyed reading the book.
St. John, Ian. The Making of the Raj : India Under the East India Company. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012.eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost(accessed April 2, 2014).
This book I actually found while at the MKE airport over spring break. I didn't have any cash, so I wasnt able to purchase it. I was very excited when I found it online, because what I read from it at the bookstore was very informational.
In the early 19th century, the British East India Company established more trade warehouses and thoroughfares in the Indian subcontinent. This occupation of Indian lands was welcomed by some groups and fiercely opposed by others. While met by more opposition, the British Empire expanded into the other Indian Ocean territories up to the end of the century. Because the trans-Atlantic slave trade was profitable for African elites and brought many valuable goods to West Africa, when it was effectively shut down after 1808 by British patrols, people along this coast were eager to keep the European trade lines alive. The imposition of this “legitimate trade” (any non-slave trade) saw a huge rise in African exports of gold and palm oil.
In the early years of the British Colonies, business and trade were very important because they were major factors of growth. Therefore, there had to be little barriers to trade in the newly founded colonies, and the...
On 17 June 1576 the thirty ton bark Gabriel, accompanied by the smaller bark Michael and a tiny pinnace, set sail from London to seek out a north-west sea passage to the treasures of the Orient. The three small vessels, whose total complement was only thirty four men, were commanded by Martin Frobisher. Although the purpose of the voyage was to find a alternate sea route to the east the two subsequent voyages that quickly followed were a prelude to the establishment of English sovereignty in North America. What were the factors that initiated the voyage? Who were the key players in the enterprise and what was the eventual outcome of these three voyages? This essay will attempt to answer those questions.
Marshall, Peter. "The British Presence in India in the 18th Century." http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/east_india_01.shtml (accessed June 8, 2014).
The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways, overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony. To begin with, one can observe that the British colonizers did indeed improve Indian civilization by developing means of communication and transport. They built a great number of bridges, over 40,000 miles of railway and paving an astounding 70,000 miles of road (Doc. 4. The adage of the adage.
Reynolds: I found it to be very well organized and easy to follow despite having a great deal of information to keep track of. The use of stories from survivors of the landings helped to make some of the more dull reading at the beginning easier to read. It also provided a more believable account of the events on the beaches. It was a pleasure to read and sometimes even humorous, despite the seriousness of the subject.
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
In 1707, The Mughal Empire was collapsing while the east india company (Britain) was using this as an advantage to take power over india,by 1757 after the battle of plassey they have taking rule over india leading them to use india for its resource/workforce.The laws created by the British had a structured government,but was strucerd to control the indians.Raw resources from india was moved to east india company control which ,however lead to the need of a workforce.British control as far as it goes for social was not positive because of the millions of deaths from the cause of famine which was the cause of cash crops.British control was not positive it was negative impact on india and its people.
Some believe that India’s non-participation in the Industrial Revolution was due to British colonization. At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, India had clout as a world leader in cotton textiles (Majumdar 62). The British plundering subsequently lead to the destruction of the textile industry, and eventually the economy. It is believed that much of the money necessary to the Industrial Revolution was obtained by the looting of India. After all, India had the three things necessary to start an endeavor such as this: raw materials, wealth, and a market. The Industrial Revolution itself began only a few years after the colonization of India (Majumdar 62). In the end, India was unable to participate in the Industrial Revolution. According to Majumdar, “Consequences of not being able to participate in the Industrial Revolution included not democratizing invention and the democratization of markets”. India’s own industrial revolution began after Independence in 1947, wh...
Iyer , L, 2004, The Long-term Impact of Colonial Rule: Evidence from India. [Online] available at [accessed on 12 November 2010]
4 # Stein, Burton (2001), a History of India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv, 432, p.222
For the past sixty-seven years, the citizens of India have embraced their country’s independence all the while seeking to regain their past. Prior to this renewed sense of freedom, India had belonged to the British Empire. From 1858 to 1947, the British government claimed India and its inhabitants as a colonial possession. Before the British Empire laid claim to the vastness of India, the British East India Company helped to oversee the transfer of the Kohinoor Diamond from the Sikh Empire to their motherland in 1851.
Nicholas B. Dirks. (2011). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
India was the first major Asian civilizations to fall victim to European predatory activities (Duiker 31). With conquering India, the British had various purposes behind it. Their main purpose was to achieve a monopolistic trading position (The Economic and Social Impact of Colonial Rule in India). The second purpose was the control of India; this was a key element in the world power structure, in terms of geography, logistics and military manpower (The Economic and Social Impact of Colonial Rule in India). When the East India Company continued to trade under the British, huge armies were created, largely composed of Indian sepoys (Marshall). The armies were used to defend the Company’s territories protect the Indian states (Marshall).